Background Researchers and funders continue to be concerned about the lack of archiving of scientific data. Such data can be useful to researchers, educators,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Panel 2 – Promoting Re-Use of Scientific Collections John Harrison SHAMAN Project University of Liverpool
Advertisements

Data Publishing Service Indiana University Stacy Kowalczyk April 9, 2010.
Curating Research: problems and policy Dale Peters Scientific Technical Manager DRIVER II.
New Services for Data Creators and Providers Louise Corti, Head ESDS Qualidata/ Outreach & Training Alasdair Crockett, ESDS Data Services Manager.
Useful tools for ESRC Research Centres
Fedora Users’ Conference Rutgers University May 14, 2005 Researching Fedora's Ability to Serve as a Preservation System for Electronic University Records.
Selecting a Data Sharing Repository. 2 Why Share Data? Enabling others to replicate and verify results as part of the scientific process Allows researchers.
ARC: Open Access and Research Data Justin Withers Director, Policy and Integrity Australian Research Council.
Transformations at GPO: An Update on the Government Printing Office's Future Digital System George Barnum Coalition for Networked Information December.
Qualitative Data Preparation and Use Jack Kneeshaw ESDS Psychology Department-U of Essex 4 December 2003.
Archives & Technology Collide: The Carolina Digital Repository Erin O’Meara Electronic Records Archivist University Archives and Records Services University.
Data Management Plans PAUL H. BERN, PH.D. APRIL 3, 2014.
Data Management What? Why? How?. 2 What do we mean by … Managing your Research (aka Data) … Ensuring physical integrity of files and helping to preserve.
Background: LIS programs generally lack the time and resources needed to track their graduates. As a result, educators, employers and other stakeholders.
Archiving our Social Science Digital History ECURE 2005 March 1, 2005.
Active Data Curation in Libraries: Issues and Challenges ASEE ELD Presentation June 27, 2011 William H. Mischo & Mary C. Schlembach.
Data Seal of Approval Overview Lightning Talk RDA Plenary 5 – San Diego March 11, 2015 Mary Vardigan University of Michigan Inter-university Consortium.
The International Household Survey Network IHSN IHSN Secretariat PARIS21 Steering Committee, 14 November 2007.
Data-PASS Shared Catalog Micah Altman & Jonathan Crabtree 1 Micah Altman Harvard University Archival Director, Henry A. Murray Research Archive Associate.
Guidance on Preparing a Data Management Plan
DMPTool Expert Resources and Support for Data Management Planning Tao Zhang Michael Witt Purdue University Libraries 1.
Data resources for the future Since 1962 The Selection, Appraisal, and Retention of Social Science Data in the United States Myron Gutmann Inter-university.
William Pooler and Heidi Imker PhD Department of Research Data Service & Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at.
IMLS NLG Collection Registry & Item-Level Metadata Repository at the University of Illinois Timothy W. Cole Mathematics Librarian &
International Council on Archives Section on University and Research Institution Archives Michigan State University September 7, 2005 Preserving Electronic.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Planning for Data Management Creating data management plans for your project.
SAVING AND STORING YOUR RESEARCH DATA : TIPS AND TOOLS Jane Fry Wendy Watkins Carleton University Library Data Centre and the Carleton Scholar Program.
Joan C. Bartlett McGill University, School of Information Studies May 6, 2013.
Elements of a Data Management Plan Bill Michener University Libraries University of New Mexico Data Management Practices for.
Digital Preservation: Lessons learned through national action Digital Preservation Interoperability Framework Workshop April 2010.
UVa Library Research Data Services
Data Management Planning
Richard MarcianoChien-Yi Hou Caryn Wojcik University of University of State of Michigan North Carolina North Carolina Records Management ServicesSALT DCAPE.
Data documentation and metadata for data archiving and sharing Managing research data well workshop London, 30 June 2009 Manchester, 1 July 2009.
Data Access and Research Transparency in Political Science Journals John Ishiyama Professor of Political Science & Editor in Chief American Political Science.
November 2004 NDIIPP: Future Directions and Relevance to Other Countries Beth Dulabahn Office of Strategic Initiatives Library of Congress November 7,
Michael Witt Interdisciplinary Research Librarian & Assistant Professor Purdue Libraries & Distributed Data Curation Center (D2C2) Eliciting.
Research Data Management for Research Support staff 30 th June 2015 Isabel Chadwick, Research Data Management Librarian
Life Cycle Models & Principles Jake Carlson Associate Professor of Library Science Data Services Specialist Purdue University Libraries.
BUILDING ON COMMON GROUND: EXPLORING THE INTERSECTION OF ARCHIVES AND DATA CURATION Lizzy Rolando & Wendy Hagenmaier 6/3/2015IASSIST 2015.
WGISS /09/2015 DATA PRESERVATION – CNES APPROACH B. Chausserie-Laprée.
Lucia Lötter NeDICC 26 February 2014 Lucia Lötter NeDICC 26 February 2014 Social science that makes a difference Research Methodology Centre Research Data.
Choosing Between Data Sharing Repositories for Engineering Linking Open Data cloud diagram, by Richard Cyganiak and Anja Jentzsch.
Data Management & the Library. FACT #1 Research is increasingly digital and produces digital data.
Peter Granda Archival Assistant Director / Data Archives and Data Producers: A Cooperative Partnership.
Persistent Digital Archives and Library System (PeDALS)
Defining Submission Agreements and Policies DigCCurr Professional Institute May 16-21, 2010 & January 5-6, 2011 Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA Carolyn.
Ensuring Long-term Access to Electronic Theses and Dissertations: Local vs. Global Lifecycle Management Daniel Gelaw Alemneh, University of North Texas.
The Project Three-year grant from the National Historical Publications and Records Commission (NHPRC), April 2010-March 2013 Develop electronic records.
System Development & Operations NSF DataNet site visit to MIT February 8, /8/20101NSF Site Visit to MIT DataSpace DataSpace.
Data Management Lesley A. Brown Director of Proposal Development.
11 Researcher practice in data management Margaret Henty.
LOGO National Institute of General Medical Sciences OPMS.
Providing access to your data: Determining your audience Robert R. Downs, PhD NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) Center for International.
Infrastructure Breakout What capacities should we build now to manage data and migrate it over the future generations of technologies, standards, formats,
SciencePAD Open Software for Open Science Alberto Di Meglio – CERN.
Open Science and Research – Services for Research Data Management © 2014 OKM ATT 2014–2017 initiative Licenced under.
A SCRIPT FOR ARCHIVING DIGITAL RESEARCH DATA IMPROVING ACCURACY AND EFFICIENCY IN THE DATAVERSE NETWORK ABSTRACT SUMMARY Rachel Carriere, Thu-Mai Christian,
Data Stewardship Lifecycle A framework for data service professionals Protectors of data.
Why do researchers need a Data Management Plan (DMP)? For all the same reasons you should take care of your data… To ensure that valuable data resources.
PhD-course Research Data Management (RDM) Expert Centre Research Data.
Beyond the Repository: Research Systems, REF & New Opportunities William J Nixon Digital Library Development Manager.
Jeff Moon Data Librarian &
CESSDA SaW Training on Trust, Identifying Demand & Networking
CFI John R Evans Leaders Fund Digital Data Management
Sophia Lafferty-hess | research data manager
ICPSR Census Metadata Repository
Research Data Management
A Case Study for Synergistically Implementing the Management of Open Data Robert R. Downs NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications.
Research data lifecycle²
Presentation transcript:

Background Researchers and funders continue to be concerned about the lack of archiving of scientific data. Such data can be useful to researchers, educators, students and policy makers for secondary analysis. The WILIS projects ( ), funded by IMLS, consist of: 1) an in-depth retrospective career survey of graduates of LIS programs in North Carolina with 2,653 respondents (WILIS1); 2) a modified recent graduates’ survey that was tested in 39 LIS programs in North America (WILIS2) with 3,507 respondents; and 3) the archiving of the WILIS1&2 datasets in the Odum Institute Dataverse Network, a publicly accessible data archive, and the creation of a guide to data archiving (WILIS3). This poster presents the WILIS 3 study and lessons learned from archiving the WILIS data sets. Methods The WILIS projects brought together various stakeholders who have an interest in archiving research data for public use, educator use and researcher use. Our WILIS3 partners were Survey Sciences Group (SSG), a web survey company responsible for the WILIS data collection, and the Odum Institute at UNC Chapel Hill. Each partner brought a different perspective to preparation of the data archiving guide: Researcher perspective (WILIS team) –survey design and logic, needs of LIS stakeholders, human subjects protection, analysis needs. Data collection perspective (SSG) –survey software, programming, data structure, sample management, methodological issues. Data archivist perspective (Odum Institute) –standards for data preservation, de- identification procedures, Dataverse interface and capabilities, ingesting process. WILIS 3 Guide to Data Archiving The WILIS guide provides a model for integrating archiving activities throughout the research process and highlights best practices for designing and implementing a data management plan throughout the project lifecycle. The web-based guide employs an interactive user-interface and illustrates how one might provide enhanced context for secondary users of research data within the data archive. Ultimately, better planning will result in higher quality data archiving. The guide is available at the study website: Cheryl A. Thompson 1, Joanne Gard Marshall 2, Jennifer Craft Morgan 3, Susan Rathbun-Grubb 4, & Amber Wells 2 1 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 3 Georgia State University, & 4 University of South Carolina #389 Integrating Data Curation Concepts throughout the Project Lifecycle: A WILIS Case Study Lessons Learned from the WILIS project Contact a data archive or repository early in the study Include your intention to archive research data in IRB application Document throughout the research process Plan ahead for archiving activities such as metadata generation & de-identification Protecting human subject privacy is time-consuming Designate resources to data archiving Research data lifecycle based on ICPSR’s Data Lifecycle Model (2012) Phase 1: Proposal development and data management plans Phase 2: Proposal set-up Phase 3: Data collection and file creation Phase 4: Data analysis Phase 6: Depositing data Phase 5: Preparing data for archiving and sharing Integrating Data Curation Concepts into the Research Data Lifecycle Archive planning Document theoretical framework & data plans Flag de-identification concerns Document methodology decisions, data types, & sources of measures Document methodology, deviations & oddities Update data management plan Prepare study-level metadata Grant proposal DMP Method memos IRB Method brief & memos Revised DMP Publicize data Preservation planning Create & use data citation Data reuse Identify archive or repository Identify any access/use restrictions Ensure data sharing complies with IRB Transfer all files to archive- friendly formats Prepare submission package (SIP) Document data codes, processing & edits Select version of data to archive Prepare data-level metadata Instrument Related studies Documents to collect: Publication Data deposit agreement Access levels De-ID process Data set Codebook Processing rules & scripts Analysis plans & memos