THE PHOENIX PROJECT Coordinated Flight of Multiple Unmanned Vehicles Michael P. Anthony & Christopher M. Gerson Lab for Control and Automation Princeton.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alert radio repeater automated backup, failover, recovery David Leader HydroLynx Systems.
Advertisements

IEEE Region 6 Student Paper Contest, Anaheim CA, September 17 th 1998 Chen-I Lim Arizona State University
MicroCART Micro processor C ontrolled A erial R obotics T eam Abstract MicroCART is a group of EE/CprE students tasked with developing an autonomous helicopter.
Hyoki Lee, Zach Zens Dr. Kim Pierson Ph.D., Dr. Peter Bui Ph.D. Hyoki Lee, Zach Zens Dr. Kim Pierson Ph.D., Dr. Peter Bui Ph.D. Integrating MAVLink into.
1 An Approach to Real-Time Support in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks Mark Gleeson Distributed Systems Group Dept.
PID Control -1 + Professor Walter W. Olson
THE PHOENIX PROJECT Coordinated Flight of Multiple Unmanned Vehicles Michael P. Anthony Lab for Control and Automation Princeton University Princeton,
Autonomous Helicopter: James Lyden Harris Okazaki EE 496 A project to create a system that would allow a remote- controlled helicopter to fly without user.
Autonomous Quadrocopter Proposal Brad Bergerhouse, Nelson Gaske, Austin Wenzel Dr. Malinowski.
EUT 1040 Lecture 10: Programmable Logic Controllers.
THE PHOENIX PROJECT Coordinated Flight of Multiple Unmanned Vehicles Michael P. Anthony & Christopher M. Gerson Lab for Control and Automation Princeton.
Parth Kumar ME5643: Mechatronics UAV ATTITUDE AND HEADING HOLD SYSTEM.
Gary MKIII University of Central Florida Chris Valle, Braden Urban, John Rowe, and Tyler Yoemans.
Integrated Mobile GIS and Wireless Internet Map Servers for Environmental Monitoring and Management By Ming-Hsiang Tsou
ECE 415 Senior Design Project Fall 2010 Justin Ayvazian Ben Johnson Eric Putney Michael Ruth Advisor: Professor Sandip Kundu Friend-Foe Identification.
REAL-TIME SOFTWARE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT Instructor: Dr. Hany H. Ammar Dept. of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, WVU.
Image Processing of Video on Unmanned Aircraft Video processing on-board Unmanned Aircraft Aims to develop image acquisition, processing and transmission.
Simultaneous Localization and Map Building System for Prototype Mars Rover CECS 398 Capstone Design I October 24, 2001.
Robot Hardware and Control Sarah Bergbreiter UC Berkeley June 17, 2002.
Internal Model Controller Design for a Robot arm By Vishal Kumar Advisor: Gary L. Dempsey 5/6/08 Bradley University Department of Computer and Electrical.
EDGE™ MAV Control System - P09122 Final Project Review Erik Bellandi – Project Manager Ben Wager – Lead Engineer Garrett Argenna – Mechanical Engineering.
Aircraft Response to Control Input Data Collection System Presenter: Curtis Cutright Advisor: Dr. Michael Braasch Project Sponsor: JUP.
CL A Coordinated Flight of Uninhabited Air Vehicles Olivier Laplace Princeton University FAA/NASA Joint University Program Quarterly Review - April, 2001.
1 The Phoenix Project: Coordinated Flight of Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles David F. Lieb ’03 & Mark R. Siano ‘03 Princeton University Professor Robert.
April 26, Team Information Designation Ongo-03 Members Advisors Dr. J. Lamont, Prof. R. Patterson, Dr. Rajagopalan, Dr. J. Basart ClientSpace Systems.
Preparations for GPS/INS Flight Testing on a High-Dynamic Vehicle Presenter: Curtis Cutright Advisor: Dr. Michael S. Braasch.
Unit 3a Industrial Control Systems
Mobile Computing in Society Jared Sutherland CIS 497
Unmanned aerial systems, what they are and what is available? Professor Sandor M Veres University of Sheffield.
Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos, Cairo Lúcio Nascimento Júnior,
Network Design Essentials
REAL-TIME SOFTWARE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT Instructor: Dr. Hany H. Ammar Dept. of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, WVU.
Sidewinder A Predictive Data Forwarding Protocol for Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks Matt Keally 1, Gang Zhou 1, Guoliang Xing 2 1 College of William and.
GPS in Sports and Recreation Presented by: Elizabeth Brocklehurst Christopher Cook Walter Sarabia.
1.  The Autonomous Helicopter Navigation System 2010 is focused on developing a helicopter system capable of autonomous control, navigation and localising.
Computational Mechanics and Robotics The University of New South Wales
1 INS Data Collection System For the Quarterly Review of the NASA/FAA Joint University Program for Air Transportation Research Wednesday October 10 th,
Motivation Collision Avoidance – Inefficient airspace utilization – Increased air traffic workload – Use of obsolete technologies 2.
Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos (ITA-Brazil)
INS Data Collection System Presenter: Curtis Cutright Advisor: Dr. Michael Braasch.
Autonomous Helicopter James LydenEE 496Harris Okazaki.
Architectural Approaches (Part 1) Power Aware Distributed Systems Kickoff August 23, 2000.
1 Lecture on Lab 6 Lab 7 Lab 8. 2 Lab 6: Open Loop Controller As you learned in lab 5, there are two kinds of control systems: open loop and closed loop.
First, by sending smaller individual pieces from source to destination, many different conversations can be interleaved on the network. The process.
Ground Control Station Flight conTrol
Advanced Speed Guidance for Merging and Sequencing Techniques Chris Sweeney Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology MITRE Corporation Center.
Control & Data Handling, Operator Control, Aircraft Interface to C&DH Steve Musko Space Physics Research Laboratory University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI.
ABSTRACT PREDICTIVE TRACKING ALGORITHM Visual Tracking of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Using GPS Samuel S. Starr Emir Tumen Advisor: Dr. George Pappas.
GPS And XBee Based Robot For War Field Surveillance
Highly Secured Robotic Control For Military Operation Using MSP430 Student Name USN NO Guide Name H.O.D Name Name Of The College & Dept.
Name Of The College & Dept
Final Semester 2 Presentation: April 24, Joshua Lasseigne: Team Lead and Autopilot Programming Christopher Edwards: AGL Subsystem and Website Maintenance.
Mid Semester 2 Presentation: February 27, Joshua Lasseigne: Team Lead and Autopilot Programming Christopher Edwards: AGL Subsystem and Website Maintenance.
University at Buffalo GLADOS SHOT II Balloon Launch Results Presentation July 1, 2012 Andrew Dianetti, Alex Wende, Bryant Carlson, Joe Flannery 1.
Data Communication and Networks Chapter 5. What’s a Network? a network consists of two or more computers that are connected together to share information.
Software Narrative Autonomous Targeting Vehicle (ATV) Daniel Barrett Sebastian Hening Sandunmalee Abeyratne Anthony Myers.
End of Semester 1 Presentation: November 28, 2007.
ITE PC v4.0 Chapter 8 1 © 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public  Networks are systems that are formed by links.  People use different.
NETWORKS THEORY AND PRACTICAL DISCUSSION JOHN KOVACEVICH INFORMATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT TEXAS A&M GALVESTON CAMPUS
Chapter 3.  Help you understand what hardware is required to allow networks to work including: ◦ Repeaters ◦ Hub ◦ Switch ◦ Bridge ◦ Gateway (not needed.
ARM and GPS Based Transformer monitoring system with area Identification Student Name USN NO Guide Name H.O.D Name Name Of The College & Dept.
Farms, sensors and satellites. Using fertilisers Farming practice are changing Growing quality crops in good yields depends on many factors, including.
Telematics derived from the Greek words “Tele” and “matos”, Tele means (far away) and matos means (derivative of Greek word machinari), Combinedly telematics.
Autonomous Quadcopter Andrew Martin, Baobao Lu, Cindy Xin Ting Group 37 TA: Katherine O'Kane.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 ACS Dave Auslander, Dave Pankow, Han Chen, Yao-Ting Mao, UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
Younis H. Karim, AbidYahya School of Computer University Malaysia Perlis 1.
Auto-Park for Social Robots By Team I. Meet the Team Alessandro Pinto ▫ UTRC, Sponsor Dorothy Kirlew ▫ Scrum Master, Software Mohak Bhardwaj ▫ Vision.
Three types of wireless technology
NGUYEN DINH HUY 2018/05/09 Dept. of Eco-friendly Offshore plant FEED Engineering 1.
Unit 2 Unmanned Aircraft
Presentation transcript:

THE PHOENIX PROJECT Coordinated Flight of Multiple Unmanned Vehicles Michael P. Anthony & Christopher M. Gerson Lab for Control and Automation Princeton University Princeton, NJ, Professor Robert Stengel

Goals Long Term –Fleet of 4 Aircraft –Way Point Navigation –Coordinated Aerobatic Maneuvers Short Term –Derivation of Longitudinal Controller –Refine Lateral Controller –Integrate System and Flight Test

The Hobbico Hobbistar 60 Advantages –Remote Pilot –Inexpensive –Almost Ready to Fly Disadvantages –Small Payload Phoenix 1 [1]

Lateral Control System

Refinement of Control System –Correction of Simulink Simulation –Alteration of LQR Control Cost

Simulink Analysis of LQR State Estimate with R=30*I 2 State Estimate with R=I 2

Longitudinal Control System Derivation of Control System –Plant Model (P above) –Control Block (C)

Longitudinal Plant Pole/Zero Map Pole/Zero Map showing Poles of Longitudinal Plant Model

PD Control Derivation PD Controller (C) –Proportional to control rise time –Derivative to control damping –Elimination of Integral Control No need for 0 steady state error Integral Control usually slows transient response –Non-computationally heavy, easier to maintain real-time

Longitudinal Control System C P

Closed Loop Step Response

The Cassiopeia Payload Bay

Onboard System Control Channel 5 Channel 1-4 Servos Rate Gyros Receiver Safety Switch Cassiopeia CF port WLan Card RS-232 TattleTale TPU Channels GPS Receiver RS-232 MUX Computed Controls MUX

Tattletale Data Logger from Onset Computers Acts as Data Acquisition Board –Reads Gyro data Pulses –Transmits Gyro data to Cassiopeia –Receives Servo data from Cassiopeia –Controls Servos via TPU Channels Sampling Time: 10Hz TattleTale Model 8 [2]

Casio Cassiopeia Main Processor –Lateral Control –Longitudinal Control Wireless LAN –2-way communication with ground laptop Cassiopeia E-125 [3]

Wireless LAN Symbol Wireless LAN –Designed for PDAs –Dynamically adjusts speed to increase range –Communicates with Ground Laptop Symbol CF WLan Card [4]

GPS Pharos iGPS Receiver Read by TattleTale –1Hz Sampling –RS-232 Protocol Data Sent to Cassiopeia Data Transmitted to Laptop Data plotted by Laptop Pharos iGPS [5]

Ground-Based Laptop Receives Data from Cassiopeia –  and  Ensures Onboard System is functioning –GPS Data Transmits Data to Cassiopeia: –  and  (desired) –‘Enter Flight Path’ Command –‘RESET’ Controls –Adjusts assumed Average Rate Gyro Values

Control System Interface

Ground Tests What Worked: Safety Switch System remained in Real-time Reliable Network Software –System reestablishes communications Controllers reacted to Disturbances What Didn’t: Integration of GPS prevented system from remaining in real-time

Flight Test

When it Rains, It Pours

Conclusions Controller Flight Test was Inconclusive –Failure before Automated Control Test –Controller Performance known only to the extent of simulations What did Work –Wireless Communications –Tattletale/Casio Communications –Sensors and Integration

Changes Next Semester New PDA Smaller PDA’s exist that would fit in the Aircraft Alternative OS’s exist for PDA’s with the Intel StrongARM PDA and Laptop will log all data GPS: Direct Communication with PDA Avoids GPS / TattleTale Interaction Would allow system to remain in real-time Control to the TattleTale More modular Design Avoids excess communications

Special Thanks Professor Stengel: for allowing our involvement in this project Professor Littman: for his advice and counsel Professor Leonard’s Dynamics Lab: for their assistance George Miller: for generously donating his time to fly our airplane

References [1] Robert F. Stengel. Accessed on 8/15/00. [2] “TattleTale Model 8v2.” 2001 Onset computers Accessed on 1/5/ TT8.html TT8.html [3] “E-125- Cassiopeia.” 2001 Casio Corporation. Accessed on 2/15/ &display=10&cid= &display=10&cid=3897 [4] “Wireless Systems.” 2001 Symbol Technology. Accessed on 1/5/ html html [5] “Pharos iGPS-180 Receiver.” 2001 Pharos. Accessed on 1/5/2002