Synchronization Andrew Hutton Slava Derbenev Yuhong Zhang.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of MEIC Ion Complex and Ion Collider Ring
Advertisements

Simulation Study For MEIC Electron Cooling He Zhang, Yuhong Zhang Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Abstract Electron cooling of the ion beams.
Proton / Muon Bunch Numbers, Repetition Rate, RF and Kicker Systems and Inductive Wall Fields for the Rings of a Neutrino Factory G H Rees, RAL.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Note: most of the slides shown here are picked from CERN accelerator workshops. Please refer to those workshop for further understanding of the accelerator.
Ion Accelerator Complex for MEIC January 28, 2010.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
1 Dejan Trbojevic EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, Virginia May 19, 2008 Dejan Trbojevic e-RHIC with non-scaling FFAG’s.
Recirculating pass optics V.Ptitsyn, D.Trbojevic, N.Tsoupas.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
Electron and Ion Spin Dynamics in eRHIC V. Ptitsyn Workshop on Polarized Sources, Targets and Polarimetry Charlottesville, VA, 2013.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
Thomas Roser RHIC Open Planning Meeting December 3-4, 2003 RHIC II machine plans Electron cooling at RHIC Luminosity upgrade parameters.
FFAG Concepts and Studies David Neuffer Fermilab.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Issues.
Physics of Particle Accelerators Kalanand Mishra Department of Physics University of Cincinnati.
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
MEIC Staged Cooling Scheme and Simulation Studies He Zhang MEIC Collaboration Meeting, 10/06/2015.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
ERHIC design status V.Ptitsyn for the eRHIC design team.
Design Optimization of MEIC Ion Linac & Pre-Booster B. Mustapha, Z. Conway, B. Erdelyi and P. Ostroumov ANL & NIU MEIC Collaboration Meeting JLab, October.
EIC Users Meeting, SBU, 6/27/14 Polarized Electron Beams in the MEIC at JLab Fanglei Lin for MEIC Study Group EIC Users Meeting, Stony Brook University,
Polarization in ELIC Yaroslav Derbenev Center for Advanced Study of Accelerators Jefferson Laboratory EIC Collaboiration Meeting, January 10-12, 2010 Stony.
MEIC Electron Ring Injection from CEBAF
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
Synchronization Issues in MEIC Andrew Hutton, Slava Derbenev and Yuhong Zhang MEIC Ion Complex Design Mini-Workshop Jan. 27 & 28, 2011.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Harmonic.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
1 RHIC II – Ion Operation Wolfram Fischer RHIC II Workshop, BNL – Working Group: Equation of State 27 April 2005.
RHIC Status April 8, 2011 RSC Meeting Haixin Huang.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz NuFact’08, Valencia, Spain, July 4, 2008 Acceleration.
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Electron Polarization In MEIC
Synchrotron Ring Schematic
Other issues and concepts under study Conclusions References
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Gap Transient Suppression using Increased Bunch Density
He Zhang MEIC R&D Meeting, 07/09/2015
JLEIC ion fullsize booster (2256m) space charge limit (Δν=0
MEIC New Baseline: Part 10
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
Synchronization in MEIC
Deuteron and Small Aperture
JLEIC 200 GeV ion beam formation options
Yu.N. Filatov, A.M. Kondratenko, M.A. Kondratenko
Non-pairwise Collision
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
Conventional Synchronization Schemes
MEIC low rep-rate operation and path length
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
More on MEIC Beam Synchronization
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
Some Thoughts on the JLEIC Ion Injector
MEIC beam path change with e-ring bypass lines
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
An Alternative Ion Complex Agenda /some preliminary estimations/
Beam Synchronization in MEIC: The Problem, Scale and Prospect
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
Illustrations of Beam Synchronization Issue
Choice of harmonic number with the consideration of ion beam formation
Presentation transcript:

Synchronization Andrew Hutton Slava Derbenev Yuhong Zhang

The Problem Electrons travel at the speed of light Protons and ions are slower There are three areas that need to be addressed Collisions Acceleration Cooling Assumptions MEIC circumference is around 900m Booster (LEIC) is the same circumference as MEIC Electron ring is the same circumference as MEIC Superconducting RF systems have limited frequency swing

Collisions Slava suggested changing the harmonic number For a circumference about 900m, the harmonic number is about 4500 The proton energy that corresponds to a harmonic number of 4499 is GeV With two interaction points, we need to slip by two units The proton energy that corresponds to a harmonic number of 4498 is GeV This is not a viable solution for the 40 – 60 GeV energy range It is a viable solution at lower energies

Harmonic Number versus Energy

Two Interaction Regions The two Interaction Regions are 180° apart for both beams in the present configuration Arcs are equal and straight sections are equal Offsetting the beam in the Arcs would work Putting two Interaction Regions in a single straight will not work without an additional variable chicane Chicane is complicated in this region Magnet offset ~1 meter for 2 mm path length change MEIC can have up to two interaction regions Must be equidistant in ring There can be one more interaction region in LEIC

Change Path Length It is possible to change the path length in the ion ring For one Interaction Point, need 20 cm For two Interaction Points, need 40 cm If path length is created in the arcs 20 cm corresponds to an offset of about ±15 mm 40 cm corresponds to an offset of about ±30 mm Increasing the bore of a 6 Tesla magnet by 30 mm is expensive! 60 mm may be prohibitive Need to look into mounting all the magnets on movers Unpleasant, but possibly affordable

Proposal - Three Ring Collider The MEIC ring should be used to cover the higher energies 40 GeV (???) and up RF frequency will be fixed (1497 MHz) Electron ring and ion ring will use SRF cavities Ion ring magnets must have increased bore or be on movers to accommodate velocity change The LEIC ring will be used to cover lower energies The LEIC ring will need variable RF frequency Ion ring will require RF cavities that can span a wide frequency range At present, that means using room temperature RF

Circumference The change in average radius to make up one wavelength is independent of the circumference But the energy corresponding to one wavelength difference is lower for a shorter machine Includes arcs and straight sections Every effort must be made to reduce the machine length This will reduce the circumference change required to span the energy range of the MEIC ring Need experimenters to define the lower energy of MEIC Too low and the machine may be prohibitively expensive

Electron Cooling Electron cooling requires exact matching of the electron and ion velocities The time between adjacent buckets is 1/frequency Therefore RF frequencies must also be matched In the MEIC ring, if the RF frequency is constant (1497 MHz) the same electron cooling system will work at all energies Fixed frequency SRF cavities will work for energy recovery of the electron beam used for cooling

Circulator Ring Circumference The length of the circulator ring will need to be changed to accommodate different electron velocities The maximum change will be 1/h ion The circumference change in the circulator ring is h e λ/h ion Numerical example MEIC is ~900 metres long, h ion = 4500 Circulator ring is ~20 meters long, h e = 100 Circulator ring must change circumference by 4.5 mm for a one wavelength change in MEIC circumference This is a radius change of ~0.7 mm This is a small number so it can easily be accommodated within the circulator ring magnet bore

LEIC Electron Cooling The RF frequency in the LEIC ion ring has to change The circumference change in the circulator ring can be accommodated within the magnet bore The RF frequency in the electron cooling system has to change The RF frequency of the electron linac must change SRF cavities will not work Electron energy is low Propose no energy recovery for the electron beam Extend the number of turns that the electron beam is in the circulator ring Electron cooling would then be available throughout the acceleration cycle

Circulator Ring Assume racetrack layout as proposed in the ZDR Electron cooling occurs on one straight section Electron beam injected/extracted on opposite straight section Straight sections must have zero dispersion If injected beam is on axis, it will be on axis for cooling Injection orbit is independent of beam energy However, correct longitudinal position is not guaranteed by good injection orbit Requires Arcs to be achromatic, but not isochronous Arc energy setting must lead beam energy during ramp so path length shortens to maintain correct timing

Injection Bunch transfer into MEIC should occur at the ring RF frequency of 1497 MHz Automatic for electron ring Ion bunches will be injected into the booster at RF frequency corresponding to the lowest booster energy This is not 1497 MHz Single bunch-to-bunch transfer is always possible Slower injection process than bunch train injection Need to define RF frequency at injection and make sure that the injection ion complex is designed to operate at this frequency

Clearing Gaps Colliders usually have one (or more) gaps in the bunch train Ion clearing in electron beams Electron cloud clearing in proton or positive ion beams Required for aborting high power beams MEIC will have gaps, probably ~10% of the circumference Will reduce MEIC luminosity by ~10% RF frequencies are the same so gaps are synchronous LEIC will have gaps, also about 10% of the circumference Will reduce LEIC luminosity by at least 20% Gaps are asynchronous Could increase beam-beam effects Needs study

Impact of Clearing Gaps The clearing gaps impact the RF systems Stored energy in the cavities changes along the bunch train Bunch energy changes along the bunch train Transverse position in regions of non-zero dispersion changes along the bunch train Polarization precession changes along the bunch train Effect minimized with RF systems with high stored energy SRF cavities Copper cavities with storage cavities It is difficult to vary the frequency of both types of cavity