RTEHC 2009 – © Berube 2009 October 8- 9, 2009 – RTP, NC EHS Communicating about Nanoscience Risks and Benefits David M. Berube Research Professor, Department.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Nano: Reducing Uncertainty SRA 2009 Boston, MA Nanotechnology: Reducing Uncertainty Synthesizing Two Views Grant E. Gardner Ph.D. Candidate - Science Education.

Advertisements

Where the nurse gets hurt: Understanding the social organization of injury management in Ontario hospitals By: Laurie Clune RN, PhD Associate Dean Research.

Lab Safety Nanoparticles. Background The ASTM Committee on Nanotechnology has defined a nanoparticle as a particle with lengths in two or three dimensions.

Nanotechnology Nano size: Generally nm The European Science Foundation definition Nanoscale was seen to range from 1 to 1000 nm.

Page 1 Regulating Nanomaterials under CEPA CIELAP Workshop February 22, 2008 Bernard Madé, New Substances Program Environment Canada.

Visualizing the nano-scale: The rhetoric of digital microscopy.

TOP NANO 21 Safety and Risks of Nanotechnology Conclusion of the meeting and next steps.

Assistant Lecturer- Zoology Department Faculty of Science

Nanotechnology: The Public and Emerging Technologies Nanotechnology: Public Dr. William Y. B. Chang Director Beijing Office U.S. National Science Foundation.

BREAKING THE CARBON BARRIER: RELIGION & RISK REGIMES EC-US Task Force on Biotechnology Research Nanobiotechnology Workshop Ispra, Italy June 3, 2008 David.

An Integrated and Comprehensive Data Mining System for Studying Environmental Impact of Nanomaterials: NEIMiner Nano Working Group Presentation 10/13/2011.

Ohio Nano-Summit March 3, 2005 REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS FOR NANOTECHNOLOGY IN PUBLIC HEALTH FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION Norris E. Alderson, Ph.D. Associate.

Safety Review and Approval Process for Research Proposals Robert Emery, DrPH, CHP, CIH, CBSP, CSP, CHMM, CPP, ARM Vice President for Safety, Health, Environment.

ICONN DEEWR Nanotechnology OHS Research and Development Program & Nanotechnology OHS Regulation Dr Howard Morris Nanotechnology OHS R&D Program.

An Assessment of Qualities and Qualifications Needed by Environmental Health Graduates Entering Private Sector Jobs Dr. Alice Anderson Mr. Eric Ferrell.

Workshop on Standards for EHS Research Needs for Engineered Nanoscale Materials WELCOME WELCOME Chemical Science and Technology Laboratory NIST Gaithersburg,

Ministère de l'Écologie, du Développement durable, des Transports et du Logement Implementation of a national legislation.

Accident Prevention Manual for Business & Industry: Engineering & Technology 13th edition National Safety Council Compiled by Dr. S.D. Allen Iske, Associate.

Enabling Responsible Innovations of Nanotechnologies Stakeholder Engagement Workshop 24 June 2008, Brussels Pieter van Broekhuizen IVAM UvA BV Amsterdam.

Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science An Emergency Response System.

PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS – INTEREST, ATTENTION… David M. Berube Professor of Science Communication, STS, and CRDM (Communication, Rhetoric and Digital Media),

The Approach of OECD to Nanosafety Peter Kearns Head, Nanosafety Team OECD Environment Directorate 1.

Nanotoxicology - small particles with unique toxicity from aquatic to human model systems Tara Sabo-Attwood, PhD University of South Carolina NCSU Workshop.

OECD Work on the Safety of Manufactured Nanomaterials Environment, Health and Safety Division Environment Directorate OECD October

 Nanotechnology is the research of compounds in the range of 1 to 100 nanometers (1.0 x m to 1.0 x m).

Presentation 3: What is nano?

Health and Safety Practices in the Nanomaterials Workplace: Results from an International Survey Joseph Conti Nanotechnology and Occupational Health and.

PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS David M. Berube Professor of Science Communication, STS, and CRDM (Communication, Rhetoric and Digital Media), North Carolina State.

The project is funded by The European Union The project is implemented by IOMC June 2015 Introduction to the IOMC Toolbox for Decision-Making in Chemicals.

Nanosciences and nanotechnologies: European Action

NanoMex’ 08 – © Berube 2008 November 5, 2008 – Mexico City Communication Risk to the Public - Seven Guides to Communicating Risk David M. Berube Professor,

NANOTOXICOLOGY & PUBLIC PERCEPTION David M. Berube Professor of Science Communication, STS, and CRDM (Communication, Rhetoric and Digital Media), North.

SOT 2009 – © Berube 2009 March 17, 2009 – Baltimore Public Understanding of Emerging Science and Technology: Four Observations David M. Berube Research.

IISP Workshop Gaithersburg, Maryland May , 2006 Nanotechnology Initiative Paul F. Wambach, CIH Industrial Hygienist Office of Epidemiology and Health.

What Makes Nanoscience so Important? Nanoscience What Is It?

RISK ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT: NANOSCIENCE David M. Berube Professor of Science Communication, STS, and CRDM (Communication, Rhetoric and Digital Media),

SAFETY PRECAUTIONS & TOXICITY RESEARCH NANOTECHNOLOGY.

Current and Future Impact of Nanotechnology Allan Fluharty, RET Fellow 2010 Science Teacher, Chicago Public Schools RET Mentor: Professor Thomas L. Theis,

NANOMATERIALS Fernando Ramos Materials science MEEN 3344.

Metallic and Ionic Nanoparticles

Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechology Program Solicitation NSF Preliminary Proposal Due: December 10, 2007 National Science.

1 Selecting Materials for Understanding the Human Health and Ecological Risks of Nanomaterials Considerations and Approach Justin Teeguarden, PhD., DABT.

Society of Risk Analysis Annual Meeting Boston Communicating Risk: Amplification, Attenuation & Digital Media National Science Foundation, NSF ,

Overview of Integrated Solid Waste Management (ISWM) Presentation made at the European Commission 7 th Framework Programme on Capacity Building Workshop.

UNCG 2009 – © Berube 2009 March 19, 2009 – Greensboro, NC Emerging Technologies: Trust and Risk David M. Berube Research Professor Department of Communication.

Technology and Productivity. What Are the Potential Benefits of Technology?

Nurses as Leaders in Health Care. Jennifer Mensik, PhD, RN, NEA- BC, FACHE ANA 2 nd Vice President Ohio Nurses Association 2013 Annual Convention October.

September 22, 2011 Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics1.

NANOTECHNOLOGY – MATERIALS IN THE WORKPLACE Kai Savolainen 8th EU-US Joint Conference on Health and Safety at Work, Fort Worth, Texas September 2015.

Material Safety Data Sheets Location of MSDS Must accompany every shipment of hazardous substance and must be available to you on the job site.

Special Session on Air Quality Modeling Applications 10 th Annual CMAS Conference October 24, 2011 in memory of Dr. Daewon Byun

Metallic and Ionic Nanoparticles Extendable Structures: Solids.

NER: Identifying & Regulating Environmental Impacts of Nanotechnology PI: N. Swami; Co-PI: M. Gorman; Students (Degree Program): A. Wardak (Ph.D.), E.

1 Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program Environmental Summit May 20, 2008 Jim Alwood Chemical Control Division Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.

The Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation

Understanding the Potential of IT

November 2013 California State University, Northridge Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry.

Dennis Utterback Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Environmental Symposium June 6, 2007 Understanding the.

INTRODUCTION TO NANOMATERIALS AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 8-Hour Training Course.

Computers and Information Management OSHE 111, Spring 2016 Instructor: Mr. Chris Kuiper, CSP Phone:

Nanosafety ISO TC 229 Nanotechnologies Standardization in the field of nanotechnologies that includes either or both of the following:  1. Understanding.

Update on Revision of DOE Order 456.1, The Safe Handling of Unbound Engineered Nanoparticles DOE and DOE Contractors Industrial Hygiene Meeting in Conjunction.

Evolving Best Practice in Governance Policy Developing Consumer Confidence in Risk Analysis Applied to Emerging Technologies Department of food science.

Non-Ferrous Founders’ Society Safety & Health Training Program

Environmental and health issues: The case for a precautionary approach

NSF Awardees Meeting 2009© Berube December 9, 2009 – Arlington, VA

Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.

Governor Snyder’s Directive Creates the PFAS Action Response Team

Sean M. Geary, PhD, Angie S. Morris, BA, Aliasger K. Salem, PhD

Nano Technology Dr. Raouf Mahmood. Nano Technology Dr. Raouf Mahmood.

Presentation transcript:

RTEHC 2009 – © Berube 2009 October 8- 9, 2009 – RTP, NC EHS Communicating about Nanoscience Risks and Benefits David M. Berube Research Professor, Department of Communication North Carolina State University Coordinator NCSU Public Communication of Science and Technology Project PI – NSF – NIRT Intuitive Nanotoxicology and Public Engagement & CoPI Dietram Scheufele, UWisc. CEINT – Duke University w PI Mark Weisner

An Introduction to the GoodNanoGuide Kristen M. Kulinowski, PhD |

Occupational Research Limited Source:

Key Questions for People Working with Nanomaterials How are you handling them now? How are you handling them now? What do you need to know to do the best job? What do you need to know to do the best job? Where are you going for information? Are MSDS sufficient? Where are you going for information? Are MSDS sufficient? How certain are you the information you are receiving is accurate? How certain are you the information you are receiving is accurate?

The GoodNano Guide Protected Internet site on occupational practices for the safe handling of nanomaterials Protected Internet site on occupational practices for the safe handling of nanomaterials Multiple stakeholders contribute, share and discuss information Multiple stakeholders contribute, share and discuss information Modern, interactive, up-to-date Modern, interactive, up-to-date Launched 1 June 2009 Launched 1 June

Interacting with the GoodNanoGuide No Registration Required Register as a User Register as a Provider VIEW COMMENT CONTRIBUTE

Implementation Committee Dr. Michael Riediker Institute for Work and Health Mr. Bruce Stockmeier Argonne National Lab Dr. Kristen Kulinowski Rice University Mr. Matthew Jaffe Crowell & Moring Dr. Mark Hoover NIOSH Dr. Steve Hankin SafeNano Ms. Ilise Feitshans International Labour Organization Mr. Victor Jones NanoTechBC Dr. Paul-Émile Boileau IRSST Mr. Steve Brown Intel Dr. Charles Geraci NIOSH Gary Albach nanoAlberta

Sponsors Now available at GoodNanoGuideICON

1. Reactivity 2. Size 3. Composition 4. Surface area to volume 5. Surface charge. Characteristics – “What are the characteristics of nanoparticles that are potentially or actually problematic to environmental health and safety (EHS)?” W =.790 Χ 2 = (0 is random not.500). CHARACTERISTICS SET 1A NEW DATA

1. To be reactive. 2. To bind with proteins. 3. To stimulate cellular reproduction. 4. To bind or mimic. 5. To aggregate. Characteristics – “What are the characteristics of nanoparticles that are potentially or actually problematic to environmental health and safety (EHS)?” W =.556 Χ 2 = CHARACTERISTICS SET 1B – SECOND LEVEL CHARACTERISTICS NEW DATA

1. Environmental persistence. 2. Bioaccumulation. 3. Mobility in groundwater. 4. Byproducts of the production process Characteristics – “What are the characteristics of nanoparticles that are potentially or actually problematic to environmental health and safety (EHS)?” W =.522 Χ 2 = CHARACTERISTICS SET 1C – THIRD LEVEL CHARACTERISTICS NEW DATA

1. Carbon nanotubes 2. Quantum dots. 3. Metal oxides. 4. Metals. 5. Fullerenes. Types – Which nanoparticles are potentially or actually problematic to EHS? W =.523 Χ 2 = CHARACTERISTICS SET 2A - TYPES OF NANOPARTICLES NEW DATA

1. Zinc oxide. 2. Silver oxides. 3. Titanium dioxide. 4. Cerium oxide. 5. Iron oxides. Types – Which nanoparticles are potentially or actually problematic to EHS? W =.361 Χ 2 = CHARACTERISTICS SET 2B – OXIDES NEW DATA

1. Cadmium. 2. Lead. 3. Silver. 4. Iron. 5. Aluminum. Types – Which nanoparticles are potentially or actually problematic to EHS? W =.646 χ 2 = CHARACTERISTICS SET 2C - METALS NEW DATA

BANDING/ALGORITHM Characteristics weighted (0.0 – 1.0). Characteristics weighted (0.0 – 1.0). Special interactions, e.g. surface charge and reactivity. Special interactions, e.g. surface charge and reactivity. Membership in subsets of characteristics. Membership in subsets of characteristics.

RISK COMMUNICATION AND PUBLICS This work was supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation, NSF , # Nanotechnology Interdisciplinary Research Team (NIRT): Intuitive Toxicology and Public Engagement. THANKS RTEHC 2009 – © Berube 2009 October 8- 9, 2009 – RTP, NC