Channel Routing Simulate the movement of water through a channel

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hydrology Rainfall - Runoff Modeling (I)
Advertisements

Flood Routing & Detention Basin Design
NWS Calibration Workshop, LMRFC March 2009 Slide 1 Calibration of Local Areas 1 2 Headwater basin Local area.
WinTR-20 Course February Muskingum-Cunge Flood Routing Procedure in NRCS Hydrologic Models Prepared by William Merkel USDA-NRCS National Water Quality.
CHAPTER FOUR Stream flow measurement
Streamflow and Runoff The character, amount, and timing of discharge from a basin tells a lot about flow paths within the basin Therefore, important to.
Review of Flood Routing
Flood Routing  .
CHARACTERISTICS OF RUNOFF
Introduction to Surface Water Hydrology and Watersheds Lecture 1 Philip B. Bedient Rice University November, 2000.
Kinematic Routing Model and its Parameters Definition.
STREAMFLOW and HYDROGRAPH ANALYSIS
1D SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MORPHODYNAMICS with applications to RIVERS AND TURBIDITY CURRENTS © Gary Parker November, CHAPTER 13: THE QUASI-STEADY APPROXIMATION.
An analysis of MLR and NLP for use in river flood routing and comparison with the Muskingum method Mohammad Zare Manfred Koch Dept. of Geotechnology and.
Hydrologic Routing Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 8.1, 8.2, 8.4.
Estimating Qmax Using the Rational Method
Hydrology and Water Resources RG 744 Institute of Space Technology December
Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 8.1, 8.2, 8.4
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers
WinTR-20 SensitivityMarch WinTR-20 Sensitivity to Input Parameters.
Flood Routing 2 Review of Energy Conservation Energy Grade Line Gradually Varied Flows, Head Loss Runge-Kutta Routing.
FLOOD ROUTING.
Channel Routing Simulate the movement of water through a channel
DES 606 : Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS Module 5 Theodore G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E 29 July 2011.
Module 6: Routing Concepts Theodore G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E, M. ASCE, F. EWRI October 2013 Module 6 1.
HEC-HMS Runoff Computation.
March 2009WinTR-20 Course1 Muskingum-Cunge Flood Routing Procedure in NRCS Hydrologic Models Prepared by William Merkel USDA-NRCS National Water Quality.
Distributed Flow Routing Surface Water Hydrology, Spring 2005 Reading: 9.1, 9.2, 10.1, 10.2 Venkatesh Merwade, Center for Research in Water Resources.
Channel Flow Routing Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 8.4, , 9.7.
Surface hydrology The primary purpose of the WEPP surface hydrology component is to provide the erosion component with the duration of rainfall excess,
Mathematical Background
Channel Routing Simulate the movement of water through a channel
WinTR-20 SensitivityFebruary WinTR-20 Sensitivity to Input Parameters.
FLOOD ROUTING Siti Kamariah Md Sa’at School of Bioprocess Engineering, UniMAP.
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers Reference: HEC-RAS Hydraulic Reference Manual, Version 4.1, Chapters 1 and 2 Reading: HEC-RAS Manual pp. 2-1 to 2-12 Applied.
Flood Routing definitions
Basic Hydraulics: Channels Analysis and design – I
DES 606 : Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS
CE 3354 Engineering Hydrology
Flood Routing Applied Hydrology
FLOOD ROUTING Flood Routing Techniques Siti Kamariah Md Sa’at PPK Bioprocess
STREAMFLOW and HYDROGRAPH ANALYSIS Stream flow is one of the most important topics in engineering hydrology because it directly relate to water supply,
MBF1413 | Quantitative Methods Prepared by Dr Khairul Anuar 8: Time Series Analysis & Forecasting – Part 1
ERT 246 Hydrology & Water Resources Eng.
UNIT – III FLOODS Types of floods Following are the various types of floods: 1.Probable Maximum Flood (PMF):This is the flood resulting from the most sever.
Basic Hydrology: Rainfall-runoff based methods – III
Basic Hydrology & Hydraulics: DES 601
Routing-Hydrologic and Hydraulic
Flow Routing Flow routing is a procedure to determine the time and magnitude of flow (i.e. the flow hydrograph) at a point on a watercourse from known.
Stormwater Conveyance Design 2
Channel Routing Simulate the movement of water through a channel
Water supply Flood prediction and forecasting. Water quality
Channel Routing Simulate the movement of water through a channel
DES 606 : Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS
03/02/2006 Flow Routing Reading: 8.1, 8.4, 9.1, 9.2.
Review of Flood Routing
Channel Routing Simulate the movement of water through a channel
FLOOD ROUTING Topic 5 River/Stream Routing Muskingum Method.
CEE 3430 – Engineering Hydrology David Rosenberg March 26, 2012
CEVE 412/512 Dr. Phil Bedient Jan 2016
Channel Routing Simulate the movement of water through a channel
Detention Routing.
Reservoir Routing.
Flood Routing & Detention Basin Design
Flood Frequency Analysis
Floods and Flood Routing
Flood Routing.
Assoc.Prof. dr.tarkan erdik
Hydrology CIVL341 Introduction
HEC-HMS Runoff Computation Modeling Direct Runoff with HEC-HMS Empirical models Empirical models - traditional UH models - traditional UH models - a.
Presentation transcript:

Channel Routing Simulate the movement of water through a channel Used to predict the magnitudes, volumes, and temporal patterns of the flow (often a flood wave) as it translates down a channel. 2 types of routing : hydrologic and hydraulic. both of these methods use some form of the continuity equation. Continuity equation Hydrologic Routing Hydraulic Routing Momentum Equation

Continuity Equation Continuity equation Hydrologic Routing The change in storage (dS) equals the difference between inflow (I) and outflow (O) or : For open channel flow, the continuity equation is also often written as : A = the cross-sectional area, Q = channel flow, and q = lateral inflow

Hydrologic Routing Continuity equation Hydrologic Routing Methods combine the continuity equation with some relationship between storage, outflow, and possibly inflow. These relationships are usually assumed, empirical, or analytical in nature. An of example of such a relationship might be a stage-discharge relationship.

Routing Methods Kinematic Wave Muskingum Muskingum-Cunge Dynamic Modeling Notes

Muskingum Method Sp = K O Prism Storage Sw = K(I - O)X Wedge Storage S = K[XI + (1-X)O] Combined Wedge Prism

Muskingum, cont... S = K[XI + (1-X)O] O2 = C0 I2 + C1 I1 + C2 O1 Substitute storage equation, S into the “S” in the continuity equation yields : S = K[XI + (1-X)O] O2 = C0 I2 + C1 I1 + C2 O1

Muskingum Notes : The method assumes a single stage-discharge relationship. In other words, for any given discharge, Q, there can be only one stage height. This assumption may not be entirely valid for certain flow situations. For instance, the friction slope on the rising side of a hydrograph for a given flow, Q, may be quite different than for the recession side of the hydrograph for the same given flow, Q. This causes an effect known as hysteresis, which can introduce errors into the storage assumptions of this method.

Estimating K K is estimated to be the travel time through the reach. This may pose somewhat of a difficulty, as the travel time will obviously change with flow. The question may arise as to whether the travel time should be estimated using the average flow, the peak flow, or some other flow. The travel time may be estimated using the kinematic travel time or a travel time based on Manning's equation.

Estimating X The value of X must be between 0.0 and 0.5. The parameter X may be thought of as a weighting coefficient for inflow and outflow. As inflow becomes less important, the value of X decreases. The lower limit of X is 0.0 and this would be indicative of a situation where inflow, I, has little or no effect on the storage. A reservoir is an example of this situation and it should be noted that attenuation would be the dominant process compared to translation. Values of X = 0.2 to 0.3 are the most common for natural streams; however, values of 0.4 to 0.5 may be calibrated for streams with little or no flood plains or storage effects. A value of X = 0.5 would represent equal weighting between inflow and outflow and would produce translation with little or no attenuation.

More Notes - Muskingum The Handbook of Hydrology (Maidment, 1992) includes additional cautions or limitations in the Muskingum method. The method may produce negative flows in the initial portion of the hydrograph. Additionally, it is recommended that the method be limited to moderate to slow rising hydrographs being routed through mild to steep sloping channels. The method is not applicable to steeply rising hydrographs such as dam breaks. Finally, this method also neglects variable backwater effects such as downstream dams, constrictions, bridges, and tidal influences.

Muskingum Example Problem A portion of the inflow hydrograph to a reach of channel is given below. If the travel time is K=1 unit and the weighting factor is X=0.30, then find the outflow from the reach for the period shown below:

Muskingum Example Problem The first step is to determine the coefficients in this problem. The calculations for each of the coefficients is given below: C0= - ((1*0.30) - (0.5*1)) / ((1-(1*0.30) + (0.5*1)) = 0.167 C1= ((1*0.30) + (0.5*1)) / ((1-(1*0.30) + (0.5*1)) = 0.667

Muskingum Example Problem C2= (1- (1*0.30) - (0.5*1)) / ((1-(1*0.30) + (0.5*1)) = 0.167 Therefore the coefficients in this problem are: C0 = 0.167 C1 = 0.667 C2 = 0.167

Muskingum Example Problem The three columns now can be calculated. C0I2 = 0.167 * 5 = 0.835 C1I1 = 0.667 * 3 = 2.00 C2O1 = 0.167 * 3 = 0.501

Muskingum Example Problem Next the three columns are added to determine the outflow at time equal 1 hour. 0.835 + 2.00 + 0.501 = 3.34

Muskingum Example Problem This can be repeated until the table is complete and the outflow at each time step is known.