Summary of Tract-to-Tract Commuter Flows by Type of Geographic Area. A useful way of comparing the general pattern of tract-to-tract commuter flows across.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Work Trip in the Context of Daily Travel Census Data for Transportation Planning Conference, May 2005 Nancy McGuckin, Travel Behavior Analyst Nanda.
Advertisements

A Synthetic Environment to Evaluate Alternative Trip Distribution Models Xin Ye Wen Cheng Xudong Jia Civil Engineering Department California State Polytechnic.
Convenient Access to Retail Pharmacies - Analysis on Preferred Cost-Sharing Pharmacy Networks December 16 & 17, 2014 Division of Benefit Purchasing and.
GETTING RURAL RIGHT IN THE AMERICAN HOUSING SURVEY American Housing Survey User Conference March 8, 2011 Washington DC.
What is Rural? Steven Hirsch Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration Office of Rural Health Policy.
Richmond Journey-To-Work Transit Factoring Analysis: A Multivariate Regression Approach Xueming (Jimmy) Chen, Ph.D I-Shian (Ivan) Suen, Ph.D Virginia Commonwealth.
Presented to: Presented by: Transportation leadership you can trust. LEHD OnTheMap Data Planning Applications Conference, Session 2 Bruce Spear, Cambridge.
CARE OF CLIENTS IN URBAN AND RURAL SETTINGS. Approaches to Defining Rural and Urban § U. S. Census Bureau § Office of Management and Budget (OMB) § Montana.
BEN ANDERSON PROJECT MANAGER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE CENTER FOR HAZARDS RESEARCH AND POLICY DEVELOPMENT Using Dasymetric Mapping.
Rethinking Urban-Rural and the Barriers Between Statistical and Programmatic Uses Michael Ratcliffe, Census Bureau John Cromartie, Economic Research Service.
Changing Demographics in Texas
1 U.S. Census Bureau Data Availability for Geographic Areas March 25, 2008.
Promoting the Economic and Social Vitality of Rural America: The Demographic Context Rural Education Conference New Orleans, LA April 14, 2003 by Dr. Daryl.
Presented to: Presented by: Transportation leadership you can trust. LEHD OnTheMap Data 2011 GIS in Public Transportation Tampa, FL Bruce Spear September.
Luci2 Urban Simulation Model John R. Ottensmann Center for Urban Policy and the Environment Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.
Measuring Rurality. Overview ERS has developed several classifications to measure rurality and assess the economic and social diversity of rural America.
Office of Social and Economic Data Analysis April 13, 2011 Springfield Area Chamber of Commerce Springfield, Missouri Dr. Bill Elder Dr. Bill Elder Missouri.
The American Community Survey (ACS) Lisa Neidert NPC Workshop: Analyzing Poverty and Socioeconomic Trends Using the American Community Survey June 23 –
1 The American Community Survey (ACS) 2005 Data Release.
1 Commuting and Migration Data Products from the American Community Survey Journey-to-Work and Migration Statistics Branch U.S. Census Bureau State Data.
Use of Truck GPS Data for Travel Model Improvements Talking Freight Seminar April 21, 2010.
Alain Bertaud Urbanist Module 2: Spatial Analysis and Urban Land Planning The Spatial Structure of Cities: International Examples of the Interaction of.
Socio-Economic & Demographic Data Tools for Proactive Planning Robin Blakely-Armitage STATE OF NEW YORK CITIES: Creative Responses to Fiscal Stress March.
“OnTheMap” The Census Bureau’s New Tool for Residence-Workplace Analysis Fredrik Andersson and Jeremy Wu May 7, 2007 Daytona Beach, FL.
A Century of Classification: The Census Bureau’s Urban and Rural Classification, Michael Ratcliffe Geography Division U.S. Census Bureau.
Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce Comparing IRS Exemptions to 2010 Census Population Counts Esther.
Everything You’ve Always Wanted to Know About Rural ? STATE OFFICES OF RURAL HEALTH ORIENTATION MEETING Steven Hirsch Executive Secretary U.S. Department.
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Special Tabulation by Jennifer Cheeseman Day Presentation for the State Data Centers Annual Meeting October 15, 2010.
1 Using the American Community Survey with American Factfinder CTPP Webinar Dec 2, 2008 Melissa Chiu, CTPP Coordinator Journey to Work and Migration Statistics.
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING. TOPICS 1.ROADS AND PUBLIC GOODS 2.RATIONALE TO JUSTIFY ROAD BUILDING 3.URBAN PLANNING AND TRAFFIC CONGESTION (UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES)
Evaluating the Concept of a Jobs- Housing Balance through LA County Diana Gonzalez Gonzalez 3/19/2012.
Impacts of Sample Sizes in the American Community Survey Northwestern University Transportation Center.
Presented by Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Co-authors Vidya Mysore, Florida Department of Transportation Nanda Srinivasan, Cambridge.
0 presented to Model Task Force Meeting presented by Vidya Mysore, FDOT Central Office Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 12/12/06 LEHD.
James Palma Maryland State Data Center Maryland Department of Planning 301 West Preston Street, Suite 702 Baltimore, Maryland September 20, 2010.
1 Commuting and Migration Data Products from the American Community Survey Journey-to-Work and Migration Statistics Branch U.S. Census Bureau 2010 State.
Broadband Needs, Challenges, and Opportunities in Rural America Presented to the Rural Broadband Workshop Federal Communications Commission March 19, 2014.
Addressed Based Sampling as an Alternative to Traditional Sampling Approaches: An Exploration May 6, 2013.
1 Journey-to-Work Data in the American Community Survey (ACS) May 17, 2009 TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Federal Data for Modelers.
1 Public Transportation Data in the American Community Survey (ACS) and Census Transportation Planning Products (CTPP) Dec 3, 2009 AASHTO Standing Committee.
1 Supplementing ACS: The LEHD Program Jeremy S. Wu Marc Roemer U.S. Census Bureau May 12, 2005 Jeremy S. Wu Marc Roemer U.S. Census Bureau May 12, 2005.
Chicago Traffic Analysis Zones 9-Counties 1990 Population: 7,429,181 Area (sq. miles): 137 Number of zones: 14,127 People per zone: 526 Resident workers:
1 The Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model: Overview Dave Schmitt, AICP Southeast Florida Users Group November 14 th 2008.
Using IPUMS.org Katie Genadek Minnesota Population Center University of Minnesota The IPUMS projects are funded by the National Science.
Understanding Retail Trade Analysis by Al Myles, Economist and Extension Professor Department of Agriculture Economics Mississippi State University November.
Evaluating the Local Employment Dynamics Program as a Source of Journey-to- Work Data for Transportation Planning 1 Wende A. Mix, Ph.D. Associate Professor,
Estimation of 2000 Zonal Employment for the Delaware Valley Region Based on Census Data by Thabet Zakaria Deputy Director for Transportation Planning Delaware.
The Relation between Jobs-Housing Ratio and Commuting in LA County Diana Gonzalez Gonzalez 2/13/2012.
American Community Survey Maryland State Data Center Affiliate Meeting September 16, 2010.
American Community Survey (ACS) 1 Oregon State Data Center Meeting Portland State University April 14,
Mobility MATTERS! Connecting People to Life Who Rides the Bus? How Understanding Transit Demographic Can Improve Service May 7, 2015.
The Benefits of Density Density and Public Transportation Support Economic Strength.
Paul Metaxatos Urban Transportation Center University of Illinois at Chicago CTS-IGERT – Weekly Seminar May 14, 2009 Some Issues in Transportation Demand.
American Community Survey “It Don’t Come Easy”, Ringo Starr Jane Traynham Maryland State Data Center March 15, 2011.
Matt Kaneshiro Christine Pierce 1/8/2014 LEVERAGING THE STRENGTHS OF THE PRCS LESSONS FROM PPH AND OTHER HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS ESTIMATED USING THE.
Demographic Analysis Update This presentation is released to inform interested parties of research and to encourage discussion. Any views expressed.
Transportation Engineering (CIVTREN) notes of AM Fillone, DLSU-Manila
1 Decennial Census Ed Christopher Resource Center Planning Team Federal Highway Administration 4749 Lincoln Mall Dr. Rm 600 Matteson, IL
Reduced Match Section 154 (d) (2) of the DD Act..
Untangling Community (County) Data: Valuable Resources for CD Practitioners Bo Beaulieu Purdue Center for Regional Development September 2013.
Travel Implications of MetroFuture Growth Scenarios Jie Xia (MCP1), Jingsi Xu (MCP2) Prof. Joseph Jr. Ferreira 05/13/ / Spatial Database.
Point-Base Household and Job Geographic Datasets Jill Locantore, Land Use Planner Jeremy Papuga, Demographic Analyst Erik Sabina, Regional Modeling Manager.
CE Urban Transportation Planning and Management Iowa State University Calibration and Adjustment Techniques, Part 1 Source: Calibration and Adjustment.
Emerging Issues for Transportation Data Users of ACS Elaine Murakami, FHWA TRB Planning Applications Conference, April 26,
Are We There Yet? Distance to Pediatric Subspecialty Care in the US Michelle L. Mayer, PhD, MPH Research Assistant Professor Department of Health Policy.
Rural Statistical Areas: A Rural-Centric Approach to Defining Geographic Areas Michael Ratcliffe Geography Division U.S. Census Bureau COPAFS Quarterly.
Finding and Mapping Census Data Kathleen Fear, Data Librarian Blair Tinker, GIS Research Specialist.
Professor Alan Townsend Workplace and commuting in the North East.
John M. Abowd and Lars Vilhuber February 16, 2011
Identifying Worker Characteristics Using LEHD and GIS
Presentation transcript:

Summary of Tract-to-Tract Commuter Flows by Type of Geographic Area. A useful way of comparing the general pattern of tract-to-tract commuter flows across multiple data sets is to summarize them into categories. For this analysis, tract-to-tract worker flow data from the LED and the census are compared by summarizing them into categories of a "flow typology" based on a simple classification scheme of the type of geographic area in which the tracts are located. Tracts located in the central city of a metropolitan statistical area were classified as "urban." Tracts located outside metropolitan central cities but still within the urbanized area were classified as "suburban." Tracts located within urbanized areas that are outside any metropolitan area were classified as “non- metro urbanized”. Finally, tracts located in the non-urbanized remainder of metropolitan areas or in non-metropolitan territory and not within an urbanized are were classified as “rural”. The resulting flow typology comprised intra-urban flows, intra-suburban flows, intra-rural flows, and flows between urban, suburban and rural areas. Flows to, from, and within tracts located in non-metropolitan urbanized areas also were differentiated in the same manner. Origin-Destination Worker Flows at the Census Tract Level Origins Destinations Total Productions UrbanSuburban Non-Metro UrbanizedRural Percent of Trips Census Urban Suburban Non-Metro Urbanized Rural Total Attractions LED Urban Suburban Non-Metro Urbanized Rural Total Attractions Note: In the Census data, 3,471 interchanges with a destination tract code of , accounting for 200,280 trips, are not included in the table. These include 2,810 trips with urban origins, 1,876 trips with suburban origins, 23,138 trips with non-metro urbanized origins, and 174,456 trips with rural origins. -- Less than 0.5, so rounds to zero percent. Sources: 2001 LED O-D. Census 2000 Transportation Planning Package, Illinois, part 3. Origins Destinations Average UrbanSuburban Non-Metro UrbanizedRural Census Urban Suburban Non-Metro Urbanized Rural Average Urban Suburban Non-Metro Urbanized Rural Average LED Average Number of Trips Per Tract-to-Tract Interchange, by Type of Flow Tract-to-Tract Work Trips, by Type of Flow Internal Work Trips Within the Same Tract by Area Type Note: The LED data contained 124 tracts with no internal trips. The Census data contained 102 tracts with no internal trips. n/a = not applicable Sources: 2001 LED O-D File. Census 2000 Transportation Planning Package, Illinois, part 3. Distance Decay Transportation planners have shown that the number of work trips between places is inversely related to distance. That is, all other things being equal, people tend to live close to where they work. So, for any destination tract, we would expect more trips from closer tracts and fewer trips from tracts farther away. A general form of this relationship is: T w = T 0 e bd-cd 2 Where: T w = Total work flows T 0 = Internal trips d = Distance b,c parameters to be estimated When c = 0, the number of trips decreases exponentially with increasing distance. When b = 0, flows decline exponentially with the square of the distance. For each of the four geographic area types, the ten destination tracts that attracted the most work trips in each dataset were analyzed (or 40 total destination tracts from each data set). Great circle distances were calculated between the geometric centers of each origin-destination pair. Flow between tracts greater than 150 miles apart were excluded from the analysis as anomalies. Area Type LEDCensus ModelR2R2 R2R2 Urban ln(T w ) = d0.74ln(T w ) = d0.84 ln(T w ) = d d ln(T w ) = d d Suburban ln(T w ) = d0.73ln(T w ) = d0.86 ln(T w ) = d d ln(T w ) = d d Non-Metro Urbanized ln(T w ) = d0.73ln(T w ) = d0.84 ln(T w ) = d d ln(T w ) = d d Rural ln(T w ) = d0.75ln(T w ) = d0.83 ln(T w ) = d d ln(T w ) = d d Regression Results – transformed model ( Ln T w = ln T 0 +bd – cd 2 ) Conclusions This exploratory analysis found that the total counts of workers in the LED data for the State of Illinois and selected Illinois counties, aggregated up from block records on the H- B File, compare favorably with the census and the ACS. However, the LED O-D File contains more than three times the number of tract-to-tract interchanges and nearly 1 million fewer work trips than the census. This results in a much lower average number of trips per interchange in the LED data compared with the census. But when the tract-to- tract interchanges and worker trips are summarized by type of origin-destination interchange or flow (e.g. suburban-to-urban or rural-to-suburban), the proportion of interchanges and trips by type of flow in the LED data is virtually identical to the census. The results of this analysis, particularly the comparability of worker flow patterns between the LED and census data, demonstrate the potential utility of journey-to-work data from the LED Program for use in transportation planning. Because it is national in scope, the LED Program offers many advantages over the piecemeal approach of individual states trying to work with their state employment security agencies to obtain and use the employment data. Many states do not allow access to ES-202 data for research, so the LED Program is a means of accessing the data. The LED methodology is consistent for every state. The file that the LED Program uses to assign residence addresses to workers is consistent for every state and contains extensive confidential information not available outside the Census Bureau. Data from the LED Program are updated quarterly. The data are cost effective, costing much less than a survey or a census special tabulation. The transportation data community has embarked on a coordinated effort to study and adjust to the ACS. It is an opportune time to thoroughly evaluate the utility of the LED data as well. Small-area data from the ACS will be based on multi-year averages. If the accuracy of the worker flow data from the LED Program is improved, the data could be used to evaluate and validate the origin-destination data from the ACS. Annual LED data could be used to measure changes in key worker flows and travel corridors, and provide evidence of new travel patterns caused by shifts in the location of employment or new housing developments. Area Type Number of Tracts Number of Internal Tract Trips Percent of Trips Originating in Area Type Average Internal Trips Per Tract Maximum Internal Trips LED Urban1,087 38, Suburban907 89, Non-Metro Urbanized94 16, Rural , ,338 Total2, , n/a Census Urban1, , ,115 Suburban , ,880 Non-Metro Urbanized94 26, ,010 Rural , ,890 Total2, , n/a