Projects spanning over two programming periods Department for Programme and Project Preparation Beatrix Horváth, Deputy Head of Department Budapest, 5.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HOW TO ASSESS THE ORGANISATIONAL AND MANAGEMENT SKILLS OF THE ORGANISATION Training Unit 1.2 Knowledge of eligibility and formal requirements.
Advertisements

Marek Szczepański Wielkopolska UDF Director of European Programmes Department at BGK Working Group JESSICA – lessons learned – proposal of action plan.
Research and Innovation Summary of MS questions on the Commission's proposal for DG Research & Innovation Research and Innovation Rules for Participation.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITIES AND THE PAYING AGENCIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Felix Lozano, Head of.
AUDITING COHESION AND STRUCTURAL FUNDS IN SLOVENIA Nataša Prah Ljubljana, 
Single Audit Strategy LATVIA. Audit System The Audit Authority functions are carried out by the Internal Audit Department of the Ministry of.
Arrangements regarding ECP 2014–2020 implementation 1.Implementation of the Republic of Slovenia Budget Act Specific section for the period:
1 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Draft information note on the Annual.
PUBLIC SECTOR INTERNAL AUDIT IN THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA Mr. Jonas Vaitkevičius Head of Internal Audit and Financial Control Methodology and Monitoring.
Large Scale Projects Aleksejs Šaforostovs LSP Project Manager Joint Technical Secretariat.
JASPERS – Supporting Urban Transport Projects Ministry of Regional Development, Czech Republic JASPERS Seminar, Prague - 28th November 2007 Dr. Joachim.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Martin Oder, LL.M. The Emerging Role of the Competitive Dialogue.
Implementing the Second Pillar of the Aarhus Convention: Problems Identified in the National Implementation Reports Magda Tóth Nagy, Senior Expert Geneva,
Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café Brussels, 10 February 2011 How to apply: Legal Framework – Beneficiaries – Application and Selection Procedure.
Project Implementation Monika Balode Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 16 October 2009, Šiauliai.
Regional Policy Major projects approval process in Brendan Smyth DG REGIO.
Financial management and control
#ICANN51 1 Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation (SCI) Activities Update to the GNSO Council ICANN-51 Los Angeles Meeting 11 October 2014.
V4 Expert Group V4 Expert Group Result Orientation Challenges – 17 June 2014 Budapest.
Second expert group meeting on Draft fiche on delegated act on the European code of conduct on partnership (ECCP) Cohesion Policy
Regional Policy Major Projects in Cohesion Policy Major Projects Team, Unit G.1 Smart and Sustainable Growth Competence Centre, DG Regional and Urban Policy.
Template and guidance for the content of the Partnership Agreement 24 May
PHASING EXPERIENCE ERIKA SALTARELLI DEPARTMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT POLICY AND METHODOLOGY CO- ORDINATION BUDAPEST 16TH JUNE 2014.
Managing Authority of EU Funds – Ministry of Finance 1 Methodology of selection of project applications for EU funds including preparation of appraisal.
1 Polish SAI (NIK) experience in the field of EU funds Piotr Szpakowski Najwyższa Izba Kontroli Prague, 6-8 November 2006.
111 Synthesis of Questionnaires. Thematic concentration  Most of the new member states support the suggested principle while maintaining the element.
1 Information and Communication rules for EU Cohesion policy Brussels, 20 October 2011 Peter Fischer
Struktūrfondu vadošā iestāde – Finanšu ministrija 1 1 Communication Strategy of EU Funds Sanda Rieksta Head of Information Division, Deputy Head.
Regional Policy Delegated act on irrecoverable amounts (IRR) (Fiche 34, version 2, 25 November 2014) DG Regional and Urban Policy.
Preparation of future ENI CBC programmes - State of Play Vanessa De Bruyn (DG DEVCO) 3 December 2012.
Paulius Baniūnas Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Lithuania EU Structural Support Management Department Monitoring and Analysis Division SYSTEM OF.
1 Eurostat’s grant policy for 2010 Luxembourg, 23/03/2010 Unit A4 – Financial Management Section 3 – Grant procedures and agreements.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT meeting, 12 December 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
Technical Assistance Office 1 SOCRATES - MINERVA GRANT AGREEMENT 2004 Kick-Off Meeting, Brussels 22 October 2004.
PPP Legal & Regulatory Framework. PPP Policy In July 2008 GOK approved the PPP policy directive through which: PPPs are identified as a method for investing.
Structural Funds Managing Authority – Ministry of Finance 1 Technical Assistance Ilze Aleksandroviča Head of Control and Development Division EU Funds.
Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
Results orientation: audit perspective Jiri Plecity, Head of Unit H1, Relations with Control Authorities, Legal Procedures, Audit of Direct Management.
Cooperation with the Seimas Audit Committee Tomas Mackevičius Deputy Auditor General.
CSO Observer Member of the Evaluation Committee. Civil Society Organization May have representation in the Evaluation Committee As a member of the Evaluation.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity Structural Funds Information Team Brussels, 30 June 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO.
Draft fiche on delegated act on the European code of conduct on partnership (ECCP) Structured Dialogue Brussels, 19 September
#ICANN50 Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation (SCI) Activities Update to the GNSO Council ICANN-50 London Meeting 21 June 2014.
Deputy Head of Federal Accreditation Service Sergey V. Migin Approximation of accreditation systems of European Union and Russia.
Potentially phased TOP-projects and their impact on the next transport operational programme Beatrix Horváth Deputy Head of Department Department for Programme.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
Ministry of Finance Compliance assessment of the management and control systems of the managing authorities under the Operational programmes. Conclusions.
Ministry of Finance Financial management and control of the Operational Programmes, co- financed under the Structural funds and the Cohesion fund of EU.
DG Justice and Consumers Project Modifications DG Justice and Consumers.
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
Proposed Organisation of Evaluation of the Romanian NSRF and Operational Programmes, Niall McCann, Technical Assistance Project for Programming,
What is a grant? A direct financial contribution – donation – from EU budget An action - contributing to EU policy achievement Functioning of a body acting.
Background Legal basis of the TA financing decision: Article 45 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions.
The role of the Passport Indicators in Monitoring PFM Strategy
Kick-off meeting of the project UMBRELLA
Control framework and Audit of European Structural and Investment Funds Visit of the Finance and Constitution Committee of the Scottish Parliament Brussels,
Amending the Performance Framework
SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITHIN EUPAN
Art. 17 EGTC Indicators 13th Meeting of the Expert Group on Delegated and Implementing Acts for the ESI Funds 4th July 2013.
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
Overview US Paper C2-7.INF
Draft Delegated Act Financial corrections linked to the performance framework (Art. 20 of CPR) As amended after expert meeting on October 24, 2013 Veronica.
The evaluation process
Review of the 1958 Agreement
Management & Control, Designation of Authorities State of play
Roles and Responsibilities
Contractual and Regulatory Framework
Role of Evaluation coordination group and Capacity Building Projects in Lithuania Vilija Šemetienė Head of Economic Analysis and Evaluation Division.
Presentation transcript:

Projects spanning over two programming periods Department for Programme and Project Preparation Beatrix Horváth, Deputy Head of Department Budapest, 5 October 2012

Department for Programme and Project Preparation project preparation for the programming period coordinated approach for phasing helping the work of the Managing Authorities as basis 5 people with years of experience in major project preparation and implementation, legal issues and public procurement Preparing the concept and methodology of phasing, assessment of individual projects and project documents (feasibility studies, application forms, tender documents) with the involvement of JASPERS, participation in project meetings

I. Definition Phasing (2012): the physical and financial division of a project in two phases, where a project was approved, its implementation and absorption of EU Funds started under the provisions of the programming period , and a part of the project (second phase) is financed from the EU Funds available in the programming period, completing the project in its entirety.

II. Regulations COCOF_ EN: Guidance note on major projects spanning over two programming periods Commission clarification on how to apply the rules for major projects which may not be completed on time by the end of the programming period. The note recalls the current framework and basic principles and sets out the steps to follow in order to handle the risks arising from uncompleted projects at the end of the programming period. Closure Guidelines (draft): Points 3.3. and 3.4. detail the main conditions for phasing of major and non-major projects. It will have also a Questions and Answers document for examples and more detailed clarification General Regulation (draft): The possibility and the modalities of the continuation of support for phased projects should be laid down in Article 145 of the CPR-regulation.

Reasons for phasing 1.Extention of implementation time (end of 2015): - delays in public procurement; - implementation problem; - unrealistic time scheduling. 2. Launch a project at the end of programming period (absorption)

Phasing procedures Member States should communicate to the Commission by 30 June 2015 a list of major projects which they propose to divide into phases.  Commission recommends that a list of phased major projects is established and agreed between the Commission and the Member States concerned.  This list should be included in the final report of the operational programme concerned. In order to formally request the phasing of the projects, the Member States must submit: a)either major project applications with a phasing proposal b)or their requests for modification of the corresponding Commission Decisions according to the rules applicable to the modification of Commission decisions of approval for major projects. List of all phased major projects in the corresponding operational programmes concerned under the period.

Conditions for phasing I. Project size 1.Major projects The revised Article 39 of 1083/2006/EK Regulation introduces a uniform threshold of EUR 50 million applicable to all major projects. In order to determine whether a project or project phase falls within the scope of Articles 39 and 40, the total cost of the investment has to be considered and not just only one particular phase of it. This total cost should correspond to a project, seen as a self-sufficient unit of analysis, for which the CBA and EIA assessment are carried out. If the total cost is above the €50 million threshold set out in Article 39, even if the project should be split between two programming periods, a major project application should be submitted to the Commission by the Member State or the responsible managing authority. It is a must to list all phased projects as major projects in the corresponding operational programmes concerned under the period. 2.Non-major projects The principle of phasing can also be applied for non-major projects where the total cost of each project amounts at least to EUR 5 million.

Conditions for phasing II. The two phases The project has two clearly identifiable stages as regards its physical and financial objectives: The first phase of the major project is completed and should be completed and ready to be used for its purpose and/or function specified in the Commission decision by the deadline of the submission of the closure documents ( ). The second phase should be eligible for financing from Structural Funds and/or Cohesion Fund under the programming period and it shall be implemented and completed within the programming period. Maintain the original overall objective of the major project that needs to be achieved within the programming period. Member State should indicate in the final implementation report that a necessary legal and financial commitment was made in order to complete and render operational the second phase under the programming period.

Thank You for Your attention!