Fundamentals of Enrolment Projections Slide 1 Module E5 - Session 1 Mekong Institute & UNESCO Regional Office-Bangkok Prepared by the Education Policy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Household Questionnaire: Education.
Advertisements

1. 2 Why are Result & Impact Indicators Needed? To better understand the positive/negative results of EC aid. The main questions are: 1.What change is.
Training Course on Training of Trainers from the Greater Mekong Sub- Region on Decentralized Education Planning in the Context of Public Sector Management.
The Nickels and Dimes of Education for All
AME Education Sector Profile
Improving English language teaching and learning in Portugal: an integrated approach UCETAM BICULTURAL-BILINGUAL CONGRESS University of Alcalá, 17 th April.
Karen L. Mapp, Ed.D. Deputy Superintendent, Boston Public Schools
Multiple Regression Fenster Today we start on the last part of the course: multivariate analysis. Up to now we have been concerned with testing the significance.
Cost Behavior, Activity Analysis, and Cost Estimation
Training Course on “Training of Trainers from the Greater Mekong Sub- Region on Decentralized Education Planning in the Context of Public Sector Management.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data dissemination and further analysis workshop Literacy Education MICS4 Data Dissemination and Further Analysis Workshop.
The Simple Linear Regression Model: Specification and Estimation
Chapter 11 Replacement Decisions
IVY TECH IN 2025: Reaching the Goal Robert E. Hoke Independent Consultant IVY TECH IN 2025: Reaching the Goal Robert E. Hoke Independent Consultant Page.
History of Comparative Education Classification of the field today
1 POPULATION PROJECTIONS Session 6 - Introduction to population projections Ben Jarabi Population Studies & Research Institute University of Nairobi.
1 MINISTRY EDUCATION AND TRAINING PUBLIC EXPENDITURE In education Hµ Néi – 28 June 2006 NguyÔn V¨n Ng÷ Director Planning and Finance Department.
ECON 6012 Cost Benefit Analysis Memorial University of Newfoundland
3R’s: Research, Retention and Repayment Predicting the Future by Understanding Current and Past Students.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Review of Statistical Inference Prepared by Vera Tabakova, East Carolina University ECON 4550 Econometrics Memorial University of Newfoundland.
Part 1: overview of the UNESCO Template ANPRO-Model (Slides 2 - 9)
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data Interpretation, Further Analysis and Dissemination Workshop Literacy and Education.
Timor-Leste AME EDUCATION SECTOR PROFILE. Education Structure Timor-Leste Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics, World Bank EdStats Education System.
ADB Grant 0133-CAM: Public Financial Management in Rural Development Ministries (Component 1) Analysing Budgets March ,
M&E progress in EFA Goals Prepared by Nyi Nyi THAUNG, UIS (Bangkok) Capacity Building Workshop on Monitoring and Evaluating Progress in Education in the.
Out of School Children in Punjab Looking at Access & Equity “Every child enrolls in school Every child is retained in school Every child learns and makes.
1 POPULATION PROJECTIONS Session 8 - Projections for sub- national and sectoral populations Ben Jarabi Population Studies & Research Institute University.
Training Course on “Training of Trainers from the Greater Mekong Sub- Region on Decentralized Education Planning in the Context of Public Sector Management.
Training Course on “Training of Trainers from the Greater Mekong Sub- Region on Decentralized Education Planning in the Context of Public Sector Management.
AME Education Sector Profile
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005 CAPITAL ACCUMULATION AND GROWTH: THE BASIC SOLOW MODEL Chapter 3 – second lecture Introducing Advanced Macroeconomics:
Chapter 6 Common Stock Valuation: Putting all the pieces together.
EDUCATION IN THAILAND Dr. Charuaypon Torranin Deputy Permanent Secretary for Education 24 March 2005.
FINANCIAL INTERPRETATION OF RATES AND RATIO ARLENE E. GAZZINGAN DEM STUDENT.
Module 14 Cost Behavior, Activity Analysis, and Cost Estimation.
Confidence intervals and hypothesis testing Petter Mostad
UNESCO Institute for Statistics 1 Education related MDG indicators: methodology and issues Ioulia Sementchouk UNESCO Institute for Statistics November.
Interval Estimation and Hypothesis Testing Prepared by Vera Tabakova, East Carolina University.
Economics 173 Business Statistics Lecture 3 Fall, 2001 Professor J. Petry
FEASIBLE tool: prospects for further developments Alexander Martoussevitch Paris, 23 February, 2007 EAP Task Force.
Part 2 Modeling Fiscal Implications of Education Policies Sajitha Bashir May 3, 2006.
Logical Framework Slide 1 Mekong Institute & UNESCO Regional Office-Bangkok 23 February – 6 March 2009; Khon Kaen, Thailand Prepared by the Education Policy.
Operating Budget Funding Sources State Appropriations - General Revenue Formula Funding, Special Items, Benefit Cost Sharing THECB Transfers TX Grant,
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Department of Education NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION.
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
How to Make Analysis and Projection Scenarios Slide 1 Mekong Institute & UNESCO Regional Office-Bangkok Prepared by the Education Policy and Reform Unit.
Training Course on “Training of Trainers from the Greater Mekong Sub- Region on Decentralized Education Planning in the Context of Public Sector Management.
Refresher course on relevant Excel skills for simulation models Slide 1 Mekong Institute & UNESCO Regional Office-Bangkok Prepared by the Education Policy.
“Moving Forward the Reform Agenda”
Project Prepare Four County Mental Health Tri-County Special Education.
Feb 2003 UNESCO/Focal points /VC 1 Measuring gender parity in education Technical issues.
Asia Education Summit on Flexible Learning Strategies Children February 2016 Bangkok Thailand The Lao Equivalency Programme (EP) for Lower Secondary.
Graduation, Completion, and Dropout Counts and Rates Tracking Student Cohorts in MSIS November 1, 2006 Office of Research and Statistics Mississippi Department.
New assessment to support a new curriculum. The new Curriculum 2014 Implemented from Sept 2014 Some subjects saw major changes e.g. history, computing.
A Training Course for the Analysis and Reporting of Data from Education Management Information Systems (EMIS)
* Alternative concepts and methodologies for the calculation of dropout in Israel Haim Portnoy Central Bureau of Statistics Twinning Activity B1 November.
Comparative Analysis of Aggregate Educational Data Between Children in Foster Care and the General Population Florida Department of Children and Families.
The education indicators concerning completion
Methods and approaches of collecting education data
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Indicators of Education Systems Performance
HIGH-LEVEL PROJECTIONS FOR EDUCATION (HIPE)
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
National Training Workshop on Mid-Decade Assessment for EFA
National Training Workshop on Mid-Decade Assessment for EFA
Fixed Assets (Capital Assets)
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
Confidence intervals for the difference between two means: Independent samples Section 10.1.
THE ECONOMIC POLICY COMMITTEE ONGOING WORK ON LONG-TERM PROJECTIONS The case for education projections Andrea Montanino European Commission Directorate.
Presentation transcript:

Fundamentals of Enrolment Projections Slide 1 Module E5 - Session 1 Mekong Institute & UNESCO Regional Office-Bangkok Prepared by the Education Policy and Reform Unit UNESCO Bangkok February 2009 Training Course on “Training of Trainers from the Greater Mekong Sub- Region on Decentralized Education Planning in the Context of Public Sector Management Reform” 23 February – 6 March 2009; Khon Kaen, Thailand

Enrolment Projection Projection is the process of obtaining an estimate (or estimates) based on present situation, future goals and targets, and past trends Projecting future enrolment is one of the most important tasks for education planners and managers at all levels Enrolment for the coming school year can be projected in several ways: using current enrolment extrapolation based on the previous years’ enrolment trend summing up a portion of current year’s enrolment in the grade (as repeating students) and another portion from the immediately lower grade (as promoting students), etc. Slide 2

Simulation Models Future enrolment cannot be predicted with 100% accuracy due to several factors impacting on schooling. Those factors are both internal (pupil, teacher, school, teaching- learning materials, assessment, …) and external (health, social, economical, cultural, migration, …) Several projections are to be made to select one from an iterative process of target setting The process of making projections based on different, but plausible, targets and assumptions is known as “simulation” Simulation models are the common tools in studying education alternatives. Slide 3

Analysis and Projection Model Analysis and Projection (ANPRO) Model is one of the “simulation models” and is designed for projecting: enrolment and graduates, resources needed, human resources: teachers, principals and other staff material resources: teaching-learning materials, textbooks… facilities and equipment: classes, classrooms, schools, … financial resources: recurrent expenditures (salaries, utilities, maintenance), and capital expenditures such as construction, major repairs, etc… and available resources and possible resource gaps ANPRO uses cohort-component method to project enrolment Other resources needed are projected based on the projected future enrolment in schools, specifically public schools. Slide 4

Cohort-Component Method (1) Let us assume that our primary education system has 5 grades, and that the official school entrance age is 6. Entry point to formal general education system is normally the first grade of primary education, that is Grade 1, and a group of pupils (students) who entered the education system during the same year is called “a pupil cohort” From Grade 1, the cohort will proceed to the higher grades, and ultimately, they will conclude the primary school as “primary school graduates (successful completers)” or “dropouts” Slide 5 new intake Population Aged 6 Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5 enrolment PRIMARY SCHOOL Graduates DROPOUTS

Cohort-Component Method (2) Not all pupils (or enrolment) in Grade 1 are “new entrants” or “new intake” of the current school year Some of them have already attended, partly or fully, during the previous school years but are still remain in Grade 1 in this school year Those pupils are known as “repeaters” (or repeating students) Similarly, not all pupils in Grade 2 studied in Grade 1 during previous school year most of them are promoted from previous year’s Grade 1 enrolment, and a smaller group is “repeaters” from previous year’s Grade 2 enrolment “promotees”. Pupils promoted to Grade 2 from the previous year’s Grade 1 enrolment are called “promotees”. Slide 6

Cohort-Component Method (3) Once a child entered the education system (primary Grade 1), he/she becomes a “pupil” and has three destinies for the coming year: (1) a higher grade (is promoted to Grade 2) (2) the same grade (repeats in Grade 1) (3) out of school (drops out during, or at the end of school year) Slide 7 Population Aged /06 Grade 1 Population Aged 6 (1) Promotees Grade 1Grade 2 (3) Dropout (2) Repeaters Repeaters 2006/07 New intake Grade 2 Repeaters Dropout

Cohort-Component Method (4) Grade 1 enrolment in year 2005/06 has two components: New intake in 05/06 (from school age population), and Repeaters (from the same grade, Grade 1 in 2004/05) Grade 1 enrolment in year 2006/07 also has two components: New intake in 06/07 (from school age population), and Repeaters (from the same grade, Grade 1 in 2005/06) Thus, Grade 1 enrolment in coming year, 2007/08 can be estimated through: (a) how many pupils will enter into Grade 1 in 07/08 from the school-age population, and (b) how many pupils will repeat in 07/08 from the current year Grade 1 enrolment Grade 1 enrolment in 2007/08 is: Grade 1 enrolment = New intake + Repeaters from in 2007/08in 2007/ /07 cohort Slide 8

Cohort-Component Method (5) Similarly, the Grade 2 enrolment also has two components: Promotees (from the lower grade, Grade 1), and Repeaters (from the same grade, Grade 2) Grade 2 enrolment in the next year is estimated through: (a) number of pupils who will be promoted from the current year Grade 1 enrolment, and (b) number of pupils who will repeat the current year Grade 2 enrolment “How many children will enter as new intake?”; “How many pupils will be promoted?” and “How many pupils will repeat?” should be estimated from the past behavior of the cohort The technique of estimating each component using the common experience of the entire cohort is known as “cohort-component method” Slide 9

Cohort-Component Method (6) Most of those who entered Grade 1 for the first time (the new intake or entrants) are from the population at the school entrance age (say 6-year olds) X Y AIR If there are X number of children aged 6 in the catchment area of a primary school, and the school received Y number of new entrants, the apparent intake rate (AIR) can be calculated as: Y AIR = ---- x 100 X AIR is also known as Gross Intake Rate (GIR) or Gross Admission Rate (GAR) Y From the above equation, number of new entrants, Y is: Y = AIR x X Therefore, number of new entrants can be estimated by multiplying the “apparent intake rate” with “population at the school entrance age” Slide 10

Cohort-Component Method (7) Since the repeaters in 2006/07 are coming from the 2005/06 cohort (of Grade 1 enrolment), the “Grade 1 repetition rate for 2005/06” is defined as: No. of Repeaters in 2006/07 Repetition rate (2005/2006) = x 100 Total enrolment in 2005/06 For example: What are the AIR in 2006/07, percentage of repeaters in Grade 1 in 2006/07, and Grade 1 repetition rate for 2005/06? Slide / Pop. Aged 6 96 Promotees 123? 18 Repeaters 10 Repeaters 2006/ New intake Grade 1 Grade 2

Cohort-Component Method (8) In this example, Grade 1 enrolment in 2006/07 school year is 123. Of them: 18 are repeaters (who were in Grade 1 during 05/06) and 105 are new intake (who have never been to school) Again, there are 100 children aged 6 in the school catchment area, and thus, the “apparent intake rate for 2006/07” is 105% (i.e., 105 / 100 x 100) Out of 123 Grade 1 enrolment in 2006/07, 18 are repeaters and percentage of repeaters is 14.6% (i.e., 18 / 123 x 100) Out of 120 Grade 1 enrolment in 2005/06, 18 pupils are repeating in Grade 1 in 2006/07 school year Therefore, Grade 1 repetition rate for the 2005/06 cohort is 15% (i.e., 18 / 120 x 100), and Grade 2 repetition rate for 2005/06 is 9.1% (i.e., 10 / 110 x 100) Slide 12

Cohort-Component Method (9) Of 120 Grade 1 enrolment in 2005/06 school year, 96 were promoted to Grade 2 in 2006/07 school year Therefore, percentage of pupils promoted from the 2005/06 Grade 1 cohort is, 80% and it is known as “promotion rate” (i.e., 96 / 120 x 100) In this example, 80% of the 2005/06 Grade 1 cohort was promoted to Grade 2, and 15% is repeating in Grade 1 Where are the remaining 5% or 6 pupils (120 – 96 – 18) from 2005/06 cohort? The remaining 6 pupils are no longer in school (or they have dropped out while studying in Grade 1) Thus, the dropout rate for the 2005/06 Grade 1 cohort is 5% (i.e., 6 /120 * 100) The dropout rate can also be obtained by subtracting promotion rate and repetition rate from 100%, that is, dropout rate= 100% - promotion rate – repetition rate = 100% - 80% - 15% = 5% Slide 13

Cohort-Component Method (10) p rd “” Promotion rate is denoted by “p”, repetition rate is denoted by “r”, and dropout rate is denoted by “d”, and the three rates are known as “student flow rates” As seen in the example, the famous relationship among the three student flow rates is: Therefore, if two out of three student flow rates are known, the remaining one can be calculated from the above equation all three We must be careful not to independently set values for all three while setting targets on student flow rates That is, targets on any two out of three student flow rates must be set meaningfully Slide 14 p + r + d = 100 %

Cohort-Component Method (11) If the “promotion rate” for Grade 1 in 2005/06 school year is known, the number of “promotees” in Grade 2 in 2006/07 can be calculated as: promotees= G1 enrolment 05/06 x G1 promotion rate 05/06 (2006/07)= 120 x 80% = 96 pupils Similarly, from the repetition rate for Grade 2 in 2005/06 (9.1%), and, Grade 2 enrolment in 2005/06 (110), one could estimate number of repeaters in Grade 2 in 2006/07 school year as: repeaters= G2 enrolment 05/06 x G2 repetition rate 05/06 (2006/07)= 110 x 9.1% = 10 pupils Therefore, total Grade 2 enrolment in 2006/07 school year becomes: G2 enrolment 06/07= promotees in G2 + repeaters in G2 = = 106 pupils Slide 15

Cohort-Component Method (12) Lets assume that there are 98 children aged 6 in the catchment area of the school and the AIR is targeted at 100% in 2007/08 How many students would the school have in Grade 1 and Grade 2 in 2007/08 school year, if the student flow rates in 2006/07 are same as in 2005/06? Slide /08 98 children aged 6 Grade 1Grade /07 enrolment 123 New Intake ??? enrolment ??? Repeaters ?? enrolment 106 Promotees ??? enrolment ??? Repeaters ?? r = 9.1% AIR = 100% p = 80%r = 15%

Cohort-Component Method (13) And, what would be the enrolment in Grade 1 and Grade 2 in 2007/08 school year, if the promotion and repetition rates for the Grade 1 in 2006/07 become 87% and 10%? Slide /08 98 children aged 6 Grade 1Grade /07 enrolment 123 New Intake 98 enrolment 116 Repeaters 18 enrolment 106 Promotees 98 enrolment 108 Repeaters 10 r = 9.1% AIR = 100% p = 80% r = 15%

Enrolment in Grade 1 Slide 18 Let us recapitulate some calculation made in this presentation: Grade 1 Population New Intake = Aged 6 x Apparent Intake Rate (AIR) in 2006/07 in 2006 Repeaters from Grade /06 G1 = enrolment x G1 Repetition Rate enrolment in 2005/06 G1 enrolment = New Intake + Repeaters in 2006/07 in 2006/07 from 2005/06 G1

Enrolment in Grade 2 Slide 19 Enrolment Promotees Repeaters Grade 2 = from 2005/06 + from 2005/06 (2006/07) Grade 1 Grade 2 Promotees Grade 1 Grade 1 from 2005/06 = enrolment x Promotion Rate Grade 1 (2005/06) (2005/06) Repeaters Grade 2 Grade 2 from 2005/06 = enrolment x Repetition Rate Grade 2 (2005/06) (2005/06)

Enrolment in Other Grades Such a simple calculation procedure is applied in all ANPRO Models for enrolment projection! Slide 20 Enrolment Promotees from Repeaters from 2006/07 = 2005/ /06 Grade i Grade (i-1) Grade (i) Promotees from Grade (i-1) Grade (i-1) 2005/06 = enrolment x Promotion Rate Grade (i-1) (2005/06) (2005/06) Repeaters Grade (i) Grade (i) from = enrolment x Repetition Rate 2005/ / /06

Slide 21 How to Calculate Student Flow: A Working Example Let us assume that our primary education level has 6 grades (Grade 1 to grade 6) and the following flow rates remain the same for the coming years: Then, we can calculate the (selected) measure of efficiency for the primary education as following:

Provincial Education Planning, UNESCO- Bangkok & MOE-Thailand (August 2007)Slide 22

Slide 23 Selected Measures of Internal Efficiency