 Collection Development Policy?  Content Development & Management Policy?  Collection Management Policy  Content Development Policy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E-resources Collection Management Anna Grigson E-resources Manager.
Advertisements

Institutional Audit Who runs it? What is it and how often does it occur? How will it affect us? What do we need to do? What will the outcome be and does.
Social Sciences Collections & Research: a new content-based team Gillian Ridgley, Ian Cooke, Jerry Jenkins.
Library Committee Meeting – 31 January 2007 Approval Plan.
the UNCG University Libraries ASERL Meeting November 13, 2012 Atlanta, GA Kathryn Crowe Associate Dean for Public Services
Commission for Academic Accreditation 1 Accreditation and Academic Quality King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals Faculty Workshop Accreditation,
Student Induction Student Representation
Implementing the new Workload Policy Heads of School Workshop April 2010.
Collection Development: Business and Economics at Monash David Horne, Subject Librarian.
External Quality Assessments
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
How the University Library can help you with your term paper Computer Science SC Hester Mountifield Science Library x 8050
Elizabeth Newbold and Samantha Tillett GL8 New Orleans, December 2006
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
Office of Institutional Assessment and Effectiveness Workshop SUNY Oneonta Version 2, February 2014.
Technical Services: Economic Lens of Philippine Libraries Presented by Lourdes T. David at the seminar on “Superior Practices and World Widening Services.
Principles of Assessment
Evaluating and Purchasing Electronic Resources- The University of Pittsburgh Experience Sarah Aerni Special Projects Librarian University of Pittsburgh.
Annual Review Information Session January Session outcomes What Annual Review is and what it is not The benefits of Annual Review How to prepare.

Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.
Research Data Management Services Katherine McNeill Social Sciences Librarians Boot Camp June 1, 2012.
Faculty Survey Results Buswell Memorial Library, 2014.
1 Collaborative Provision and External Examining Nicola Clarke Centre for Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement (CASQE)
ICLS Project Planning Team: Elizabeth Arkles, Stephanie Cusworth, Steven Chang.
Serials DeDup Project Training Exercise Antoinette Nelson Department Head: STEM Outreach & Scholarship Texas STEM Librarians’ Conference Texas A&M University-College.
Leeds University Library Implementing an information literacy audit in the School of Healthcare, Leeds University Alison Lahlafi, Faculty Team Librarian.
Primoz Juznic, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia 1 Using a decision grid process to evaluate library collections on the way to post-print times Primoz.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Editorial Strategies and Developments Richard Delahunty Managing Editor Politics and International Relations UKSG Seminar, Oxford, 21st January Web:
Welcome Back! Day Two. Homework Our next challenge to discuss—outreach. Before we meet tomorrow, be ready to share: –A program you would like to reach.
1 1 Taking portfolio management further July 2010 PCG/10/33.
Digital Learning Futures Roadshow June Why a digital teaching and learning strategy? 2. What are we planning over the next 12 months? 3. What.
Cairo, 20 December 2004 National Strategy for the Development of Statistics (NSDS) Roadmap.
Africa nazarene university Board of Trust and University Council Planning Retreat and Annual Meeting October 29-31, 2012.
NSS as a Quality Enhancement Tool University of Strathclyde A case study Rowena Kochanowska and Anna Highmore.
Policy Office Background & Status. Background : interest in policy development and organization Extensive research and study Systems Policy Review.
General Staff Performance Reviews Campus Briefings
The Liaison Librarian Program – Meeting Faculty Needs? Daphne Flanagan, AUS University Librarian, Alanna Ross, AUS Associate University.
Course Rep Induction Welcome to the Course Representatives’ Induction
The Comprehensive School Counseling Program and Career Clusters/Pathways August 2008 Judith Kuse, School Counseling Consultant Barbara Bitters, Assistant.
Corporate Library Collection Policy A Comparative Document Analysis Paula R. Davidson Emporia State University.
Building Partnerships for Enhanced Analysis and Utilization of Census Data Pretoria 25 March 2014 UN Regional Seminar on Promotion and Utilization of Census.
Taking an Innovative Approach to Knowledge Management.
Making reading lists work Alison Randall and Sandra Celada Guest speakers: Ralph Denny, Steven Howlett, Magnus Lehn L&T Conference 20 th April 2016.
AB 798 RFP Planning & Intellus Learning Welcome! Please introduce yourself to others by entering your name, title, and campus in the chat window. If you.
© All rights reserved Your Voice, Your CC: The Colorado College Employee Climate/Engagement Survey Advancement.
1 Oxford Professional Education Group Ltd Mastering Metrics An Introduction.
New Areas of Development for HR Professionals: Project and change management at the EPO R. ErnstNovember 2008.
Here Today Here to Stay August 17, TJC’s Mission.
PDR 2015 A Guide for Managers for Academic Staff 1. Plan 2. Progress 3. Review.
Library Databases to Support APCSS Alumni Research
Information Resources Strategy: Continuing to Provide the Resources You Need Fall 2016.
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
Partnership Forum 2017 Partner Institution Survey 2016 :
A Guide for Academic Staff
One ODOT: Positioned for the Future
Sex and Gender Goal Group
2016 Tenure and Promotion Workshop Policy and Procedures Overview
A Guide for Managers for Academic Staff
External Examiner Reports
Paul Jude Beauvais August 31, 2009
Sex and Gender Goal Group
Digital Stewardship Curriculum
A Guide for Academic Staff
Making the Most of Your Publisher Search Process: A Society Perspective April 18, 2019 Andrea Kunz, Managing Editor Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer.
Sex and Gender Goal Group
APEC Project Cycle Overview
Presentation transcript:

 Collection Development Policy?  Content Development & Management Policy?  Collection Management Policy  Content Development Policy

“This Content Development Policy sets out the Library’s current strategic thinking on the acquisition of materials and information content to support teaching, learning and research at The University of Manchester. It has been developed to respond both to the needs of the University and to changes in the environment in which we operate. The policy is, therefore, designed to be flexible and will be reviewed regularly to ensure its continuing relevance to our mission.”

“Within the University, constraints including the need to control the size of the university estate mean the library is operating in a zero-growth environment. There is no realistic prospect of new library buildings... The library is now effectively full.”

 General principles  Books  Databases  Exam papers  Journals  Manchester e-scholar  Maps  Newspapers  Official publications  Reading lists  Special Collections  Theses

 Set up another working group  Do a couple of pilot projects  Experiment with data gathering and analysis (Talis ‘Decisions’ reports)  Rip it up and start again

 Collection Areas  Document Supply Service  Teaching & Learning  Digitization  Manchester E-Scholar  Stock Editing  Donations  Recommendations  Contacts

1. Stock overview (by classmark/age) 2. Book purchases in previous year 3. Current journal subscriptions 4. ‘Other’ subscriptions 5. Relevant Special Collections

Subject: JRUL Content Development Policy for [name of School/Discipline area]. The Library Strategy, New Directions , "represents a plan for action to position the JRUL, not only as a leading library of the world, but most importantly, as a library fit to meet the changing needs of its customers by 2012.“ The Library Strategy New Directions is available as a PD Fat As part of the Strategy, the Content Development Policy, which was formally approved in April 2010 "sets out the Library’s current strategic thinking on the acquisition of materials and information content to support teaching, learning and research at The University of Manchester.“ Over the past nine months Faculty Teams have been bringing together information about collections and considering policies at School and Discipline level. The Policy is publicly available at I am pleased to attach [or provide link to] the draft discipline level Content Development Policy for [name of School/Discipline area]. The document covers Existing Collections in [name of School/Discipline area]. Bookfund Collection Areas Document Supply Service Teaching & Learning Digitization Manchester E-Scholar Stock Editing Donations Recommendations Contacts.

with appendices giving a discipline-centred overview of Stock in the discipline Book Purchases in the last financial year Current Journal Subscriptions Database and Other Subscriptions, and Special Collections This micropolicy is intended as the first stage in an ongoing dialogue with the discipline, and will be reviewed regularly in consultation with academic colleagues. I would appreciate your comments on this draft policy by the end of March, in advance of a more formal launch later in the year. Please respond to [Name of Team contact] [Contact details] The Library would welcome opportunities to discuss policies at School and/or Faculty Committees. Best regards,

“The CDP fails to reconcile the core issue of collection development, i.e. what to do about areas where we have superb collections such as Aramaic, Syriac, Assyriology etc … but where research interests in these subjects – as a result of staff retiring etc – may be declining. There was considerable disagreement on this point with diametrically opposed views.”

 Collection evaluation  Greater knowledge of resources (librarians & curators)  Better exploitation of resources (academics)  Improved student satisfaction  Enhanced research support  Improved relationship between librarians and academics