Integrated Modeling of the Interactions Between Climate Change, Forest Biomass, Wildfire Emissions and Air Quality U. Shankar 1, A. Xiu 1, and D. Fox 2,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some recent studies using Models-3 Ian Rodgers Presentation to APRIL meeting London 4 th March 2003.
Advertisements

Gridded Biome-BGC Simulation with Explicit Fire-disturbance Sinkyu Kang, John Kimball, Steve W. Running Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group, School.
Causes and Consequences of Climate Change: Wildfire Emissions and Their Air Quality Impacts in the Southeastern U.S. U. Shankar 1, J. Prestemon 2, A. Xiu.
Forest Growth and Fire Fuel Predictions for Air Quality Modeling Limei Ran, Uma Shankar, Aijun Xiu, B.H. Baek, Zac Adelman Institute for the Environment,
CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON US AIR QUALITY: EXAMINATION OF OZONE AND FINE PARTICULATE MATTER CONCENTRATIONS AND THEIR SENSITIVITY TO EMISSION CHANGES Tagaris.
Multi-scale and Ensemble Modeling of the Effects of Global Change on Air Quality in the US NW –AIRQUEST Annual Meeting Washington State University Pullman,
A statistical method for calculating the impact of climate change on future air quality over the Northeast United States. Collaborators: Cynthia Lin, Katharine.
Fire Modeling issues: fire effects on regional air quality under a changing climate Douglas G. Fox
U. Shankar 1, D. McKenzie 2, J. Bowden 1 and L. Ran 1 Assessing the Impacts on Smoke, Fire and Air Quality Due to Changes in Climate, Fuel Loads, and Wildfire.
BlueSky-EM, SMOKE and Data Linkages Andy Holland Carolina Environmental Program Symposium on Climate, Forest Growth, Fire and Air Quality Interactions.
Discussion Space Research Centre. Urbanization and Industrialization: in 2008, more than half of humans live in cities UN Population Report 2007.
Climate, Fire and Air Quality Climate Impacts Group June 1, 2006.
Climate change, fires, and carbon aerosol over N. America with preliminary detour to discuss GCAP model development (GCAP= Global change and air pollution)
The AIRPACT-3 Photochemical Air Quality Forecast System: Evaluation and Enhancements Jack Chen, Farren Thorpe, Jeremy Avis, Matt Porter, Joseph Vaughan,
Forest Growth Model and Data Linkage Issues Limei Ran Carolina Environmental Program UNC Steve McNulty Jennifer Moore Myers Southern Global Change Program,
Air Quality-Climate Interactions Aijun Xiu Carolina Environmental Program.
THE IMPACTS OF TRANS-BOUNDARY TRANSPORT OF AEROSOLS ON THE REGIONAL AIR QUALITY: A case study of Mexican wildland fire on May 1998 Hee-Jin In 1, Daewon.
Fire Emissions and The Cyclical Relationships of Climate Change, Forest Biomass, Fire Emissions and Atmospheric Aerosol Loadings U. Shankar 1, A. Xiu 1,
BlueSky Implementation in CANSAC Julide Kahyaoglu-Koracin Desert Research Institute - CEFA CANSAC Workshop Riverside, CA May 2006 Julide Kahyaoglu-Koracin.
Effects of Siberian forest fires on regional air quality and meteorology in May 2003 Rokjin J. Park with Daeok Youn, Jaein Jeong, Byung-Kwon Moon Seoul.
Climate Change Impacts on Georgia’s Natural Resources Steven McNulty, Ph.D. Research Ecologist USDA Forest Service Raleigh, NC.
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
Modeling climate change impacts on forest productivity with PnET-CN Emily Peters, Kirk Wythers, Peter Reich NE Landscape Plan Update May 17, 2012.
A Modeling Investigation of the Climate Effects of Air Pollutants Aijun Xiu 1, Rohit Mathur 2, Adel Hanna 1, Uma Shankar 1, Frank Binkowski 1, Carlie Coats.
Prediction of Future North American Air Quality Gabriele Pfister, Stacy Walters, Mary Barth, Jean-Francois Lamarque, John Wong Atmospheric Chemistry Division,
OMI HCHO columns Jan 2006Jul 2006 Policy-relevant background (PRB) ozone calculations for the EPA ISA and REA Zhang, L., D.J. Jacob, N.V. Smith-Downey,
Copyright © SRC 2012 Forestry Component of the PRAC Terrestrial Theme Mark Johnston and Elaine Qualtiere Saskatchewan Research Council 15 February 2012.
Using MODIS fire count data as an interim solution for estimating biomass burning emission of aerosols and trace gases Mian Chin, Tom Kucsera, Louis Giglio,
1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.
Determining and Distributing Real-Time Strategic-Scale Fire Danger Assessments Chris Woodall and Greg Liknes USDA North Central Research Station, Forest.
Spatial and temporal patterns of CH 4 and N 2 O fluxes from North America as estimated by process-based ecosystem model Hanqin Tian, Xiaofeng Xu and other.
WRAP Fire Emissions Meeting 5 December 2002 Community Smoke Emissions Model WRAP Fire Emissions Forum Meeting December 2002 Douglas Fox Cooperative Institute.
US Aerosols : Observation from Space, Climate Interactions Daniel J. Jacob and funding from NASA, EPRI, EPA with Easan E. Drury (now at NREL), Loretta.
Future climate change drives increases in forest fires and summertime Organic Carbon Aerosol concentrations in the Western U.S. Dominick Spracklen, Jennifer.
Development and Preliminary Results of Image Processing Tools for Meteorology and Air Quality Modeling Limei Ran Center for Environmental Modeling for.
Gridded Biome-BGC Simulation with Explicit Fire-disturbance Sinkyu Kang, John Kimball, Steve W. Running Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group, School.
Assessment of the Impacts of Global Change on Regional U.S. Air Quality: A synthesis of climate change impacts on ground-level ozone An Interim Report.
Wildland Fire Impacts on Surface Ozone Concentrations Literature Review of the Science State-of-Art Ned Nikolov, Ph.D. Rocky Mountain Center USDA FS Rocky.
Operational Evaluation and Comparison of CMAQ and REMSAD- An Annual Simulation Brian Timin, Carey Jang, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Tom Braverman USEPA/OAQPS.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
Pollutant Emissions from Large Wildfires in the Western United States Shawn P. Urbanski, Matt C. Reeves, W. M. Hao US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research.
GEOS-CHEM Modeling for Boundary Conditions and Natural Background James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling.
1 Aika Yano, Yongtao Hu, M. Talat Odman, Armistead Russell Georgia Institute of Technology October 15, th annual CMAS conference.
Simulating global fire regimes & biomass burning with vegetation-fire models Kirsten Thonicke 1, Allan Spessa 2 & I. Colin Prentice
Impact of the changes of prescribed fire emissions on regional air quality from 2002 to 2050 in the southeastern United States Tao Zeng 1,3, Yuhang Wang.
Importance of chemistry-climate interactions in projections of future air quality Loretta J. Mickley Lu Shen, Daniel H. Cusworth, Xu Yue Earth system models.
Denver 2004 TGP1 PM2.5 Emissions Inventory Workshop Denver, CO March 2004 Thompson G. Pace USEPA Emissions Estimation for Wildland Fires.
Georgia Institute of Technology SUPPORTING INTEX THROUGH INTEGRATED ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE AND SUB-ORBITAL MEASUREMENTS WITH GLOBAL AND REGIONAL 3-D MODELS:
Uncertainties in Wildfire Emission Estimates Workshop on Regional Emissions & Air Quality Modeling July 30, 2008 Shawn Urbanski, Wei Min Hao, Bryce Nordgren.
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
Future Air Quality in Representative Concentration Pathway Scenarios: Relationships Between Economic Wellbeing and Air Quality J. Jason West Steven J.
CHARGE QUESTIONS: ENDPOINTS  anthropogenic emissions   air pollution   climate OK, but can we be more specific?  Intercontinental transport of.
Application of Fuel Characteristic Classification System to Ph II EI (add-on task to Inter RPO project) Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting Spokane, WA.
GCAP (Global Climate and Air Pollution): One of six projects funded by EPA-STAR to study effect of climate change on air quality. Collaborators: Harvard.
Fire and Air Quality Interactions Symposium on Climate, Forest Growth, Fire and Air Quality Interactions Overview of Project and Personnel Uma Shankar.
Climate-Air Quality: Linkages and OAQPS Strategy National Tribal Forum April 2007.
Research Progress Discussions of Coordinated Emissions Research Suggestions to Guide this Initiative Focus on research emission inventories Do not interfere.
Forest Management Service Center Providing Biometric Services to the National Forest System Program Emphasis: We provide products and technical support.
Mayurakshi Dutta Department of Atmospheric Sciences March 20, 2003
Updates to model algorithms and inputs for the Biogenic Emissions Inventory System (BEIS) model Jesse Bash, Kirk Baker, George Pouliot, Donna Schwede,
Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory WRF-CMAQ 2-way Coupled System: Part II Jonathan.
Using TEMPO to Evaluate the Impact of Ozone on Agriculture
Western Regional Technical Projects 2011 through 2013
Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions Data Demonstration.
Forecasting the Impacts of Wildland Fires
J. Burke1, K. Wesson2, W. Appel1, A. Vette1, R. Williams1
Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions Data Demonstration.
Current Research on 3-D Air Quality Modeling: wildfire!
Presentation transcript:

Integrated Modeling of the Interactions Between Climate Change, Forest Biomass, Wildfire Emissions and Air Quality U. Shankar 1, A. Xiu 1, and D. Fox 2, L. Ran 111 S. Arunachalam 1, B. Wang 1, L. Ran 1, B. H. Baek 1, N. Davis 1, S. Arunachalam 1, B. Wang 1, D. Mckenzie 3, S. McNulty 4, J. M. Meyers 4, J. Prestemon 5 Future Air Quality with Projected Global Changes: EPA STAR Progress Review Meeting October 27, Institute for the Environment, UNC-Chapel Hill 2 Consultant (formerly with the Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Ft. Collins, CO) 2 USDA Forest Service, 2 USDA Forest Service, Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Laboratory 4 USDA Forest Service, Southern Global Change Program 5 USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, RTP, NC

Research Program Goals  Project funding: EPA STAR Grant RD  Aim: support the EPA Global Change Research Program goals by  Examining consequences of climate change for wild fire occurrence and consequently for U.S. air quality  Combining the effects of climate change with forest growth to examine impacts of changes in fuel loads on wildfire emissions  Investigating the impacts of evolving fire and biogenic emissions from on air quality  Currently in no-cost continuation (end date: March 2009)

Outline  Background  Modeling System Overview  Model Applications  Forest Growth Model (PnET) Simulations and Fuel Projections  Future Year Projections of Fire Activity  Air Quality Simulations and Aerosol Radiative Impacts  BlueSky – SMOKE Emissions Modeling  Nested METCHEM Simulations  Conclusions  Tasks Remaining

Air Quality and Climate Impacts of Fires  Impacts of wild fires felt at the regional and global scale  Black carbon => positive climate feedback (warming); SO 2 emissions => negative climate forcing from secondarily produced SO 4  Effect of radiatively important pollutants on short-term climate variability affects forest growth, biogenic emissions and future fuel loads COO3O3 Carbonaceous Aerosol Effects of Canadian boreal fires on CO, PM and ozone from a July 1995 simulation

Predictive Modeling Issues  Current fire inventoriesdo not captureclimate impacts on forest biomass and fuel loads  Current fire inventories do not capture climate impacts on forest biomass and fuel loads  best estimates are from 5-year history  effects not reflected in biogenic land cover data  Feedback of scattering and absorbing aerosols and ozone to atmospheric dynamics not captured in most air quality simulation models  Understanding these effects is essential to fully assess impacts of fires on air quality and climate and the net benefits of fire management plans

Integrated Modeling System PnET-II CCSM METCHEM (MM5-MCPL / MAQSIP MAQSIP) BlueSky/EPM MEGAN SMOKE Monthly met. Base & future year fuel data Fire Scenario Builder Hourlymet Fire activity data Anthropogenic inventoried emissions Gridded & Speciated Emissions Initial & boundarymet. FCCSFIA

Forest Growth Model  PEcon forest growth and economics model has been used by the USFS Southern Global Change Program to model 13 states in the Southeast  Ecological process model of forest productivity, species composition, and hydrology (PnET II); predictions of forest biomass scaled up from the FIA plot level to the county level  SGCP provided PnET model and inputs for 11 SE US states from for the project

ClimateSpatial FIA FIA Plot PnET-CN  Volume 1  Volume 2  Volume 3 Inventory and Harvest SRTS Update Acres Calculate Acres Harvested Allocate Harvest Calculate Growth Update Inventory Update Equilibrium Flow Chart of PEcon

PnET Modifications  Expanded inputs to 13 states with new country-level data for site parameters (EESI-Penn State) and climate parameters (NCEP [historic] and CCSM [future, CO 2 increases under IPCC - B2])  Computed county center location, elevation, and water holding capacity for modeling at county level  Initialized with species groups biomass and fuel data (2000 FIA data) in all states at the county level  Modified output to add LAI, foliar NPP, wood NPP, root NPP, plot ID, year, month, forest species and other variables

PnET Linkages to Fuel Estimates  BlueSky-EM uses 2 fuel-related input files  114 FCCS fuel bed classifications at 1 km grid resolution (54 fuel bed types in the Southeast)  fuel load look-up table for DWM, grass, shrub and canopy fuels in various size classes  Developed a cross walk between FIA species groups and FCCS fuel beds for DWM (coarse and fine woody debris, litter, herb/shrubs, slash, duff, and fuel bed depth) and canopy fuels  Attempts to correlate live biomass to current DWM, and related data (latitude, elevation, temperature, RH, winds) at county level using SAS data mining tools did not yield good correlations  Found DWM variability to be better associated with stand disturbances and climate than with live biomass  Future-year simulations thus use a constant DWM  Updated canopy fuels as a fixed proportion of total simulated biomass  For the relatively young forests in SE US we assumed this to be 10%, with an upper limit of 20 T/acre

PnET Linkages to Biogenic Emissions Model  PnET outputs monthly biomass and LAI for 203 forest species at plot and county level  Will use the MEGAN model to import PnET output for estimating biogenic emissions  MEGAN takes gridded monthly LAI and climate data with plant function type and emission factor files to estimate gridded biogenic emissions  Includes isoprene (O 3 precursor), mono- and sesquiterpenes (PM precursors)

Future-year Projections of Fire Activity  Fire activity data for 2002 from state-level fire reports converted to the model grid for lightning- and human- induced ignitions as annual gridded values  Future-year annual area burned projected using a statistical model (Prestemon and Mercer, FS SRS) from 2002 values to 2020, 2030 and 2050  Human- and lightning-induced ignitions were correlated to population and income level changes, as well as met variables from MM5 (monthly means of WS max, T min )  Gridded annual area burned estimates apportioned to daily values for the fire season using a modified version of the Fire Scenario Builder (McKenzie et al., 2006); flammability based on fuel moisture calculated by the NFDRS  Uniform probability of fire for fuel moisture < 25%

Projected Annual Acres Burned (Southeast) from Human-induced and Lightning lgnitions

Ignition AvailFlammability Fire frequency & fuel maps Management RxFire/suppression MM5 (mesoscale model) Human- and lightning- induced ignitions Fire Generator Fire Starts Daily Fire Sizes Equations predict fuel moisture in fuel size classes that carry fire. NFDRS Fire Scenario Builder

BlueSky/SMOKE Simulations  BlueSky smoke emissions model linked to SMOKE for merging with emissions from other sources  Directly linked to the FCCS fuel database  Jan and Jul 2002 simulations at 12-km for SE U.S.  BlueSky simulations have just been completed for 2002 and 2020  The SMOKE processing is underway for July 2002  Results are preliminary, need calibration through AQ simulations at 12-km

Coupled Meteorology-Chemistry Model (METCHEM) H & V Transport, Cloud Physics & Chemistry, Gas/Particulate Chemistry, PM Microphysics (Modal), D ry & Wet Removal (MAQSIP CTM) Met. Couple (MCPL) Meteorology (MM5) Emissions Processing (SMOKE) Aerosol Direct Radiative Feedback

METCHEM Simulations  ConUS METCHEM simulations are underway for 2002 using EPA NEI 2002 emissions inventory  Evaluation against IMPROVE and STN show significant regional bias with underprediction of PM in the summer  Used to extract boundary condition inputs for SE domain  Began 12-km Southeastern US simulations to test the BlueSky/SMOKE output and evaluate against network obs  Next proceed to 1-month simulations in Jan and Jul 2020, 2030 and 2050 to analyze effects on key climate parameters

36-km PM Concentrations – Summer 2002 All sitesWestEast

36-km SO 4 Concentrations – Summer 2002 WestEast

East US EC, OC Concentrations – Summer 2002 ECOC

36-km PM Compositions – Summer 2002

Conclusions  Forest Biomass/Fuel Load Uncertainties:  No spatial changes in vegetation species across the landscape  Constant expansion factor for species biomass from plot to county  Assumed constant mortality and removal rates  Used 10% of biomass for canopy fuel for all forest types  Uncertainties in Fire Activity Estimates  Mismatch in IPCC scenario used in fuel estimates and annual area burned estimation  Assume uniform probability of ignition throughout the fire season, and no variability in dependence on fuel moisture

Conclusions (cont’d)  The PM composition is predicted better at low concentrations, and in general, in urban sites in the West  Uncertainties in emissions inputs, particularly in 36-km simulations due to lack of adequate fire emissions for Canada and Mexico in NEI 2002  Sulfate underbias suggests lack of adequate spin-up in the model  Low values of other unspeciated PM could be due to insufficient wind-blown dust emissions

Tasks Remaining  Complete the emissions processing for the base and future years  Complete the air quality simulations  Examine the 550 nm aerosol optical depth and compare to MODIS AOD’s (available on the 12- km grid)  Improve the estimates of biogenic emissions from MEGAN by more fully accounting for changes in land cover type due to fires  Perform sensitivities on future fire emissions by refining the daily fire area estimates