Risk-Based Capital: So Many Models CAS Annual Meeting 2007 Matthew Carrier, Principal Deloitte Consulting LLP November 12, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jennifer Marshall Senior Financial Analyst Property/Casualty Division February 12, 2009 Treatment of Investments in the A.M. Best Rating Process NYIA Educational.
Advertisements

Quantitative Challenges of Solvency 2. Bruce Porteous, Standard Life. Challenges in Quantitative Risk Management for Insurance, ICMS, 14 India Street,
Setting the Standard African Insurance Organisation Credit Assessment Programme Progress Report.
1 ASSAL Reinsurance Walter Bell – Alabama Commissioner of Insurance – NAIC President.
Age Exp. of Life
CASUALTY LOSS RESERVE SEMINAR CAPITAL MODELS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH LOSS RESERVING Matthew C. Mosher Managing Actuary September 28, Meeting.
1 U. S. Risk-Based Capital Requirements and Their Context Alfred W. Gross Virginia Commissioner of Insurance National Association of Insurance Commissioners.
Copyright © 2008 by the American Academy of Actuaries NAIC Rating Agency Hearing September 2009 Use of Rating Agency Ratings in State Insurance Regulation.
1 PROVISIONS FOR PROFIT AND CONTINGENCIES (MIS-35) Seminar on Ratemaking Nashville, TNRuss Bingham March 11-12, 1999Hartford Financial Services.
SAP Accounting. Statutory Accounting Insurers produce financial statement prescribed by NAIC Filed with insurance department of regulators Based on Statutory.
XXIII Annual ASSAL General Meeting US Risk-Based Supervision Director Christina Urias April 23, 2012.
Own Risk & Solvency Assessment (ORSA): The heart of Risk & Capital Management John Spencer Director, Ultimate Risk Solutions.
Capital Adequacy Chapter 20
Capital Models and Their Relationship With Loss Reserving Joanne Balling, ACAS Director.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Financial Operations of Insurers.
1 CINCINNATI FINANCIAL CORPORATION Credit Suisse First Boston 2005 Annual Insurance Conference November 2005.
Reinsurance and Rating Agency Models
Regulation, Basel II, and Solvency II
Economic Capital (EC) ERM Symposium, CS 1-B Chicago, IL April 26-27, 2004 Hubert Mueller, Tillinghast Phone (860) Profit Growth Value/$ Capital.
Macroprudential Surveillance in Practice ASSAL – July 2011 Susan Voss Iowa Insurance Commissioner NAIC President Todd Sells Director—Financial Regulatory.
Presenting the Results of a DFA Study to Management Casualty Actuarial Society Seminar on Dynamic Financial Analysis July 17-18, 2000 Gerald S. Kirschner,
GOOD PRACTICE IN REGULATING ANNUITY PROVIDERS Chris Daykin UK Government Actuary.
Solvency II and the Swiss Solvency Test
Icelandic experience of QIS3 – What to be expected in QIS4 and nearest future? credit market securities market pension- market insurance market Solvency.
Presenter: Amara Gondal General Insurance Balance Sheet October 28, 2010.
SB304 Montana State Fund Financial Presentation September 23, 2003.
Solvency II Framework IUMI Conference Copenhagen, 10 September 2007 Cosimo Turi Swiss Reinsurance Company.
Solvency Regulation in Iceland – Future Environment credit market securities market pension- market insurance market Willis Re’s Nordic Seminar 20th June.
FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORTING Ioana Abrahams 13 November 2009.
Capital Adequacy ASSAL – July 2011 Todd Sells ©2011 National Association of Insurance Commissioners.
Solvency II: Future Regulatory Capital Requirements CAS CARE Seminar, June 2005 Susan Witcraft.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin 20-1 © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Importance of Capital Adequacy Absorb unanticipated losses and preserve.
 CAS Spring Meeting Solvency Models Compared June 19, 2007.
1 RBC AND DST General Descriptions By Masdar. 2 Rational for RBC Formula Risk Based Capital provides a means of setting capital standards that recognizes.
THE USE OF ADMINISTRATIVE BANKING AND INSURANCE DATA 1 Presented by Hazel Corbin Statistics Adviser, ECCB Palm Haven Hotel Saint Lucia 3 to 7 February,
1 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar September 14, 1999 Presented by: Susan E. Witcraft Milliman & Robertson, Inc. DYNAMIC FINANCIAL ANALYSIS What Does It Look.
© AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS 101 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC Solvency Modernization and Corporate Governance ACLI’s Compliance.
Copyright © 2004 by Thomson Southwestern All rights reserved Insurance Company Financial Management Issues Chapter 16.
Prepared for: Casualty Actuarial Society Reinsurance and Rating Agency Models May 8, 2007 Susan Witcraft.
1 Roundtable discussions re: EPIC Philippine Insurers & Reinsurers Association Wednesday 22 nd & Thursday 23 rd January 2014.
© 2010 National Association of Insurance Commissioners NAIC Risk-Based Capital (RBC) HISTORY.
Spring 2002 CAS Meeting Modeling Capital Adequacy Matthew C. Mosher, FCAS Group Vice President Property/Casualty Ratings May 21, 2002.
By: Marife Umali and Pearl Mabutas Term Paper Compliance of Phil. Non-Life Insurance Companies to Risk- Based Capital as Imposed by the Insurance Commission.
The Application Of Fundamental Valuation Principles To Property/Casualty Insurance Companies Derek A. Jones, FCAS Joy A. Schwartzman, FCAS.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2004 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Insolvencies, Solvency Ratings, and Solvency Regulation.
PD-34: Capital Models OSFI Guidance Canadian Institute of Actuaries General Meeting Ottawa November 2009.
2,532 NDIRF Membership Schools Other City County 2014 MEMBERS’ PREMIUM DISTRIBUTION.
Effect of Reinsurance on BCAR Case Study CARe Seminar on Reinsurance May 20, 2008 Thomas M. Mount, ACAS, MAAA A. M. Best Company.
Economic Capital at Manulife
Basel Capital Adequacy Framework
2003 FINANCIAL REVIEW Samuel M. Garvin, Jr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Spring 2004 CAGNY Meeting How do Rating Agencies Determine Insurance Company Ratings John Andre Vice President Property/Casualty Ratings June 3, 2004.
Banking, Investing and Insurance BUSINESS AND BANKING AND PROFITABILITY.
November 14, 2001 François Morin, FCAS, MAAA, CFA Capital Management 2001 CAS Annual Meeting - Atlanta, Georgia.
LIFE INSURANCE CAPITAL Market and Credit Risk QIS Sylvain St-Georges, FSA, FCIA November 19, 2009.
Chapter 7 Financial Operations of Insurers. Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.7-2 Agenda Property and Casualty Insurers Life.
1 Larry J. Bruning FSA, MAAA, CLU International Life Actuary, NAIC USA 6 September 2011 Capital Adequacy and Supervisory Assessment of Solvency Positions.
Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Financial Statement Analysis K R Subramanyam John J Wild.
AXIS CAPITAL Risk Management International Insurance Society July 10, 2007 David B. Greenfield Chief Financial Officer.
19 May 2004 The NAIC Risk-Based-Capital Formula Revisited Robert F. Wolf, FCAS, MAAA Principal, Mercer Oliver Wyman G. Chris Nyce, FCAS, MAAA Manager,
Benchmarking Key Financial Ratios Prepared by: Mujtaba Datoo, ACAS, MAAA, FCA | Actuarial Practice Leader Aon Global Risk Consulting Phone:
Capital Modeling for Benefit Pools: A Case Study How Much is Enough (for us)?
Insurance Companies. Chapter Outline Two Categories of Insurance Companies: Chapter Overview Life Insurance Companies Property-Casualty Insurance Companies.
CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of Standard & Poor’s.
Insurance Accounting Overview
Chapter Outline 5.1 Insurer Insolvencies
PROFIT AND CONTINGENCIES (FIN-28)
Financial Statement Analysis K.R. Subramanyam
Financial Statement Analysis
IAIS – ASSAL Training Seminar April 28, 2009 David Oakden
Presentation transcript:

Risk-Based Capital: So Many Models CAS Annual Meeting 2007 Matthew Carrier, Principal Deloitte Consulting LLP November 12, 2007

Copyright © 2007 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. Agenda Capital Requirement Measurement NAIC Risk-Based Capital Requirements A.M. Best Capital Model Standard & Poor’s Current and Proposed Capital Model FSA (United Kingdom) and Solvency II Disclaimers Views and information communicated today are based on research and do not necessarily reflect the views or procedures of the organizations discussed. None of the information included herein should be utilized without independent verification.

Copyright © 2007 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. Capital Requirement Measurement Formula Based Approach –NAIC Risk Based Capital (RBC) –A.M. Best Capital Adequacy Requirement –Standard & Poor’s Capital Adequacy Requirement Formula + Stochastic Based Approach –Financial Services Authority (FSA) - UK –Solvency II

Copyright © 2007 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. NAIC Risk Based Capital (RBC) Requirements Goals of NAIC RBC –Establish a standard capital requirement approach –Utilize quantitative analysis of capital and surplus requirements that reflect each insurer’s inherent risks –Provide regulators with authority to enforce compliance with capital requirements Supervisory Intervention Requirements –No Action (RBC Ratio > 200%) –Company Action Level (RBC ratio %): I nsurer files financial and business plan –Regulatory Action Level (RBC ratio %): Above plus, regulator must examine and require corrective action –Authorized Control Level (RBC ratio %): Above plus, regulator may take control of insurer –Mandatory Control Level (RPB ratio < 70%): Regulator required to take control unless corrected within 90 days

Copyright © 2007 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. NAIC Risk Based Capital RBC Ratio = Authorized Control Level RBC = 0.5 x Total RBC Requirement Total RBC Requirement = R 0 + √R R (0.5R 3 ) 2 + (0.5R 3 +R 4 ) 2 + R categories of capital charges –R 0 :Off Balance Sheet –R 1 :Fixed Income Securities –R 2 :Equity Securities –R 3 :Credit –R 4 :Loss and LAE Reserves –R 5 :Net Written Premium Adjusted Surplus Authorized Control Level RBC

Copyright © 2007 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. NAIC Risk Based Capital Categories of capital charges R 0 : Off Balance Sheet –Investment in insurance affiliates –Guarantees for Affiliates –Contingent liabilities R 1 :Fixed Income Securities –Cash, bonds –Mortgage loans –Collateral Loans –Bond size and asset concentration adjustment factors R 2 :Equity Securities –Common stocks, preferred stocks, real estate –Aggregate write-ins for invested assets –Asset concentration adjustment factors R 3 :Credit Risk –Reinsurance recoverables –Other receivables

Copyright © 2007 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. R 5 :Written Premium Risk Basic premium risk charge –Offset for loss-sensitive business –Adjustment for claims-made business –Premium concentration factor –Growth charge for premium risk Written premium risk charge by line = Net written premium * [(RBC charge adjusted for company average loss & expense ratio * adjustment for investment income) + company underwriting expense ratio – 1] * Offset factor Total written premium risk charge = Sum of written premium risk charge by line * premium concentration factor R 4 :Reserving Risk Basic reserving risk charge –Offset for loss-sensitive business –Adjustment for claims-made business –Loss concentration factor –Growth charge for reserving risk Reserving risk charge by line = Reported reserve * [( 1+ RBC charge adjusted for company development) * adjustment for investment income – 1] * Offset factor Total reserving risk charge = Sum of reserving risk charge by line * loss concentration factor NAIC Risk Based Capital Categories of capital charges (continued)

Copyright © 2007 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. A.M. Best Capital Model BCAR = Adjusted Surplus Net Required Capital Net Required Capital = B 7 + √B B B (0.5B 4 ) 2 + (0.5B 4 +B 5 ) 2 + B 6 2 Formula Components –B 1 :Fixed Income Securities –B 2 :Equity Securities –B 3 :Interest Rate –B 4 :Credit –B 5 :Loss and LAE Reserves –B 6 :Net Written Premium –B 7 :Off Balance Sheet

Copyright © 2007 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. S&P Current and Proposed Capital Model S&P Current Capital Adequacy Ratio = TAC – C 1 – C 2 C 3 + C 4 + C 5 TAC: Total Adjusted Capital –Reserves adjusted for any deficiency and then discounted Formula Components –C 1 :Asset Risk –C 2 :Credit Risk –C 3 :Underwriting Risk (Written Premium Risk) –C 4 :Reserve Risk –C 5 :Other Business Risk *S&P Proposed Capital Model: - Currently running both current and proposed models in parallel. Risk variables are stressed using confidence levels varied by the company’s targeted rating category and cumulative five-year defaults across ratings. Explicit credit for diversification within the capital model, albeit at more conservative levels than generally observed within the market. Outcome => Model more reflective of specific company.

Copyright © 2007 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. Comparison of Models

Copyright © 2007 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. Comparison of Risk Charges

Copyright © 2007 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. Financial Services Authority (FSA) - UK Two components for Capital Requirement Enhanced Capital Requirement (ECR): standard formula is utilized with different percentage charges for assets, liabilities and premiums Individual Capital Assessment (ICA): Additional requirement for insurers to develop internal view of capital requirements using scenario testing or internal models –99.5% confidence level for 1 year –Results discussed with regulators and capital requirements agreed

Copyright © 2007 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. Solvency II Currently targeting 2012 to have the new system in place Two capital measures to be introduced Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR) – Formula approach calculation. –If company falls below MCR threshold, regulators will have requirement to stop operations. Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) - The SCR is based on a Value-at-Risk measure calibrated to a 99.5% confidence level over a 1-year time horizon. –Covers all risks and risk mitigations for company –The SCR may be calculated using either a new European Standard Formula (to be finalized in 2009) or an internal model validated by the supervisory authorities. –If company falls below SCR threshold, regulators will have requirement to intervene.