Atlas CAP Closeout Thanks to all the presenters for excellent and frank presentations Thanks to all the presenters for excellent and frank presentations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Data Services Task Team Proposal Discussion at WGISS #25 February, 2008 Lyndon R. Oleson U.S. Geological.
Advertisements

Market-Based Management
OPSM 639, C. Akkan Monitoring Progress How does a project get one year late? … One day at a time –Frederick P. Brooks MBWA: Management by Walking Around.
MIS 2000 Class 20 System Development Process Updated 2014.
Resources for the ATLAS Offline Computing Basis for the Estimates ATLAS Distributed Computing Model Cost Estimates Present Status Sharing of Resources.
Project What is a project A temporary endeavor undertaken to create a unique product, service or result.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
CS 325: Software Engineering April 7, 2015 Software Configuration Management Task Scheduling & Prioritization Reporting Project Progress Configuration.
Planning for a Western Analysis Facility Richard P. Mount Planning for a Western Analysis FacilityPage 1.
IT Planning.
SE is not like other projects. l The project is intangible. l There is no standardized solution process. l New projects may have little or no relationship.
Project Management Session 7
Market-Based Management
Software Project Risk Management
Project Plan Development
Defining the Activities. Documents  Goal Statement defines why helps manage expectations  Statement of Work what gets delivered defines scope  Software.
LSU 07/24/2004Defining Project Tasks1 Defining the Project Tasks Project Management Unit, Lecture 4.
DATA PRESERVATION IN ALICE FEDERICO CARMINATI. MOTIVATION ALICE is a 150 M CHF investment by a large scientific community The ALICE data is unique and.
State of Kansas Statewide Financial Management System Pre-Implementation Project Steering Committee Meeting January 11, 2008.
U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Budget and Schedule Review John Huth Harvard University DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven.
October 24, 2000Milestones, Funding of USCMS S&C Matthias Kasemann1 US CMS Software and Computing Milestones and Funding Profiles Matthias Kasemann Fermilab.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Software Development Life Cycle Decisions Project Management Disciplines Stacey Shearn September 8, 2005.
CIS 321—IS Analysis & Design Chapter 3: The Analyst as a Project Manager.
Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.
D. Britton GridPP Status - ProjectMap 22/Feb/06. D. Britton22/Feb/2006GridPP Status GridPP2 ProjectMap.
SLA of an Outsource Process - 1 Service Level Agreements (SLAs) of an Outsource Process Michael Day MBA 731 October 29, 2007.
Project Tracking. Questions... Why should we track a project that is underway? What aspects of a project need tracking?
Getting Started Conservation Coaches Network New Coach Training.
DOSAR Workshop, Sao Paulo, Brazil, September 16-17, 2005 LCG Tier 2 and DOSAR Pat Skubic OU.
Page 1 BaBar IFR Mechanical, Schedule Cost Review Outbriefing (1) Excellent job on preparing and presenting review Overall, the Committee feels that the.
19 November 98 1 Jürgen Knobloch ATLAS Computing ATLAS Computing - issues for 1999 Jürgen Knobloch Slides also on:
Formal Methods in Software Engineering
1 EURO REPORTING – Doing Business With The EC –. 2 Index  Relationship Overview  The FAFA Principles  Gain/Loss Scenarios  Financial Risk  Possible.
Questions for ATLAS  How can the US ATLAS costs per SW FTE be lowered?  Is the scope of the T1 facility matched to the foreseen physics requirements.
U.S. ATLAS Tier 1 Planning Rich Baker Brookhaven National Laboratory US ATLAS Computing Advisory Panel Meeting Argonne National Laboratory October 30-31,
Page 1 May 10, 2011 IT for the 12 GeV Era 2011 Review Review Closing Summary.
Commodity Node Procurement Process Task Force: Status Stephen Wolbers Run 2 Computing Review September 13, 2005.
US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Brookhaven National Laboratory DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven National Laboratory.
BNL Tier 1 Service Planning & Monitoring Bruce G. Gibbard GDB 5-6 August 2006.
3.1.1 Optics, Optical Corrector, Mechanical Systems M. Johns, C. Claver.
US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Brookhaven National Laboratory Review of U.S. LHC Software and Computing Projects Fermi National Laboratory November.
Meeting Management/Planning. Today Go over basics of meeting management Introduce key elements of creating a plan.
1 ILC Internal Cost Review Major Points from External Reviewers T. Elioff, J. Marx, V. Soergel, M. Yoshioka, and A. Yamamoto, (C. Wyss, absent) To be presented.
ATLAS Tier 1 at BNL Overview Bruce G. Gibbard Grid Deployment Board BNL 5-6 September 2006.
6/23/2005 R. GARDNER OSG Baseline Services 1 OSG Baseline Services In my talk I’d like to discuss two questions:  What capabilities are we aiming for.
ATLAS WAN Requirements at BNL Slides Extracted From Presentation Given By Bruce G. Gibbard 13 December 2004.
CSE SW Project Management / Module 15 - Introduction to Effort Estimation Copyright © , Dennis J. Frailey, All Rights Reserved CSE7315M15.
Integration of the ATLAS Tag Database with Data Management and Analysis Components Caitriana Nicholson University of Glasgow 3 rd September 2007 CHEP,
U.S. ATLAS Computing Facilities Overview Bruce G. Gibbard Brookhaven National Laboratory U.S. LHC Software and Computing Review Brookhaven National Laboratory.
U.S. ATLAS Computing Facilities Bruce G. Gibbard Brookhaven National Laboratory Mid-year Review of U.S. LHC Software and Computing Projects NSF Headquarters,
US ATLAS Tier 1 Facility Rich Baker Deputy Director US ATLAS Computing Facilities October 26, 2000.
PCAP Close Out Feb 2, 2004 BNL. Overall  Good progress in all areas  Good accomplishments in DC-2 (and CTB) –Late, but good.
The ATLAS Computing & Analysis Model Roger Jones Lancaster University ATLAS UK 06 IPPP, 20/9/2006.
LARP Review, June 12-14, 2006 Prebys, Todesco, Zisman 1 Accelerator Systems Eric Prebys Ezio Todesco Mike Zisman.
BSBPMG501A Manage Project Integrative Processes Manage Project Integrative Processes Project Integration Processes – Part 2 Diploma of Project Management.
Implementing Program Management Standards at Duke Energy.
Impacts of implementation of 4PM Vesna Kobal, Arctur d.o.o. Rijeka, april 2014.
DOE-NSF Comprehensive Review of US-LHC Computing January 19, 2007 UT Arlington CLOSEOUT SESSION.
Designing Measurable Expected Outcomes & The Work Plan.
Phase-1: Prepare for the Change Why stepping back and preparing for the change is so important to successful adoption: Uniform and effective change adoption.
Ian Bird, CERN WLCG Project Leader Amsterdam, 24 th January 2012.
Cowlitz County, WA Accounting Function Review
Readiness of ATLAS Computing - A personal view
CS 325: Software Engineering
Recognization and management of RISK in educational projects
New strategies of the LHC experiments to meet
Student Led Conferences: A Closer Look
Time Scheduling and Project management
Presentation transcript:

Atlas CAP Closeout Thanks to all the presenters for excellent and frank presentations Thanks to all the presenters for excellent and frank presentations

Project Overall U.S. Atlas (and International Atlas) have made considerable progress in the past 12 months U.S. Atlas (and International Atlas) have made considerable progress in the past 12 months Budgets remain very tight, and may jeopardize project goals, especially in the out years Budgets remain very tight, and may jeopardize project goals, especially in the out years

Management (1) Overall, the management of the Software & Computing of the research program appears healthy... Overall, the management of the Software & Computing of the research program appears healthy... For FY2006-FY2007, an adequate management reserve is being maintained. For FY2008, it is ephemeral, in that the computing project deficits consume the full reserve (i.e. there is no reserve). Moreover, the Tier 1 plans do not include the expected increase in overhead by 30%, which pushes the overhead well above the reserve. For FY2006-FY2007, an adequate management reserve is being maintained. For FY2008, it is ephemeral, in that the computing project deficits consume the full reserve (i.e. there is no reserve). Moreover, the Tier 1 plans do not include the expected increase in overhead by 30%, which pushes the overhead well above the reserve. Recommendation: Make presentation of what is “unfunded” explicit. Minor point: Use of Access and Project does not yet (apparently) include resource loading. These details are being held at lower levels of project (software, tier1, etc.). Minor point: Use of Access and Project does not yet (apparently) include resource loading. These details are being held at lower levels of project (software, tier1, etc.).

Management (2) (Formal) Change Control remains for the most part unimplemented, and is not being used as a management tool. (Formal) Change Control remains for the most part unimplemented, and is not being used as a management tool. –The one change which exercised the mechanism this year was an aggregate “omnibus” change, which is not a recommended approach –The move to PanDA should have invoked change control under any reasonable definitions of triggers –The re-organization of the WBS should likewise have invoked change control, even if cost neutral –A 3 month milestone delay as a trigger is much too lax at this stage of the project –“Changes in scope / cost” as a trigger is too vague; recommend adding an FTE-month or $$$ qualification Recommendation: Utilize Change Control more formally.

Software (1) Data analysis model has matured to the level of having a concrete definition of the AOD (additional work needed is recognized) Data analysis model has matured to the level of having a concrete definition of the AOD (additional work needed is recognized) –Further effort on optimizing read performance of the AOD & ESD would be well spent now –While the transient/persistent model shows good initial gains, should study whether simplifying the persistent data structures will in the end result in higher performance Geometry effort impressive, facilitating a nice event display Geometry effort impressive, facilitating a nice event display

Software (2) Responded well to problems in DC2 and future scaling challenges by developing a tool (PanDA) that minimized reliance on the weak links in the grid toolset. Change made at good point: early enough to do good job in hardening, not so early as to miss opportunity for maturing middleware. Responded well to problems in DC2 and future scaling challenges by developing a tool (PanDA) that minimized reliance on the weak links in the grid toolset. Change made at good point: early enough to do good job in hardening, not so early as to miss opportunity for maturing middleware. Presentations need polish: PanDA might be viewed as an adhoc, non-collaborative effort. Need to emphasize that Presentations need polish: PanDA might be viewed as an adhoc, non-collaborative effort. Need to emphasize that –at top end, interfaces to standard executor –at the bottom end, interfaces to standard grid

Software (3) Commissioning strategy... Commissioning strategy... –Component level testing for CSC is good Are the dates for milestones for components firm? Confirm they are early enough for integration testing. –Delaying a full scale data challenge to actual beam may represent a risk

Software (3) Analysis Model needs additional work to show how pieces all connect together Analysis Model needs additional work to show how pieces all connect together –will the AOD be used, and give good performance? –role of tag database (vs trigger data) isn’t clear enough, relationship to streaming

Software Support Plans for software support are considerably more concrete (good!) Plans for software support are considerably more concrete (good!) How the 3 centers will be realized & staffed remains vague How the 3 centers will be realized & staffed remains vague Recommendation: Identify people, charge them with the task, and get them to organize their support activities to accomplish the goals: –develop process that will motivate support, and not overload those tasked with it –define / negotiate level of effort

Facilities Substantial progress on procurements and facility services (e.g. dCache, grid interfaces) and ramp-up of staff Substantial progress on procurements and facility services (e.g. dCache, grid interfaces) and ramp-up of staff Wonderful news on WAN upgrades Wonderful news on WAN upgrades Capacity and staff are on schedule Capacity and staff are on schedule FY2006 will be another significant year of increases FY2006 will be another significant year of increases

Facilities (2) While current scale of dCache is impressive, current utilization is modest and does not yet represent a significant test While current scale of dCache is impressive, current utilization is modest and does not yet represent a significant test Size of resources utilized through the grid interface averaged ~100 cpu’s, which is rather modest; need to work on larger stress tests Size of resources utilized through the grid interface averaged ~100 cpu’s, which is rather modest; need to work on larger stress tests

Facilities (3) BNL is enjoying significant benefit from co- location with RCF BNL is enjoying significant benefit from co- location with RCF –Need to document benefits, both to show the benefit to agencies, and to reveal potential risk if RCF goes away Budget does not include upcoming 30% increase in overhead. Budget does not include upcoming 30% increase in overhead. Recommendation: include the overhead in out-year planning.

Facilities (4) Long term planning for Tier 1 (space, etc.) needs additional attention Long term planning for Tier 1 (space, etc.) needs additional attention Current ESD size and simulation times are considerably above “nominal”, and may result in need for additional storage and compute resources, or a de-scoping of event rate. Current ESD size and simulation times are considerably above “nominal”, and may result in need for additional storage and compute resources, or a de-scoping of event rate. Recommendation: Make sure this issue is being addressed at all levels within International Atlas

Facilities (5) Procurement of 2008 resources with fy2008 funds implies that resources are not fully available January 1. Procurement of 2008 resources with fy2008 funds implies that resources are not fully available January 1. Recommendation: –Plans should be made to reflect the realities of procuring and commissioning multiple petabytes of disk and ~1000 nodes (plan for staged roll-out during Jan-April 2008)

Grids Formal involvement in OSG management is on a good track Formal involvement in OSG management is on a good track –expressions of support from US Atlas management, involvement of Torre There is some unease on both sides (OSG, US Atlas) about Atlas participation in OSG There is some unease on both sides (OSG, US Atlas) about Atlas participation in OSG Recommendation: Find success oriented approach (find a win-win) for US Atlas participation in OSG. OSG needs to deliver a net positive impact on the US LHC experiments early in LHC operations