Improved Covariance Modeling of Gravimetric, GPS, and Leveling Data in High-Resolution Hybrid Geoids Daniel R. Roman, Ph.D. Research Geodesist.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Best Practices for Real-Time GNSS Network Administration Webinar July 31, pm ET RTK/RTN Precision vs. Accuracy & Occupation Time Mark L. Armstrong,
Advertisements

A Comparison of topographic effect by Newton’s integral and high degree spherical harmonic expansion – Preliminary Results YM Wang, S. Holmes, J Saleh,
GNSS DERIVED HEIGHTS- PART 2 NOS/NGS - 59
OPUS-Database: Supplemental Data for Better Datum Conversion Models D.R. Roman and N.D. Weston F.I.G. Working Week Session TS04A: National Geodesy I Marrakech,
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 43 Science and.
Datum-shift, error-estimation and gross-error detection when using least-squares collocation for geoid determination. by C.C.Tscherning Department of Geophysics,
An example of gravimetric geoid computation: The Iberian Gravimetric Geoid of 2005.
Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.
Refinements to the North American Datum of 1983 Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National Adjustment of 2011 Dr. Neil D. Weston Chief, Spatial Reference.
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 59 Performance.
GEODETIC CONTROL SURVEYS
NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey USGG2009 & GEOID09: New geoid height models for surveying/GIS ACSM-MARLS-UCLS-WFPS Conference FEB 2009 Salt Lake.
Surveying & Mapping. GPS on Bench Marks Campaign.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 11 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Datum Shifts and Geoid Height Models
Use of G99SSS to evaluate the static gravity geopotential derived from the GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE missions Daniel R. Roman and Dru A. Smith Session: GP52A-02Decade.
Error Analysis of the NGS Gravity Database Jarir Saleh, Xiaopeng Li, Yan Ming Wang, Dan Roman and Dru Smith, NOAA/NGS/ERT Paper: G , 04 July 2011,
Sea-ice freeboard heights in the Arctic Ocean from ICESat and airborne laser H. Skourup, R. Forsberg, S. M. Hvidegaard, and K. Keller, Department of Geodesy,
LINK TO SLIDES: ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/dist/whenning/FWS2011/
A New & Improved National Spatial Reference System Refinements of the North American Datum of 1983 through the Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National.
SU 4100 GEODETIC POSITIONING Instructor: Indra Wijayratne.
GRAV-D Project Update Vicki Childers, Ph.D. GRAV-D Project Manager.
1 Assessment of Geoid Models off Western Australia Using In-Situ Measurements X. Deng School of Engineering, The University of Newcastle, Australia R.
“ New Ocean Circulation Patterns from Combined Drifter and Satellite Data ” Peter Niiler Scripps Institution of Oceanography with original material from.
Geoid Modeling at NOAA Dru A. Smith, Ph.D. National Geodetic Survey National Ocean Service, NOAA November 13, 2000.
Geoid Height Models at NGS Dan Roman Research Geodesist.
Integrated and Collaborative Organizations Create Geospatial Solutions Geospatial Solutions by DBZ Achieving Great Heights: Toward a Better Vertical Reference.
Gravity-Lidar Study for 2006: Refined Gravity Field For the North-Central Gulf of Mexico Dan Roman National Geodetic Survey Jarir Saleh National Geodetic.
Height Modernization Making the Most of the Indiana HARN and the INDOT CORS March 14, 2007 By William A. Schmidt, PE, LS Manager of Aerial Engineering,
Improved Hybrid Geoid Modeling and the FY 2000 Geoid Models Dr. Daniel R. Roman January 16, : :30 Conference Room 9836.
B ≥ 4 H & V, KNOWN & TRUSTED POINTS? B LOCALIZATION RESIDUALS-OUTLIERS? B DO ANY PASSIVE MARKS NEED TO BE HELD? RT BASE WITHIN CALIBRATION (QUALITY TIE.
20 FEB 2009 Salt Lake City, UTACSM-MARLS-UCLS-WFPS Conference 2009 Geoid Modeling, GRAV-D and Height Mod.
NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey USGG2009 & GEOID09: New geoid height models for surveying/GIS ACSM-MARLS-UCLS-WFPS Conference FEB 2009 Salt Lake.
Gravity, Geoid and Heights Daniel R. Roman National Geodetic Survey National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
A Geodesist’s View of the Ionosphere Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey Silver Spring, MD.
GRAV-D Part II : Examining airborne gravity processing assumptions with an aim towards producing a better gravimetric geoid Theresa Diehl*, Sandra Preaux,
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
M. Herceg and C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen Evaluation of Least-Squares Collocation and the Reduced Point Mass method using the International.
MISSISSIPPI HEIGHT MODERNIZATION PROJECT JUNE 11, 2009 By Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, Geodetic Advisor Branch NOAA, National Geodetic Survey.
Effect of High Resolution Altimetric Gravity Anomalies on the North America Geoid Computations Yan M. Wang and D. Roman National Geodetic Survey NOAA Montreal,
Lecture 21 – The Geoid 2 April 2009 GISC-3325.
The Height Modernization Program in the United States and the Future of the National Vertical Reference Frame 1 Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey,
AUSGeoid Richard Bean Robyn Stevens 26 May Geoid 3D surface of equal gravity (Equipotential) Not smooth like an ellipsoid Transformation needed.
Progress toward the Geopotential Reference Frame Dru Smith Dan Roman Vicki Childers 45 minutes April 13, Geospatial Summit1.
Tide corrections from KGPS and a precise geoid
Regional Enhancement of the Mean Dynamic Topography using GOCE Gravity Gradients Matija Herceg 1 and Per Knudsen 1 1 DTU Space, National Space Institute,
International Symposium on Gravity, Geoid and Height Systems GGHS 2012, Venice, Italy 1 GOCE data for local geoid enhancement Matija Herceg Per Knudsen.
Full Resolution Geoid from GOCE Gradients for Ocean Modeling Matija Herceg & Per Knudsen Department of Geodesy DTU Space living planet symposium 28 June.
Recent Investigations Towards Achieving a One Centimeter Geoid Daniel R. Roman & Dru A. Smith U.S. National Geodetic Survey GGG 2000, Session 9 The Challenge.
Model Fusion and its Use in Earth Sciences R. Romero, O. Ochoa, A. A. Velasco, and V. Kreinovich Joint Annual Meeting NSF Division of Human Resource Development.
A comparison of different geoid computation procedures in the US Rocky Mountains YM Wang 1, H Denker 2, J Saleh 3, XP Li 3, DR Roman 1, D Smith 1 1 National.
Geodetic Applications of GNSS within the United States Dr. Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey NOS/NOAA Silver Spring, Maryland USA Munich Satellite.
GEOID03 in Louisiana and Alaska Dr. Yan M Wang and Dr. Daniel R Roman Geodesist, NGS/NOAA ACSM Annual Conference and Technology Exhibition Orlando, FL.
Investigation of the use of deflections of vertical measured by DIADEM camera in the GSVS11 Survey YM Wang 1, X Li 2, S Holmes 3, DR Roman 1, DA Smith.
Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen Torsten Mayer-Gürr, Annette Eicker, Judith Schall Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation University.
GRAV-D: NGS Gravity for the Re- definition of the American Vertical Datum Project V. A. Childers, D. R. Roman, D. A. Smith, and T. M. Diehl* U.S. National.
Nic Donnelly – Geodetic Data Analyst 5 March 2008 Vertical Datum Issues in New Zealand.
Evaluation of the Release-3, 4 and 5 GOCE-based Global Geopotential Models in North America M. G. Sideris (1), B. Amjadiparvar (1), E. Rangelova (1), J.
Initial Results of the Geoid Slope Validation Survey of 2011 Dru Smith 1, Simon Holmes 1, Xiaopeng Li 1, Yan Wang 1, Malcolm Archer-Shee 1, Ajit Singh.
Improvements to the Geoid Models
An overview of spectral methods for the optimal processing of satellite altimetry and other data I.N. Tziavos1, M.G. Sideris2, G.S. Vergos1, V.N. Grigoriadis1,
Satlevel Collocation Model for Adapting GEM 2008 to Regional Geoid: A case Study of Yanbu Industrial City in Saudi Arabia Kamorudeen Aleem Department of.
Vertical datum unification on Iberia and Macaronesian islands with a local gravimetric geoid. First results J. Catalão(1), M. Sevilla(2) 1) University.
Satellite Altimetry for Gravity, geoid and marine applications (MSS + LAT) Dr Ole B. Andersen, DTU Space, Denmark,
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Chairs: H. Sünkel, P. Visser
D. Rieser *, R. Pail, A. I. Sharov
An T Nguyen (MIT) Thomas A Herring (MIT)
California Geodetic Advisor,
Daniel Rieser, Christian Pock, Torsten Mayer-Guerr
Presentation transcript:

Improved Covariance Modeling of Gravimetric, GPS, and Leveling Data in High-Resolution Hybrid Geoids Daniel R. Roman, Ph.D. Research Geodesist

Abstract Hybrid geoids are created from gravimetric geoids and GPS-derived ellipsoidal heights at spirit-leveled Bench Marks (GPSBM's). Modeling of the residuals between the GPSBM's and gravimetric values was previously accomplished nationally using single values for correlation length and signal amplitude in Least Squares Collocation (LSC). The most recent high resolution hybrid geoid (GEOID99) converts heights between the NAD 83 and NAVD 88 datums at about 2.5 cm RMS accuracy, which represents the remaining correlated signal in the residuals. While this signal is lower in power compared to the initial residuals (21 cm RMS) and the features implied by it are generally narrow, these features can have great lateral extent (100's to 1000's of km). Hence it is desirable to further reduce this correlated signal, and more elaborate LSC modeling techniques were explored to do this. The two most promising are the of progressively reduced correlation lengths & signal amplitudes and also combination of multiple covariance matrices in a single pass. The results of these tests demonstrate that the correlated signal of the residuals can be reduced to cm RMS. These results are discussed in relation to error sources deriving from the observed heights above the NAVD 88 and NAD 83 datums (the GPSBM's) as well as those from the gravimetric geoid model.

Outline Introduction Unresolved issues after GEOID99 Alternative LSC modeling Separation of error sources Conclusions

Empirical (+) versus Gaussian Function (line) for GPSBM-G99SSS

Empirical (+) versus Gaussian Function (line) for GPSBM-GEOID99

Empirical Error Statistics for GEOID96 (100 km range)

Empirical Error Statistics for GEOID96 (1000 km range)

First empirical covariance function for iterative-LSC

Second empirical covariance function for iterative-LSC

Empirical covariance function for MM-LSC

Empirical covariance function for Gaussian-Sinusoidal combination function

Error Sources GPS Obs. Short/Int.  Statewide adjustments (HARNs) CORS National adjustment Gravimetric Geoid Faye anomalies DEM resolution and accuracy Remove-and- Restore (EGM96) 1D FFT solution New DEM/gravity Combined data & Fourier solution Leveling (BM) Long/Int.  Quality of initial gravity The effect is greatest in the mountains Propagation GPS/Leveling

Summary & Outlook More complex models of the Gaussian function better emulate GPSBM residuals Further near term improvements will derive from readjusting and improving input data Long term improvements require revising the entire approach taken to generate the underlying gravimetric geoid