LTPP Lessons Learned: Delaware SPS-2 Wednesday April 9, 2014 SPS-2 Tech Day, Dover, DE Gabe Cimini Project Manager, LTPP North Atlantic Regional Support Contractor (NARSC)
Delaware SPS-2 Lessons Learned Overview How are the Sections Performing? Construction Related Performance Issues Overview of Performance What Lies Ahead?
Delaware SPS-2 Lessons Learned Overview SPS-2 experiments examine effects of climatic region, subgrade soil and Traffic rate on doweled jointed plain concrete pavement Structural factors include drainage, concrete thickness, base type, concrete flexural strength and lane width Requires that all test sections be constructed with perpendicular joints at 4.9 m spacing and stipulates a traffic load level in the lane in excess of 200,000 ESALs per year The Climate for this SPS-2 project is considered to be a wet- freeze environment by LTPP definitions Construction completed and section opened to traffic - May1996
Delaware SPS-2 Layout
How are the Section Performing? Overview of Maintenance/Rehabilitation Treatments SequenceDateActivitySection(s) 1 April 1996 Full Depth Transverse Joint Repair Patch May 1996 Full Depth Transverse Joint Repair Patch June 2000 Grinding Surface June 2002 Transverse Joint Sealing and Lane- Shoulder Longitudinal Joint Sealing June 2006 Lane-Shoulder Longitudinal Joint Sealing June 2008 Crack Sealing March 2011 Crack Sealing Partial Depth Patching of PCC Pavement Other Than at Joint Patch Pot Holes - Hand Spread, Compacted with Truck Patch Pot Holes - Hand Spread, Compacted with Truck May 2012 Partial depth patching of PCC pavements at joints and Partial Depth Patching of PCC Pavement Other Than at Joint
Longitudinal Cracking
100207
Transverse Cracking
100205
Roughness
Roughness
Pavement Deflections
Construction Related Performance Issues Subgrade Eight of the 12 test sections contained partial shallow cuts that did not meet the specifications. Sections were excavated and received 12 inches of Type A borrow DGAB Bases did not extend the full width of the shoulder
Construction Related Performance Issues (cont.) LCB During paving of the LCB layer, depressions in the subgrade occurred during stoppage of the paver. Transverse shrinkage cracks developed in the LCB layer prior to PCC paving, and some of these shrinkage cracks developed in the depression areas PCC 7 sections have PCC slab thickness that exceed the allowable tolerance of ± ½ inch
Construction Related Performance Issues (cont.) Both Flexural Strength values (14 day MPa) are over by more than 10% of design averages 550 PSI (Actual averages = 657 PSI)(Type B Mix – 650PSI) 900 PSI (Actual averages = 757 PSI) No. 57 Stone was used as the edge drain backfill instead of PATB No joint sealant was used between the mainline concrete pavement and the asphalt shoulder
Construction Related Performance Issues (cont.) Sections , , received new PCC to replace original that showed early shrinkage cracks (Type B mix PSI Compressive Strength) Sections and were also replaced (900PSI Flexural strength) Before removing concrete coring of transverse and longitudinal shrinkage cracks showed cracks extended either entirely or partially through the PCC but not into the underlying LCB. No bond was found to occur between the PCC and the underlying LCB
Overview of Performance More maintenance/rehabilitation treatments were required for sections with No Drainage Sections with Drainage reported less cracking and lower maximum wheel path faulting as well as lower initial deflections with more sections performing better over time. Sections , , , , , ) Maintenance/rehabilitation treatments were effective at reducing cracking and faulting
What Lies Ahead? LTPP monitoring to continue SPS-2 Pavement Preservation Pooled Fund Study (2013 to 2016) – Partners - AZ, CA, CO, GA, KS, NC, WA More Data Analysis and data insights Data and reports available on LTPP InfoPave™
LTPP InfoPave™
Explore/Search/View data (Sitemap/Features) Select what you need (Data Bucket) Download what you have selected LTPP InfoPave™ brand represents a complete body of knowledge and not just data.
LTPP InfoPave™
Questions?