Page 1 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Envisat Validation Workshop Atmospheric Chemistry Validation Team Ground-Based Measurements.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

ISSI team workshop, Bern, January, 2015 Eugene Rozanov PMOD/WRC, Davos and IAC ETH, Zurich, Switzerland Simulation of the NO.

Advertisements

Satellite Validation HALOE: –Excellent data access page, but can be a bit painful to download years of data. –O 3, H 2 O,

Preliminary results of the seasonal ozone vertical trends at OHP France Maud Pastel, Sophie Godin-Beekmann Latmos CNRS UVSQ, France  NDACC Lidar Working.

Slide 1 Atmospheric Chemistry User Workshop, 20th & 21st January 2004, ESTEC EUMETSAT Satellite Application Facility on Ozone Monitoring

Tangent height offsets estimated by correlation analysis of ground-based data with O 3 limb profiles J.A.E. van Gijsel Y.J. Meijer.

Hester Volten, Ellen Brinksma, Stijn Berkhout, Daan Swart, René van der Hoff, Hans Bergwerff, Pieternel Levelt, Gaia Pinardi, Michel Van Roozendael NO.

Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft NDACC H2O workshop, Bern, July 2006 Water vapour profiles by ground-based FTIR Spectroscopy:

ISSI WG on H 2 O Bern, Switzerland Feb , 2008 Information Content from Satellites 1/24 Collocation Error budget Vertical Horizontal Perspectives.

Task Group 3 AT2 workshop, 30 Sept – 1 Oct 2008 Task Group 3 Achievements and Prospects Ankie Piters, KNMI.

Report from the 2 nd ACVE Workshop Frascati, Italy, 3-7 May 2004 Yasmine Calisesi International Space Science Institute.

Page 1 Atmospheric, Oceanic & Planetary Physics, University of Oxford MIPAS QWG9 Florence 01/02 Feb 2006A Dudhia Microwindow Selection for new* Nominal.

Accent-troposat 2 final workshop, 30 Sept Oct. 2008, FMI Helsinki, Finland Atmospheric bromine monoxide retrieval from space and ground-based UV-visible.

Atmospheric, Oceanic & Planetary Physics, University of Oxford QWG-11, October 2006, Bologna Chiara Piccolo and Anu Dudhia Precision Validation.

Page 1 ENVISAT SYMPOSIUM - Montreux – 23/27 April 2007 Page 1 Stratospheric Distribution of CO 2 from the MIPAS High-resolution Full Mission Bianca Maria.

INSTITUTET FÖR RYMDFYSIK Swedish Institute of Space Physics U. Raffalski, NDSC MW workshop, KOS, KIMRA Kiruna Microwave Radiometer U. Raffalski.

VALIDATION OF SCIAMACHY CH 4 SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS USING GROUND-BASED FTIR MEASUREMENTS B. Dils, M. De Mazière, C. Vigouroux, C. Frankenberg, M. Buchwitz,

Ground-based validation of SCIAMACHY OL 3.0 Ozone Profile Data and Estimation of Altitude Shift.

ORM 9, Geneva, May , 2014 Evolution of Measurement Capabilities + cooperating networks.

8-years of global observations of water isotopologues in the stratosphere and mesosphere by the Odin satellite J. Urban, D.P. Murtagh, P. Eriksson,...

M. De Mazière et al. NDACC Steering Committee, 15-19/10/2012 Progress in the first year of NORS De Mazière Martine, Hocke Klemens, Richter Andreas, Godin-Beekmann.

Page 1 Sciamachy Validation Workshop – Bremen December 2004 Contribution to the validation of SCIAMACHY scientific data products for CO, CH 4, CO.

Introduction A new methodology is developed for integrating complementary ground-based data sources to provide consistent ozone vertical distribution time.

Herman G.J. Smit/FZJ-COST723-WG-I Overview Noordwijk March 2004 COST723-WG1- Working Group I: Data and Measurement Techniques Overview Herman G.J.

EARLINET and Satellites: Partners for Aerosol Observations Matthias Wiegner Universität München Meteorologisches Institut (Satellites: spaceborne passive.

ASAC Meeting, March 2011, Norderstedt, Germany Observation of OH rotational temperatures with GRIPS at ALOMAR Carsten Schmidt, Verena Kopp, Christoph.

Irion et al., May 3, 2005 Page 1 Ozone validation for AIRS V4 Fredrick W. Irion, Michael R. Gunson Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology.

Page 1 Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Monitoring of near-real-time SCIAMACHY, MIPAS, and.

AMFIC third progress meeting MariLiza Koukouli & Dimitris Balis Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.

Page 1 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, SCIAMACHY scient. prod. 12/12/2002 Envisat Validation Workshop Atmospheric Chemistry Validation Team Ground-Based.

Page 1 Validation by Balloons and Aircraft - ESRIN - 9– 13 December 2002 Observations of aerosol and clouds obtained during the M-55 Geophysica ENVISAT.

Validation workshop, Frascati, 13 December 2002Page 1 SCIAMACHY products quality and recommendations Based on presentations and discussions during this.

AMFIC second progress meeting MariLiza Koukouli & Dimitris Balis Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.

SCIAMACHY long-term validation M. Weber, S. Mieruch, A. Rozanov, C. von Savigny, W. Chehade, R. Bauer, and H. Bovensmann Institut für Umweltphysik, Universität.

Envisat Validation Workshop Atmospheric Chemistry Validation Team Ground-Based Measurements and Campaign Database Subgroup Comparisons with GOMOS air-density.

Page 1 MIPAS Validation Review - ESRIN - 9–13 December 2002 MIPAS Validation Summary - Plenary Session - Herbert Nett ESTEC / EEM-PPP.

CEOS ACC-8, Columbia, MD, April 18-19, th Atmospheric Composition Constellation Meeting (ACC-8), April 2012, Columbia, MD Smoothing and Sampling.

Assessment of SBUV Profile Algorithm Using High Vertical Resolution Sensors Assessment of SBUV Profile Algorithm Using High Vertical Resolution Sensors.

GSFC STROZ Lidar at MOHAVE 2009 Laurence Twigg, Thomas J. McGee and Grant Sumnicht Code 613.3, Goddard Space Flight Center MOHAVE 2009 Water Vapor Workshop.

Validation by Model Assimilation/Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Expected Validation of Envisat Ozone Data E. Hilsenrath NASA Goddard.

11th OMI Science Team Meeting De Bilt, June The Aura Validation Data Center Bojan R. Bojkov.

Sentinel-5 precursor: TROPOMI Cloud slicing retrieval: Program development and testing with SCIAMACHY/GOME-2 WFDOAS data Kai-Uwe Eichmann, Mark Weber,

Retrieval of Methane Distributions from IASI

Spectroscopic Study of Atmospheric Trace Gases Using PARIS-IR from Waterloo Atmospheric Observatory in 2005 and 2006 Dejian Fu, Kaley Walker, Keeyoon Sung,

University of Liège (ULg) activities based on long-term FTIR observations performed at the Jungfraujoch station Jungfraujoch, 46.5°N, 8.0°E, 3580m alt.

A new spectroscopic observatory in Créteil to measure atmospheric trace gases in solar occultation geometry C. Viatte, P. Chelin, M. Eremenko, C. Keim,

Page 1Validation by Balloons and Aircraft - ESRIN - 9–13 December 2002 Validation of MIPAS on ENVISAT by in situ instruments on the M55-Geophysica J. Heland,

HDF and HDF-EOS Workshop November 30, 2006 The Homogenization and Reporting of Groundbased Atmospheric Datasets for the Validation.

Comparisons CH 4 SCIAMACHY / GROUND-BASED FTIR B. Dils, BIRA + HYMN partners Corinne Vigouroux, BIRA, HYMN progress meeting, 7-8 April 2008.

Page 1 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, GOMOS O 3 (r) 12/12/2002 ACVT-GBMCD subgroup GOMOS ozone profiles, analysis of comparison with GMBCD datasets.

Page 1 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS p&T&H20 12/12/2002 Envisat Validation Workshop Atmospheric Chemistry Validation Team Ground-Based.

Research Center KarlsruheRalf Sussmann et al. IMK-IFU Garmisch-PartenkirchenHarmonized global SCIA XCH4 validation 1 Harmonized 2003 & 2004 XCH4 data from.

From science to routine operations – Ceilometer and Lidar networks for cloud and aerosol detection WMO TECO October 2012 W. Thomas Deutscher Wetterdienst.

Page 1 Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Evaluation of Envisat data using a NWP Assimilation.

Page 1 Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December D-VAR chemical data assimilation of ENVISAT chemical.

Upgrade from SGP V5.02 to V6.00: Conclusions from delta-validation of Diagnostic Data Set D. Hubert, A. Keppens, J. Granville, F. Hendrick, J.-C. Lambert.

Page 1 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, GOMOS altitude-reg. 12/12/2002 Envisat Validation Workshop Atmospheric Chemistry Validation Team Ground-Based.

- EQUAL - Envisat Quality Assessment with Lidar a project to support the long-term validation of SCIAMACHY’s ozone and temperature profiles in opbouw.

Inventory of IWV intercomparison sites

Definition of SCIAMACHY Diagnostic Data Set

SCIAMACHY QWG PM6, Sept Upgrade from SGP V5.02 to V6 .01: Ground-based (delta) validation conclusions A. Keppens, D. Hubert, J. Granville,

On instrumental errors and related correction strategies of ozonesondes: possible effect on calculated ozone trends for the nearby sites Uccle and De Bilt.

Preliminary comparisons of GOMOS and MIPAS ozone products with Odin

Initial comparison of SAGE III data with GOMOS and SCIAMACHY

AO 160 – OZVAL Validation of ENVISAT ozone products through assimilation in the MSDOL model: First results obtained with GOMOS Authors: B. Théodore and.

“Brief” update on ACE water vapour

Comparison of other Sciamachy operational products

MIPAS-2D water database and its validation

GSFC Mobile Lidar Station Report T. McGee, J. Sullivan

NDACC Lidar measurements at OHP

Presentation transcript:

Page 1 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Envisat Validation Workshop Atmospheric Chemistry Validation Team Ground-Based Measurements and Campaign Database Subgroup Comparison with MIPAS O 3 Profiles Thomas Blumenstock, IMK/FZK Karlsruhe,

Page 2 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Validation Team Projects involved: AOID 158 AOID 179 AOID 191 AOID 300 AOID 360 AOID 9003 Instruments involved: GB MWR GB LIDAR GB FTIR O 3 sondes Ground-based FTIR Kiruna, AOID 191, A. Griesfeller, T. Blumenstock, F. Hase, U. Raffalski et al. Groundbased LIDAR Lauder, AOID 9003, Y. Meijer, D. Swart et al. NDSC, AOID 158, V. Soebijanta, J.-C. Lambert, Y. Calisesi, S. Godin, H. Claude et al. O 3 sonde Uccle, AOID 300, H. Schets et al. LIDAR Andoya, AO 9073, 360 K. Stebel, G. Hansen, Y. Orsolini et al.

Page 3 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of Ozone Profiles Groundbased FTIR Izana, AOID 191, A. Griesfeller, M. Schneider, T. Blumenstock, F. Hase et al.

Page 4 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of Ozone Profiles Groundbased FTIR Kiruna, AOID 191, A. Griesfeller, T. Blumenstock, F. Hase, U. Raffalski et al.

Page 5 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of Ozone Profiles Groundbased FTIR Kiruna, AOID 191, A. Griesfeller, T. Blumenstock, F. Hase, U. Raffalski et al.

Page 6 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of Ozone Profiles Groundbased FTIR Kiruna, AOID 191, A. Griesfeller, T. Blumenstock, F. Hase, U. Raffalski et al.

Page 7 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002

Page 8 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of Ozone Profiles Groundbased FTIR Kiruna, AOID 191, A. Griesfeller, T. Blumenstock, F. Hase, U. Raffalski et al. FTIR Kiruna (& Izana): 7 (2) comparisons with MIPAS version 4.53 (before Nov. 13) around 20 km: MIPAS vmr too low (up to 0.8 ppmv) around 30 km: MIPAS vmr too large (up to 0.8 ppmv) MIPAS columns (integr. prof. >16 km): ~ 10% too large altitude assignment: alt. shift of ~1.5 km MIPAS VMR (p) agrees better than VMR (H)

Page 9 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of Ozone Profiles Groundbased LIDAR Lauder, AOID 9003, Y. Meijer, D. Swart et al.

Page 10 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of Ozone Profiles Groundbased LIDAR Lauder, AOID 9003, Y. Meijer, D. Swart et al.

Page 11 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of Ozone Profiles LIDAR O.H.P. S. Godin et al. (CNRS/SA) AOID 158, J.-C. Lambert, V. Soebijanta et al.

Page 12 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of Ozone Profiles LIDAR O.H.P. S. Godin et al. (CNRS/SA) AOID 158, J.-C. Lambert, V. Soebijanta et al.

Page 13 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of Ozone Profiles Groundbased LIDAR Andoya, AOID 9073, 360, K. Stebel, G. Hansen, Y. Orsolini et al.

Page 14 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of Ozone Profiles Groundbased LIDAR Andoya, AOID 9073, 360, K. Stebel, G. Hansen, Y. Orsolini et al.

Page 15 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of Ozone Profiles LIDAR Lauder : 7 comparisons with MIPAS version 4.53 height assignment is reasonable good agreement O.H.P. / Alomar: 7 (6) comparisons with MIPAS version 4.53 good agreement above ~20 km  altitude: km

Page 16 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of Ozone Profiles O3 sonde Uccle, AOID 300, H. Schets et al.

Page 17 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of Ozone Profiles O3 sonde Uccle, AOID 300, H. Schets et al.

Page 18 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of Ozone Profiles O3 sonde Hohenpeissenberg H. Claude (DWD) AOID 158, J.-C. Lambert, V. Soebijanta et al.

Page 19 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of Ozone Profiles O3 sonde Hohenpeissenberg H. Claude (DWD) AOID 158, J.-C. Lambert, V. Soebijanta et al.

Page 20 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of Ozone Profiles O3 sonde Uccle, AOID 300, H. Schets et al. O 3 sondes Uccle: 34 comparisons with MIPAS version 4.53 before Nov. 13: error in height assignment: km quantitative analysis in progress Hohenpeissenberg: 5 comparisons with MIPAS version 4.53 good agreement above ~18 km error in height assignment: km

Page 21 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of Ozone Profiles MWR Payerne Y. Calisesi et al. (MCH) AOID 158, J.-C. Lambert, V. Soebijanta et al.

Page 22 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of Ozone Profiles MWR Payerne Y. Calisesi et al. AOID 158, J.-C. Lambert, V. Soebijanta et al.

Page 23 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of Ozone Profiles 72 comparisons MWR Payerne Y. Calisesi et al. AOID 158, J.-C. Lambert, V. Soebijanta et al.

Page 24 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of Ozone Profiles 38 comparisons MWR Payerne Y. Calisesi et al. AOID 158, J.-C. Lambert, V. Soebijanta et al.

Page 25 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of Ozone Profiles MWR Payerne Y. Calisesi (MCH) AOID 158, V. Soebijanta, J.-C. Lambert et al. MWR Payerne: 110 comparisons! with MIPAS version 4.53 before Nov. 13: agreement above ~22 km  altitude: km after Nov. 13: significant improvement good agreement

Page 26 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Conclusion Comparisons with MIPAS 4.53 (data from Oct. 24 onwards) using g.b. MWR, LIDAR, FTIR, and O 3 sondes before Nov. 13:  altitude: km 25 km: MIPAS vmr too large after Nov. 13: O 3 sondes Uccle & MWR Payerne (110 comparisons !) : height assignment is reasonable much better agreement Quality of MIPAS O 3 profiles is quite promising

Page 27 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Outlook A quantitative validation has to be perfomed Data from MIPAS observations before Oct. 24 are needed More than 1000 files with O 3 profile data on CAL/VAL data base Topics to be addressed: day / night differences latitudinal dependence coincidence criteria: influence of different time and geolocation other MIPAS products (species)

Page 28 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of HNO 3 Profiles Groundbased FTIR Kiruna, AOID 191, A. Griesfeller, T. Blumenstock, F. Hase, U. Raffalski et al.

Page 29 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, MIPAS O 3 12/12/2002 Intercomparison of N 2 O Profiles Groundbased FTIR Kiruna, AOID 191, A. Griesfeller, T. Blumenstock, F. Hase, U. Raffalski et al.