© HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH Ukrainian Port Reform - Changes faced by a Terminal Operator - Klaus Schmöcker, President HPC Ukraine Maritime Days.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Large Project Finance Workshop Presentation on Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) Structural, Legal and Regulatory issues Peter Kyle Lead Counsel The World.
Advertisements

Establishing the Regulatory Framework for Competition DAVID PARKER OHR/OECD Conference on Regulatory Governance and Network Industries, Sarajevo 19 April.
1 New form of PPP in strategic infrastructure: Monetization of present infrastructure based on concession rights Presented by mr sci Izet Bajrambašić,
FEDERAL ANTIMONOPOLY SERVICE Liberalization and Structural Reorganization of Natural Monopolies (energy, transport, communications) as a Factor of Economic.
SPUTNIC – Strategies for Public Transport in Cities Strategies for Public Transport in Cities Funded by the EU PT Market.
SEE Port Development A Variation on the Story of the Rabbit and the Turtle Erich Cossutta, President Confindustria Serbia.
Strategic Planning of Port Infrastructure
Growing prosperity through trade Kenya Ports Authority Media Workshop Port Management Models.
1 PRIVATIZATION OF TCDD PORTS REPUBLIC OF TURKEY PRIME MINISTRY PRIVATIZATION ADMINISTRATION.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE GIURGIULESTI PORT COMPLEX. Giurgiulesti International Free Port ha, - has the status of a free economic zone - the oil terminal.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU CONCESSIONS IN TURKISH LAW İbrahim BAYLAN Legal Adviser Public.
May 2005 The French Water Services: Main present challenges.
1 FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN CUBA Republic of Slovenia October 15, 2013.
World Bank Port Reform Toolkit Module 2 The Evolution of Ports in a Competitive World.
1 Indian Port Sector By Hans Ole Madsen – CEO, South Asia for A.P. Moller-Maersk Port Pipavav.
1 / LiveLink number Passenger Land Transport in Portugal: Improving Competition by Legislative Reform José Luís Moreira de Silva Ana Pereira de Miranda.
Framework for Port Reform
Concession Length and Investment Timing Flexibility Chiara D’Alpaos, Cesare Dosi and Michele Moretto.
Public Private Partnership in Ports By A.K. Mohapatra Secretary Department of Shipping.
22 February 2007 Analysis of European road organization and infrastructure funding CEDR Conference of European Directors of Roads Paris, 22 February 2007.
Problems of regulating tariffs for housing and communal services, which create obstacles for developing sub national borrowing March 6, 2007 Alyona Babak,
Module 4 Legal Tools for Port Reform.
Odessa Maritime Days 24 May 2013 – Odessa.
Maris Brizgo, Loze, Grunte & CersNovember 22, Latvian Legal Perspective of Structuring Public – Private Partnership Project Maris Brizgo Loze, Grunte.
1 PORTS AND HARBOUR ENGINNERING PRIVATIZATION AND FINANCIAL ASPECTS OF PORTS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES.
ProFina - Project and Private Finance Feb 2002 Whither Private Sector Participation? Private Investment in the Utility Industries – Energy, Transport,
IMPLEMENTING PRICING POLICIES IN INTERURBAN ROAD TRANSPORT IN NAS COUNTRIES IN THE LIGHT OF PRESENT TRANSPORT POLICY - THE EXAMPLE OF POLAND Monika Bak.
Il porti in Europa: governance al porto di Barcelona Santiago Garcia-Milà Subdirector General, Autoridad Portuaria de Barcelona Chairman, European Sea.
Republic of Slovenia Capital Assets Management Agency of the Republic of Slovenia Corporate Governance of SOEs in Slovenia Dagmar Komar President of the.
THEORIES OF REGULATION
Technical Manager; Bechtel Oil, Gas & Chemicals.
Mayer Brown LLP APPLYING THE TOLL ROAD PRIVATIZATION MODEL TO OTHER ASSETS John Schmidt & David Narefsky NYU Wagner Rudin Center for Transportation Policy.
The practical challenges behind a change of an organisational model -Manfred Reuter- Workshop in Piraeus 1 October 2012.
Romania – National Regulatory Authority for Municipal Services.
Investment Project Construction of Multi-purpose Marine Complex of Terminals (MMCT) “Galitsyno”
PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP – CROATIAN EXPERIENCE Kamilo Vrana, B.Sc.E.E. Managing Director Beograd, November 18, 2010.
UN ECE R EAL E STATE M ARKET A DVISORY G ROUP (REM)Forum UNECE REM Policy Framework for Sustainable Real Estate Markets Policy Principles for Improved.
Public Private Participation William Demoor 10 th July 2015.
Timing of the Second Maasvlakte Maurits van Schuylenburg January 17th 2002.
Regulatory Institutions in Turkey. Regulatory Institutions Central Bank of Turkey Banking Supervision and Regulatory Institutions Capital Markets Board.
Interim Report on Cutting Cost and Time in Maritime Container Transport Maritime Experts Group 23 May 2006 Hanoi, Viet Nam 27th APEC Transportation Working.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Introducing a New Concessions System – Latvian Experience.
Dr Chris Whitaker Chairman, James Point Pty Ltd SW Corridor Strategic Planning afternoon Thursday January 29th 2009 James Point Port at Kwinana: “Development.
Maciej Grabowski Privatisation and role the state Improving Business Environment in Ukraine: Lessons from Central European Reforms INEKO – ICPS Seminar.
BMT Transport Solutions GmbH 1 Third BSR INTERREG III B partner search forum in Gdansk Actors perspective on pan-Baltic transport development Lars Källström.
The Nature of Real Estate and Real Estate Markets Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Public Benefits of Wholesale Markets. 1.Market Transparency, Competition and Efficiency 2.Food Safety 3.Farmers’ Access to Markets.
National port policy and Motorways of the Sea Initiatives: The case of Spain Xavier Gesé Deputy Director of Planning Puertos del Estado The First Mackay.
Transport A competitive port system for a competitive Europe Assoporti General Assembly Rome, 22 July 2015 Dimitrios Theologitis, Head of Unit "Ports &
PROJECT FINAL MEETING Advocacy and Capacity Building on Competition Policy and Law in Asia (7up2 Project) June 2006 Hotel Landmark Bangkok, Bangkok,
Increase Capacity of: Seaport Major Roadways Utility Services Improve the Mass Transit System Revision of Construction Regulations Labor Camps and the.
Security and Finnish Port Authorities ISPS Seminar at Finnish Transport Safety Agency Kirsti Tarnanen-Sariola, Deputy Director, Finnish Port.
Gdansk – Seaports Management Conference September 2010 Gdansk – Seaports Management Conference September 2010.
Amman October 1-2, 2003 Presentation Evolution of Saudi Telecom During Sector Reform 3 rd Annual Private Sector Cooperation Meeting in the Arab Region.
Attraction of investments into tourism sector in the EU member states The existing practice of special economic regime of natural resources management.
REGIONAL APPROACH TO RAIL DEVELOPMENT BY KINGSTON MKANDAWIRE RAIL CONSULTANT LOAD CENTRE ENGINEERING.
Privatization The transfer of public functions and resources to the private sector –Involves transfer of operations, management, or ownership The entry.
Session 1: Sector Perspective on PPPs Vickram Cuttaree The World Bank St. Petersburg – May 22, 2008.
Univeristy of Rijeka Faculty of Maritime Studies Loris Rak, LL.B.
Д-р Роланд A. Брэдшоу степени MBA, MSc, CEng, MICE
Association of providers of communal services in Republic of Macedonia - ADKOM Business planning in Macedonia – process starting as a request of the Regulator.
Review of priority areas of reform
The New Italian Law on Ports in the European Perspective
Legal Status of Seaports in the Republic of Slovenia
Module 8 : Implementing Port Reform
progress of the water reform in bulgaria
12thJune, 2016 Science City, Kolkata.
WATER UTILITY REFORM PLAN
Government Finance Statistics
The Role of Private Sector in Capital Budgeting
Presentation transcript:

© HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH Ukrainian Port Reform - Changes faced by a Terminal Operator - Klaus Schmöcker, President HPC Ukraine Maritime Days in Odessa, May 23th – 25th, 2013

2Ukrainian Port Reform – Changes faced by a Terminal Operator – © HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH Expected Uncertainties during Transition Period  Due to smaller scope of work the port administrations will have to reduce personnel.  Reduction of personnel not solved yet.  possibility of strikes?  The financing (budget) of the state companies still unclear.  possibility of lack of services?  Status of already initiated port investments unclear.  Due to centralised administration, lack of knowledge for the needs of local operators and users.  resulting in less-than-ideal and slow decisions.

3 Privatisation and Renting of Port Infrastructure  Some strategic port infrastructure facilities can be rented:  Berths  Rail lines and access roads used by one party only  Alternatively to renting, a concession up to 49 years can be granted to private companies for the use of strategic port infrastructure. Ukrainian Port Reform – Changes faced by a Terminal Operator – © HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH

4 Deregulation of Tariffs (Prices) The new port law differs between:  Specialised services provided by natural monopolies;  Other services.  Specialised services:  Will still be regulated by the State Company for the ports of Ukraine (i.e., the Government).  A list of services that belong to this class is to be enacted by the government.  Other services:  Comprise the majority of port services.  Will be deregulated – allow for free market-based tariffs and prices. Ukrainian Port Reform – Changes faced by a Terminal Operator – © HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH

5 Port of Odessa:  Breakwater and quay wall (650m)  Dredging (-16 m) HPC Ukraina:  Access dam to berths  Pavement of quay and access roads  Reclamation of 19ha terminal area  + 3 STS cranes for QM Status Quo of Quarantine Mole Project reclaimed area existing terminal and reclaimed area Ukrainian Port Reform – Changes faced by a Terminal Operator – © HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH

6 Future Steps to be solved Existing Terminal  no concessions granted  established in other sectors  never before used for port infrastructure  political priority for the ministry  ministry has to define future procedure Reclaimed Area  currently classified as fixed assets of ports  operators with unclear status  under the new law will be classified as land  can only be owned by the state but  can be leased to private entities  government to introduce legislation governing the status of reclaimed land Ukrainian Port Reform – Changes faced by a Terminal Operator – © HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH

7 Backup Ukrainian Port Reform – Changes faced by a Terminal Operator – © HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH

8 Factors Determining Private Port Investments Private Port Investments Capital Manpower Land Area Market Environment Resource Availability & Cost Demand for Services Competition Political Stability Laws and Regulations Planning Certainty Revenues Regulation of Tariffs Development of Prices Ukrainian Port Reform – Changes faced by a Terminal Operator – © HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH

9 Key Changes of the new Port Law The new Ukrainian port law…  …forms central National Company to manage all maritime ports of Ukraine.  …changes the port concept from „state company“ to „territory and water area“.  …allows ownership of port land assets in different sectors:  State  Municipal  Private  …provides no grounds for the termination of existing contracts under which infrastructure is used. Ukrainian Port Reform – Changes faced by a Terminal Operator – © HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH

10 Limiting the Sphere of State Monopoly The new Ukrainian port law provides a list of services which still can only be provided by the port-based branches of the state company:  regulation of ship traffic  rescue operations  navigational and hydrographic services  mapping and cartography services  detection, supervision and removal of oil spills All other services – particularly all kinds of cargo handling operations – can be provided by private companies. Ukrainian Port Reform – Changes faced by a Terminal Operator – © HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH

11 Future Adminstration of State Ports Organisation  single state company – not state authority  branch in each port  degree of independence of each branch to be determined by central administration (Ministry) Scope of Work  As per service list  No explicit mandate for cargo handling  Harbour Master separated from the administration Central Administration of Ukrainian State Ports Port of IllichevskPort of OdessaPort of YuzhnyOther Ports Ukrainian Port Reform – Changes faced by a Terminal Operator – © HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH

12 Facing New Status of Port Infrastructure The new Ukrainian port law differs between:  Strategic port infrastructure facilities  Other port infrastructure facilities The strategic facilities include:  Hydraulic structures (e.g., berths)  Rail lines and access roads  Communication and utility lines  Navigation equipment and other facilities of navigation and hydrographic support  Port traffic control systems  Information systems Ukrainian Port Reform – Changes faced by a Terminal Operator – © HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH

13 Factors Determining Private Port Investments Private Port Investments Capital Manpower Land Area Market Environment Resource Availability & Cost Demand for Services Competition Political Stability Laws and Regulations Planning Certainty Revenues Regulation of Tariffs Development of Prices Improved by new Port Law Ukrainian Port Reform – Changes faced by a Terminal Operator – © HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH