Massachusetts’ 4-Pollutant Power Plant Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Air Innovations Conference - August.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Florida Department of Environmental Protection David Read Cement Subproject Manager Bureau of Air Regulation Cement Mercury Subproject.
Advertisements

KEEA Conference October 2013 Carbon Pollution Standards for Power Plants under Section 111 of the CAA: How Energy Efficiency Can Help States Comply 1 Jackson.
EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposed Rules for Reducing GHG Emissions from Power Plants Presentation to ACPAC June 16,
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators (HMIWI) Tiffany Miesel & John Glunn Florida DEP, Division.
GHG BACT Analysis Deanna L. Duram, P.E., C.M. August 4, 2011 Air & Waste Management Association Southern Section Meeting trinityconsultants.com.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Mercury from Electric Utilities: Monitoring and Emission Reductions Greg DeAngelo & Tiffany Miesel Florida.
The Massachusetts Approach to Power Plant Clean-up Policy Making and Standards Setting to Reach Clean Air Sonia Hamel Massachusetts Executive Office of.
Recent EPA Regulation Development Presented by Bill Luthans to the 56 th Meeting of the Joint Advisory Committee Meeting for the Improvement of Air Quality.
Wes Thornhill, Chief Industrial Chemicals Section Air Division
1 Year in Review: Clean Air Act Presented by: Tom Wood Stoel Rives LLP October 8, 2010 Things Are Getting Really Complicated.
EPA Rulemakings to Set GHG Emission Standards for Power Plants National Hydropower Association Webinar Kyle Danish February 14, 2014.
Beyond Federal Standards Nevada Mercury Air Emission Control Program Leo M. Drozdoff, P.E. Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection December.
EPA Regulations On Electric Utility Generating Units (EGU)
Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture using Solid Sorbents Sharon Sjostrom, Chief Technology Officer CREA Energy Innovations Summit, October 27, 2014 Carbon Capture:
Generation Performance Standards Paul Hibbard, Lexecon, Inc.
Clean Air Act Section 111(d) Indiana Energy Association September 11, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management.
A History and Status of CEMS Applications in USEPA Regulations Dale Evarts US EPA December 16, 2002 Better Air Quality in Asian Cities 2002
Katrina Pielli U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CHP Partnership
Mercury in the Great Lakes Region Sponsored by the Commission for Environmental Cooperation’s Environment, Economy and Trade and Pollutants and Health.
TRP Chapter Chapter 4.2 Waste minimisation.
Texas Lignite Industry. Texas Lignite  Because >95% of lignite mining operations in Texas are in support of electric generation…..whatever impacts the.
Pennsylvania Draft Regulations for the Control of Mercury From Coal-fired Electric Generating Units Allegheny Section- AWMA Air Quality Issues Workshop.
Mirant Mid-Atlantic MWAQC Technical Advisory Committee Briefing January 21, 2005.
Massachusetts’ Power Plant Mercury Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection WESTAR Fall Business Meeting - September.
Air Emission Benefits of CHP Air Innovations Conference August 10, 2004 Joel Bluestein Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc. Prepared under contract.
Clean Water Act 319(g) Petition Kathy G. Beckett Midwest Ozone Group January 22-23, 2009.
American Public Power Association Washington, DC April 27, 2010 Leslie Sue Ritts, RITTS LAW GROUP, PLLC 1.
Analysis of Existing and Potential Regulatory Requirements and Emission Control Options for the Silver Lake Power Plant APPA Engineering & Operations Technical.
GA EPD Air Protection Branch AWMA Southern Section August 2015.
MERCURY POLICIES: A VIEW FROM THE ELECTRIC POWER SECTOR Michael T. Rossler Indiana Energy Conference September 16, 2004.
UTILITY MACT WORKING GROUP STATE AND LOCAL STAKEHOLDER RECOMMENDATIONS.
Air & Waste Management Association September 13, 2012 The Cahaba Lilies Photo by Danny Smith U.S. Environmental Policy Issues and the Natural Gas Solution.
Clean Air Act Section 111(d) Indiana State Bar Association Utility Law Section September 4, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner IN Department.
Industrial Sources of Mercury in the Atmosphere Jim Orgeron Staff Environmental Scientist, Environmental Planning Division.
1. Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) – Naturally occurring and man- made. 5,505.2 mmts emitted in 2009, GWP = 1 Methane (CH 4 ) - Naturally occurring and man-made.
Assessment of Mercury Rules for Electric Generators in North Carolina September 9, 2015 Presented to the Environmental Management Commission – Air Quality.
NACAA Fall Meeting October 2012 Innovative and Replicable Initiatives - The Colorado Clean Air/Clean Jobs Act Will Allison, Director CDPHE Air Pollution.
Massachusetts Greenhouse Gas Reporting Regulation 310 CMR 7.71 Stacy DeGabriele & Will Space MassDEP Climate Strategies December 10 th and 11 th, 2009.
WRAP States Four Factor Reasonable Progress Lee Gribovicz WRAP IWG Meeting March 10, 2009.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
Public Workshop Airborne Toxic Control Measure (ATCM) for Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coatings Public Workshop Airborne Toxic Control Measure (ATCM)
California Energy Commission IEPR Lead Commissioner Workshop University of California, Irvine August 17,
Massachusetts’ EE/RE Set-Aside Program Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Air Innovations Conference August 12, 2004 – Chicago,
Indiana Energy Conference EPA Clean Power Plan—111(d) November 13, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management.
Massachusetts Multi-pollutant Power Plant Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection EPA Utility MACT Working Group.
June 26, Background of Federal GHG Regulation Supreme Court determines greenhouse gases (GHGs) are “air pollutants” under the Clean Air Act U.S.
24 th Annual Sustainability and Environmental, Health & Safety Symposium March 25, 2015 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner IN Department of Environmental.
PM 2.5 Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #1 South Coast Air Quality Management District June 8, 2006.
Update on Methane Regulations Affecting Landfills Pat Sullivan Senior Vice President SCS Engineers Nov. 10, 2015.
AirSection 1 Motor Vehicle Emissions Almost one-third of our air pollution comes from gasoline burned by vehicles. According to the U.S. Department of.
Public Workshop Proposed RACT/BARCT Determination for Stationary Spark-Ignited Internal Combustion Engines August 29, 2000 California Environmental Protection.
The Effect of Environmental Regulation upon the Electric Power Industry: A Rating Agency Perspective 23rd February 2005 At the California Public Utility.
Air Pollution Challenges Kentucky Coal Association April 29, 2013 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Impacts of Environmental Regulations in the ERCOT Region Dana Lazarus Planning Analyst, ERCOT January 26, 2016.
June 15, New England Generation Information System Nancy L. Seidman Division Director Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
1 Draft Landfill Methane Control Measure California Air Resources Board April 22, 2008.
© 2015 Haynes and Boone, LLP Overview of the EPA Clean Power Plan Suzanne Beaudette Murray February 19, 2016 Tulane Environmental Law Summit.
Clean Power Plan Kyra Moore Director, Air Pollution Control Program Prepared for: Midwest Energy Policy Conference October 6, 2015.
MPCA Citizens’ Board Meeting: United States Steel Corporation-Keetac Air Emissions Permit Owen Seltz Industrial Division September 13, 2011.
RACT 2 – Source Testing and Monitoring Requirements Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee August 4, 2016 Harrisburg, PA Tom Wolf, GovernorPatrick McDonnell,
Tampa Electric Company’s Emission Reduction Program
EPA Options for the Federal Regulation of Coal Combustion Waste Lisa Evans Earthjustice October 22, 2010.
NSPS Rulemakings for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Department of Environmental Quality
Enforcing the NAAQS Case Study Sean Taylor
Chesterfield Neighborhood Coal Ash Update January 9th, 2019
Senator Dance Town Hall Coal Ash Update December 5, 2018
NEW JERSEY 1-HR SULFUR DIOXIDE (SO2) ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION
Presentation transcript:

Massachusetts’ 4-Pollutant Power Plant Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Air Innovations Conference - August 11, Chicago, IL

August 11, Affected Facilities’ Contribution to Generation and Emissions 6 affected facilities represent 19% of 2003 New England megawatts of generating capacity The 6 facilities emit a substantial portion of MA emissions: 46% of 1996 SO 2 8% of 1996 NO x 17% of 2002 point source mercury All MA electricity production was projected to account for 29% of 2000 CO 2

August 11, Major Provisions Effective May 11, 2001 Standards Output-Based Emission Rates - SO 2, NO x, CO 2 Annual caps for CO 2 (tons) and Hg (lbs) Hg data collection for cap and 2003 proposed standard Hg control feasibility report by December 2002 Compliance schedules Dates depend on compliance approach standard path - 10/04 and 10/06 repowering path - 10/06 and 10/08 Hg cap effective at first compliance date

August 11, Mercury Standard Setting Process Regulation 310 CMR 7.29: Emissions Standards for Power Plants: promulgated May 11, Mercury coal/emissions baseline testing: Stakeholder meetings: Aug/Sep/Oct 2002, Jan 2003 Feasibility Report: December Proposed regulation: September 2003 Final regulation: released May, effective June 4,

August 11, Mercury Control Feasibility Report – December 2002 “Evaluation of the Technological and Economic Feasibility of Controlling and Eliminating Mercury Emissions from the Combustion of Solid Fossil Fuel” % removal of flue gas Mercury is feasible

August 11, Final Mercury Standard Effective June 4, 2004 Form of the standard Output-based and % control efficiency options Level of the standard Phase 1: 85% or lb/GWh by 1/1/2008 Phase 2: 95% or lb/GWh by 10/1/2012 Demonstrating compliance with the standard Every other quarter stack tests 10/06-1/1/2008 CEMs required beginning 1/1/2008 Averaging time of the standard Rolling 12-month basis

August 11, Media Transfer & Off-Site Mercury Reductions Facility mercury caps include mercury emissions due to on-site re-burn of ash or off-site high temperature processing in Massachusetts (e.g., use of ash in cement kiln or asphalt batching plant) Mercury standards must be met while including mercury emissions due to on-site re-burn of ash Units shutting down can use early or off-site reductions to Facilities emitting less than 5 lb in 2001 can use early or off site reductions to phase 2.

August 11, Expected Annual Reductions due to 2001 and 2004 Standards SO 2 : 50-75% (about 56,000-84,000 tons) NO x : 50% (about 15,000 tons) CO 2 : 10% (about 1,954,000 tons, implemented on-site or off-site) Mercury: 85% (about 155 pounds)