Cataloguing Code and Cataloguing Process. What is a Catalog(ue)?  A list of library materials contained in a collection, a library, or a group of libraries.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RDA : the Inside Story The Genesis OLA, February 2, 2008 Ingrid Parent Library and Archives Canada.
Advertisements

AACR3 … RDA An interim report on the new cataloguing code Antony Gordon (British Library Sound Archive) Drawn partially from presentations by: Jennifer.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: Moving from AACR2 to RDA Ann Chapman Chair.
Expanding the Serials Family Continuing resources in the library catalogue Chris Oliver autumn 2002 LTS/McGill.
Cataloguing codes Need of Cataloguing Codes
Session 6 Issues in Cataloging Loose-leaf Integrating Resources Original content by Rhonda K. Lawrence Head of Cataloging, UCLA Law Library.
The US RDA Test: Status & Next Steps For the Authority Control Interest Group, American Library Association Midwinter Meeting, January 9, 2011 Presented.
Resource Description and Access (RDA): a new standard for the digital world Ann Huthwaite Library Resource Services Manager, QUT.
Why RDA? Canadian Association of Law Libraries May 26th, 2008 CALL/ACBD Liaison to Canadian Committee on Cataloguing F. Tim Knight York University Law.
Highlights of 2003 & 2004 AACRII updates Pt. 2 Chapter 9 through 24.
RDA Test at LC Module 1: Overview What RDA Is; Structure.
RDA: a new international standard for resource discovery and access Gordon Dunsire Based on a presentation created by the Joint Steering Committee for.
Nonprint Materials Cataloging Codes LSC550 Dr. Yan Ma.
AACR2's Strategic Plan and IFLA Work towards an International Cataloguing Code Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Library of Congress Representative to the Joint Steering.
SLIDE 1IS 257 – Fall 2007 Codes and Rules for Description: History 2 University of California, Berkeley School of Information IS 245: Organization.
Cambridge University Library RDA - Hugh Taylor, 7 Jan 09 RDA: Past, Present, Future Hugh Taylor CILIP Representative, Joint Steering Committee for Development.
AACR3: Resource Description and Access Presented by Dr. Barbara Tillett Chief, CPSO Library of Congress 2004.
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen OLAC 2006 Conference October 27, 2006
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen Cornell University May 16, 2006
The Library Cataloging Tradition
SLIDE 1IS 245 – Spring 2009 Codes and Rules for Description: History University of California, Berkeley School of Information IS 245: Organization.
Revising AACR: RDA Stuart Hunt CILIP/BL Committee on AACR/RDA Oslo, January 2006.
Descriptive Cataloging of Monographs 1. Introduction DRAFT.
AACR3: Resource Description and Access Update for the Continuing Resources Cataloging Committee Midwinter 2005 Jennifer Bowen, ALA Representative to the.
SLIDE 1IS 257 – Fall 2007 Codes and Rules for Description: History University of California, Berkeley School of Information IS 245: Organization.
Resource Description and Access (RDA) A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen NYLA Annual Meeting, Buffalo, NY October 26, 2005
RDA Test “Train the Trainer Module 1: What RDA is and isn’t [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
Organization of Knowledge –ISTC 653 September 6, 2012.
Music Library AssociationFeb. 18, 2005BCC Open Meeting Development of AACR3 Kathy Glennan University of Southern California.
Music Library Association SDC Open Meeting Feb. 18, 2005 AACR3: Summary of Part I Draft ( and a glimpse into Parts II and III) Kathy Glennan University.
Cataloguing Electronic resources Prepared by the Cataloguing Team at Charles Sturt University.
Lecture Four: Steps 3 and 4 INST 250/4.  Does one look for facts, or opinions, or both when conducting a literature search?  What is the difference.
History of Bibliographic Control. Library and Information-type Work –Undertaken through much of human history. –Information packages of various types,
Jan. 29, 2004OLA SuperConference Changes to AACR2 Problems and Solutions Pat Riva (McGill University) Maureen Killeen (A-G Canada Ltd.)
LI 804.  What MARC is  How MARC was developed  How MARC is used  The future of MARC  Our evaluation of MARC.
The Library Cataloging Tradition Marty Kurth CS 431 February 9, 2005 [slides stolen from Diane Hillmann]
Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian IU Digital Library Program New Developments in Cataloging.
International Week 2012, March 19-24, TUT Library Cataloguing Department in the Wind of Changes Mirjam Piik Cataloguer of Cataloguing Department, TUT Library.
Resource Description and Access Since We Last Met… Marjorie E. Bloss RDA Project Manager 1.
From AACR2 to RDA: An Evolution Kathy Glennan University of Maryland.
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen RDA Forum ALA Annual Meeting, New Orleans, June 24,
RDA in NACO Module 6.a RDA Chapter 11: Identifying Corporate Bodies—Overview Recording the Attributes.
The Future of Cataloging Codes and Systems: IME ICC, FRBR, and RDA by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Cataloging Policy & Support Office Library of Congress.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: RDA: the state of play Ann Chapman Chair.
Cataloguing integrating resources with RDA OLA Preconference workshop, January 29, 2014 Emma Cross Cataloguing Librarian, Carleton University Library.
Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard ACOC Seminar, September 2007.
Setting a new standard Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard 18 September 2006.
AACR2 Pt. 1, Monographic Description LIS Session 2.
RDA Compared with AACR2 Presentation given at the ALA conference program session Look Before You Leap: taking RDA for a test-drive July 11, 2009 by Tom.
RDA, the Next Phase Joy Anhalt Marjorie Bloss Richard Stewart.
RDA DAY 1 – part 2 web version 1. 2 When you catalog a “book” in hand: You are working with a FRBR Group 1 Item The bibliographic record you create will.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: The Tools of Our Trade: AACR2/RDA and MARC.
Description of Bibliographic Items. Review Encoding = Markup. The library cataloging “markup” language is MARC. Unlike HTML, MARC tags have meaning (i.e.,
Cataloging Unique Collections with RDA and Non-MARC Standards Melanie Wacker Metadata Coordinator Columbia University Libraries Jan. 21, 2012 ALA Midwinter.
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records The Changing Face of Cataloging William E. Moen Texas Center for Digital Knowledge School of Library.
AACR 2 –Rules for Descriptive Cataloguing
RDA: history and background Ann Huthwaite Library Resource Services Manager, QUT ACOC Seminar, Sydney, 24 October 2008.
FROM AACR2 to RDA (and a few things in between) The history and context of RDA development Jenny Stephens, National Library of Australia, October 2010.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: The Tools of our Trade: AACR2/RDA and MARC.
Key differences from AACR2 Structure 1. Learning Outcomes Understand similarities between RDA and AACR2 Understand the structural differences between.
Queensland University of Technology Faculty of Information Technology Michael Middleton 1 CRICOS No J Bibliographic description.
Queensland University of Technology FIT School of Information Systems MM 1 CRICOS No J Bibliographic description Objectives –Comments.
RDA Resource Description and Access : a brief overview of the new bibliographic cataloging standard Billy Chi-hing Kwan Assistant Library Director Philadelphia.
Theory, Tools, History: A Brief Introduction August 17, 2016.
Cataloging Unique Collections with RDA and Non-MARC Standards
FUNDAMENTALS OF CATALOGING
LIBRARY CATALOGUE (meaning, definition, scope, purpose, & Objectives)
Cataloging Tips and Tricks
RDA: Cataloguing in the 21st century
Historical Development of the Organization of Information
Presentation transcript:

Cataloguing Code and Cataloguing Process

What is a Catalog(ue)?  A list of library materials contained in a collection, a library, or a group of libraries arranged according to some definite plan.  In a wider sense, a list of materials prepared for a particular purpose (e.g., an exhibition catalog, a sales catalog).

Purpose of Cataloging  What can cataloging do for you? Find what you’re looking for (the ultimate) … by finding a bibliographic record (via access points) Identify: there has to be enough information in the bibliographic description to verify the “find” (title/author, edition, pagination) Select (from description, subjects, classification) Obtain (call number, ISBN, citation)

Prescribed order of catalogue

Punctuation

ISBD to Catalog Format

Anglo American Cataloguing Rules A detailed set of standardized rules for cataloguing various types of library materials.. Which is divided into two parts: Rules for creating the bibliographic description of an item of any type Form of entry of headings (access points) in the catalogue.

Brief History of Cataloging Codes  Panizzi’s Ninety-one Rules (1839) Earliest codified rules in Western cataloging Codification of rules for British Museum cataloging The British Museum rules were revised up until 1936.

Brief History of Cataloging Codes  Jewett’s Rules (1853) Charles Jewett worked for Smithsonian 33 rules loosely based on Panizzi Jewett known for 2 things: ○ Earliest discussion of subject heading codification (standard form of entry for subject headings) ○ Proposed centralized or cooperative cataloging by means of union catalog with a “stereotyped” (standard) record

Brief History of Cataloging Codes  Cutter’s Rules (1876) The first edition of Charles Amni Cutter’s Rules for a Dictionary Catalog was published in 1876 Cutter’s rules nyumbered 369 and set out the first principles of cataloguing, and included a statement of the objectives of the catalogue. The code covered rules for dictionary catalogues including both entry (for authors, titles, subjects, and form headings), and description.

Brief History of Cataloging codes  AA (1908)  In light of the similar work being done on both sides of the Atlantic, Melvil Dewey suggested that there should be co-operation to produce an Anglo-American code. The American Library Association and the Library Association formally agreed to co- operate in Consultation between the two bodies occurred by correspondence.  The first international cataloguing code was published in 1908 in an American edition (Catalog Rules, Author and Title Entries) and a British edition (Cataloguing Rules, Author and Title Entries)  Both editions contained 174 rules covering both entry and heading for authors and titles, and description.  Areas of disagreement between the two editions centered on authors and publications that changed names or titles.  In both editions disagreements were explained either in a note or by printing two versions of the rule. Library of Congress supplementary rules were also included where necessary.

Brief History of Cataloging Codes  ALA Cataloging Rules (1941)  In the 1930s committees of American Library Association and the Library Association discussed revision of the 1908 rules. The two bodies co- operated until 1939 when the Second World War ended British involvement.  A preliminary second edition of the American edition of the 1908 rules was published by the American Library Association in 1941, and contained 324 rules in two parts: Part I, Entry and Heading; Part II, Description of book; as well as various appendices, including one on “authority cards.” So, the 88 pages of AA had grown to 408 pages  Andrew Osborn’s article “The Crisis in Cataloging”

Brief History of Cataloging Codes  ALA Cataloging Rules (1949)  The 1941 edition was criticized for being too detailed and complex, and in 1949 A.L.A. Cataloging Rules for Author and Title Entries was published  This edition contained only rules for entry and heading.  American alternative rules in the 1908 code were reflected in the 1949 code.

Brief History of Cataloging Codes  Rules for Descriptive Cataloging in the Library of Congress (1949)  As the 1949 ALA code did not contain rules for descriptive cataloguing, the Library of Congress took responsibility for documenting rules of this nature. As Library of Congress catalogue cards were widely used by American libraries, there was interest in the rules used by the Library of Congress.  Rules for Descriptive Cataloging in the Library of Congress was published in 1949, and the rules were adopted by the American Library Association. Included were rules for separately published monographs, serials, and some non-book materials.  Supplementary rules were subsequently issued for additional non-book formats.

Brief History of Cataloging Codes  AACR (1967)  In 1951 the American Library Association asked Seymour Lubetzky, of the Library of Congress, to analyse the 1949 ALA code. An approach was also made to the Library Association regarding co-ordination of revision of the 1949 code.  In 1953 Lubetzky’s report (Cataloging Rules and Principles]) was published. This work advocated a move towards a principle-based rather than case-based code.]  In 1956 Lubetzky was appointed editor of the revised code, and in 1960 he produced the draft Code of Cataloging Rules; Author and Title Entry  The International Conference on Cataloguing Principles was held in Paris in 1961 to examine the choice and form of headings in author/title catalogues. The outcome was a statement of 12 principles known as the Paris Principles  In 1967 two versions of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR) were published, a North American text and a British text.

Brief History of Cataloging Codes  International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD)  At the International Meeting of Cataloguing Experts in Copenhagen in 1969, a program of International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD) was developed.  The objective was to identify components in a bibliographic description, their preferred order, and the necessary punctuation.  The first ISBD standard to be produced was that for Monographs (ISBD(M)) in

Brief History of Cataloging Codes  AACR2 (1978)  In 1974 the Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of AACR (JSC) was established, with membership from the American Library Association, the British Library, the Canadian Library Association (represented by the Canadian Committee on Cataloguing), the Library Association, and the Library of Congress.  The JSC was charged with incorporating the North American and British texts into a single version. The JSC appointed two editors for the revised code, Michael Gorman of the British Library, and Paul W. Winkler of the Library of Congress.  The Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, Second edition (AACR2) was published in one version in  AACR2 was adopted by the Library of Congress, the National Library of Canada, the British Library, and the Australian National Library in January  Revisions to AACR2 were adopted in 1982, 1983 (published 1984), and 1985 (published 1986).  A draft revision of AACR2 chapter 9 (renamed: Computer Files) was published in 1987.

Brief History of Cataloging Codes  AACR revision  The 1988 Revision of AACR2 incorporated the 1982, 1983, and 1985 revisions plus subsequent unpublished revisions.  The 1988 Revision was published in both book and loose-leaf format.  One set of amendments was published in 1993.

Brief History of Cataloging Codes  AACR revision  The 1998 Revision of AACR2 incorporated the 1993 amendments, and revisions approved between 1992 and 1996  The 1998 Revision was published in book and CDROM format.  Amendments packages were published in 1999 and The 2001 amendments included a complete revision of chapter 9 (renamed: Electronic Resources).

What is RDA The new standard foe resource description and access designed for the digital world. Built on the foundations established by AACR2, RDS provides a comprehensive set of guidelines and instructions on resource description and access covering all types of content and media