Monitoring aerosols in China with AATSR Anu-Maija Sundström 2 Gerrit de Leeuw 1 Pekka Kolmonen 1, and Larisa Sogacheva 1 AMFIC. 24.6.2009, Barcelona 1:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds
Advertisements

A Methodology for Simultaneous Retrieval of Ice and Liquid Water Cloud Properties O. Sourdeval 1, L. C.-Labonnote 2, A. J. Baran 3, G. Brogniez 2 1 – Institute.
UPRM Lidar lab for atmospheric research 1- Cross validation of solar radiation using remote sensing equipment & GOES Lidar and Ceilometer validation.
Gerrit de Leeuw 1,2,3, Larisa Sogacheva1, Pekka Kolmonen 1, Anu-Maija Sundström 2, Edith Rodriguez 1 1 FMI, Climate Change Unit, Helsinki, Finland 2 Univ.
GEOS-5 Simulations of Aerosol Index and Aerosol Absorption Optical Depth with Comparison to OMI retrievals. V. Buchard, A. da Silva, P. Colarco, R. Spurr.
A Dictionary of Aerosol Remote Sensing Terms Richard Kleidman SSAI/NASA Goddard Lorraine Remer UMBC / JCET Short.
Junwei Xu 1 Randall V. Martin 1,2, Jhoon Kim 3, Myungje Choi 3, Qiang Zhang 4, Guannan Geng 4, Yang Liu 5, Zongwei Ma 5,6, Lei Huang 6, Yuxuan Wang 4,7.
Aerosol radiative effects from satellites Gareth Thomas Nicky Chalmers, Caroline Poulsen, Ellie Highwood, Don Grainger Gareth Thomas - NCEO/CEOI-ST Joint.
Constraining aerosol sources using MODIS backscattered radiances Easan Drury - G2
Improvement and validation of OMI NO 2 observations over complex terrain A contribution to ACCENT-TROPOSAT-2, Task Group 3 Yipin Zhou, Dominik Brunner,
European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2006 Vienna, Austria, 02 – 07 April 2006 Paper’s objectives: 1. Contribute to the validation of MODIS aerosol.
Xin Kong, Lizzie Noyes, Gary Corlett, John Remedios, Simon Good and David Llewellyn-Jones Earth Observation Science, Space Research Centre, University.
Assimilation of Aerosol Optical Depth Gé Verver 1, Bas Henzing 1, Peter van Velthoven 1 Cristina Robles-Gonzalez 2, Gerrit de Leeuw 2 1 KNMI, De Bilt,
Development of the SEVIRI Aerosol Retrieval Algorithm (SARA) Aerosol retrievals using MSG-SEVIRI images Y.S. Bennouna and G. de Leeuw.
Dr. Natalia Chubarova Faculty of Geography, Moscow State University, , Moscow, Russia, 2012 Gregory G. Leptoukh Online Giovanni.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
Dust Detection in MODIS Image Spectral Thresholds based on Zhao et al., 2010 Pawan Gupta NASA Goddard Space Flight Center GEST/University of Maryland Baltimore.
Aerosol-cci: WP2220: Cloud mask comparison Gerrit de Leeuw.
Imperial College - 19 Feb DESERT DUST SATELLITE RETRIEVAL INTERCOMPARISON Elisa Carboni 1, G.Thomas 1, A.Sayer 1, C.Poulsen 2, D.Grainger 1, R.Siddans.
Visualization, Exploration, and Model Comparison of NASA Air Quality Remote Sensing data via Giovanni Ana I. Prados, Gregory Leptoukh, Arun Gopalan, and.
EARLINET and Satellites: Partners for Aerosol Observations Matthias Wiegner Universität München Meteorologisches Institut (Satellites: spaceborne passive.
Developing a High Spatial Resolution Aerosol Optical Depth Product Using MODIS Data to Evaluate Aerosol During Large Wildfire Events STI-5701 Jennifer.
DUP-TEMIS WP2.6 Regional Aerosol Gerrit de Leeuw, FMI/UHEL/TNO Pekka Kolmonen, FMI Robin Schoemaker, TNO.
Determination of aerosol components from multiwavelength/depolarization measurements Nobuo SUGIMOTO, Tomoaki Nishizawa, and Atsushi Shimizu National Institute.
Algorithms and chemical data assimilation activities at Environment Canada Chris McLinden Air Quality Research Division, Environment Canada 2 nd TEMPO.
EUMETSAT METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CONFERENCE 15/09/2013 – 20/09/2013, VIENNA EUMETSAT METEOROLOGICAL SATELLITE CONFERENCE 15/09/2013 – 20/09/2013, VIENNA.
AMFIC: Aerosol retrieval Gerrit de Leeuw, FMI/UHEL/TNO Pekka Kolmonen, FMI Anu-Maija Sundström, UHEL Larisa Sogacheva, UHEL Juha-Pekka Luntama, FMI Sini.
AMFIC third progress meeting MariLiza Koukouli & Dimitris Balis Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Operational assimilation of dust optical depth Bruce Ingleby, Yaswant Pradhan and Malcolm Brooks © Crown copyright 08/2013 Met Office and the Met Office.
AMFIC final meeting LAP/Auth validation activities Dimitris Balis & MariLiza Koukouli Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Aristeidis K. Georgoulias Konstantinos Kourtidis Konstantinos Konstantinidis AMFIC Web Data Base AMFIC Annual Meeting - Beijing October 2008 Democritus.
Assessment of aerosol plume dispersion products and their usefulness to improve models between satellite aerosol retrieval and surface PM2.5  Chowdhury.
Aerosol Optical Depth during the Northern CA Fires of 2008 In situ aerosol light scattering and absorption measurements in Reno Nevada, 2008, indicated.
DEVELOPING HIGH RESOLUTION AOD IMAGING COMPATIBLE WITH WEATHER FORECAST MODEL OUTPUTS FOR PM2.5 ESTIMATION Daniel Vidal, Lina Cordero, Dr. Barry Gross.
Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium Validation of the method to retrieve the AOD and first preliminary results of the aerosol measurements campaign.
POLAR MULTI-SENSOR AEROSOL PROPERTIES OVER LAND Michael Grzegorski, Rosemary Munro, Gabriele Poli, Andriy Holdak and Ruediger Lang.
QA filtering of individual pixels to enable a more accurate validation of aerosol products Maksym Petrenko Presented at MODIS Collection 7 and beyond Retreat.
Fog- and cloud-induced aerosol modification observed by the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Thomas F. Eck (Code 618 NASA GSFC) and Brent N. Holben (Code.
Numerical simulations of optical properties of nonspherical dust aerosols using the T-matrix method Hyung-Jin Choi School.
Timothy Logan University of North Dakota Department of Atmospheric Science.
As components of the GOES-R ABI Air Quality products, a multi-channel algorithm similar to MODIS/VIIRS for NOAA’s next generation geostationary satellite.
Data was collected from various instruments. AOD values come from our ground Radiometer (AERONET) The Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL) height is collected.
Synergy of MODIS Deep Blue and Operational Aerosol Products with MISR and SeaWiFS N. Christina Hsu and S.-C. Tsay, M. D. King, M.-J. Jeong NASA Goddard.
Introduction 1. Advantages and difficulties related to the use of optical data 2. Aerosol retrieval and comparison methodology 3. Results of the comparison.
Evaluation of OMI total column ozone with four different algorithms SAO OE, NASA TOMS, KNMI OE/DOAS Juseon Bak 1, Jae H. Kim 1, Xiong Liu 2 1 Pusan National.
Improving MISR-retrieved Aerosol Properties Using GOCART Simulations Yang Liu, PhD June 3, 2015 St. Louis, MO.
High Resolution MODIS Aerosols Observations over Cities: Long Term Trends and Air Quality.
Daily observation of dust aerosols infrared optical depth and altitude from IASI and AIRS and comparison with other satellite instruments Christoforos.
DODO RESULTS: Campaign Averages & BAe-146 Nephelometer Findings Claire McConnell Ellie Highwood Acknowledgements: Paola Formenti, Met Office, FAAM.
CM-SAF Board Meeting, Helsinki, September 2006 CM-SAF TOA radiation status report D. Caprion Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.
AEROCOM AODs are systematically smaller than MODIS, with slightly larger/smaller differences in winter/summer. Aerosol optical properties are difficult.
QWG-10 – 4-6 February 2013 – ESRIN (Italy) SMOS Level3 and Level 4 Research Products Provided by the Barcelona Expert Center Jordi Font and BEC team SMOS.
Estimation of the contribution of mineral dust to the total aerosol depth: Particular focus on Atlantic Ocean G. Myhre, A. Grini, T.K. Berntsen, T.F. Berglen,
Modeling the emission, transport, and optical properties of Asian dust storms using coupled CAM/CARMA model Lin Su and Owen B. Toon Laboratory for Atmospheric.
Aerosol Pattern over Southern North America Tropospheric Aerosols: Science and Decisions in an International Community A NARSTO Technical Symposium on.
New Aerosol Models for Ocean Color Retrievals Zia Ahmad NASA-Ocean Biology Processing Group (OBPG) MODIS Meeting May 18-20, 2011.
Page 1 © Crown copyright 2004 Aircraft observations of Biomass burning aerosol Ben Johnson, Simon Osborne & Jim Haywood AMMA SOP0 Meeting, Exeter, 15 th.
Lorraine Remer, Yoram Kaufman, Didier Tanré Shana Mattoo, Richard Kleidman, Robert Levy Vanderlei Martins, Allen Chu, Charles Ichoku, Rong-Rong Li, Ilan.
Horizontal variability of aerosol optical properties observed during the ARCTAS airborne experiment Yohei Shinozuka 1*, Jens Redemann 1, Phil Russell 2,
ESA :DRAGON/ EU :AMFIC Air quality Monitoring and Forecasting In China Ronald van der A, KNMI Bas Mijling, KNMI Hennie Kelder KNMI, TUE DRAGON /AMFIC project.
Retrieving sources of fine aerosols from MODIS/AERONET observations by inverting GOCART model INVERSION: Oleg Dubovik 1 Tatyana Lapyonok 1 Tatyana Lapyonok.
Challenge the future Corresponding author: Delft University of Technology Collocated OMI DOMINO and MODIS Aqua aerosol products.
Fourth TEMPO Science Team Meeting
Extinction measurements
DOAS workshop 2015, Brussels, July 2015
Daytime variations of AOD and PM2
Near UV aerosol products
Remote Sensing of Aerosols
Remote Sensing of Aerosols
Using dynamic aerosol optical properties from a chemical transport model (CTM) to retrieve aerosol optical depths from MODIS reflectances over land Fall.
Presentation transcript:

Monitoring aerosols in China with AATSR Anu-Maija Sundström 2 Gerrit de Leeuw 1 Pekka Kolmonen 1, and Larisa Sogacheva 1 AMFIC , Barcelona 1: Finnish Meteorological Institute 2: University of Helsinki

Presentation outline  A short overview of the current AATSR aerosol algorithm over land  Comparison with the AERONET data  Datasets and the Web page

The AATSR Dual View (ADV) algorithm Used to monitor aerosol optical properties over land The algorithm exploits the AATSR measurements made in two viewing angles (nadir and 55° forward ) to exclude the surface contribution from the measured TOA-reflectance. Over ocean a single view algorithm is used The retrieved parameters include aerosol optical depth at 555, 659, and 1600 nm wave lengths, mixing ratio and Ångström coefficient at 1x1 km2 resolution. 55

New implementations Modified linear-mixing method After Abdou et al., 1997 To reduce the AOD overestimation by AATSR Interpolation between the AOD levels Several new aerosol models (Dubovik et al. 2002, Levy et al. 2007) Based on AERONET observations (Dubovik et al. 2002, Levy et al. 2007) Current status of the ADV algorithm

Aerosol models Fine mode models (r eff ~ 0.1 µm) Sulphate type aerosol Industrial pollution Dirty pollution Coarse mode models (r eff ~1 µm) Neutral Mineral type aerosol In each retrieval two aerosol model are mixed The best mixture for each case (pixel) is found by the least squares method in the iteration procedure.

Comparison with the AERONET measurements The goal is to find the most plausible aerosol models for large dataset processing. Available AERONET stations are centered either around Beijing or Shanghai area. large interesting areas remain still uncovered. Studied months (Mar.-Nov. 2008) are selected by the availability of the AERONET-data. Beijing, XiangHe, Xin- glong Hefei, NUIST, Shouxian, Qiandaohu, LA-TM, Hangzhou, and Ningbo

1.5 and 2.0 level AERONET-data is used The monthly number of collocated AATSR and AERONET observations can vary a lot. Since the retrieved AODs can vary depending on which aerosol models are used, the AATSR retrievals for each AERONET station are done with all the possible combinations of the five models.

On average the best agreement with the AERONET AOD at the Beijing area was obtained with the combination of industrial or dirty pollution and neutral coarse model aerosol. During the summer months the mixing ratio for fine particles was about 100% best agreement was obtained with a mixture of sulphate and dirty or industrial pollution. the best agreement was obtained with a mixture of sulphate and dirty or industrial pollution.   To some degree the best aerosol model combinations depended on the location (urban, rural) and season and/or the origin of the airflow. AOD 555nm Note different scales

At Shanghai area the fine mode fraction was near 100% most of the time with the exception of the summer months. During the summer months, the industrial pollution combined with the neutral coarse model was mainly the optimal combination. Hangzhou City Qiandaohu AOD 555 nm

The AATSR ADV retrieval algorithm works for a wide range of AODs and for different aerosol types.

Dust and smog episodes has been shown to be extremely di ffi cult cases for the di ff erent satellite algorithms, also for the AATSR ADV. RGB-compositeBT 11 microns - BT12 microns  The dense dust plume over Beijing (Mar 2008) was almost completely missed by the algorithm.  We are testing alternative methods for detecting dust.  For the smog episodes, the best agreement was obtained with dirty pollution and sulphate aerosol.  The AATSR AOD pattern is correctly retrieved but the absolute values remain underestimated.

Based on the results from collocated AATSR-AERONET comparisons, the combination of industrial pollution – neutral coarse mode aerosol was selected to the larger dataset processing.

Datasets and Web-page AATSR retrievals over China are produced for Mar-Nov 2008 (dataset 1.0) Figures: AOD at 555 nm with 1x1 km 2 resolution Retrievals for specific AERONET stations as a 25 km x 25 km spatial averages. Web page: Web page:

First 13 letters in the file name refer to the AATSR aerosol model Contents: Aeronet sitename, Year, Month, Day, Hour, Minute AOD 555 nm, std AOD555, AOD 659 nm, std AOD659, AOD 1600 nm, std AOD1600, mixratio1 and std mixratio1 AATSR data is being collected from 25x25 km2 AOD distributions. AATSR data point has to be closer than 12.5 km to an Aeronet site to be accepted. Hangzhou_City Hangzhou_City Hangzhou_City Hefei Hefei Hefei Hefei LA-TM LA-TM LA-TM LA-TM Ningbo Ningbo Ningbo Ningbo Qiandaohu Qiandaohu

Conclusions The AATSR ADV- algorithm is able to retrieve AODs over China in highly di ff erent situations. Anthropogenic fine mode aerosol components dominate the ADV retrieval. Smog and dust cases are difficult as for all satellite instruments, and lead to underestimation of AATSR AOD. Dataset 1.0 is available at the web-page Figures of the AOD pattern at 555 nm at 1x1 km 2 resolution Data for specific AERONET stations. The dataset is updated regularly Article submitted to Remote Sensing of Environment, AATSR Special Issue