Los Angeles New Administrators Leadership Program Unit of Study 2 CPSEL 1 & Reflective Leadership October 1, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reading ARDT Teams September 10 & 11, Agenda Your Role Your Role Big Picture Big Picture PLC for ARDT PLC for ARDT CI support CI support Plan on.
Advertisements

June 20, Your Presenters  Ken Mattingly – Rockcastle County  Jessica Addison – Todd County/KDE.
Conducting Action Research in Your School. What is Action Research? “The development of powers of reflective thought, discussion, decision and action.
PORTFOLIO.
Linking Working Systemically to Research On Effective Professional Development.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Learning Teaching Enhancing Supporting Sharing Social Studies Leadership Network October 24, 2014.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
School Governance for Parents: Advisory Committees How ELAC and SAC Can Help Your School Develop a Better Balanced Scorecard.
Collaborative Data Teams
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
The Quality Review A Reflection.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board— AiM, Achievement in Motion for Student Success Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board Assessment.
Grade 3-5 ELA Common Core Ambassadors August 13-17, 2012 Albany, NY.
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
SEISMIC Whole School and PLC Planning Day Tuesday, August 13th, 2013.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
Instructional Coaching Columbia High School February 17, 2011 JoAnn Moore, Facilitator 10 minutes.
AWCPA PLC Facilitator’s Training AWCPA Leadership Team.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board— AiM, Achievement in Motion for Student Success Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board Assessment.
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
Why Collaborate?. “Why do we have to collaborate? I know my job. If I do my job and everybody else does his, we will be fine. The teachers I work with.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
EngageNY.org Session 1: Building a Change-Focused Culture November, 2013 Network Teams Institute.
Assistant Principal Meeting September 18, :00am to 1:00pm Presenters: Anna Arrigo & Marygrace DiForte.
ISLLC Standard #2 Supporting Teacher Learning Name Workshop Facilitator.
August 19, The current situation Fall 2008 – incoming college students needing writing remediation: 36.7% of incoming students in 2 year institutions.
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Coastal Plains RESA Assessment Literacy: Leading Formative Instructional Practices January 28 and February 25 Session One: Modules 1, 2, 3 Session Two:
ISLLC Standard #1 Implementing a Shared Vision Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #4 Collaborating with Families (and Stakeholders) Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Adult Learning.
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental III: Climate and Engagement.
ESD Regional Workshop Year 1 Workshop 2. Welcome Back to the Leadership Academy.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
PLC LEADERSHIP ACADEMY November 17/December 15/January 19 Jeremy Koselak Secondary RtI Coordinator.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Instructional Leadership: Planning for Improvement.
Instructional Leadership: Applying Concern & Use Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership: Implementing Conditions for Success.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
Welcome! CKEC Science Teacher Leader Network November 23, 2015
Los Angeles New Administrators Leadership Program Unit of Study 1 Introduction to LANALP February 26, 2015.
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
ELA FELLOWS Convening #4. SWITCHING LENSES As a learner, how did I manage my learning? As a teacher, how have I helped my students make meaning? As a.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
North Carolina Mentor Training Standards 4 and 5 A Lifeline for North Carolina’s Beginning Teachers.
ISLLC Standard #3 Implementing Effective Meetings Name Workshop Facilitator.
Support for (rather than Evaluation of) Administrators Delaware Academy for School Leadership.
Los Angeles New Administrators Leadership Program Unit of Study 3, CPSEL 2 Instructional Leadership, Social Justice, & Equity May 7, 2015.
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
Unpacking Effective Instruction
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Los Angeles New Administrators Leadership Program Unit of Study 2 CPSEL 1 & Reflective Leadership October 1, 2015

Agenda Welcome Shaping a School Vision Break Development & Implementation of a Shared Vision Individual Reflection/Writing Problem of Practice Tuning Protocol Intro to Action Research

LANALP Meeting Norms Watch your airtime Avoid sidebars Each participant brings strengths Trust the Process Focus on what we can do Honor diversity of thought Assume positive intentions Reflect at the end of each meeting

Shaping A School Vision CPSEL 1 : Development and Implementation of a Shared Vision Review the CPSEL 1 Document Highlight key words or phrases that resonate with you

Shaping A School Vision In Table Groups: From the words you highlighted, selected 1 that you will share out with your table group in Round Robin fashion. Speak to how this point connects to your current work around development and implementation of a shared Vision.

Shaping a Vision of Academic Success for All Students

Charting Your Evidence On 2-3 sentence strips, write down the examples you feel are the most important Using your CPSEL 1 Document, identify which element your examples align with Stick your sentence strips on the corresponding CPSEL 1 Element Chart on the wall

Individual Reflection/Writing

John Dewey “We do not learn from experience… We learn from reflecting on experience.”

Tuning Protocol Room Assignments Group #1, Marco Nava – Facilitator, MPR Group #2, LisaRose Blacnhette – Facilitator, MPR Group #3, Delores Manrique – Facilitator, MPR Group #4, Ursula Rosin – Facilitator, Cafeteria Group #5, Irene Herrera-Stewart – Facilitator, Cafeteria

Action Research - Field Project

Action Research Cycle

Action Research Defined Action Research: A disciplined process of inquiry conducted by and for those taking the action. The primary reason for engaging in action research is to assist the actor in improving or refining his or her actions.” Sagor, 2000 You should be able to answer “Yes” to all of the following questions: Is the focus on your professional action? Are you empowered to adjust future action based on the results? Is improvement possible?

Finding a Focus What are the priority issues, projects, and programs that your school community believes are needed to be worked on to impact teaching and learning? Which of the listed issues, projects, or programs is the highest priority to your school community? Why? Expand on your answer as much as possible. If you succeed with this endeavor beyond the community’s wildest expectations, what will the results look like? Be specific. What factors, issues, or obstacles have gotten in the way of achieving this extraordinary level of success (see above) in the past?

Problem Statement Identify problem to be studied and compose a problem statement of approximately 100 words that clearly and concisely answers the following questions: Who have you included in problem identification? Who is affected? Who or what is suspected of causing the problem? What kind of problem is it? (e.g., a problem with goals, skills, resources, time, etc.) What is the goal for improvement? What does the community propose to do about it?

Problem Statement Example As the administrator of Skyline ES, I have noticed a high number of teacher behavior referrals, challenges with classroom management, and low student performance on state assessments. Skyline is a low-performing, low-SES, high English Learner school community on the district watch list. We are in danger of becoming School Improvement and potentially reconstituted. We will collect and analyze data on 1) student internal benchmark measures, 2) professional development, and 3) promoting a positive school culture, in order to reduce out of seat instructional time, improve classroom management, and increase student achievement.

Determining Research Question(s) There is an unlimited scope and range of research questions to pursue. These 3 questions can provide valuable professional insight when used with nearly any project: What did we actually do? (This focuses the action) What changes occurred regarding the performance on the achievement targets? (This focuses on change) What were the relationships, if any, between the actions taken and the changes in performance? (This focuses on relationships)

Drafting the Questions Avoid narrow questions that could be answered yes or no. e.g., Does teacher feedback influence student motivation? Do ask open-ended questions, where a large number of potential answers may surface. e.g., What are the relationships of different forms of feedback to changes in student performance? e.g., What are the characteristics of teacher feedback that correspond to increases in the quality of student work?

Support Work with colleagues from your site, your cohort, to share ideas, research articles, strategies, surveys, etc. Go online and review some Educational Action Research projects Action Research is about professional learning and growth (improving or refining actions) Be aware of CPSEL, LAUSD SLF, and LANALP Habits of Mind Please call or LANALP staff for support

Save the Date! Next Unit of Study: Date: Thursday, November 5 Refreshments: 4:30pm Meeting 5:00pm-8:00pm Location: Ortho HS Watch for with updates and document links