Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Michael Stahl on behalf of the German Oesophageal Cancer Study Group

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Michael Stahl on behalf of the German Oesophageal Cancer Study Group"— Presentation transcript:

1 Michael Stahl on behalf of the German Oesophageal Cancer Study Group
Abstract No 4530, Poster No 18 Long term results of a phase III study investigating chemoradiation with and without surgery in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus Michael Stahl on behalf of the German Oesophageal Cancer Study Group

2 Participating Centers German Oesophageal Cancer Study Group
Essen (KEM, AKK, University, EKK) Düsseldorf (University) Tübingen (University) Marburg (University) Duisburg (St.J., Städt.) Trier (KB) Berlin (RRK) Göttingen (University) Mönchengladbach (Franz.)

3 Eligibility Criteria SCC of the intrathoracic esophagus Stage T3-4 N0-1 M0 according to CT und EUS Medically fit for surgery, PS 0-1 Age up to 70 years Written informed consent

4 Flow Diagram of Patients included
Excluded (not meeting inclusion criteria) n = 5 Assessed for eligibility n = 189 Refused randomisation n = 12 Treated A n = 7 Treated B n = 5 Randomised n = 172 Allocated to Arm A n = 86 Allocated to Arm B n = 86 Stahl M, et al JCO 23:2310-7, 2005 Treated n = 86 Treated n = 85

5 Stratification Criteria
Center Gender Weight loss (up to vs. above 10% of BW) Complete EUS Stage (T3N0 vs. T3N+ vs. T4)

6 Endpoints Primary endpoint Overall survival Secondary endpoints
POET GOeCSG Primary endpoint Overall survival Secondary endpoints Rate of R0-Resection Rate of PCR Postoperative Mortality Local tumor control

7 Statistical design Test for equivalence between arms Id<15%I
- H0: 35% 2y-survival in Arm A; >20% Arm B N= 175 , power of 80%, a=0.05

8 Results at Surgery Surgery 62 patients Resection 55 / 62 (89%)
ypT0 N0 M0 18 / 51 (35%) ypT1-3 N0 M0 17 / 51 (33%) ypT1-3 N1 M0 9 / 51 (18%) ypT1-3 N0-1 M1 7 / 51 (14%)

9 Surgical Procedures Exploration 7 /62 Resection 55/62 (89%)
TTE 49/55 (89%) THE 4/55 Other 1/55 Unknown 1/55

10 Treatment Related Mortality
CTX CRTX Surgery Arm A 2/86(2.2%) /57(12.3%) Arm B 2/85(2.3%) /5 all 4/171(2.3%) /62(11.3%) Overall 8.2%, including 3 pts. with late toxicity

11 Patterns of Failure (treatment according to protocol)
Arm A* Arm B* Any failure 31/56 (55%) 57/83 (69%) Local+regional 14/31 (45%) 41/57 (72%) Distant (only) 16/31 (52%) 14/57 (25%) Unknown 1/31 ( 3%) 2/57 ( 3%) * Arm A: CRTX (at least 36 Gy) + Resection, Arm B: CRTX (at least 59 Gy)

12 Overall Survival (JCO 2005)
Log-rank for equivalence p = 0.04 2-YSR 38.8% vs. 35.4%

13 Overall Survival (December 2007)
5-YSR 27.9% vs. 17.0% Calculated 10-YSR 19.2% vs 12.2% Logrank p=0.36 HR ( ) CRTX with Surgery CRTX alone

14 Survival as treated (no crossover)
5-YSR 28.0% vs. 17.0% Calculated 10-YSR 19.8% vs 12.9% Logrank p=0.48 HR ( )

15 Cox Regression Analysis
Progn. Factor HR (95%CI) p-value CTX-Response (y/n) <0.0001 Treatment group (A/B) Gender (m/f) EUS complete (y/n) Weight loss (</>10%) Stage (T3N1/T3N0) Stage (T4NX/T3N0)


Download ppt "Michael Stahl on behalf of the German Oesophageal Cancer Study Group"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google