LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Teachers in Planning, Teaching, and Reflecting on Mathematics Instruction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementing the CCSS 8:30-8:40 Introductions & quick background
Advertisements

Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Mathematics Instruction: Planning, Teaching, and Reflecting
December 11, 2013 Algebra and 8 th Grade Kimberly Tarnowieckyi Last time together October 23. Think back over your lessons form October 24 to December.
NUMBER SENSE & PLACE VALUE
Reading the Mathematics Evidence Tables 1. Master Claim: On-Track for college and career readiness. The degree to which a student is college and career.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Academically Productive Talk in Mathematics: A Means of Making Sense.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Number Talks Math Institute Summer Activating Strategy Discussion: Which common errors would you expect to see? =
Algebra and the Mathematical Practices Google Image.
Math - 2 Common Core Vs. Kansas Standards. DOMAIN Operations And Algebraic Thinking.
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
A Look at Standards for Mathematical Practice, Grades K-2
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
NUMBER SENSE & PLACE VALUE December 11, 2013 Erie 1 BOCES Presenter: Andrea Tamarazio.
Math Curriculum.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
The Standards for Mathematical Practice
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Common Core Mathematics Scope and Sequence State-wide Conference Christina Foran and Rebecca Candino, TSD.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
Math in Focus Singapore Math By Marshall Cavendish
A Common Sense Approach to the Common Core Math Math teaches us more than just content Standards for Mathematical Practice Make sense of problems and.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of the Expressions and Equations Standards via a Set.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Selecting and Sequencing Students’ Solution Paths to Maximize Student Learning Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing.
Description of Strategies
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Section 2 Systems of Professional Learning Module 2 Grades K-5: Focus on Content Standards.
Store an Award, a Cheesy Task: Addition with Regrouping.
Vacaville USD December 5, AGENDA Problem Solving and Patterns Math Practice Standards and High Leverage Instructional Practices Number Talks –Computation.
Grade 3 Common Core Multiplication Represent and solve problems involving multiplication and division. 3.OA.1 Interpret products of whole numbers, e.g.,
Vacaville USD August 25, AGENDA Problem Solving and Patterns Math Practice Standards/Questioning Review Word Problems Review Fact Strategies Sharing.
+ Sunnyside District Day One Math Training Focus 2; Training for Teachers by Math Leaders; Fall 2014.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
K-1 TIPM3 Dr. Monica Hartman Cathy Melody and Gwen Mitchell November 2, 2011.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of Numbers and Operations Fraction Standards via a Set.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of the Number.
Algebraic Reasoning Content Academy—Grade 5 Round Rock ISD Learning by Doing® Sami Briceño.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Study Group 7 - High School Math (Algebra 1 & 2, Geometry) Welcome Back! Let’s.
Section 3 Systems of Professional Learning Module 2 Grades K-5: Focus on Content Standards.
Module 4 Shift of Application Sunnyside School District.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
Math & Science Collaborative Analyzing Mathematical Tasks and the Mathematical Task Framework.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of the Number System Standards via a Set of Tasks Tennessee.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Mathematical Structures: Addition and Subtraction Word Problem Types Tennessee.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing.
Analyzing Mathematical Tasks. Developed under the auspices of the NSF-funded ESP Project (ESI ) -- Directed by Margaret Smith, University of.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of the Number.
K-2 Math Countywide Data May 2015 Administration September 4, 2015 – RHS K-8 Subcommittee September 22, 2015 – Data Sharing with K-2 Math Task Force October.
Insights About the Grade 1 Learning Expectations in the CCSS Topic #1: The meaning of the equal sign Presented by the Office of Curriculum, Instruction.
Amy Jones Lewis November 2010 Green River Regional Educational Cooperative MathPLUS Content Day 1: Student-Centered Problem Solving.
National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics CCSS Standards of Mathematical Practice: Reasoning and Explaining The Common Core State Standards Illustrating.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Engaging In and Analyzing Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Enacting Instructional Tasks:
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
INSTITUTE for LEARNING This module was developed by DeAnn Huinker, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; Victoria Bill, University of Pittsburgh Institute.
By Kathy Richardson Assessment #8 Grouping Tens Overview & Description of Strategies.
4 th Grade Math Learning Objective: We will multiply by multiples of 10, 100, and READY TO TEACH SM EDI ® Lessons ©2013 All rights reserved. EDI.
Mathematical Practice Standards
Faster Isn’t Smarter Message 17: Constructive Struggling
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 1
Presentation transcript:

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Teachers in Planning, Teaching, and Reflecting on Mathematics Instruction Modifying Tasks to Increase the Cognitive Demand Tennessee Department of Education Elementary School Mathematics Grade 2

2 There is no decision that teachers make that has a greater impact on students’ opportunities to learn and on their perceptions about what mathematics is than the selection or creation of the tasks with which the teacher engages students in studying mathematics. Lappan & Briars, 1995 By determining the cognitive demands of tasks and being cognizant of the features of tasks that make them high- level or low-level tasks, teachers will be prepared to select or modify tasks that create opportunities for students to engage with more tasks that are high-level tasks. Rationale

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Session Goals Participants will: deepen understanding of the cognitive demand of a task; analyze a set of original and modified tasks to learn strategies for increasing the cognitive demand of a task; and recognize how increasing the cognitive demand of a task gives students access to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for Mathematical Practice. 3

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Overview of Activities Participants will: discuss and compare the cognitive demand of mathematical tasks; identify strategies for modifying tasks; and modify tasks to increase the cognitive demand of the tasks. 4

5 Mathematical Tasks: A Critical Starting Point for Instruction All tasks are not created equal−different tasks require different levels and kinds of student thinking. Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards- based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development, p. 3. New York: Teachers College Press.

6 Mathematical Tasks: A Critical Starting Point for Instruction The level and kind of thinking in which students engage determines what they will learn. Hiebert, Carpenter, Fennema, Fuson, Wearne, Murray, Olivier, & Human, 1997

7 Mathematical Tasks: A Critical Starting Point for Instruction If we want students to develop the capacity to think, reason, and problem-solve, then we need to start with high-level, cognitively complex tasks. Stein & Lane, 1996

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH 8 Revisiting the Characteristics of Cognitively Demanding Tasks

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Comparing the Cognitive Demand of Two Tasks Compare the two tasks. How are the tasks similar? How are the tasks different? 9

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Task #1: A Place Value Task Identify the place value for each of the underlined digits. a.351 b.76 c.4,789 10

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Task #2: What is Changing? Solve each equation = ___ = ___ = ___ = ___ = ___ = ___ When ten is added to each of the numbers above, how is the sum changing from one equation to the next? Sometimes the tens place changes and sometimes the hundreds place change when ten is added to the number. Why does this happen and when does it happen? Look at the number 2,399. Which numbers will change when ten is added to this number and why? 11

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Linking to Research/Literature: The QUASAR Project Low-Level tasks –Memorization –Procedures without Connections High-Level tasks –Procedures with Connections –Doing Mathematics 12

The Mathematical Task Analysis Guide Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2000) Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development, p. 16. New York: Teachers College Press. 13

The CCSS for Mathematics: Grade 2 Number and Operations in Base Ten 2.NBT Understand place value. 2.NBT.A.1 Understand that the three digits of a three-digit number represent amounts of hundreds, tens, and ones; e.g., 706 equals 7 hundreds, 0 tens, and 6 ones. Understand the following as special cases: a.100 can be thought of as a bundle of ten tens—called a “hundred.” b.The numbers 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900 refer to one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, or nine hundreds (and 0 tens and 0 ones). Use place value understanding and properties of operations to add and subtract. 2.NBT.B.7 Add and subtract within 1000, using concrete models or drawings and strategies based on place value, properties of operations, and/or the relationship between addition and subtraction; relate the strategy to a written method. Understand that in adding or subtracting three-digit numbers, one adds or subtracts hundreds and hundreds, tens and tens, ones and ones; and sometimes it is necessary to compose or decompose tens or hundreds. Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 19, NGA Center/CCSSO 14

The CCSS for Mathematical Practice 1.Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2.Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3.Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. 4.Model with mathematics. 5.Use appropriate tools strategically. 6.Attend to precision. 7.Look for and make use of structure. 8.Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning. 15 Common Core State Standards, NGA Center/CCSSO, 2010

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH 16 Analyzing Modified Textbook Tasks

17 Linking to Research/Literature: The QUASAR Project TASKS as they appear in curricular/ instructional materials TASKS as set up by the teachers TASKS as implemented by students Student Learning Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000, p. 4 The Mathematical Tasks Framework

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH 18 Comparing the Cognitive Demand of Tasks Compare the original versions of the tasks with the modified versions of the tasks. The mathematical objective, the mathematical understandings, and the prior knowledge that students should have acquired are listed for each lesson. For each, determine: How are the modified tasks the same and how are they different from the original? In what ways was the original task modified, and for what purpose? What is the “value added” by making the modification to the original task? − Which CCSS for Mathematical Practice will students use when solving each task? − Which CCSS for Mathematical Content are the foci of each task?

Original Guided Practice Task 19 Modified from EnVision, Tennessee version, Grade 1, 2012

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Modified Guided Practice Task 20 Solve the problem two different ways. Write two equations showing the two different approaches that can be taken when solving this problem. Alex bought 16 green peppers. He bought 11 red peppers. How many peppers did Alex buy in all? Alex uses 14 of the peppers. How many peppers are left? Compare the two different ways of solving the problem and explain how the two ways differ from each other. Explain what remains the same with each way of solving the problem.

21 Original Addition Story Problem Task This page appears at the end of several days of work on solving two-digit addition problems in which students are directed to regroup when the amount is over ten. (Page 230) Modified from EnVision, Tennessee version, Grade 1, 2012 Journal: Write an addition story about something you collect. Add. Regroup if you need to. Answers will vary.

22 Modified Addition Story Problem Task Eliminate the picture and the problem template. Write a story problem for the expression Make sure you ask a question. Solve the problem. Modified from EnVision, Tennessee version, Grade 1, 2012 Journal: Write an addition story about something you collect. Add. Regroup if you need to. Answers will vary.

Original Relating Addition and Subtraction Task Model/Demonstrate: How can you use addition to check subtraction? Draw an arrow from the difference (30) to the place where the first addend of your vertical addition problem will be. Help children to understand that you write the difference as the first addend and the number being subtracted as the second addend. Guide children to complete the addition. What is the sum? (50) Is it the same as the number that you subtracted from in the first problem? (Yes) That means you subtracted correctly. Use a part-part-whole model like the one on page 271, with 50 as the whole and 20 and 30 as the parts to make sure that children see the relationship between the pairs of problems. What addition problem does this model? ( = 50) Does it also model the subtraction problem 50 – 30 = 20? (Yes, the parts and the whole are the same.) 23 Modified from EnVision, Tennessee version, Grade 1, 2012

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Modified Relating Addition and Subtraction Task Explain how you can use addition to solve 5 – 2. ________________________________________ Explain how you can use addition to solve 50 – 20. __________________________________________ Solve the subtraction problem 31 – 13 = _____________. Solve the subtraction problem 31 – 13 by using addition. Explain how addition can be used to solve the subtraction problem. Show 31 – 13 on the part-part-whole. Do you know the parts or the whole in this problem? 24

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Consider… What can you do if you want students to develop the capacity to think, reason, and problem solve, but your textbook doesn’t have many high-level, cognitively demanding tasks? 25

The CCSS for Mathematics: Grade 2 Operations and Algebraic Thinking 2.OA Represent and solve problems involving addition and subtraction. 2.OA.A.1 Use addition and subtraction within 100 to solve one- and two-step word problems involving situations of adding to, taking from, putting together, taking apart, and comparing, with unknowns in all positions, e.g., by using drawings and equations with a symbol for the unknown number to represent the problem. Add and subtract within OA.B.2 Fluently add and subtract within 20 using mental strategies. By end of Grade 2, know from memory all sums of two one-digit numbers. Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 19, NGA Center/CCSSO 26

The CCSS for Mathematics: Grade 2 Operations and Algebraic Thinking 2.OA Work with equal groups of objects to gain foundations for multiplication. 2.OA.C.3 Determine whether a group of objects (up to 20) has an odd or even number of members, e.g., by pairing objects or counting them by 2s; write an equation to express an even number as a sum of two equal addends. 2.OA.C.4 Use addition to find the total number of objects arranged in rectangular arrays with up to 5 rows and up to 5 columns; write an equation to express the total as a sum of equal addends. Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 19, NGA Center/CCSSO 27

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Strategies for Modifying Tasks Compare your list of task modifications with the list of task modification strategies identified by others. How is your list similar? Different? 28

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH 29 Strategies for Modifying Textbook Tasks Increasing the cognitive demands of tasks: Ask students to create real-world stories for “naked number” problems. Include a prompt that asks students to represent the information another way (with a picture, in a table, a graph, an equation, with a context). Include a prompt that requires students to make a generalization. Use a task “out of sequence” before students have memorized a rule or have practiced a procedure that can be routinely applied. Eliminate components of the task that provide too much scaffolding.

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH 30 Strategies for Modifying Textbook Tasks (continued) Increasing the cognitive demands of tasks: Adapt a task so as to provide more opportunities for students to think and reason—let students figure things out for themselves. Create a prompt that asks students to write about the meaning of the mathematics concept. Add a prompt that asks students to make note of a pattern or to make a mathematical conjecture and to test their conjecture. Include a prompt that requires students to compare solution paths or mathematical relationships and write about the relationship between strategies or concepts. Select numbers carefully so students are more inclined to note relationships between quantities (e.g., two tables can be used to think about the solutions to the four, six, or eight tables).

The CCSS for Mathematical Practice 1.Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2.Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3.Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. 4.Model with mathematics. 5.Use appropriate tools strategically. 6.Attend to precision. 7.Look for and make use of structure. 8.Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning. 31 Common Core State Standards, NGA Center/CCSSO, 2010

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH 32 Giving it a Go: Modifying Textbook Tasks to Increase the Cognitive Demand of Tasks

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH 33 Your Turn to Modify Tasks Form groups of no more than three people. Discuss briefly important NEW mathematical concepts, processes, or relationships you will want students to uncover by the textbook page. Consult the CCSS. Determine the current demand of the task. Modify the textbook task by using one or more of the Textbook Modification Strategies. You will be posting your modified task for others to analyze and offer comments.

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH 34 Gallery Walk Post the modified tasks. Circulate, analyzing the modified tasks. On a “Stickie- Note,” describe ways in which the tasks were modified and the benefit to students. If the task was not modified to increase the cognitive demand of the task, then ask a wondering about a way the task might be modified.

LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH 35 The Cognitive Demand of Tasks Does the demand of the task matter? What are you now wondering about with respect to the task demands?