Administrative Professional Annual Review Process Administrative Professional Advisory Council – November 13, 2008

Overview Regulatory Aspects Process Resources

University Requirement Performance reviews are conducted on an annual basis (January 1 – December 31) Permanent and temporary appointments State and grant funding

Purpose Evaluate “how well” job is performed Plan for the future Career enhancement

Policies, Forms and Directives Administrative Professional Handbook Business Policies and Procedures Manual (BPPM) Administrative Directives

Evaluation Criteria Productivity Quality of Work Job Knowledge Interpersonal Skills Other Factors

The Ratings Numerical scale of 1 to 5 1 = unsatisfactory 2 = needs improvement 3 = satisfactory/meets expectations 4 = exceeds expectations 5 = outstanding

Preparation Review position description Update resume/vita Identify accomplishments - keep notes Establish goals for the next year - employee - department

Facilitate communication Plan for the future - Remove any deficiencies - Improve current skills - Expand personal/professional growth Clarify ratings and expectations Evaluation Discussion

Considerations The employee signature on review form indicates receipt of review – not necessarily agreement All employees may add a written statement/ rebuttal to the annual review Annual reviews are retained in the official personnel file for three years following evaluation date

Periodically review goals - track progress Track accomplishments - keep notes Seek clarification Preparing for the Next Year

BPPM Office of Procedures, Records and Forms - Office of the Provost (509) Human Resource Services - Administrative Professional Handbook (509) Resources