XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute 1 Study on cycle modification ~ Reflect validation test 1 result ~ 10 th DHC sub-group meeting under GRPE/WLTP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WLTP-EU DB short trip analyis 1 by H. Steven Overview of the WLTP-EU database short trip analysis.
Advertisements

WLTP Elaborated by the WLTP downscaling issues task force OIL #5 Proposal for modifications of the calculation parameter/coefficients.
Applicability of Driving Index
Further modifications on the gearshift calculation tool
1 Comparison of WLTP unified database distributions and WLTC rev2 distributions Heinz Steven WLTP WLTP-DHC
Informal document No. GRPE (63rd GRPE, Jan. 2012, agenda item 3(a)) 1 1 Progress Report of World-wide Light-duty Test Cycle Prepared by DHC.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Test procedure
Working paper number WLTP-DHC Application of the development approach described in WLTP-DHC on ACEA’s EU database By H. Steven
Informal document No. GRPE (62nd GRPE, 9-10 June 2011, agenda item 3(a)) 1 Summary of 8 th WLTP-DHC Meeting 9 June 2011 Palais des Nations, Geneva.
1 Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class Technical justification.
2012/1/13 1 Gear shift analysis ~ Further Review on original JPN gear shift points ~ Prepared by Japan 13 January 2012.
WLTP-DHC Validation Phase I Results and Recommendations by India
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Modification of WLTC Ver.5 Prepared by Japan 13 th DHC group under GRPE/WLTP informal group 5 June.
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
RWTÜV Fahrzeug GmbH, Institute for Vehicle Technology 1 Mobilität Motorcycles have the highest technical potential of noise emission (figure 1), Motorcycles.
under GRPE/WLTP informal group
WLTC* methodology Proposed by Japan
Working paper number WLTP-DHC Comparison of different European databases with respect to road category and time periods (on peak, off peak, weekend)
1 Mr H A Nakhawa, ARAI, Pune, India 13 th DHC Informal Group Meeting 64 th GRPE Session, June 2012 Geneva Validation 1 results of Indian Vehicles on LPVC.
WLTP-DHC WLTC* Methodology ~ Initial Analysis Results & Modification on proposed methodology ~ Presented by Japan GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup 14.
1 Comments on the Ste 3 gearshift calculation tool from validation 2 participants Heinz Steven WLTP WLTP-DHC
1 Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data delivered by vehicle manufacturers By Heinz Steven
1 Proposals of WLTC versions for low powered vehicles Heinz Steven WLTP.
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Motorcycle Noise Emission Proposal for a measurement method representing rural driving behaviour.
Proposed by Japan GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
1 Comparison of the worldwide weighted WLTP database and EU regional database with WLTC rev3 and further modifications performed by JARI, JRC and HS Heinz.
WLTP-DHC Development of World-wide Light- duty Test Cycle -- Proposal for the threshold vehicle speed of Low/Middle/High(/extra-High) phase --
12 April th DTP Meeting WLTP-DHC Secretary WLTP-DTP DHC Progress Report 12 April 2011 EMPA, Duebendorf, Switzerland WLTP-DHC Secretary N.
Starting note on gearshift issues
WLTP-DHC Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data, influence of different parameters By Heinz Steven
WLTP-DHC Gear shift analysis Proposed by Japan DHC group under GRPE/WLTP informal group 6-7 July 2011 Stockholm, Sweden.
Progress Report of World-wide Light-duty Test Cycle
ASEP IWG Report to GRB 66th
Progress Report of World-wide Light-duty Test Cycle
Random Cycle Generator
RDE Regulation Commission Meeting
In-use Data Conversion Technique ( Re-Categorization of in-use data )
Confirmation on application to EVs unique cycle
Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions
BRAKE PARTICLE EMISSIONS
on Transition for level 3 Automated Driving system
WLTP-21-04e Revision 1 Amendment proposals for annex 2 of GTR #15 from the cycle gearshift issues task force Heinz Steven
Current status of WLTP-DHC
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven , modified
JAMA position on RDE Boundary Condition
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Development of World-wide Light-duty Test Cycle
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update and summary of previous presentations by H. Steven
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 1/2/2019.
WLTP Validation2 for RLD ~ Validation test plan by Japan ~
Overview of in-use driving behaviour data from different regions
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven , modified
Vehicle warm up and stabilisation – RLD and dyno
Safety Distance to the front
Proposal to replace 3 s rule by 2 s rule
WLTP Comparison of WLTP unified database distributions and WLTC rev2 distributions Heinz Steven
RDE-LDV working group 13 April 2012 Pierre Bonnel Martin Weiss
WLTP/DHC meeting on 29th March 2012 at Ispra, Italy.
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
In-use Data Conversion Technique ( Re-Categorization of in-use data )
GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
Comparative study on the threshold speed
Comparison NEDC/WLTC Comparison of the influence of weighting factors as proposed by France on the validation 2 CO2 emission results for the WLTC By H.
WLTP-26-03e - Revision 1 Final amendments for annex 2 and status report about the programming code development subgroup Heinz Steven
Comparison of key parameters of EU WLTP database and WLTC version 5
Working Paper No. WLTP-05-10e
WLTP/DHC meeting on 29th March 2012 at Ispra, Italy.
Palais des Nations, Geneva
GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
Presentation transcript:

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute 1 Study on cycle modification ~ Reflect validation test 1 result ~ 10 th DHC sub-group meeting under GRPE/WLTP informal group October 2011 Brussels, Belgium Prepared by Japan

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute 2 Table of contents 1.Overview of Validation test 1 result 2.Proposal for Modification parts 3.Viewpoints of Modification 4.Proposal for WLTC v2 revised 5.Influence for X 2 value 6.Justifications 5.1. Review acceleration 5.2. Review deceleration 5.3. Review minimum speed

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute Overview of Validation test 1 result can not follow the target speed during acceleration parts can not trace the target speed during deceleration parts have adverse influence on drivability / reproducibility

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute Potential area need to be modified There are possibility that some vehicles can not trace the target, due to tire lock, shortage of brake power of rear wheel. There are possibility that low/middle powered vehicles can not follow the target

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute Proposal for modification parts 1. delete creep drive 2. increase vehicle speed 3. increase vehicle speed (parallel translation) 4. replace short trips according to JRC proposal 5. reduce deceleration6. reduce deceleration

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute Proposal for modification parts 7. reduce deceleration 8. reduce deceleration 11. reduce low deceleration 12. increase vehicle speed (parallel translation) 13. reduce acceleration reduce deceleration 17. reduce acceleration 18. replace acc. portion 19. reduce deceleration 22. reduce deceleration 20. reduce deceleration 9. increase vehicle speed (parallel translation) 10. reduce deceleration 21. smooth dec.

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute List of proposed modification parts #TimeModification 190 – 99delete creep portion 2145 – 155delete deceleration portion during low speed part 3189 – 204parallel translation to be minimum speed of 6.2 km/h 4512 – 566replaced ST4 and ST5 based on JRC 5661 – 664reduce deceleration 6761 – 763reduce deceleration 7974 – 978reduce deceleration – 1060reduce deceleration – 1064parallel translation to be minimum speed of 6.2 km/h reduce deceleration reduce deceleration parallel translation to be minimum speed of 6.2 km/h – 1171reduce acceleration reduce deceleration – 1406reduce deceleration – 1434reduce deceleration – 1500reduce acceleration – 1552replace acceleration phase – 1552reduce deceleration reduce deceleration , 1776smooth deceleration reduce deceleration

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute 8 3. Viewpoints of Modification  Acceleration  Review acceleration portions based on comments from the participant laboratories  Set maximum acceleration ratio 95 percentiles of cumulative frequency in each speed range  Ex-HIGH: replace high acceleration part ( km/h) by alternative acceleration part from in-use database which match the 95 percentiles  Deceleration  To avoid tire lock and/or shortage of brake power, set maximum deceleration to appropriate value ( km/h/s)  Drivability / reproducibility  Because Low speed portion (e.g. creep drive) have an adverse influence on drivability and reproducibility, minimum speed should be set to V idle on 1 st gear

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute Proposal for modification 1. delete creep drive 3. increase vehicle speed (parallel translation) 2. increase vehicle speed (delete deceleration portion)

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute Proposal for modification 4. replace short trips according to JRC proposal 5. reduce deceleration 6. reduce deceleration

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute Proposal for modification 7. reduce deceleration 8. reduce deceleration 10. become low deceleration 9. increase vehicle speed (parallel translation) 11. reduce deceleration 12. increase vehicle speed (parallel translation) 13. reduce acceleration

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute Proposal for modification reduce deceleration 17. reduce acceleration 18. replace acceleration portion 19. reduce deceleration 22. reduce deceleration 20. reduce deceleration 21. smooth deceleration

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute VA distribution of WLTC v2

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute VA distribution of WLTC v2 rev.

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute Influence for X 2 value In HIGH and Ex-high phase, When the cycle was modified, X2 value become smaller and then test cycle have more representativeness

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute Comparison of VA distribution – LOW & MIDDLE [Unified distribution][WLTC v2][WLTC v2 rev]

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute Comparison of VA distribution – HIGH & Ex-HIGH [Unified distribution][WLTC v2][WLTC v2 rev]

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute Review acceleration for MIDDLE phase 1) 30 ~ 35 km/h 1) 30~35 km/h 2) 35 ~ 40 km/h 84.0 ~ 92.5 percentiles 88.1 ~ 94.7 percentiles [MIDDLE phase] Because acceleration in middle phase keep in 95parcentiles, it is not necessary to modify the acceleration parts in middle phase 1 2 2) 35~40 km/h No need to be modified

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute Review acceleration for HIGH phase ~ 55 km/h, 5km/h steps (1) 35 – 40 km/h (2) 40 – 45 km/h (3) 45 – 50 km/h (4) 50 – 55 km/h 82.8 ~ 91.0 percentiles 86.1 ~ 93.0 percentiles 89.5 ~ 95.1 percentiles 84.2 ~ 92.2 percentiles [HIGH phase] No need to be modified

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute Review acceleration for HIGH phase ~ 70 km/h, 5km/h steps 88.1 ~ 94.7 percentiles 92.0 ~ 96.5 percentiles 94.6 ~ 97.8 percentiles [HIGH phase] In HIGH phase, acceleration exceed 95 percentiles in the range of 60 to 70 km/h, Therefore it is necessary to reduce acceleration (5) 55 – 60 km/h (6) 60 – 65 km/h (7) 65 – 70 km/h Need to be modified No need to be modified Need to be modified 95% ≒ 3.6 km/h/s 95% ≒ 3.3 km/h/s

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute Review acceleration for Ex-HIGH phase-1 [Ex-HIGH phase] 90.0 ~ 95.1 percentiles 96.3 ~ 98.4 percentiles 97.3 ~ 98.8 percentiles 96.2 ~ 98.3 percentiles 25 ~ 115 km/h, 5km/h steps (1) 25 – 30 km/h (2) 35 – 40 km/h (3) 40 – 45 km/h (4) 50 – 55 km/h Need to be modified No need to be modified 95% ≒ 5.8 km/h/s 95% ≒ 6.2 km/h/s 95% ≒ 5.2 km/h/s

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute Review acceleration for Ex-HIGH phase-2 [Ex-HIGH phase] 97.3 ~ 99.0 percentiles 99.3 ~ 99.7 percentiles 99.5 ~ 99.8 percentiles 99.1 ~ 99.7 percentiles 25 ~ 115 km/h, 5km/h steps (5) 75 – 80 km/h (6) 80 – 85 km/h (7) 85 – 90 km/h (8) 90 – 95 km/h Need to be modified 95% ≒ 3.3 km/h/s 95% ≒ 3.6 km/h/s 95% ≒ 3.1 km/h/s 95% ≒ 4.0 km/h/s

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute Review acceleration for Ex-HIGH phase-3 [Ex-HIGH phase] 98.1 ~ 99.4 percentiles 98.6 ~ 99.6 percentiles In Ex-HIGH phase, acceleration exceed 95 percentiles in the range of 35 to 55 km/h and 75 to 115 km/h. Therefore it is necessary to reduce acceleration 25 ~ 115 km/h, 5km/h steps (9) 95 – 100 km/h (10) 100 – 105 km/h (11) 105 – 110 km/h (12) 110 – 115 km/h ~ 99.0 percentiles 85.6 ~ 96.9 percentiles Need to be modified 95% = 2.3 km/h/s 95% ≒ 2.4 km/h/s 95% ≒ 2.5 km/h/s 95% ≒ 2.8 km/h/s

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute Acceleration portion for Ex-HIGH  The 95% of cumulative frequency in each speed range are as follows; Ex-HIGH95 percentiles 75 – – 4.5 km/h/s – 3.5 km/h/s – 2.5 km/h/s  Search acceleration portion which meet the above criteria from in-use database  Select the shortest / highest acceleration one

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute Ex-HIGH ( km/h) km/h までの区間を 32 秒で到達する加速データを 選択 [Time series 60 – 130 km/h][Speed vs. Acceleration]

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute maximum deceleration  For light duty truck and/or FR (front engine – rear drive) vehicle, maximum deceleration should be reviewed. Maximum deceleration of current test cycle for certification is as follows; NEDCUDDSJC08 Maximum deceleration km/h/s ( m/s 2 ) km/h/s ( m/s 2 ) km/h/s ( m/s 2 )  It's preferable to be the maximum deceleration of km/h/s

XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute Minimum speed of short trip (Vidle of 1 st gear) Minimum vehicle speed should be 6.2km/h (*) Vidle: Vehicle idling engine speed GearAverage of V 1000 Average of V idle *) Calculated based on vehicle specification of submitted in-use driving data) (Unite: km/h)