4-PARAMETER TRANSFORMATION OF DIGITIZED ASTRONOMICAL IMAGES Yavor Chapanov 1 1 – National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography, Bulgarian Academy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
D. Elia, INFN BariALICE Offline Week - June Recent results from SPD beam test D. Elia, R. Santoro INFN Bari ALICE Collaboration - SPD Group.
Advertisements

Optical Astronomy Imaging Chain: Telescopes & CCDs.
1 International Conference on RadioAstron Mission November 2003, Moscow ASTROMETRIC GOALS OF THE RADIOASTRON MISSION V.E.ZHAROV 1, A.E.RODIN 2, I.A.GERASIMOV.
Digital Camera and Computer Vision Laboratory Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
CHAMP Observations of Multiple Field-Aligned Currents Dimitar Danov 1, Petko Nenovski 2 Solar-Terrestrial Influences Laboratory, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences,
Two-view geometry.
3mm amplitude test by Cheng-Jiun Ma. Observation Source : Orion SiO Frequency: GHz 256 channels within 64MHz bandwidth Ant 3 & Ant 4 no Tsys correction.
With support from: NSF DUE in partnership with: George McLeod Prepared by: Geospatial Technician Education Through Virginia’s Community Colleges.
Towards Creation of a JWST Astrometric Reference Field: Calibration of HST/ACS Absolute Scale and Rotation Roeland van der Marel Jay Anderson, Colin Cox,
How to Get Equator Coordinates of Objects from Observation Zhenghong TANG Yale Astrometry Summer Workshop July, 2005.
CS485/685 Computer Vision Prof. George Bebis
IMAGING RETREAT ( 06 / 01 / 05 ) IMAGE REGISTRATION Ravichandran Rajaram Graduate Research Assistant MR Research Facility.
1 Time-Delayed Integration/ Drift scanning William van Altena Yale University Basic Astrometric Methods Yale University July 18-22, 2005.
Astrometry for NGAO Brian Cameron, Matthew Britton, Jessica Lu, Andrea Ghez, Rich Dekany, Claire Max, and Chris Neyman NGAO Meeting #6 April 25, 2007.
Haskins fMRI Workshop Part I: Data Acquisition & Preprocessing.
Search for the Gravitational Wave Memory effect with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array Jingbo Wang 1,2,3, Hobbs George 3, Dick Manchester 3, Na Wang 1,4 1.
Georeferencing Getting maps and satellite images into GIS.
HJ-1A/B CCD IMAGERY Geometric Distortions and Precise Geometric Correction Accuracy Analysis Changmiao Hu, Ping Tang
COMPUTER MODELS FOR SKY IMAGE ANALYSIS OF THE INASAN ZVENIGOROD OBSERVATORY Sergei Pirogov ( Institute of Astronomy, Russian Academy of Sciences) VIIth.
1 Preview At least two views are required to access the depth of a scene point and in turn to reconstruct scene structure Multiple views can be obtained.
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
Image Preprocessing: Geometric Correction Image Preprocessing: Geometric Correction Jensen, 2003 John R. Jensen Department of Geography University of South.
Automated Reconstruction of Industrial Sites Frank van den Heuvel Tahir Rabbani.
IGS Workshop, June 02, Validation of GNSS Satellite Orbits C. Flohrer, G. Beutler, R. Dach, W. Gurtner, U. Hugentobler 1, S. Schaer, T. Springer.
AST 443/PHY 517 : Observational Techniques November 6, 2007 ASTROMETRY By: Jackie Faherty.
VII th Bulgarian-Serbian Astronomical Conference (VII BSAC): 1- 4 June, 2010, Chepelare, Bulgaria DIGITIZING OF THE ASTRONOMICAL PHOTO PLATES IN THE NATIONAL.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
High Precision Astrometry and Parallax from Spatial Scanning Part 2 Adam Riess and Stefano Casertano.
FIELD PREDICTION SOFTWARE © C2PU, Observatoire de la Cote d’Azur, Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis Jean-Pierre Rivet CNRS, OCA, Dept. Lagrange
Transformations Day 1: Graphing. Vocabulary Transformations – mapping of a figure on the coordinate plane. 1) Reflection: Mirror image x-axis (x,y) →(x,-y)
Aldo Dell'Oro INAF- Observatory of Turin Detailed analysis of the signal from asteroids by GAIA and their size estimation Besançon November 6-7, 2003.
SITE PARAMETERS RELEVANT FOR HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGING Marc Sarazin European Southern Observatory.
Two-view geometry. Epipolar Plane – plane containing baseline (1D family) Epipoles = intersections of baseline with image planes = projections of the.
S/X receiver for Parkes geodetic VLBI program 29 October 2012 ATNF, Sydney 29 October 2012 Оleg Titov (Geoscience Australia)
POSSII IMAGES ASTROMÉTRIC REDUCTION Reduction methods and their influence on Theta and Rho measures Ignacio Novalbos O.A.N.L. Barcelona.
1 Chapter 2: Geometric Camera Models Objective: Formulate the geometrical relationships between image and scene measurements Scene: a 3-D function, g(x,y,z)
Figure 6. Parameter Calculation. Parameters R, T, f, and c are found from m ij. Patient f : camera focal vector along optical axis c : camera center offset.
VIIth Bulgarian-Serbian Astronomical Conference, 1- 4 June 2010, Chepelare, Bulgaria The INASAN Zvenigorod observatory plate collection Sergei V. Vereshchagin,
Weak Lensing - PSF Calibrations Steve Kent Apr 1, 2005 ● Motivation for studies: – 1. Develop concise metrics for requirements for weak lensing calibrations.
On the Evaluation of Optical Performace of Observing Instruments Y. Suematsu (National Astronomical Observatory of Japan) ABSTRACT: It is useful to represent.
Abstract Beam Test of a Large-area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System V. Bhopatkar, M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
XI XiaoJin NATIONAL TIME SERVICE CENTER CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES.
Physics 114: Lecture 13 Error Analysis, Part III Dale E. Gary NJIT Physics Department.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Pluto Astrometry From Table Mountain Observatory William M. Owen, Jr. Jet Propulsion Laboratory California.
Status VELO alignment 1.Alignment at IP8 Jo van den Brand Frans Mul June 2, 2006.
12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences
Geoprocessing and georeferencing raster data
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya CORRECTION OF SPATIAL ERRORS IN SMOS BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE IMAGES L. Wu, I. Corbella, F. Torres, N. Duffo, M. Martín-Neira.
January 6, 2005 URSI Nation Radio Science Meeting, Boulder, CO. Pointing and Focusing the GBT K. T. Constantikes NRAO Green Bank.
Astrometry with Schmidt Plates Difficulty in attaining highly accurate positions -Bending of plates as they are placed in plate holder -Characteristics.
Theodolite: Tachymat wild TC2002S Laser Distantiometer: Distomat Wild DI2002 Corner Cube reflector: Wild GPH1P East Up North M E 1 R N T 2 Local Survey.
PIXEL ladder alignment Hidemitsu ASANO. Photo analysis & survey beam data (with zero magnetic field) ① SVX standalone tracking Global Tracking Strategy.
WFC3 SMOV UVIS and IR Geometric Distortion Calibration and Multidrizzle Vera Kozhurina-Platais and WFC3 team.
Precise Automated Kinematic Calibration of RCM Robots Checkpoint Presentation Group6.
C. Y. Hui & W. Becker Probing the Proper Motion of the Central Compact Object in Puppis-A Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstrasse.
Observations of ERS from ICRF2 list using ASV 60cm and Rozhen 2m telescopes I. S. Milić, G. Damljanović Astronomical Observatory, Belgrade,
UFOAnalyzerV2 (UA2) the key of accuracy
Proper motion accuracy of WFPDB stars
Examinations of the relative alignment of the instruments on SOT
Diane Karakla ESAC “On Your Mark” Workshop Madrid, Sept
VII BSAC  "ASTROINFORMATICS" – Chepelare, 1-4 June 2010
Lunar Observation with
Version 02, 15/08/2017 A SOFTWARE FOR STAR FIELD PREDICTION AND TARGET OBSERVABILITY ASSESSMENT Conférence présentée à PARSEC, le 1er octobre Jean-Pierre.
GPI Astrometric Calibration
A movement of a figure in a plane.
UCAC U.S. Naval Observatory CCD Astrograph Catalog T.J. Rafferty
Troposphere and Clock Parameterization During Continuous VLBI Campaigns Kamil Teke1, 2, Johannes Boehm1, Hana Spicakova1, Andrea Pany1, Harald Schuh1 1.
X SERBIAN-BULGARIAN ASTRONOMICAL CONFERENCE 30 MAY - 3 JUNE, 2016, BELGRADE, SERBIA EARTH ORIENTATION PARAMETERS AND GRAVITY VARIATIONS DETERMINED FROM.
Reflections in Coordinate Plane
Spatial Data Entry via Digitizing
Presentation transcript:

4-PARAMETER TRANSFORMATION OF DIGITIZED ASTRONOMICAL IMAGES Yavor Chapanov 1 1 – National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences VIII Serbian-Bulgarian Astronomical Conference: 8-12 May 2012, Leskovac, Serbia

4-, 3- parameter transformation – Z, Cz, Rx and Ry are zeroes

DATA SIMULATION PLATE SCALE <100"/mm SCAN RESOLUTION 2400dpi IDENTICAL STAR SETS PRELIMINARY UNIFIED DATA REFRACTION AND DISTORTION CORRECTIONS ACCURACY: (I) 0”.5 – the best case, (II) 1”.0 – middle precision, (III) 5”.0 – poor accuracy Systematic errors: Image rotation 2 arcmin; Center shift 5 Scales 1*10 -4 ; 1*10 6 (  =2) VIII Serbian-Bulgarian Astronomical Conference: 8-12 May 2012, Leskovac, Serbia

Field Width: 02Ê00' Center RA: 02h 00m 00s, Center DE: 42Ê00'00º Equinox: J2000 North is Up, East is Left Source catalog: GSC-ACT Created by StarGazer version dev (C) by Rumen G.Bogdanovski STAR POSITIONS 317 stars

A MODEL OF TIPICAL ASTROMETRIC ERRORS Normally distributed numbers N (0, 0.1) Replaced by: 1% evenly distributed numbers from intervals (  0.8,  0.4], [0.4, 0.8); 6% evenly distributed numbers from intervals (  0.4,  0.1], [0.1, 0.4); 6% evenly distributed numbers from intervals (  0.06, 0.06). Resulting  =0.14 Re-scaling as: 0”.5; 1”.0; 5”.0 VIII Serbian-Bulgarian Astronomical Conference: 8-12 May 2012, Leskovac, Serbia

ERROR MODEL – I Standard 0.5 arcsec VIII Serbian-Bulgarian Astronomical Conference: 8-12 May 2012, Leskovac, Serbia Coordinate Frame Rotation 2 translations, 1 rotation, scale correction X vector [arcsec] Y vector [arcsec] Z angle [arcsec] Scale [ppm] Quality criteria 2.75 Maximum spatial residual [arcsec] 0.60 Average spatial residual [arcsec] 0.41 Root mean Square (RMS) of residuals [arcsec] X=180as, Y=240as, Rz=-120as, S=100ppm Max. errors <0”.05

ERROR MODEL – II Standard 1.0 arcsec VIII Serbian-Bulgarian Astronomical Conference: 8-12 May 2012, Leskovac, Serbia Coordinate Frame Rotation 2 translations, 1 rotation, scale correction X vector [arcsec] Y vector [arcsec] Z angle [arcsec] Scale [ppm] Quality criteria 5.23 Maximum spatial residual [arcsec] 0.86 Average spatial residual [arcsec] 0.66 Root mean Square (RMS) of residuals [arcsec] X=180as, Y=240as, Rz=-120as, S=100ppm Max. errors <0”.05

ERROR MODEL – III Standard 5.0 arcsec VIII Serbian-Bulgarian Astronomical Conference: 8-12 May 2012, Leskovac, Serbia Coordinate Frame Rotation 2 translations, 1 rotation, scale correction X vector [arcsec] Y vector [arcsec] Z angle [arcsec] Scale [ppm] Quality criteria Maximum spatial residual [arcsec] 6.07 Average spatial residual [arcsec] 4.31 Root mean Square (RMS) of residuals [arcsec] X=180as, Y=240as, Rz=-120as, S=100ppm Max. errors <0”.4

VII BSAC "ASTROINFORMATICS" – Chepelare, 1-4 June 2010 Position errors 0”.5 + PM errors 0”.5/a*10a Coordinate Frame Rotation 2 translations, 1 rotation, scale correction X vector [arcsec] Y vector [arcsec] Z angle [arcsec] Scale [ppm] Quality criteria Maximum spatial residual [arcsec] 5.55 Average spatial residual [arcsec] 4.46 Root mean Square (RMS) of residuals [arcsec] X=180as, Y=240as, Rz=-120as, S=100ppm Max. errors <0”.5 PROPER MOTION ERRORS

VII BSAC "ASTROINFORMATICS" – Chepelare, 1-4 June 2010 Standard 1.0 arcsec Coordinate Frame Rotation 2 translations, 1 rotation, scale correction X vector [arcsec] Y vector [arcsec] Z angle [arcsec] Scale [ppm] Quality criteria 5.5 Maximum spatial residual [arcsec] 1.2 Average spatial residual [arcsec] 0.8 Root mean Square (RMS) of residuals [arcsec] X=360as, Y=480as, Rz=-120as, S=1,  =2 Max. errors <0”.6 A CASE OF LARGE SCALE

CONCLUSIONS It is possible to estimate the rotation and image center of digitized astronomical plates by the 4-parameter Helmert transformation if the number of identical stars is more than 100. The estimation accuracy is better than 0.4as for plates with 100”/mm scale, scan resolution 2400dpi and total rms errors of star positions below 5as. The necessary preprocessing of digitized astronomical images are image convert to small scale, determination of identical stars from the image and star catalog and correction of the atmosphere refraction and distortions due to telescope optics and projection of celestial sphere over the focal plane. VIII Serbian-Bulgarian Astronomical Conference: 8-12 May 2012, Leskovac, Serbia