Effect of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy on survival of patients with resectable esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancer: Results from.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Blik op de toekomst: lopende en geplande DOCG studies
Advertisements

516 (32723) Phase III trial comparing AC (x4)taxane (x4) with taxane (x8) as adjuvant therapy for node-positive breast cancer: Results of N-SAS-BC02.
Post-operative Radiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer Parag Sanghvi, M.D., M.S.P.H. Department of Radiation Medicine Esophageal Care Conference 3/26/2007.
I I. B.- T R E A T M E N T P L A N: DOCETAXEL 75 mg/m2 40 mg/m2 THORACIC RT (66 Gys: 180 cGy/d) CISPLATIN 40 mg/m2 Days E V A L U A.
Carcinoma of the Cardia: Is there progress in the management of non-Barrett’s cancer Spanish Association of Surgeons Madrid 11 November 2002 The University.
1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.
CA Esophagus – Role of Chemoirradiation WH Chan Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital.
ANDREW NG PRINCE OF WALES HOSPITAL Role of primary chemoradiation in esophageal carcinoma.
Modified Megestrol The Clinical Trials by : Carolina R. Akib
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer Key issues in trial design.
Mary McCormack & Jonathan Ledermann NCRI Gynae Clinical Studies Group.
Prospective Phase II Study of Preoperative Radiotherapy and Oral Capecitabine followed by Total Mesorectal Exicision (TME) in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.
A phase I study on the combination of neoadjuvant radiotherapy plus pazopanib in patients with locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities.
Sequential vs. concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell carcinoma.
Pneumonectomy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer after Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemo-radiation Therapy K. Okabe, H. Tao, T. Tanaka, T. Hayashi, K. Yoshiyama,
Intergroup trial CALGB 80101
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Safety and Toxicity of Sparing Radiation to the Pathologic N0 Side of the Neck in Squamous Cell.
Sphincter preserving surgery after preoperative treatment for ultra-low rectal carcinoma. A French multicenter prospective trial: GRECCAR 1 P Rouanet,
Phase II Trial of Continuous Course Re- irradiation Concurrent with Weekly Cisplatinum and Cetuximab for Recurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of The Head.
Pancreatic Cancer Ali Shamseddine MD Proessor of Medicine AUBMC
Definitive chemo-radiotherapy for esophageal cancer; failure pattern and salvage treatments Ryuta Koike, Y. Nishimura, K. Nakamatsu, S. Kanamori, M. Okubo,
Background  Reports of long-term survivors (≥5 years) of locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC) have focused mainly on HRQL or GI symptoms  Only.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
Individual patient data-based meta- analysis assessing the interest of pre- operative chemotherapy in resectable oesophageal carcinoma Abstract: 4512 Thirion.
Delivering clinical research to make patients, and the NHS, better OG neoadjuvant therapy Brachytherapy Stephen Falk dd/mm/yyyy.
11 One vs Three Years of Adjuvant Imatinib for Operable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor A Randomized Trial Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, et al.
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with 5-FU and oxaliplatin versus 5-FU alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: First results.
Phase Ⅱ Trial of Docetaxel and Cisplatin Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy with Concurrent Cisplatin in Locally Advanced.
Rectal Cancer: French Prodige Study: Best of ASCO, Beirut, July 2009 Prof Eric Van Cutsem, MD, PhD Digestive Oncology Leuven, Belgium.
Preoperative fluorouracil (FU)-based chemoradiation +/- weekly oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer. Pathologic response analysis of the STAR.
CJ Allegra, G Yothers, MJ O’Connell, MS Roh, RW Beart, NJ Petrelli, S Lopa, S Sharif, and N Wolmark Neoadjuvant Therapy For Rectal Cancer: Mature Results.
EARLY PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH-RISK SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS AN ANALYSIS FROM A PHASE III RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE TRIAL (EORTC 62961/ESHO) OF NEOADJUVANT.
THE OUTBACK TRIAL A Phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy following chemoradiation as primary treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer compared.
0 Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer NCCTG Intergroup Phase III Trial N0147 Jocelin Huang, Daniel J Sargent,
The Combination of Bevacizumab (Bev) with capecitabine/irinotecan (CapIri/Bev) or capecitabine/oxaliplatin (CapOx/Bev) is highly active in advanced colorectal.
Long-term efficacy of early versus delayed radiotherapy for low-grade astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma in adults: the EORTC randomised trial From.
Michael Stahl on behalf of the German Oesophageal Cancer Study Group PreOperative Chemotherapy or Radiochemotherapy in Esophago- gastric Adenocarcinoma.
Final results of a randomized trial comparing preoperative 5-fluorouracil (F)/cisplatin (P) to surgery alone in adenocarcinoma of the stomach and lower.
Poster # 18, abstract # 4530 Long term results of a phase III study investigating chemoradiation with and without surgery in locally advanced squamous.
EORTC OSN/CTOS11 Safety of Caelyx combined with ifosfamide in previously untreated adult patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. Final.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Journal Club Dr. Eyad Al-Saeed Radiation Oncology 12 January, 2008.
The Role of Preoperative Approaches in Localized Gastro Esophageal Cancers David H. Ilson, MD, PhD Gastrointestinal Oncology Service Memorial Sloan-Kettering.
Identification of localized rectal cancer (RC) patients (pts) who may NOT require preoperative (preop) chemoradiation (CRT). D. Roda 1, M. Frasson 2, E.
Carboplatin Not Inferior to Radiation as Adjuvant Therapy for Stage I Seminoma Slideset on: Oliver RT, Mason MD, Mead GM, et al. Radiotherapy versus single-dose.
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy in Non- Small Cell Lung Cancer Seminars in Oncology 2oo5;32 (suppl 2):S9-S15 Kyung Hee Medical Center Department of Thoracic.
D2 Lymphadenectomy Alone or with Para-aortic Nodal Dissection for Gastric Cancer NEJM July vol 359 R2 임규성.
Addition of Chemotherapy to Preoperative Radiotherapy Improves Outcomes in Rectal Cancer Slideset on: Bosset JF, Calais G, Mineur L, et al. Enhanced tumorocidal.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of NSCLC Department of Thoracic Oncology, University Hospital Ghent, Belgium Current Opinion in Oncology 2007,
Adjuvant autologous renal tumour cell vaccine and risk of tumour progression in patients with renal- cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy: phase III,
Perioperative Complications after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Locally-Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison of Platinum/5-FU and Carboplatin/Paclitaxel.
Slamon D et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 62.
Results of Definitive Radiotherapy in Anal Canal Carcinoma
นายแพทย์ธราธร ตุงคะสมิต นายแพทย์ชำนาญการพิเศษ โรงพยาบาลมะเร็งอุดรธานี
ESPAC-4: Adjuvant Gemcitabine/ Capecitabine Improves 5-Yr Survival vs Gemcitabine Alone in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma CCO Independent Conference.
Concurrent chemotherapy and hyperthermia in patients with recurrent cervical cancer after chemoradiation: outcome and survival S.T. Heijkoop1,2; H.C. van.
Prognosis of younger patients in non-small cell lung cancer
Advances in esophageal cancer: Current and future strategies
What is the optimal pre-op therapy for esophagus and GE junction cancers?
Adjuvant Radiation is Required for Gastric Cancer
ACT II: The Second UK Phase III Anal Cancer Trial
Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil-based (neo-)adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: safety results of a randomized phase III.
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
Michael Stahl on behalf of the German Oesophageal Cancer Study Group
RTOG 9704: A Phase III Study of Adjuvant Pre and Post Chemoradiation 5-FU vs. Gemcitabine for Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma A U.S. GI INTERGROUP.
Presentation transcript:

Effect of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy on survival of patients with resectable esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancer: Results from a multicenter randomized phase III study. A. van der Gaast, P. van Hagen, M. Hulshof, M.I. van Berge Henegouwen, G.A. Nieuwenhuijzen, J.T. Plukker, J.J. Bonenkamp, E.W. Steyerberg, H.W. Tilanus. CROSS study group

Erasmus Medisch Centrum, Rotterdam Academisch Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven UMC St. Radboudt, Nijmegen Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen VU Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam Rijnstate Ziekenhuis, Arnhem CROSS study 2

Background  The incidence of esophageal (adenocarcinomas) cancer increases  Despite careful preoperative staging in 20% - 30% an irradical resection is performed  A radical resection is a strong prognostic factor  Preoperative chemoradiotherapy may increase the number of radical resection and therefore the prognosis of these patients CROSS study 3

Objectives Primary endpoints  To compare median survival rates between patients treated for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma  To compare quality of life before, during and after treatment Secondary endpoints  To compare pathological responses  To compare progression free survival  To compare the number of R0 resections  To compare treatment toxicity  To compare costs CROSS study 4

Eligibility criteria Major Inclusion criteria:  Esophageal SCC or AC (cT1N1, T2-3Nx, M0)  Adequate hematologic, renal, hepatic and pulmonary functions  WHO 0, 1 or 2  Written informed consent Major exclusion criteria:  T1N0 or M+  Tumor length > 8 cm  Weight loss > 10% CROSS study 5

Statification and statistical considerations  Stratification parameters  WHO performance  N- stage  Tumor type  Hospital  Sample size calculation  16 versus 22 months median survival  175 patients per treatment-arm CROSS study 6

Accrual CROSS study 7

Chemoradiotherapy treatment regimen  Chemoradiotherapy regimen:  Paclitaxel 50mg/m 2 + Carboplatin AUC=2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22 and 29  Concurrent radiotherapy of 41.4 Gy in 23 fractions of 1.8 Gy  Surgery within 6 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy (THE/TTE) CROSS study 8

Baseline characteristics (1) Surgery aloneCRT + Surgery Performance (WHO) Median0 (0-1) cN-stage cN166%67% Sex Male81%75% Histology AC139 (74%)129 (74%) SCC44 (23%)40 (23%) Other5 (3%)6 (3%) CROSS study 9

Baseline characteristics (2) Surgery aloneCRT + Surgery Age (y) Median60 (36-73)60 (37-79) Dysphagia score Median1 (0-4) Tumor length (cm) Median4 (1-10)4 (1-13) Tumor location proximal43 mid1827 distal GEJ2123 CROSS study 10

Baseline uTN-stage Number of patients TN-Stage CROSS study 11

Delivery of treatment  Number of courses:  1 course = 175 pts  2 courses = 172 pts  3 courses = 172 pts  4 courses = 167 pts  5 courses = 163 pts  Number of operated patients:  CRT arm: 166/175 (95%)  Surgery arm: 184/188 (98%) % CROSS study 12

Toxicity of treatment (chemoradiotherapy)  Major toxicities (grade 3-5 CTC 3.0)  Hematologic: n=12 (6.8%)  Grade 3: n=12  Grade 4: n=0  Grade 5: n=0  Non-hematologic: n=28 (16%)  Grade 3: n=26  Grade 4: n=1  Grade 5: n=1 CROSS study 13

Resection rate and resection margins Resection rate of all randomised patients Surgery aloneCRT + surgery 162/188 (86%)157/175 (90%) Resection margins Surgery aloneCRT + surgery R0110 (67%)145 (92.3%) p<0.002 R1 52 (33%) 12 (7.6%) R0 = no tumor within 1 mm of the resection margins CROSS study 14

Pathology after CRT Pathologic complete response rate 32% in primary tumors (in 145 revised resection specimens of 158 in total) Number of patients Tumor Regression Grade TGR1: No vital cells (pCR) TGR2: <10% vital cells TGR3: 10-50% vital cells TGR4: >50% vital cells CROSS study 15

Morbidity and Mortality (postoperative) Surgery aloneCRT + Surgery Pulmonary complications 66% 69% Cardiac complications 24% 23% Chylothorax 8% 11% Mediastinitis 6% 4% Anastomotic leakage 25% 22% In-hospital mortality 7 (3.8%) 6 (3.4%) CROSS study 16

Follow-up and survival  Median follow-up 32 months Surgery alone CRT + Surgery  1 year survival rate 70% 82%  2 year survival rate 52% 67%  3 year survival rate 48% 59%  Median survival 26 months 49 months CROSS study 17

No’s at risk Surgery alone CRT + surgery HR % CI ( ) P=0.012 Overall survival HR % CI ( ) CRTx Surgery CROSS study 18

HR’s (95% CI) for death according to baseline variables Favors preoperative CRTFavors surgery alone CROSS study 0.67 (0.49 – 0.91) 0.49 (0.27 – 0.90) 0.72 (0.50 – 1.04) 0.62 (0.44 – 0.87) 0.92 (0.45 – 1.89) 0.82 (0.58 – 1.16) 0.34 (0.17 – 0.68) 0.67 (0.49 – 0.94) 0.67 (0.32 – 1.41) 19

CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with weekly administrations of carboplatin and paclitaxel and concurrent radiotherapy followed by surgery improves survival compared to surgery alone In this study we observed no increase in postoperative complications or postoperative mortality with preoperative chemoradiotherapy CROSS study 20

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We want to thank all our patients and families CROSS study 21