Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
USING THE INSTRUCTIONAL BLUEPRINT TO GUIDE TIER I WORK.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Campus Improvement Plans
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
School-Level Literacy Plans ERT Training - Session 2 October 23, 2007 (C) 2007 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
Using Core, Supplemental, and Intervention Reading Programs to Meet the Needs of All Learners Carrie Thomas Beck, Ph.D. Oregon Reading First Center COSA.
Response to Intervention: Getting Started Traci Seils Literacy/Dyslexia/MRT
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Oregon Department of Education Sustaining K-3 Literacy Momentum Forum Salem, Oregon September 28, 2007.
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
Unit 8: Tests, Training, and Exercises Unit Introduction and Overview Unit objectives:  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises. 
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Schoolwide Planning, Part III: Strategic Action Planning
Cohort B Leadership Session March 3, 2008 Agenda.
Using Targeted Interventions to Support School Improvement Presenter: Kathleen Smith Director Office of School Improvement.
ACTION PLANNING. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: List the goals of Action Planning Explain the Action Planning.
Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Module 4: Unit 2, Session 2 MODULE 4: TIERED INSTRUCTION Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 2, Session 2.
Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.
School Leadership Teams Collaborating for Effectiveness Begin to answer Questions #1-2 on the Handout: School Leadership Teams for Continuous Improvement.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
Data Summit July 27, 2012 Stephanie Smyka RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION.
Team Choice Activity What would it be like to present to the school board and district leadership? 1.Need for a District Leadership Implementation Team.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
1 SINA Implementation Action Plan Professional Development Assessment Evaluation Questions Requires ongoing Specifies Monitors Student Success Teacher.
Company LOGO Professional Development in the Zone Organizational Meeting January 13, 2005.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
RTI: Response To Instruction NEA NH Presentation Madison Elementary School
Draft TIP for E-rate. What is E-rate? The E-rate provides discounts to assist schools and libraries in the United States to obtain affordable telecommunications.
Grant Writer’s Workshop Oregon Reading First Overview of Request for Proposals January 7, 2003 Holiday Inn Portland Airport The Oregon Department of Education:
Ingham ISD RtI District Leadership Team March 8, 2010.
CSI Maps Randee Winterbottom & Tricia Curran Assessment Programs Florida Center for Reading Research.
Senior Capstone Experience Framework A Guide for South Dakota Schools.
Inclusion: Effective Practices for All Students, 1e McLeskey/Rosenberg/Westling © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved What.
Response to Intervention: Core Components and Resources Related to Implementation Marie Fisher March 3, 2012.
QUALITY OF THE MANAGEMENT PLAN 15 Points (recommend 5 pages)
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Choice Activity What would it be like to present to the school board and district leadership? 1.The need for an EBISS District Leadership Implementation.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
1 Monitoring and Revising the Title I, Part A, Schoolwide Plan Title I University March 11, 2015 Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration.
Collaboration. © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2  Collaboration refers to “ongoing participation of two or more individuals who are.
Birmingham Primary Strategy Team Subject Leader Training Session 4 Leading Improvement.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Response to Instruction and Intervention and how it could apply to High Achievers/Gifted Education Tanya Morret, Dr. Christine.
USING RTI TO IMPROVE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN LITERACY A Report to Our Stakeholders TEMPLATE to fill in/ add to/ delete as you see fit! SCHOOL NAME– Board.
Office of School Improvement Contractor Update Division Leadership Support Team Meeting The College of William and Mary March 31, 2014.
RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.
The Prevention That Avoids Intervention ORTIi
All readers by 3rd grade Guidance for the Use of Diagnostic
Overview: Understanding and Building a Schoolwide Assessment Plan
School-Level Literacy Plans
RTI: Response To Instruction
Response To Instruction
Presentation transcript:

Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details Provides details on how school will apply the key components identified in the plan’s introduction. Using an Example Throughout this presentation we will be referring to the sample plan for Oregon Elementary to provide explicit examples for each component of the Schoolwide Reading Plan. 2

Part 1: Introduction (K-3) The introduction should clearly state school’s commitment to reading instruction K-3 and the role of key components. Why is early reading instruction and achievement important to the school? How will each component in the school’s reading model help meet the reading goals? How will the school use the literacy plan? 3

Goals Assessment Instruction Leadership Professional Development Commitment 4 Key components suggested by the Oregon Literacy Framework

How will the components in your school’s reading model (or those identified in the OLF) help meet the reading goals? For example… ◦ What are the reading goals for the school? ◦ Why are assessments necessary and how will they be implemented and used? ◦ How much time will be devoted to instruction? Which core program(s) will be used and what supplemental or intervention services will be offered for which students? 5

How will the components in your school’s reading model (or those identified in the OLF) help meet the reading goals? (continued) ◦ Why is leadership important to your school? Who are the leaders supporting reading instruction, and how will they work together to support achievement of the reading goals? ◦ For what and to what degree will professional development be provided? How often and for what purposes will staff communicate about reading instruction (at the school, class, and student levels)? ◦ How will leadership and staff ensure an ongoing commitment to quality reading instruction? 6

Part 2: Component Details (K-3) The component details describe how you will accomplish the tasks identified in the introduction. We recommend this section be organized by component. NOTE: Use the prompts provided here as a starting point to create a plan that fits your school’s literacy context and vision. 7

Component 1. Goals State the school’s primary reading goal Specify formative reading goals for each grade Outline school-level “overall improvement” goals 8

Example: Oregon Elementary The goals for Oregon Elementary School appear on page 4 of their Literacy Action Plan. 9

Component 2. Assessment State why each type of reading assessment is administered. Provide information about each measure you will use. Describe the structure of reading assessments at your school. Describe the process by which data will be used to make instructional decisions. 10

Example: Oregon Elementary Example: Oregon Elementary Information about the measures used to monitor and evaluate student progress at Oregon Elementary is provided on pages 5-10 of their Schoolwide Reading Plan. This plan outlines the four types of assessments the school proposes to use: screening, progress monitoring, diagnostic, and end-of-year outcome measures. All of the information described on the previous slide is provided for each type of assessment Information about how the data will be used is also provided. 11

Component 3. Instruction Sufficient time for reading instruction How will additional materials— supplemental materials, intervention programs—be used? How funded? What affects program/material selection and use? What programs have already been selected and what are their essential elements? 12

Example: Oregon Elementary The instructional plan for Oregon Elementary appears on pages In addition to information about the programs used (p. 12), the following information is also provided: ◦ Length of the reading block ◦ Start/End dates for reading instruction ◦ Lesson pacing goals for each program being implemented ◦ Criteria for identifying those in need of additional support and small group formation ◦ How fidelity of program implementation will be monitored ◦ How special populations of students will be served 13

Component 4. Leadership State why leadership is important in the implementation of strong reading instruction. Discuss key leadership positions (roles, funding, scope). Discuss how services will be coordinated and integrated for students. Discuss grade-level and early reading teams. Leaders in the school are ultimately responsible for implementation. 14

Example: Oregon Elementary The Schoolwide Reading Plan for Oregon Elementary includes the following information related to reading leadership on pages 14-18: ◦ Principal’s roles and responsibilities ◦ Instructional/Literacy coach’s roles and responsibilities ◦ Information about grade level and building level literacy teams (e.g., members, frequency of meetings, how meetings will be supported, etc.) 15

Component 5. Professional Development (PD) Why is PD important and for whom will it be provided? ◦ tie to reading assessments and instructional programs and materials ◦ explain how PD might be differentiated Be explicit about PD resources and your commitment to PD. Explain the role of follow-up and adequate support. Describe the PD role of the reading coach or other designated building leaders. 16

Example: Oregon Elementary Professional development plan for Oregon Elementary is outlined in pages and specifically addresses the following: ◦ Process for determining PD needs ◦ The types of PD that will be made available to different staff members (including, in some cases, the designated PD provider, and the length and time of training) ◦ Schedule for PD opportunities ◦ Funding sources that will be used to cover PD costs 17

Component 6. Commitment Use school action plans to remediate weaknesses and inform revisions of the Schoolwide Reading Plan Report student performance data to stakeholders Acknowledge and celebrate student success Specify hiring practices that will sustain the reading model 18

Remember… The prompts provided in this presentation and in the supplementary materials and templates are not exhaustive. Use them as a starting point to create a plan that fits your school’s literacy context and vision. 19