The Socratic Seminar

Debate and Dialogue Dialogue is collaborative: multiple sides work toward shared understanding. Debate is oppositional: two opposing sides try to prove each other wrong. In dialogue, one listens to understand, to make meaning, and to find common ground. In debate, one listens to find flaws, to spot differences, and to counter arguments.

Debate and Dialogue (continued) Dialogue enlarges and possibly changes a participant’s point of view. Debate affirms a participant's point of view. Dialogue reveals assumptions for examination and re-evaluation. Debate defends assumptions as truth.

Debate and Dialogue (continued) Dialogue creates an open-minded attitude: an openness to being wrong and an openness to change. Debate creates a close-minded attitude, a determination to be right. In dialogue, one submits one's best thinking, expecting that other people's reflections will help improve it rather than threaten it. In debate, one submits one's best thinking and defends it against challenge to show that it is right.

Debate and Dialogue (continued) Dialogue calls for temporarily suspending one's beliefs. Debate calls for investing wholeheartedly in one's beliefs. In dialogue, one searches for strengths in all positions. In debate, one searches for weaknesses in the other position.

Debate and Dialogue (continued) Dialogue respects all the other participants and seeks not to alienate or offend. Debate rebuts contrary positions and may belittle or deprecate other participants. Dialogue assumes that many people have pieces of answers and that cooperation can lead to a greater understanding. Debate assumes a single right answer that somebody already has.

Debate and Dialogue (continued) Dialogue remains open-ended. Debate demands a conclusion.

Socratic Seminars Ground Rules 1. Speak so that all can hear you. 2. Listen closely. 3. Speak without raising hands. 4. Refer to the text.

Socratic Seminars Ground Rules (continued) 5. Talk to each other, not just to the leader (no side conversations) 6. Ask for clarification. Don ’ t stay confused. 7. Invite and allow others to speak. 8. Consider all viewpoints and ideas. 9. Know that you are responsible for the quality of the seminar.

Socratic Seminar-Ground Rules Cont. 10. Address one another respectfully 11. Monitor “ air time ” 12. Use sensitivity to take turns and not interrupt others 13. Be courageous in presenting your own thoughts and reasoning, but be flexible and willing to change your mind in the face of new and compelling evidence

Pre-Seminar Question-Writing Before you come to a Socratic Seminar class on Friday, please read the assigned text, which will consist of two articles on the days I am gone, and fill in the assigned Dialectic Journal. (If the Dialectic Journal is not complete, you may not participate in the Socratic Seminar, and you will earn a zero.)

Level 1: Close-ended Questions Write a question about the text that will help everyone in the class come to an agreement about events or characters in the text. This question usually has a "correct" answer.

Level 2: Open-ended Questions Write an insightful question about the text that will require proof and group discussion and "construction of logic" to discover or explore the answer to the question.

Level 3: World Connection Questions Write a question connecting the text to the real world.

Level 4: Universal Theme/Core Questions Write a question dealing with a theme(s) of the text that will encourage group discussion about the universality of the text.

How am I graded? A Level Participant ♦ Participant offers enough solid analysis, without prompting, to move the conversation forward. ♦ Participant, through his/her comments, demonstrates a deep knowledge of the text. ♦ Participant has come to the seminar prepared, with notes and a marked/annotated text. ♦ Participant, through his/her comments, shows that he/she is actively listening to other participants. ♦ Participant offers clarification and /or follow-up that extends the conversation. ♦ Participant’s remarks often refer back to specific parts of the text.

How am I graded? B Level Participant ♦ Participant offers solid analysis without prompting. ♦ Participant, through his/her comments, demonstrates a good knowledge of the text. ♦ Participant has come to the seminar prepared, with notes and a marked/annotated text. ♦ Participant shows that he/she is actively listening to others. ♦ Participant offers clarification and /or follow-up to other’s comments. ♦ Participant’s remarks sometimes refer back to specific parts of the text.

How am I graded? C Level Participant ♦ Participant offers some analysis but needs prompting. ♦ Participant, through his/her comments, demonstrates a general knowledge of the text. ♦ Participant is less prepared, with few notes and no marked/annotated text. ♦ Participant is actively listening to others. ♦ Participant does not offer clarification and /or follow-up to other’s comments. ♦ Participant relies more upon his/her opinion and less on the text to drive comments.

How am I graded? D or F Level Participant ♦ Participant offers little commentary. ♦ Participant comes to the seminar ill-prepared with little understanding of the text. ♦ Participant does not listen to others. ♦ Participant offers no commentary to further the discussion. ♦ Participant distracts the group by interrupting other speakers or by offering off topic questions and comments. ♦ Participant ignores the discussion and its participants.