B EAM STEERING EXPERIENCE AT CTF3 Davide Gamba 14 June 2014 Americas Workshop on Linear Colliders 2014 - Fermilab.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Matching Injector To Linac. Caveats This is all loose and fuzzy – sort of religion We dont have real tight control over and knowledge of the machine –
Advertisements

S TEERING ALGORITHM EXPERIENCE AT CTF3 Davide Gamba 14 November 2013 The International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders LCWS13.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Frank Tecker - BE/OP for the CTF3 Team IWLC 2010, Frank Tecker Critical Review of CTF3 performance Introduction Beam phase Improved operation.
Measurements on phase stability at CTF3 Giulio Morpurgo / CERN IWLC 2010.
P. Emma, SLACLCLS Commissioning – Sep. 22, 2004 Linac Commissioning P. Emma LCLS Commissioning Workshop, SLAC Sep , 2004 LCLS.
Drive Beam Phase Measurements and Feedback at CTF3 Giulio Morpurgo.
R. Corsini, CLIC Project Meeting - 24 th May 2013 CTF3 1 CTF3: Highlights of the 1 st run R. Corsini for the CTF3 Team 1.
Alessandro Cappelletti for CTF3 collaboration 5 th May 2010 RESULTS OF BEAM BASED RF POWER PRODUCTION IN CTF3.
CTF3 commissioning status R. Corsini - CTF3 committee 17 th September 2009 Update on CTF3 Operations and schedule This time I will try to give a more complete.
Drive Beam and CTF 3 International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 October 22, 2010 Erik Adli, Department of Physics, University of Oslo and CERN Bernard.
CTF3 ORBIT : TOOLS AND AUTOMATIC TUNING Davide Gamba 4 February 2014 CLIC Workshop CERN.
Drive Beam Linac Stability Issues Avni AKSOY Ankara University.
Providing Beams for Power Production What has been done Problems and Boundary Conditions Future improvements and possibilities.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
CTF3 BPMs October 18-22/2010 IWLC2010 CTF3 BPMs Lars Soby 1.
SPPS, Beam stability and pulse-to-pulse jitter Patrick Krejcik For the SPPS collaboration Zeuthen Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-ray FEL’s August.
IWLC - 21st october 2010Califes CTF3 probe beam - Wilfrid Farabolini1 CTF3 Probe Beam Status 1.
Energy Spectrometer for the ILC Alexey Lyapin University College London.
EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007.
Drive Beam Status and Issues Drive beam quality Dispersion tuning Emittance Combination issues Piotr Skowroński Ben Constance Javier Barranco … 10 October.
R. Corsini, CLIC Project Meeting October 24, 2012 CTF3 Experimental program for end 2012 R. Corsini for the CTF3 Team 1.
1 CTF3 collaboration meeting 2007 G.Geschonke Status Status of CTF3 G.Geschonke CERN.
R. Assmann - LHCCWG Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann LHCCWG Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P. Baudrenghien, J. Uythoven,
Two-beam Test Stand Status and Results Roger Ruber & Igor Syratchev for the TBTS team.
The CLIC decelerator Instrumentation issues – a first look E. Adli, CERN AB/ABP / UiO October 17, 2007.
July 19-22, 2006, Vancouver KIRTI RANJAN1 ILC Curved Linac Simulation Kirti Ranjan, Francois Ostiguy, Nikolay Solyak Fermilab + Peter Tenenbaum (PT) SLAC.
DEVELOPMENT OF A BEAM LOSS DETECTION SYSTEM FOR THE CLIC TEST FACILITY 3 T. Lefevre Beam loss monitors for the CLIC Test Facility 3 Preliminary study done.
Design of the Turnaround Loops for the Drive Beam Decelerators R. Apsimon, J. Esberg CERN, Switzerland.
1 Alternative Bunch Compressor 30 th Sep KNU Eun-San Kim.
Beam Dynamics WG Summary N.Solyak, K.Kubo, A.Latina LCWS 2014 – Oct 6-10, 2014 – Belgrade, Serbia.
1 General Status of Commissioning Piotr Krzysztof Skowroński CTF3 Collaboration Technical Meeting 27 January 2009.
… Work in progress at CTF3 … Davide Gamba 01 July 2013 Study and Implementation of L INEAR F EEDBACK T OOLS for machine study and operation.
Beam Based Optics Measurements CTF3 Collaboration meeting CERN Yu-Chiu Chao, TJNAF.
P. Urschütz - CTF3 Collaboration Meeting 2007 CTF3 commissioning & operation in 2006 P. Urschütz for the CTF3 operations team  Commissioning of the Delay.
Injector Options for CLIC Drive Beam Linac Avni Aksoy Ankara University.
1 CTF3 CLEX day July 2006 CLEX day 2006 Introduction G.Geschonke CERN.
CTF3 Drive Beam studies results & Program Piotr Skowroński for the CTF3 team 30 December 2013 CLIC Workshop
Oleksiy Kononenko CERN and JINR
Tools in CTF3 Simona Bettoni for the CTF3 operation team.
2014 Issues & Strategy execution Piotr Skowroński 18 January 2016 CLIC Workshop
CLIC Workshop 2008 TBTS status. PETS testing program and installation status. Igor Syratchev & Germana Riddone for the CLIC team.
CLIC Workshop 18 th -22 nd January 2016, CERN 1 Alfonso Benot Morell Manfred Wendt.
O RBIT F EEDBACK EXPERIENCE AT CTF3 Davide Gamba 3 October 2014 Octoberfest at JAI – Royal Holloway University of London.
R. Corsini CLIC work-package planning meeting 2-3 November 2011 Introduction to the session.
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
8 th February 2006 Freddy Poirier ILC-LET workshop 1 Freddy Poirier DESY ILC-LET Workshop Dispersion Free Steering in the ILC using MERLIN.
Progress in CLIC DFS studies Juergen Pfingstner University of Oslo CLIC Workshop January.
C. Biscari, D. Alesini, A. Ghigo, F. Marcellini, LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy B. Jeanneret, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland CLIC DRIVE BEAM FREQUENCY MULTIPLICATION.
CLIC Frequency Multiplication System aka Combiner Rings Piotr Skowronski Caterina Biscari Javier Barranco 21 Oct IWLC 2010.
Threading / LTC/ JW1 How difficult is threading at the LHC ? When MADX meets the control system … J. Wenninger AB-OP &
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
Simulation for Lower emittance in ATF Damping Ring Kiyoshi Kubo Similar talk in DR WS in Frascati, May 2007 Most simulations were done several.
Effects of Accelerating Cavities on On-Line Dispersion Free Steering in the Main Linac of CLIC Effects of Accelerating Cavities on On-Line Dispersion Free.
FACET Tests Update A. Latina, J. Pfingstner, D. Schulte,
Phase Feed-Forward Piotr Skowroński (CERN)
Piotr Skowroński for the CTF3 team
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
First Year of Operation at the Two-beam Test Stand
In collaboration with P. N. Burrows, A. Latina and D. Schulte
Steering algorithm experience at CTF3
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
New algorithms for tuning the CLIC beam delivery system
S. Bettoni for the CTF3 commissioning team CTF3 commissioning status
Have a chance to operate your own beam at CERN
Phase Feedforward in 2015 & Plans for 2016
Beam-Based Alignment Results
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3
Evaluation of 1GHz vs 2GHz RF frequency in the damping rings
Presentation transcript:

B EAM STEERING EXPERIENCE AT CTF3 Davide Gamba 14 June 2014 Americas Workshop on Linear Colliders Fermilab

Outlook CTF3: the CLIC Test Facility at CERN. Steering necessities. A general feedback algorithm and its implementation. – An example of its use. Some issues: – Beam Jitter. – Energy profile along the pulse. Dispersion measurements Summary.

CTF3: the CLIC Test Facility at CERN. F ACTOR 2 R ECOMBINATION F ACTOR 2 R ECOMBINATION D RIVE B EAM G UN D RIVE B EAM G UN F ACTOR 4 R ECOMBINATION F ACTOR 4 R ECOMBINATION P ROBE B EAM P HOTO -I NJECTOR P ROBE B EAM P HOTO -I NJECTOR T WO B EAM T EST S TAND (TBTS) D OGLEG E XPERIMENT D ECELERATION T EST B EAM L INE (TBL) P HOTO I NJECTOR T ESTS XBOX EXPERIMENT XBOX EXPERIMENT CR 84 [m] DL 42 [m] Building 2001 Building 2013 Building 2010 Building 2003 CLEX area

Steering necessities. Final aim: during recombination, different section of the initial train take different paths. O NLY ONE SECTION OVER TWO IS DELAYED INTO THE D ELAY L OOP T HEY DON ’ T NECESSARILY COME BACK ON THE SAME TRAJECTORY. I NITIALLY WE ONLY HAVE A LONG TRAIN “ DIVIDED ” INTO 8 SECTIONS, EACH 140 NS LONG P ROJECTED EMITTANCE BLOW - UP. I NCREASED LOSSES. P ROJECTED EMITTANCE BLOW - UP. I NCREASED LOSSES. I N THE C OMBINER R ING ALL THE 8 SECTIONS CAN END UP IN HAVING DIFFERENT ORBITS

The algorithm B EAM LOSSES D ATA SYNCHRONIZATION B EAM LOSSES D ATA SYNCHRONIZATION M ODEL ACCURACY R ESPONSIVITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE CONTROL SYSTEM S TRENGTH CALIBRATION R ESPONSIVITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE CONTROL SYSTEM S TRENGTH CALIBRATION BPM RESOLUTION D ATA SYNCHRONIZATION N OISE C ALIBRATION L INEARITY BPM RESOLUTION D ATA SYNCHRONIZATION N OISE C ALIBRATION L INEARITY

Feedback implementation C ONTROLS : F EEDBACK G AINS W EIGHT ON CORRECTION MINIMIZATION P OSSIBILITY TO REDUCE OVERALL CORRECTION STRENGTH C ONTROLS : F EEDBACK G AINS W EIGHT ON CORRECTION MINIMIZATION P OSSIBILITY TO REDUCE OVERALL CORRECTION STRENGTH RM VIEW AND O RBITS HISTORY C ORRECTORS SETTINGS AND EXPECTED CORRECTION C URRENT ORBIT AND EXPECTED AFTER CORRECTION BPM S WEIGHTS

An example: orbit closure in Combiner Ring (CR) Nominally 4 trains of bunches at 3 GHz are injected and interleaved with each other in CR, generating a short 12 GHz pulse with high current (up to 32 A). For the orbit closure we use a shorter pulse circulating for many turns. O N TWO CONSECUTIVE TURNS THE ORBIT MIGHT BE DIFFERENT. A SHORT PULSE (140 NS LONG ) I S INJECTED IN CR A SHORT PULSE (140 NS LONG ) I S INJECTED IN CR P ROCEDURE : 1.W E TAKE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND TURN ORBIT AS OBSERVABLE TO MINIMIZE. 2.W E MEASURE THE R ESPONSE M ATRIX OF CORRECTOR MAGNETS INSIDE OR OUTSIDE CR ON THIS OBSERVABLE. 3.W E PROCEED WITH THE CORRECTION. P ROCEDURE : 1.W E TAKE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND TURN ORBIT AS OBSERVABLE TO MINIMIZE. 2.W E MEASURE THE R ESPONSE M ATRIX OF CORRECTOR MAGNETS INSIDE OR OUTSIDE CR ON THIS OBSERVABLE. 3.W E PROCEED WITH THE CORRECTION.

An example: orbit closure in Combiner Ring (CR) B EFORE CORRECTION A FTER CORRECTION A FTER CORRECTION H IGH W EIGHT BPM S P ATTERN VERY SIMILAR TO NOMINAL X- DISPERSION … T O BE INVESTIGATED. P ATTERN VERY SIMILAR TO NOMINAL X- DISPERSION … T O BE INVESTIGATED.

Issue: beam jitter and energy profile We are affected by a natural jitter of the energy due to RF power compression. Beam energy along the pulse is also not always flat. Thanks to generality of our feedback tool we can use it to shape the RF power of last linac structures to try to compensate the second effect. Jitter, as expected, doesn’t change…. …But we can use it… Looking at horizontal beam position along the pulse in a dispersive pickup.

Dispersion measurement from Jitter Developed an application to passively/actively measure dispersion by beam jitter. O NE CAN MEASURE : C ORRELATED JITTER ( PASSIVE ) L INEAR FIT ON INJECTOR BEAM CURRENT INDUCED JITTER ( ACTIVE ) L INEAR FIT ON MAIN BENDING SCALING ( ACTIVE ) C AN BE USED AS ONLINE DETECTION OF MACHINE DRIFTS. O NE CAN MEASURE : C ORRELATED JITTER ( PASSIVE ) L INEAR FIT ON INJECTOR BEAM CURRENT INDUCED JITTER ( ACTIVE ) L INEAR FIT ON MAIN BENDING SCALING ( ACTIVE ) C AN BE USED AS ONLINE DETECTION OF MACHINE DRIFTS.

Dispersion measurement from Bending Scaling Scaling only the main bending magnets one can have (at first order) the nominal dispersion (depending only on quadrupoles strength and beam energy). An example: CLEX experimental area. D ESIGNED DISPERSION SHOULD BE ZERO T WO B EAM A CCELERATION T EST A REA I NCOMING DISPERSION SHOULD BE ZERO D OGLEG DISPERSION SUPPRESSION WITH QUADRUPOLES

Dispersion measurement from Bending Scaling Before correction (Dark green line) O NLY IN THE FIRST BPM DISPERSION IS EXPECTED !

Dispersion measurement from Bending Scaling Manually changing quadrupoles used for dispersion correction.

Summary What has been done: - Developed and tested a generic linear feedback application. - Smart way to measure the response matrix: it can work in quasi-parasitic mode and/or during orbit correction. - Feedback is currently used for orbit correction and energy stabilization. What we are working on: - Injector stabilization. - Dispersion measurements from jitter. - “Jitter free” steering. - Machine Tuning by targeting nominal dispersion. Main limitations: - Beam losses induce fake signals of BPMs due to move of beam centroid and noise on acquisition. - Reliability of Beam Instrumentation. - Very important to “know” the machine. - Non linear dispersion may give some contribution in beam position measurement.

Thank you.

Issue with CR BPIs: an example

Orbit closure after Delay Loop (DL) First stage: match orbits of delayed and not-delayed trains. U SE CORRECTORS IN D ELAY L OOP F ORCE THE SAME ORBIT IN THE NEXT T RANSFER L INE (TL1) In principle only two correctors with the right phase advance are needed. – Aperture limitations may impose to use more correctors.

Preliminary result – 1 st run 2013 “Orbit matching” in TL1

Jitter free steering The first area where we have dispersion is at the end of Drive Beam linac, where a chicane is installed. N OMINALLY DISPERSION FREE N OMINALLY NON ZERO DISPERSION N OMINALLY NON ZERO DISPERSION

Jitter free steering Using the same feedback application and measuring dispersion as jitter (std). Change correctors inside chicane to reduce jitter (i.e. dispersion) downstream. Acquiring 30 beam pulses for each iteration. Main disadvantage: RM measurement and correction takes longer time.