Implementation Strategy July 2002 STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT LIFECYCLE PROCESS ORP Publishes & Maintains 8 Standing Committee Recommends Approval / Disapproval.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GIS Executive Council and Advisory Committee Update November 2010.
Advertisements

Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
A BPM Framework for KPI-Driven Performance Management
A-16 Portfolio Management Implementation Plan Update
Past and Current Initiatives in Pinellas County to Coordinate Planning between the School Board and Local Governments 1996 – Interlocal Agreement and Comprehensive.
Process and Procedure Documentation. Agenda Why document processes and procedures? What is process and procedure documentation? Who creates and uses this.
ClosingExecuting/ Controlling ControllingPlanningInitiatingOpportunityAssessment Client AcceptancePlanning ApprovalInitiating ApprovalOpportunity Assessment.
Financial Systems Needs Assessment Project Update Monthly Research Administrators Meeting March 11, 2010.
1 LBNL Enterprise Computing (EC) January 2003 LBNL Enterprise Computing.
Project Integration Management Sections of this presentation were adapted from A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge 4 th Edition, Project.
Adjusting EPLC to your Project Colleen Robinson & Teresa Kinley Friday, February 6, 2009.
Chapter 3: The Project Management Process Groups
ECM Project Roles and Responsibilities
New Business Processes Classification Review Process changes PDF Documentation – standard business documentation Auditing Process If questions contact.
December 3, 2010 SAIF Governance Framework A Brief Update on work to date.
EPLC Deliverables Sherry Brown-Scoggins & Wanda Hall
11 A presentation on A-16 Themes for The FGDC Steering Committee June 5, by Wendy Blake-Coleman US EPA Lifecycle Management Work Group.
1 Geospatial Portfolio Management, Theme Lead and Dataset Manger Roles and Responsibilities, and the ‘Investment Collaboration Process’ DRAFT.
N “If you bring the appropriate people together in constructive ways with good information, they will create authentic visions and sustainable responses.
The Microsoft Office 2007 Enterprise Project Management Solution:
Post 2012 Energy Efficiency Planning Schedule: Options and Implications February 16, am - 5 pm CPUC Auditorium.
Federal Geographic Data Committee: Coordination Group Meeting Proposal: FGDC Annual Planning Process & Monthly Performance Management Reviews Submitted.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
State of Iowa Enterprise HIPAA Compliance
FHWA Reorganization Update Program Performance Management Standing Committee on Performance Management Meeting Detroit, MI October 14, 2011 Peter Stephanos.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Roles and Responsibilities
IT PMB: Executive Oversight and Decision Authority for Application and Infrastructure Projects at NASA Larry Sweet Chair, IT PMB JSC CIO August 2010.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program July 10, 2002 eGovernment Working Group Meeting Chris Niedermayer, USDA eGovernment Executive.
DRAFT – For Discussion Only HHSC IT Governance Executive Briefing Materials DRAFT April 2013.
Why Proposed TC Procedures? Define how TC reaches “completion” of what OASIS calls “Committee Specifications” TC procedures lead up to the OASIS process:
Office of Performance Review (OPR) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Stephen Dorage.
Chapter 3 Strategic Information Systems Planning.
Deloitte Consulting LLP Commonwealth of Massachusetts IT Consolidation Initiative IT Governance Target State Update Briefing for Statewide Working Group.
Eurostat/UNSD Conference on International Outreach and Coordination in National Accounts for Sustainable Development and Growth 6-8 May, Luxembourg These.
WECC Section 4.9 Review Progress Report Standing Committees Meeting October 14, 2015 W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
How do You Fit within the Process? Roles and Responsibilities – Pre CAB (1/2) 1 Change Requestor Initiates the Change Request (CR) in Service-now Includes.
Developing a Project Management Standard for Your Organization Francine DiMicele, PMP June 08, 2015 NC Piedmont Triad Chapter.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
State of Georgia Release Management Training
Deloitte Consulting LLP Commonwealth of Massachusetts Statewide Strategic IT Consolidation (ITC) Initiative IT Governance Sub-Committee Working Session.
ESSRT In-Process Review September 10, Agenda 1.Work Completed Till Date 2.Scope of future activities and deliverables 2.
Policy Lifecycle Policy Created Published & Communicated Periodic ReviewRevised or Retired 10/4/2010 Policy Development Process-v4.b.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage the IT Portfolio World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
Section 4.9 Work Group Members Kris Hafner, Chair, Board Member Rob Kondziolka, MAC Chair Maury Galbraith, WIRAB Shelley Longmuir, Governance Committee.
1 CCSAS Governance An Overview 2007 Annual Child Support Training Conference and Expo September 18, :30 – 12:00.
Select Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Transmission Advisory Group NCTPC Process Update Rich Wodyka September 7, 2006.
ITS Device Standards & Procurement Project PURPOSE  Develop a series of Standards & Strategies designed to guide and provide consistency across the development.
July 27, Brain Works Consulting, LLC 1.
Strengthening the Medical Device Clinical Trial Enterprise
IT Governance and Management Structure
Sample Fit-Gap Kick-off
Office 365 Security Assessment Workshop
Data Architecture World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
TechStambha PMP Certification Training
Implementation Strategy July 2002
CIO Council User Experience Strategic Initiative Update
The Standards Development Process
Module 2 Key Phases of the Peer Review Programme
Research Program Strategic Plan
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO]
About The Federal Data Architecture Subcommittee (DAS) 2008
Agenda Purpose for Project Goals & Objectives Project Process & Status Common Themes Outcomes & Deliverables Next steps.
Project Integration Management
Project Integration Management
Practice Standards, Program Guides, and CES Operations Manual
Presentation transcript:

Implementation Strategy July 2002 STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT LIFECYCLE PROCESS ORP Publishes & Maintains 8 Standing Committee Recommends Approval / Disapproval 7 Standards Committee Reviews Draft 6 SDT Develops Standard Pkg 5 Standards Committee Coordinates SDT 4 Standing Committee Reviews Priorities 3 Standards Committee Reviews 2 SPONSOR Proposes Standard 1

2 of 13 Outline u Purpose u Benefits u Standards Development Lifecycle Process u Composite View of Standards Lifecycle u Next Steps

3 of 13 Purpose u To allow Standards to evolve in an orderly and repeatable manner while ensuring compatibility and supportability across the State’s core IT infrastructure. u The statewide Standards Development Lifecycle Process (SDLP) provides a uniform, repeatable mechanism for the development, adoption and application of enterprise IT standards. u The Standards Committee provides guidance and administration of the standards development lifecycle process.

4 of 13 Benefits From a Standards Development Lifecycle Process u Provides coordinated and timely standards development administration. u Ensures prioritization and support for standards development process. u Reduces cost of government through efficient and consistent technology management.

5 of 13 Sponsor u Prepares Standard Proposal Request (SPR) for creation, implementation, change or deletion of an enterprise standard. u SPR is submitted to the the Standards Committee for review. SPONSOR offers SPR for problem/need Need Identified Step 1 Outcomes / Deliverables u Standard Proposal Request Prepared and Submitted

6 of 13 Standards Committee Reviews Standard Proposal Request REVIEW STANDARD PROPOSAL REQUEST (SPR) ORP u Schedules meetings u Reviews standard proposal requests for scope, feasibility, impact, resources and alternatives u Assesses compliance with strategic direction ESRT reviews and sends recommendation for priorities, resources, and schedules, to IMPACT Step 2 Outcomes / Deliverables u Recommendations to Standing Committee

7 of 13 Standing Committee Reviews priorities & resources Standing Committee u Provides executive guidance for initiation of standards through review of scope, feasibility, impact, and resources. u State CIO - Final approval of priorities, resources and schedules Step 3 Outcomes / Deliverables u Decisions u Priorities u Resources

8 of 13 Establish and Coordinate Standards Development Teams Standards Committee u Establishes Standards Development Team (SDT) u Provides Project Plan Outline u Activates standard templates u Reports progress of SDT u Prepares status information Standards Committee Coordinates SDT Step 4 Outcomes / Deliverables u SDT Assigned u Collect and maintain status information

9 of 13 Standards Development Team (SDT) SDT u Reviews SPR and Complete Project Plan u Researches issues related to standard u Prepares findings u Post for comments u Completes Draft standards package SDT Develops Draft Standard Package Step 5 Outcomes / Deliverables u Project Plan u Draft Standard Package

10 of 13 Review Draft Standard Package Standards Committee u Reviews draft standard package u Post for Review u Sends to Standing Committee for review / recommendation Standards Committee Reviews Draft Standard Package Step 6 Outcomes / Deliverables u Status Reports u Recommendations to Standing Committee

11 of 13 Standing Committee Recommends approval /disapproval Standards Approval Standing Committee u Reviews draft standards package u Discuss and considers implementation to enterprise direction and Agency operations. u Recommends approval / disapproval of the draft standards package for publication u State CIO provides final approval / disapproval Step 7 Outcomes / Deliverables u Approval of Standard for Publication

12 of 13 Publish Standard ORP Publishes & Maintains Standing Committee / ORP u Notifies all stakeholders and participants of availability for final standard u Publishes Standard - updates Administration Guide and web site u Performs Post Implementation Review and Maintenance Step 8 Outcomes / Deliverables u Published standard u Maintain Standard

13 of 13 COMPOSITE VIEW OF STANDARDS LIFE CYCLE FLOW