Monica L. DeAngelis Marine Mammal Biologist National Marine Fisheries Service Long Beach, CA 562-980-3232 The Marine Mammal Protection.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
. Cetacean Conservation in the U.S. David Cottingham Division Chief, Marine Mammal and Sea Turtle Conservation Office of Protected Resources NOAA Fisheries.
Advertisements

Sections 10 and 404: NMFS’ Oversight, Concerns and Actions
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources Amendments to Part 182: Endangered Species Regulations.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources Briefing on Proposed Amendments to Endangered Species Regulations.
Introduction to CESA Incidental Take Permits and Consistency Determinations Developed by Jennifer Deleon, Staff Environmental Scientist CESA Permitting.
Use of the Endangered Species Act in Alaska Doug Vincent-Lang, Special Assistant Alaska Department of Fish & Game 1.
May 17 th,  Overview of endangered species regulations  Purpose of Habitat Conservation Plans  Review Balcones Canyonlands Conservation Plan.
Environmental Data Task Force Carl Zichella, Chair—EDTF W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
THE ACTS What you need to know about MBTA, BGEPA, & ESA.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
Impacts of the Endangered Species Act Roundtable U.S. Chamber of Commerce Energy, Clean Air & Natural Resources Committee W. Parker Moore Beveridge & Diamond,
ESA, HCPs and Recovery Plans. Endangered Species Conservation Federal protection began with the limited Endangered Species Preservation Act of 1966 –Limited.
Intersection of the Magnuson Stevens Act with the Endangered Species Act and the Marine Mammal Protection Act Roger Williams University School of Law November.
Endangered Species Act
Endangered Species US Fish and Wildlife Service. Endangered Species Endangered Species Act Passed in 1983 Purpose Conserve Endangered and Threatened Species.
1 Update on the Ongoing ESA Section 7 Consultation and DEIS Development for the Southeast Shrimp Fishery Louisiana Shrimp Task Force November 29, 2011.
Endangered Species Act GOALS: Prevent species extinctions Increase numbers to the point where a species has recovered and can be delisted.
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Ken Cannon ODOT Aquatic Biology and Fish Passage Program Coordinator.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Marine Mammal Exploitation & Conservation MARE 444 Dr. Turner Fall 2007.
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Management and Conservation Act 1956 as amended Ch 4 Mod 4 HO # 12 Essential Fish Habitat 1.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972
Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 Chapter 4, Module 3 1.
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Overview Endangered Species Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2001.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations. The Endangered Species Act Sec. 2:Purpose Sec. 3:Definitions Sec. 4:Listing, Recovery, Monitoring Sec.
Trista Dillon THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT (1973, 1982, 1985, 1988)
Biological Opinions & Endangered Species Act Consultation – A “How To” Guide for Working with Agencies on ESA Issues MATTHEW A. LOVE Partner- Seattle,
Overview of the Impact of Research and Monitoring in the Columbia River Basin Rob Clapp Gary Rule Blane Bellerud Ritchie Graves.
NOAA’s Organizational Structure for Consultations, Permits, and Authorizations Environmental Compliance Training.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
The Endangered Species Act: Species Listings and Implications for Development in Alaska Presented by: Cherise Oram Stoel Rives LLP.
The Lesser Prairie Chicken Has Been Listed As Threatened: Now What!? The Lesser Prairie Chicken Has Been Listed As Threatened: Now What!? Jim Jones Power.
NOAA Fisheries (National Marine Fisheries Service) Office of Protected Resources.
The Intersection of the National Environmental Policy Act and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act November 4, 2010 Roger Williams.
Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.
Identifying Information Needs and Research Priorities for the North Aleutian Basin of Alaska Kirk LaGory North Aleutian Basin Information Status and Research.
The Section 6 Program of the Federal Endangered Species Act: Overview and Update New York Marine Endangered Species Workshop Port Jefferson, NY October.
National Marine Sanctuaries Permits and Consultations USGC Training – Oakland, CA June 4, 2014 Vicki Wedell National Coordinator for Permitting, Consultations.
Fish and Wildlife : Regulatory Framework and Challenges Cherise M. Oram STOEL RIVES LLP Hydrovision 2008 Ocean/Tidal/Stream Power Track 7D “Environmental.
New Technologies: Fish & Wildlife Permitting Issues Cherise M. Oram STOEL RIVES LLP NWHA Annual Conference – February 20, 2008.
Regulations and requirements for monitoring and mitigating potential impacts from anthropogenic activities on marine mammals: e.g., ship strikes and noise.
Office of Affordable Housing ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR THE HOME PROGRAM BY: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OFFICE OF AFFORDABLE.
COASTAL COMMISSION – August 14, 2014 THE CHILDREN’S POOL WAS CREATED FOR CHILDREN.
THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT & THE FLORIDA BEACHES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN.
NOAA Fisheries’ Proposed Strategy to Reduce Ship Strikes of North Atlantic Right Whales – Shipping Industry Dialog Gregory Silber, Ph.D., Patricia Gerrior,
August 1 st Draft of Offshore Aquaculture Amendment Gulf Council Meeting August 11-15, 2008 Key Largo, FL Tab J, No. 6.
Essential Fish Habitat NOAA / National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Habitat Conservation 1.
Pacific Gas and Electric Company Scientific Collecting Permit Presentation to the Fish and Game Commission September 24, 2012 Brian Owens, Marine Region.
California’s New State Symbol Pacific Leatherback Sea Turtle AB 1776 – Fong Sponsors: Turtle Island Restoration Network.
Isis Johnson Environmental Protection Specialist Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Office of Renewable Energy Programs April 28, 2016.
National Flood Insurance Program ESA Consultation for Online Information Sessions May 11 th and 12 th 2016 Oregon.
Protected Resources Division NOAA Fisheries, Alaska Region Steller Sea Lion Awareness: Be Part of the Solution © AK Dept. Fish & Game, taken pursuant to.
Environmental Issues Update - Endangered Species 1.
Whale Conservation and Study Act of 1976 By Morgan Stewart.
Russian River Estuary Management.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife Wolf Plan Status DRAFT Gray Wolf Conservation Plan December 2015 Karen Kovacs Wildlife Program Manager Northern.
Endangered Species Act Application in New York State – What’s New? October 4, 2015 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Robyn A. Niver.
California WaterFix Aquatic Science Peer Review Sacramento, California April 5, 2016.
Indiana Bats, Fire, and the Endangered Species Act Sue Cameron US Fish & Wildlife Service April 16, 2013.
Back River Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Final Hearing Cambridge Bay, NU April 25-30,
Phase 2 Hope Bay Belt Project
Endangered Species Act
Oceanographic Technical Services Program, GEO/OCE, NSF
Phase 2 Hope Bay Belt Project
Offshore Oil and Gas Environmental Issues
Application of Natural Resource Laws
Kodiak, Alaska Community Presentation 26 March 2019
Presentation transcript:

Monica L. DeAngelis Marine Mammal Biologist National Marine Fisheries Service Long Beach, CA The Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) at work in the Russian River

Overview and Background of MMPA Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA Incidental Harassment Authorization Compliance with Other Statutes What will MMPA permit cover Pinnipeds and the Russian River Topics to be Covered

Prohibits the taking (harassment, injury, or killing) of marine mammals Unless exempted by the MMPA or authorized under a permit Incidental taking that occurs under otherwise lawful activities (Sections 101(a)(5)(A) [Letter of Authorization] (D) [Incidental Harassment Authorization] NMFS issues incidental take authorizations for activities such as: o underwater seismic exploration (U.S. oil industry/scientific research institutes) o highway bridge and port construction o military and oil industry undersea explosives detonations o Navy sonar operations o rocket launches o scientific research in areas where marine mammals are present Overview-Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA)

Take – To harass, hunt, capture, or kill, or attempt to harass, hunt, capture, or kill any marine mammal Harassment (for all but “military readiness activities”) – any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which – (i) has the potential to injure a marine mammal stock in the wild (Level A harassment) or (ii) has the potential to disturb a marine mammal stock in the wild by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering (Level B harassment) MMPA Definitions

The Secretary (of the Department of Commerce) shall allow the incidental take (but not intentional take) of small numbers of marine mammals pursuant to a specified activity (other than commercial fishing) within a specific geographic area if: After opportunity for public comment The Secretary finds: The total taking will have a negligible impact on the affected species (or stock) The total taking will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the affected species or stocks for subsistence uses The permissible methods of taking are clearly set forth Means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact on the affected species, their habitat, and subsistence uses are set forth ( mitigation measures ), paying particular attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar significance Requirements pertaining to the monitoring and reporting of the taking are set forth Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA

…small numbers and having no more than a negligible impact on species not listed as depleted under the MMPA and not having an unmitigable adverse impact… Letter of Authorization Section 101(a)(5)(A) – Up to a 5 year permit Incidental Harassment Authorization (IHA) Section 101(a)(5)(D) – 1 year permit, renewed each year, if necessary “Taking” under the MMPA

Estimated Timeline for IHA (120 days by statute) The incidental take authorization is not a permit to conduct the activity, rather it is an “insurance policy” that protects the activity against taking marine mammals in a way that is prohibited by the MMPA Applicant submits IHA application NMFS reviews application for adequacy/completeness – mo. NMFS reviews application and draft NEPA document, makes preliminarily determinations, and prepares proposed IHA – mo. NMFS publishes Proposed IHA in FR, comments received – 30 days NMFS reviews public comments, and NEPA findings, and potentially works through issues with applicant to make final determinations. NMFS issues final IHA mo. Assuming: -application is complete/adequate when received -adequate draft NEPA document is available for NMFS to review prior to publishing the proposed IHA Typically takes between 4 and 9 months to issue an IHA

The Endangered Species Act (ESA) The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) The issuance of an incidental take authorization must also be consistent with other Federal Statutes, including, but not limited to: The Coastal Zone Management Act The National Marine Sanctuaries Act The Fisheries Conservation Act (Magnuson-Stevens) – “Essential Fish Habitat” The Information Quality Act Compliance with Other Statutes

What will the MMPA permit cover? Level B harassment of harbor seals, California sea lions, and elephant seals from management activities for maintaining the Russian River Estuary Including: Minimization measures Monitoring Reporting

Pinnipeds and the Russian River

Pacific harbor seal (Phoca vitulina richardii) From Lowry et al Harbor seal population in California is increasing California: , ,333 w/ correction factor 46,449 Northern CA , ,591

From Lowry et al. 2008

–Considerable monitoring –Reflects mainland California o Also increases in #s –Peak #s in winter o Other areas peak during pupping, breeding, molting –Anthropogenic factors Harbor Seals and the Russian River

Thank You