Coronal Loops Workshop 6, La Roche-en-Ardenne, Belgium, 25-27 Jun 2013 Density of active region outflows derived from Fe XIV 264/274 Naomasa KITAGAWA &

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Masuda Flare: Remaining Problems on the Looptop Impulsive Hard X-ray Source in Solar Flares Satoshi Masuda (STEL, Nagoya Univ.)
Advertisements

Initial Results of EIS Shinsuke Imada (NAOJ) EIS Team.
Plasma diagnostics of a giant stellar flare Carolin Liefke 1 Birgit Fuhrmeister 1 Ansgar Reiners 1,2 Jürgen H.M.M. Schmitt 1 1 Hamburger Sternwarte, 2.
1 Plasma flows during solar flares A. Berlicki Observatoire de Paris, Section de Meudon, LESIA (Astronomical Institute of the Wrocław University, Poland)
Hot explosions in the cool solar atmosphere Hardi Peter Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research Göttingen H. Tian, W. Curdt, D. Schmit, D. Innes,
Science With the Extreme-ultraviolet Spectrometer (EIS) on Solar-B by G. A. Doschek (with contributions from Harry Warren) presented at the STEREO/Solar-B.
SJC 2/28/2002Steady Flows Detected in EUV Loops 1 Steady Flows Detected in Extreme-Ultraviolet Loops Winebarger, A.R., Warren, H., van Ballegooijen, A.
Estimating the Chromospheric Absorption of Transition Region Moss Emission Bart De Pontieu, Viggo H. Hansteen, Scott W. McIntosh, Spiros Patsourakos.
Hinode / EIS Solar 24, Dec 2008 Dr Peter Young, NRL/GMU Active Region Diagnostics with EIS Dr Peter Young Dr Peter Young Naval Research Laboratory George.
Nanoflares and MHD turbulence in Coronal Loop: a Hybrid Shell Model Giuseppina Nigro, F.Malara, V.Carbone, P.Veltri Dipartimento di Fisica Università della.
Detailed Plasma and Fluorescence Diagnostics of a Stellar X-Ray Flare Paola Testa (1) Fabio Reale (2), Jeremy Drake (3), Barbara Ercolano (3), David Huenemoerder.
X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields David Cohen Swarthmore College.
X-ray Diagnostics and Their Relationship to Magnetic Fields David Cohen Swarthmore College.
Coronal HXR sources a multi-wavelength perspective.
Ingolf E. Dammasch ROB/SIDC Brussels, Belgium Solar UV Spectroscopy with SUMER on SOHO (extended version for 11 Oct 2007)
Alfvén Waves in the Solar Corona S. Tomczyk, S. Mclntosh, S. Keil, P. Judge, T. Schad, D. Seeley, J. Edmondson Science, Vol. 317, Sep., 2007.
08__050610_SCIP/SEB_PSR_Delivery.1 Temperature and Density Diagnostics with SECCHI EUVI J.S. Newmark Naval Research Laboratory (202)
Properties of Prominence Motions Observed in the UV T. A. Kucera (NASA/GSFC) E. Landi (Artep Inc, NRL)
Analysis of Doppler-Broadened X-ray Emission Line Profiles from Hot Stars David Cohen - Swarthmore College with Roban Kramer - Swarthmore College Stanley.
X-ray Emission from O Stars David Cohen Swarthmore College.
Radio Measurements of the Height of Strong Coronal Magnetic Fields Above Spots at the Limb Jeff Brosius (Catholic Univ.) Stephen White (Univ. of MD)
Analysis of Coronal Heating in Active Region Loops from Spatially Resolved TR emission Andrzej Fludra STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 1.
Solar-B/EIS high-cadence observation for diagnostics of the corona and TR S. Kamio (Kyoto Univ.) Solar-B domestic meeting.
EIS - MSSL/NRL EUV Imaging Spectrometer SOT - ISAS/NAOJ Solar Optical Telescope XRT - SAO/ISAS X-ray Telescope FPP - Lockheed/NAOJ Focal Plane Package.
Age dependence of EM in AR Cores... and... Some thoughts on the Accuracy of Atomic Data Helen Mason, Durgesh Tripathi, Brendan O’Dwyer and Giulio Del Zanna.
December in Antarctica: The Sun never sets. The images are 1 hour apart.
Thermal, Nonthermal, and Total Flare Energies Brian R. Dennis RHESSI Workshop Locarno, Switzerland 8 – 11 June, 2005.
Determining the Location of Open Magnetic Field Areas in Active Regions and their Potential as Sources of the Slow Solar Wind J. L. Culhane 1, S.J. Edwards.
High Resolution Imaging and EUV spectroscopy for RHESSI Microflares S. Berkebile-Stoiser 1, P. Gömöry 1,2, J. Rybák 2, A.M. Veronig 1, M. Temmer 1, P.
Magnetic Fields Near the Young Stellar Object IRAS M. J Claussen (NRAO), A. P. Sarma (E. Kentucky Univ), H.A. Wootten (NRAO), K. B. Marvel (AAS),
The Solar-B EUV Imaging Spectrometer: an Overview of EIS J. L. Culhane Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London.
2005/11/086th Solar-B Science Supersonic downflows in the photosphere discovered in sunspot moat regions T. Shimizu (ISAS/JAXA, Japan),
Where is Coronal Plasma Heated? James A. Klimchuk NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, USA Stephen J. Bradshaw Rice University, USA Spiros Patsourakos University.
Solar Atmosphere A review based on paper: E. Avrett, et al. “Modeling the Chromosphere of a Sunspot and the Quiet Sun” and some others [Alexey V. Byalko]
Evolution of Emerging Flux and Associated Active Phenomena Takehiro Miyagoshi (GUAS, Japan) Takaaki Yokoyama (NRO, Japan)
Modelling the radiative signature of turbulent heating in coronal loops. S. Parenti 1, E. Buchlin 2, S. Galtier 1 and J-C. Vial 1, P. J. Cargill 3 1. IAS,
Quasi-periodic upflows in the solar active region Hui Tian High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research ASP research review 2010/10/27.
Evolution of Flare Ribbons and Energy Release Rate Ayumi ASAI 1, Takaaki YOKOYAMA 2, Masumi SHIMOJO 3, Satoshi MASUDA 4, and Kazunari SHIBATA 1 1:Kwasan.
Feb. 3-5, 20034th Solar-B science meeting1 Corona-Photosphere Connection with Spectropolarimeter Yukio Katsukawa (Univ. of Tokyo)
Emission measure distribution in loops impulsively heated at the footpoints Paola Testa, Giovanni Peres, Fabio Reale Universita’ di Palermo Solar Coronal.
Coronal loops: new insights from EIS observations G. Del Zanna 1,2, S. Bradshaw 3, 1 MSSL, University College London, UK 2 DAMTP, University of Cambridge,
NON-THERMAL   DISTRIBUTIONS AND THE CORONAL EMISSION J. Dudík 1, A. Kulinová 1,2, E. Dzifčáková 1,2, M. Karlický 2 1 – OAA KAFZM FMFI, Univerzita Komenského,
Spectroscopic observations of CMEs Hui Tian Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Collaborators: Scott W. McIntosh, Steve Tomczyk New England Space.
Flare Differential Emission Measure from RESIK and RHESSI Spectra B. Sylwester, J. Sylwester, A. Kępa Space Research Centre, PAS, Wrocław, Poland T. Mrozek.
XRT and EIS Observations of Reconnection associated Phenomena D. Shiota, H. Isobe, D. H. Brooks, P. F. Chen, and K. Shibata
UV Spectroscopy of CME Currrent Sheets John Raymond Angela Ciaravella Silvio Giordano Dave Webb.
XUV monochromatic imaging spectroscopy in the SPIRIT experiment on the CORONAS-F mission I. Diagnostics of solar corona plasma by means of EUV Spectroheliograph.
Some EOVSA Science Issues Gregory Fleishman 26 April 2011.
Nov. 8-11, th Solar-B science meeting Observational Analysis of the Relation between Coronal Loop Heating and Photospheric Magnetic Fields Y. Katsukawa.
A 500 ks Chandra/HETG observation of EX Hya Gerardo J. M. Luna (SAO)‏ Nancy Brickhouse (SAO)‏ John Raymond (SAO)‏ Chris Mauche (LLNL)‏ Daniel Proga (UNLV)‏
What Can We Learn About the Ejecta from Solar-B/EIS P. F. Chen 1,2, D. H. Brooks 1, H. Isobe 1, K. Shibata 1 1. Kwasan Observatory, Kyoto University, Japan.
Observations of the Thermal and Dynamic Evolution of a Solar Microflare J. W. Brosius (Catholic U. at NASA’s GSFC) G. D. Holman (NASA/GSFC)
On the spectroscopic detection of magnetic reconnection evidence with Solar B – I. Emission line selection and atomic physics issues P. F. Chen 1,2, H.
Active Region Loops - Observational Constraints on Heating from Hinode/EIS Observations Helen E. Mason DAMTP, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University.
2 nd Solaire Network Meeting Catania, January 2009 Investigating the characteristics of coronal loop heating by 1D hydrodynamic simulations R.
The Ionization Toward The High-Mass Star-Forming Region NGC 6334 I Jorge L. Morales Ortiz 1,2 (Ph.D. Student) C. Ceccarelli 2, D. Lis 3, L. Olmi 1,4, R.
Using Solar-B EIS – lessons from SOHO/CDS Peter Young*, Andrzej Fludra CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0QX, U.K.
Spectroscopic Observations with SolarB-EIS Helen E. Mason DAMTP, Centre for Mathematical Sciences Giulio Del Zanna, MSSL.
Chromospheric Evershed flow
Nicholeen Viall & James Klimchuk NASA GSFC
Nanoflare Properties in the Solar Corona
P.Zacharias1, S. Bingert2 & H. Peter2 1ISSI, Bern, Switzerland
Dong Li Purple Mountain Observatory, CAS
Direct Observations of the Magnetic Reconnection Site of an Eruption on 2003 November ,ApJ, 622,1251 J. Lin, Y.-K. Ko, L. Sui, J. C. Raymond, G.
Teriaca, et al (2003) ApJ, 588, SOHO/CDS HIDA/DST 2002 campaign
Studying Transition Region Phenomena with Solar-B/EIS
Coronal Loop Oscillations observed by TRACE
Chromospheric and Transition Region Dynamics
Magnetic connection between the photosphere and the corona
search of Alfvén waves in faculae
Presentation transcript:

Coronal Loops Workshop 6, La Roche-en-Ardenne, Belgium, Jun 2013 Density of active region outflows derived from Fe XIV 264/274 Naomasa KITAGAWA & Takaaki YOKOYAMA The University of Tokyo, Japan

Coronal Loops Workshop 6, La Roche-en-Ardenne, Belgium, Jun 2013 Discovery of AR outflows In dark location v= km s -1 Persistent Emanated from ‘open’ region Fe XII intensity Doppler vel.Width (Doschek 2008)

Coronal Loops Workshop 6, La Roche-en-Ardenne, Belgium, Jun 2013 Upflows from footpoints of active region loops Line profile = EBW + Main component Intensity V NT (Hara et al. 2008) EBW

Coronal Loops Workshop 6, La Roche-en-Ardenne, Belgium, Jun 2013 R-B asymmetry Ubiquitous EBWs in footpoint regions (De Pontieu et al. 2009) Spatial correspondence with propagating disturbances in fan loops (Tian et al. 2011) (Tian et al. 2011) (De Pontieu et al. 2009)

Coronal Loops Workshop 6, La Roche-en-Ardenne, Belgium, Jun 2013 DEM of AR outflows FIP bias of outflows: 3–5 –Coronal origin i.e. not the photospheric Total emission EBW Asymmetries of the emission lines peak in the coronal temperature (around Fe XII). Fe VIII Si X S X Fe XIIFe XIIIFe XV (Brooks & Warren 2012)

Coronal Loops Workshop 6, La Roche-en-Ardenne, Belgium, Jun 2013 Motivation Properties revealed so far –Persistency –Location: AR edge Boundary of close & open field? –Doppler velocity: km s -1 –DEM: close to AR What should we know about AR outflows? –Driving mechanism –Source (in terms of height) Density ( n e ) of AR outflows ITSELF is one of the key clues to approach the nature of them. cf. ) Density of outflow regions –7x10 8 cm -3 (Doschek et al. 2008, Fe XII total emission) – cm -3 (Brooks & Warren 2012, Fe XIII total emission)

Coronal Loops Workshop 6, La Roche-en-Ardenne, Belgium, Jun 2013 Simultaneous fitting for Fe XIV 264/274 Wavelength calibration –Each component in Fe XIV 264/274 must have the same Doppler velocity because the emission comes from Fe XIV. Double-Gaussian fitting EBW Main ⇒ Histogram for l 274 / l 264

Coronal Loops Workshop 6, La Roche-en-Ardenne, Belgium, Jun 2013 Density diagnostics of AR outflows CHIANTI ver.7 (Dere et al. 1997, Landi et al. 2013) Outflow region Main componentEBW Density map for each component

Coronal Loops Workshop 6, La Roche-en-Ardenne, Belgium, Jun 2013 Density: EBW vs. Main component EBW (outflows): ~ cm -3 Main: ~ cm -3 EBW (outflows) Main component Main component EBW EBWs (outflows) are more tenuous than the main component.

Coronal Loops Workshop 6, La Roche-en-Ardenne, Belgium, Jun 2013 Column depth of AR outflows EBW: ±0.6 cm Main: ±0.2 cm Although emission of AR outflows is weak, they dominate in terms of the volume. (h* for two components were calculated separately.)

Coronal Loops Workshop 6, La Roche-en-Ardenne, Belgium, Jun 2013 Density diagnostics without fitting Derivation of N e from I 264 /I 274 at each spectral bin spectrum “ l -N e diagram” Wavelength scale is adjusted. △ : solution : diagram

Coronal Loops Workshop 6, La Roche-en-Ardenne, Belgium, Jun 2013 l -N e diagram in AR10978 AR core –log N e ( l ) ≃ 9.5 Outflow region –Dip around 274.1Å (v ~ 100 km s -1 ) AR coreOutflow region It is confirmed that outflows are more tenuous than the dominant, rest component.

Coronal Loops Workshop 6, La Roche-en-Ardenne, Belgium, Jun 2013 Discussion (1) n outflow < n Main –The outflows observed here were not likely produced as a result of impulsive heating (e.g., nanoflare). However, this is not decisive because we do not know whether the two components in emission lines come from the same magnetic structure or not. (2) h * outflow > h * Main –The volume of the outflows is larger than that of the main component, contrary to their weakness in emission line profiles. (3) Doppler velocities indicate blueshift for log T≥5.8. –Different from fan loops Driving mechanism in somewhat steady manner is required.

Coronal Loops Workshop 6, La Roche-en-Ardenne, Belgium, Jun 2013 Summary of results EIS observation on AR10978 Density measurement –Main: ≃ cm -3 –Outflows: ≃ cm -3 Column depth –Main: ±0.2 cm –Outflows: ±0.6 cm Verification by “ l -N e diagram” Histogram for N e Outflows Main

Coronal Loops Workshop 6, La Roche-en-Ardenne, Belgium, Jun 2013 End