Search for Rare Decays of the B S Meson at the Tevatron Ralf Bernhard University of Zurich XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD 19 th March 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Rare Decays of B Hadrons at CDF Matthew Jones October 3, 2005.
Advertisements

ICFP 2005, Taiwan Colin Gay, Yale University B Mixing and Lifetimes from CDF Colin Gay, Yale University for the CDF II Collaboration.
Search for B s oscillations at D  Constraining the CKM matrix Large uncertainty Precise measurement of V td  properly constrain the CKM matrix yield.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
1 B s  J/  update Lifetime Difference & Mixing phase Avdhesh Chandra for the CDF and DØ collaborations Beauty 2006 University of Oxford, UK.
Heavy Flavor Production at the Tevatron Jennifer Pursley The Johns Hopkins University on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty University.
The new Silicon detector at RunIIb Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96.
1 Rare Decays At the Tevatron Cheng-Ju S. Lin (Fermilab ) BEAUTY 2006 OXFORD 28 September 2006.
On the Trail of the Higgs Boson Meenakshi Narain.
B s and Λ b Lifetimes and BRs at the Tevatron Satyajit Behari (For the CDF Collab.) Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore,USA 25 th September 2006 Beauty 2006,
Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B mixing at DØ WIN 2005 Delphi, Greece Chris Barnes, Imperial College.
B Production and Decay at DØ Brad Abbott University of Oklahoma BEACH 2004 June 28-July 3.
B physics: new states, rare decays and branching ratios in CDF Vyacheslav Krutelyov Texas A&M University For CDF Collaboration July 1, 2004 BEACH04 Chicago,
B S Mixing at Tevatron Donatella Lucchesi University and INFN of Padova On behalf of the CDF&D0 Collaborations First Workshop on Theory, Phenomenology.
Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 1 Recent B Physics results from DØ The B Physics program in D Ø Run II Current analyses – First results.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
B c Results from CDF II Satyajit Behari (For the CDF Collab.) Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore,USA 23 rd Jul HEP2005 Europhysics Conference, Lisboa,
Cano Ay, Johannes Gutenberg Universität, B mixing and flavor oscillations at DØ Cano Ay University Mainz for the DØ Collaboration 23 may.
February 28, 2008Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallee d'Aoste, B States at the Tevatron Matthew Jones Purdue UniversityPurdue University/CDFCDF.
B c mass, lifetime and BR’s at CDF Masato Aoki University of Tsukuba For the CDF Collaboration International Workshop on Heavy Quarkonium BNL.
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
KIRTI RANJANDIS, Madison, Wisconsin, April 28, Top Quark Production Cross- Section at the Tevatron Collider On behalf of DØ & CDF Collaboration KIRTI.
1 Search for FCNC Decays B s(d) → μ  μ - Motivation Analysis Method Results Conclusion Matthew Herndon, University of Wisconsin For Doug Glenzinski, Hauke.
Search for B s →  +  - and B d →  +  - Decays at CDF Cheng-Ju Lin (Fermilab) Representing CDF Collaboration SUSY 2004 Tsukuba, Japan June 17, 2004.
1 Rare Bottom and Charm Decays at the Tevatron Dmitri Tsybychev (SUNY at Stony Brook) On behalf of CDF and D0 Collaborations Flavor Physics and CP-Violation.
Searches for the Standard Model Higgs at the Tevatron presented by Per Jonsson Imperial College London On behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations Moriond.
B physics and X(3872) production at DØ  Introduction  DØ-Detector  Results on B physics  Results on X(3872)  Summary Frank Lehner U Zurich DIS 2004,
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
Charm Physics Potential at BESIII Kanglin He Jan. 2004, Beijing
Measurements of Top Quark Properties at Run II of the Tevatron Erich W.Varnes University of Arizona for the CDF and DØ Collaborations International Workshop.
03/19/2006 Md. Naimuddin 1 B s Mixing at the Tevatron Md. Naimuddin (on behalf of CDF and D0 collaboration) University of Delhi Recontres de Moriond 19.
1 EPS2003, Aachen Nikos Varelas ELECTROWEAK & HIGGS PHYSICS AT DØ Nikos Varelas University of Illinois at Chicago for the DØ Collaboration
3/13/2005Sergey Burdin Moriond QCD1 Sergey Burdin (Fermilab) XXXXth Moriond QCD 3/13/05 Bs Mixing, Lifetime Difference and Rare Decays at Tevatron.
Lukens - 1 Fermilab Seminar – July, 2011 Observation of the  b 0 Patrick T. Lukens Fermilab for the CDF Collaboration July 2011.
B Masses and Lifetimes at the Tevatron Satoru Uozumi University of Tsukuba Duke University.
Chunhui Chen, University of Pennsylvania 1 Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the Tevatron Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the.
Paul Balm - EPS July 17, 2003 Towards CP violation results from DØ Paul Balm, NIKHEF (for the DØ collaboration) EPS meeting July 2003, Aachen This.
Hot Topics at D0 David Buchholz (Northwestern Univ) On behalf of the DØ Collaboration.
M. Herndon, Illinois HETEP Seminar March Search for FCNC Decays B s(d) → μ  μ - Matthew Herndon, University of Wisconsin Madison University of Illinois.
SUSY Searches at the Tevatron Rencontres de Moriond, QCD March 2006 Else Lytken, Purdue University for the CDF and D0 collaborations.
Sinéad M. Farrington University of Liverpool for the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty st June 2005 Rare Decays at the Tevatron.
1 Sinéad M. Farrington University of Oxford for the CDF Collaboration HQL 15 th October 2010 Rare B and D Decays at CDF.
Properties of B c Meson On behalf of DØ Collaboration Dmitri Tsybychev, SUNY at Stony Brook, PANIC05, Santa Fe, New Mexico B c is ground state of bc system.
RECENT RESULTS FROM THE TEVATRON AND LHC Suyong Choi Korea University.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
Searches for rare B s Decays with the DØ Detector Ralf Bernhard University of Zürich Ra Interview May 16 th 2006.
B Production Cross Sections and Fragmentation Fractions at LHCb Laurence Carson (University of Santiago de Compostela) on behalf of the LHCb collaboration.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Julia Thom, FNALEPS 2003 Aachen Rare Charm and B decays at CDF Julia Thom FNAL EPS 7/18/2003 Tevatron/CDF Experiment Decay Rate Ratios and CP Asymmetries.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
Penny Kasper Fermilab Heavy Quarkonium Workshop 21 June Upsilon production DØ Penny Kasper Fermilab (DØ collaboration) 29 June 2006 Heavy Quarkonium.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
Rare decays of charm & bottom atTevatron  Introduction  Tevatron  CDF & DØ Detector  Rare charm decays  Rare bottom decays  Summary & Conclusions.
Michael Milnik (University of Karlsruhe) for the CDF Collaboration Search for Rare b-Hadron Decays at CDF II HEP 2007, Manchester.
Sinéad M. Farrington University of Liverpool for the CDF Collaboration ICHEP 28 th July 2006 Rare B Decays at CDF.
Jessica Levêque Rencontres de Moriond QCD 2006 Page 1 Measurement of Top Quark Properties at the TeVatron Jessica Levêque University of Arizona on behalf.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Recent D0 results on Quarkonium HAN, Liang Univ. of Science & Technology of China Univ. of Manchester presenting D0 Collaboration ( commented by Rick Van.
Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton Final State at the CDF Detector Karen Bland [ ] Department of Physics,
1/16 Arnold Pompoš, Lisbon, Portugal, July 22, 2005.
7/7/06Jason Rieger BEACH 2006 Rare B Decays at the Tevatron Jason Rieger, Indiana University On behalf of the DØ and CDF collaborations BEACH 2006.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
K. Holubyev HEP2007, Manchester, UK, July 2007 CP asymmetries at D0 Kostyantyn Holubyev (Lancaster University) representing D0 collaboration HEP2007,
Suyong Choi (SKKU) SUSY Standard Model Higgs Searches at DØ Suyong Choi SKKU, Korea for DØ Collaboration.
A Search for Higgs Decaying to WW (*) at DØ presented by Amber Jenkins Imperial College London on behalf of the D  Collaboration Meeting of the Division.
1 Rare B Decays At CDF Michael Weinberger (Texas A&M University ) For the CDF Collaboration DPF 2006 November 1, 2006.
Heavy Flavor Results from CMS
Searches for rare Bs Decays with the DØ Detector
B  at B-factories Guglielmo De Nardo Universita’ and INFN Napoli
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb-1
Presentation transcript:

Search for Rare Decays of the B S Meson at the Tevatron Ralf Bernhard University of Zurich XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD 19 th March 2006

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, Outline  Motivation for rare decays  Tevatron  CDF & DØ Detector  Search for the Decay B s → μ + μ -  Search for the Decay B s →  μ + μ -  Summary & Conclusions

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, Purely leptonic B decay  B->l + l - decay is helicity suppressed FCNC  SM: BR(B s ->     ) ~ 3.4   depends only on one SM operator in effective Hamiltonian, hadronic uncertainties small  B d relative to B s suppressed by |V td /V ts | 2 ~ 0.04 if no additional sources of flavor violation  reaching SM sensitivity: present limit for B s ->  +  - comes closest to SM value Br(B d  l + l - )Br(B s  l + l - ) l = e3.4 × × l= μ 1.0 × × l= τ 3.1 × × SM expectations: C.L. 90% Br(B d  l + l - )Br(B s  l + l - ) l = e< 6.1 ·10 -8 < 5.4 ·10 -5 l= μ < 8.3 ·10 -8 <1.5 x l= τ < 2.5%< 5.0% Current published limits:

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, Purely leptonic B decay  excellent probe for many new physics models  particularly sensitive to models w/ extended Higgs sector  BR grows ~tan 6  in MSSM  2HDM models ~ tan 4   mSUGRA: BR enhancement correlated with shift of (g-2)   also, testing ground for  minimal SO(10) GUT models  R p violating models, contributions at tree level  (neutralino) dark matter … Two-Higgs Doublet models: R p violating:

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, Tevatron performance  excellent performance of Tevatron in 2005 and early 2006  machine delivered more than 1500 pb -1 up to now !!  recorded (DØ/CDF)  1.2/1.4 fb -1  record luminosity of 1.7  cm -2 /s in January 2006  high data taking efficiency ~85%  current dataset reconstructed and under analysis  ~1000 pb -1  compare with ~100 pb -1 Run I

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, CDF detector  Silicon Tracker SVX  up to |  <2.0  SVX fast r-  readout for trigger  Drift Chamber  96 layers in |  |<1  particle ID with dE/dx  r-  readout for trigger  tracking immersed in Solenoid 1.4T  Time of Flight  → particle ID

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, DØ detector  2T Solenoid  hermetic forward & central muon detectors  excellent coverage |  |<2  Fiber Tracker  8 double layers  Silicon Detector  up to |  <2.5

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, B production at the Tevatron  bb cross section orders of magnitude larger than at B-factories  (4S) or Z σ (pp → bb) = 150 μ b at 2TeV σ (e + e - → Z → bb) = 7nb σ (e + e - → Υ (4S) → bb) = 1nb  all kinds of b hadrons produced:  B d, B s, B c, B**,  b,  b, …  However:  QCD background overwhelming, b- hadrons hidden in 10 3 larger background  events complicated, efficient trigger and reliable tracking necessary  crucial for B physics program:  good vertexing & tracking  triggers w/ large bandwidth, strong background rejection  muon system w/ good coverage Lots going on in Si detector e.g., integrated cross sections for |y|<1:  (B +, p T  6 GeV/c)~4  b

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, “classical” triggers: robust and quiet di-muon and single- muon triggers working horse for masses, lifetimes, rare decays etc. keys to B physics program at DØ “advanced” triggers using silicon vertex detectors exploit long lifetime of heavy quarks displaced track + leptons for semileptonic modes two-track trigger (CDF) – all hadronic mode two oppositely charged tracks with impact parameter p T (B)  5 GeV L xy  450  m Decay length L xy Triggers for B physics

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, Experimental search  CDF:  780 pb -1 di-muon triggered data  two separate search channels  central/central muons  central/forward muons  extract B s and B d limit  DØ:  240 pb -1 (update 300 pb -1 ) di-muon triggered data (limit)  Combined sensitivity for 700 pb -1 of recorded data (300 pb pb -1 )  both experiments:  blind analysis to avoid experimenter’s bias  side bands for background determination  use B + -> J/  K + as normalization mode  J/  ->     cancels     selection efficiencies blinded signal region: DØ: < m  < GeV/c 2 ; ±2  wide,  =90 MeV CDF: < m  < GeV/c 2 ; covering B d and B s ;  =25 MeV

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, Pre-selection  Pre-selection DØ:  4.5 < m  < 7.0 GeV/c 2  muon quality cuts  p T (  )>2.5 GeV/c  (  )| < 2  p T (B s cand.)>5.0 GeV/c  good vertex  Pre-Selection CDF:  < m  < GeV/c 2  muon quality cuts  p T (  )>2.0 (2.2) GeV/c CMU (CMX)  p T (B s cand.)>4.0 GeV/c  (B s )| < 1  good vertex  3D displacement L 3D between primary and secondary vertex  (L 3D )<150  m  proper decay length 0 < < 0.3 cm e.g. DØ: about 38k events after pre-selection Potential sources of background: continuum  Drell-Yan sequential semi-leptonic b->c->s decays double semi-leptonic bb->  X b/c->  x+fake fake + fake 300 pb -1

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, Optimization I  DØ:  optimize cuts on three discriminating variables  angle between     and decay length vector (pointing consistency)  transverse decay length significance (B s has lifetime): L xy / σ (L xy )  isolation in cone around B s candidate  Random Grid Search  maximize  /(1.+  B)

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, Optimization II  CDF: discriminating variables  pointing angle between     and decay length vector  isolation in cone around B s candidate  proper decay length probability p( ) = exp(-  Bs )  construct likelihood ratio to optimize on “expected upper limit”

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, Unblinding the signal region  CDF:  central/central: observe 1, expect 0.88 ± 0.30  Central/forward: observe 0, expect 0.39 ± 0.21  DØ ( 300 pb -1 ):  observe 4, expect 4.3 ± 1.2 CDF

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, DØ Sensitivity 1f b -1 Expect 2.2 ± 0.7 background events Cut Values changed only slightly! Used in previous analysis Used now in addition! Obtain a sensitivity (w/o unblinding) w/o changing the analysis Combine “old” Limit with obtained sensitivity

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, Normalization  relative normalization is done to B + -> J/  K +  advantages:     selection efficiency same  high statistics  BR well known  disadvantages:  fragmentation b->B u vs. b-> B s  DØ: apply same values of discriminating cuts on this mode  CDF: no likelihood cut on this mode 300 pb -1

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, Master equation  R = BR(B d )/BR(B s ) is small due to |V td /V ts |^2  B + /  Bs relative efficiency of normalization to signal channel  Bd /  Bs relative efficiency for B d ->      versus B s ->     events in B s search channel (for CDF~0, for DØ ~0.95)  f s /f u fragmentation ratio (in case of B s limit) - use world average with 15% uncertainty

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, The present (individual) limits  DØ mass resolution is not sufficient to separate B s from B d. Assume no B d contribution (conservative)  CDF sets separate limits on B s & B d channels  all limits below are 95% C.L. Bayesian incl. sys. error, DØ also quotes FC limit B d limit x3 better than published Babar limit w/ 111 fb -1 CDF B s ->  176 pb ×10 -7 Published DØ B s ->  240 pb ×10 -7 Published DØ B s ->  300 pb ×10 -7 Prelim. DØ  700 pb -1 Prelim. Sensitivity CDF B s ->  364 pb ×10 -7 Published CDF B s ->  780 pb ×10 -7 Prelim. CDF B d ->  364 pb ×10 -8 Published CDF B d ->  780 pb ×10 -8 Prelim.

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, Search for B s ->  +  -  long-term goal: investigate b -> s l + l - FCNC transitions in B s meson  exclusive decay: B s ->  +  -  SM prediction:  short distance BR: ~1.6×10 -6  about 30% uncertainty due to B->  form factor  2HDM: enhancement possible, depending on parameters for tan  and M H+  presently only one published limit  CDF Run I: 6.7×10 95% C.L.

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, Search for B s ->   +  -  DØ: 300 pb -1 of dimuon data  normalize to resonant decay B s -> J/   cut on mass region 0.5 < M(  ) < 4.4 GeV/c 2 excluding J/  &  ’  two good muons, p t > 2.5 GeV/c  two additional oppositely charged tracks p t >0.5 GeV/c for   candidate in mass range < M(  ) < GeV/c 2  good vertex  p t (B s cand.) > 5 GeV/c  non-resonant decay: cut out J/  and  ’ Dilepton mass spectrum in b -> s l l decay J/  ’’

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, Search for B s ->   +  -  Blind analysis: optimization with following variables in random grid search  Pointing angle  Decay length significance  Isolation  Background modeled from sidebands  Use resonant decay B s -> J/  with same cuts as normalization  Gaussian fit with quadratic background: 73 ± 10 ± 4 B s -> J/  resonant decays

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, Limit on B s ->   +  -  expected background from sidebands: 1.6 ± 0.4 events  observe zero events in signal region BR(B s ->     )/BR(B s -> J  ) < 4.4 × 10 95% C.L. Using central value for BR(B s -> J  ) = 9.3×10 -4 PDG2004: BR(B s ->     ) < 4.1×10 95% C.L. x10 improvement w.r.t previous limit

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, Conclusions  CDF & DØ provide world best limits on purely leptonic decays B d,s ->      limit important to constrain new physics  With more statistics to come enhance exclusion power/discovery potential for new physics  Improved DØ limit on exclusive B s ->  +  -  decay shown, about 2x above SM  Tevatron is doubling statistics every year - stay tuned for many more exciting results on B physics R. Dermisek et al., hep-ph/ (2005)

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, SPARE

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, Future Prospects for B s ->      assuming unchanged analysis techniques and reconstruction and trigger efficiencies are unaffected with increasing luminosity  for 8fb -1 /experiment an exclusion at 90%C.L. down to 2  is possible  both experiments pursue further improvements in their analysis

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, Tevatron limit combination I  fragmentation ratio b->B s /b->B u,d  standard PDG value as default  Tevatron only fragmentation (from CDF) improves limit by 15%  uncorrelated uncertainties:  uncertainty on eff. ratio  uncertainty on background  correlated uncertainties:  BR of B ± -> J/  (->  ) K ±  fragmentation ratio b->B s /b->B u, d  quote also an average expected upper limit and single event sensitivity hep-ex/ DØ has larger acceptance due to better  coverage, CDF has greater sensitivity due to lower background expectations

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, Combination II  combined CDF & DØ limit:  BR(B s ->     )     ) < 1.2 (1.5) × 10 90% (95%) C.L.  world-best limit, only factor 35 away from SM  important to constrain models of new physics at tan   e.g. mSO(10) model is severely constraint Example: SO(10) symmetry breaking model Contours of constant Br(B s  μ + μ - ) R. Dermisek et al. hep-ph/

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, FCNC & new physics  flavor-changing neutral current processes  in SM forbidden at tree level  at higher order occur through box- and penguin diagrams  sensitive to virtual particles in loop, thus can discern new physics  GIM-suppression for down-type quarks relaxed due to large top mass  observable SM rates lead to tight constraints of new physics  corresponding charm decays are less scrutinized and largely unexplored  smaller BRs, more suppressed by GIM-mechanism, long-distance effects also dominating  nevertheless large window to observe new physics beyond SM exists: R p -violating models, little Higgs models w/ up-like vector quark etc.

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, Systematic uncertainties  systematics for DØ (CDF very similar)  efficiency ratio determined from MC with checks in data on trigger/tracking etc.  large uncertainty due to fragmentation ratio  background uncertainty from interpolating fit

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, expected limit B s ->  +  -   expected limit at 95% C.L. for B s ->  +  - 

Ralf P. Bernhard – XLIst Rencontres de Moriond QCD - March 19, Constraining dark matter  mSUGRA model: strong correlation between BR(B s ->     ) with neutralino dark matter cross section especially for large tan   constrain neutralino cross section with less than, within and greater than 2  of WMAP relic density universal Higgs mass parameters non-universal Higgs mass Parameters,  H u =1,  H d =-1 S. Baek et al., JHEP 0502 (2005) 067