Generalized Label for Super-Channel Assignment on Flexible Grid Iftekhar Hussain Abinder Dhillon

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CCAMP WG, IETF 80th, Prague, Czech Republic draft-gonzalezdedios-subwavelength-framework-00 Framework for GMPLS and path computation support of sub-wavelength.
Advertisements

Flexible Grid Label Format in Wavelength Switched Optical Network
Page th IETF – Stockholm, Sweden, July 2009 WSON Signal Characteristics and Network Element Compatibility Constraints for GMPLS Greg
Generalized Labels for G.694 Lambda-Switching Capable Routers draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g-694-lambda-labels-03,04.txt CCAMP WG, IETF 74 rd San Francisco.
Lambda Labels Lambda Labels draft-otani-ccamp-gmpls-lambda-labels-02 Tomohiro Otani (KDDI R&D Labs) Hongxiang Guo (KDDI R&D Labs) Keiji Miyazaki (Fujitsu.
Next-Generation ROADMs
Data Communications and Networking
1/28 Chapter 8 Multiplexing. 2/28 Multiplexing  To make efficient use of high-speed telecommunications lines, some form of multiplexing is used  Multiplexing.
GMPLS Signaling Extensions for G.709-v3 (draft-khuzema-ccamp-gmpls-signaling-g txt ) Rajan Rao ( Khuzema Pithewan.
Page th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007 PCEP Requirements and Extensions for the support of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON) Young
Lecture: 4 WDM Networks Design & Operation
William Stallings Data and Computer Communications 7 th Edition Chapter 8 Multiplexing.
1 Framework for GMPLS based control of Flexi-grid DWDM networks draft-ogrcetal-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-00 CCAMP WG, IETF 84 Oscar González de Dios, Telefónica.
Doc.: IEEE /0806r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Authors: aj (45 GHz) Channelization and Channel Operation Jul 2014 Bo Sun, ZTE Corp.
1 K. Salah Module 3.3: Multiplexing WDM FDM TDM T-1 ADSL.
ECS 152A 6. Multiplexing.
Page th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007 Framework for GMPLS and PCE Control of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON) & RWA Information for.
NETE 0510 Presented by Dr.Apichan Kanjanavapastit
Generalized Labels for the Flexi-Grid in Lambda-Switch-Capable (LSC) Label Switching Routers A. Farrel, Old Dog Consulting D. King, Old Dog Consulting.
All Optical Switching Architectures. Introduction Optical switches are necessary for achieving reliable, fast and flexible modular communication means.
Doc.: IEEE /0323r0 SubmissionRon Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Views on ah Use Cases Date: Authors: March 2011.
MPLS - 73nd IETF Minneaplis1 Composite Transport Group (CTG) Framework and Requirements draft-so-yong-mpls-ctg-framework-requirement-00.txt draft-so-yong-mpls-ctg-framework-requirement-00.txt.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public 1 Version 4.0 4: Addressing in an Enterprise Network Introducing Routing and Switching in the.
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS). 2 MPLS Overview A forwarding scheme designed to speed up IP packet forwarding (RFC 3031) Idea: use a fixed length.
Standardisation Activities on Felxigrid – ECOC 2013 – London, September Standardisation Activities on Flexigrid Adrian Farrel - Old Dog Consulting.
1 William Stallings Data and Computer Communications 7 th Edition Chapter 8 Multiplexing.
William Stallings Data and Computer Communications 7 th Edition Chapter 8 Multiplexing.
Information model for G.709 Optical Transport Network (OTN) draft-bccg-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model-01 CCAMP WG, IETF 78 th Maastricht.
Data and Computer Communications
Physical Layer Dr. Sanjay P. Ahuja, Ph.D. Fidelity National Financial Distinguished Professor of CIS School of Computing, UNF.
1 William Stallings Data and Computer Communications 7 th Edition Chapter 8 Multiplexing.
Waveband switching. WBS –In GMPLS networks, underlying network nodes need to support multiple switching granularities –Therefore, ordinary wavelength-switching.
1 Framework for GMPLS based control of Flexi-grid DWDM networks draft-ogrcetal-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-02 CCAMP WG, IETF 86 Oscar González de Dios, Telefónica.
SMUCSE 8344 Protection & Restoration of Optical Networks.
OSPF extensions for supporting spectrum sub-band allocation draft-wang-ccamp-flexigrid-wavelength-range-ospf-02 Qilei Wang Xihua.
Design format of AAI_NBR-ADV message in m Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/2007 Date Submitted: Source: Inuk Jung
CSC 600 Internetworking with TCP/IP Unit 7: IPv6 (ch. 33) Dr. Cheer-Sun Yang Spring 2001.
6.1 Chapter 6 Bandwidth Utilization: Multiplexing and Spreading Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
OSPF-TE Extensions for Flex-grid Abinder Dhillon Iftekhar Hussain
Communications Equipment Communication Equipments: –Equipments that are, Not a direct part of the network (like node, client, terminal, server etc.) but,
Signaling Extensions for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks draft-bernstein-ccamp-wson-signaling-02.txt Greg BernsteinGrotto Networking Young LeeHuawei.
Page th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007 Signaling Extensions for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks Greg
Generic Aggregation of Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) for IPv4 and IPv6 Reservation over PCN domains Georgios Karagiannis, Anurag Bhargava draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn-01.
Old Dog Consulting Composite Labels In Flexi-Grid Adrian Farrel Old Dog Consulting
IETF-70th Vancouver1 Extensions to GMPLS RSVP-TE for Bidirectional Lightpath with the Same Wavelength draft-xu-rsvpte-bidir-wave-01 Sugang Xu, Hiroaki.
Rajan Rao, Abinder Dhillon, Iftekhar Hussain, Marco Sosa, Biao Lu
CCAMP WG, IETF 75th, Stockholm, Sweden draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g txt Fatai Zhang Guoying
2015/12/261 Lambda Labels Lambda Labels draft-otani-ccamp-gmpls-lambda-labels-01 Tomohiro Otani (KDDI R&D Labs) Hongxiang Guo (KDDI R&D Labs) Keiji Miyazaki.
Generalized Label for Super-Channel Assignment on Flexible Grid draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-label-03 IETF 83 - Paris, France March , 2012.
1 Why Optical Layer Protection? Optical layer provides lightpath services to its client layers (e.g., SONET, IP, ATM) Protection mechanisms exist in the.
Unit III Bandwidth Utilization: Multiplexing and Spectrum Spreading In practical life the bandwidth available of links is limited. The proper utilization.
PCEP Protocol Extension for Spectrum Utilization Optimization in Flexi-Grid Networks draft-zhaoyl-pce-flexi-grid-pcep-ex-00.txt Yongli Zhao, Jie Zhang,
55th IETF GSMP WG, Atlanta 1 General Switch Management Protocol (GSMP) v3 for Optical Support 55 th IETF GSMP WG, Atlanta Jun Kyun Choi
1 73th IETF, CCAMP WG, Minneapolis, MN, USA November 2008 RSVP-TE based Impairments Collection Mechanism Zafar Ali, Roberto Cassata (Cisco Systems) Marco.
Mathilde Benveniste Avaya Labs
Flex-grid architecture for NREN optical networks
Grid Optical Burst Switched Networks
Bandwidth signaling for EDMG
Framework for GMPLS based control of Flexi-grid DWDM networks draft-ogrcetal-ccamp-flexi-grid-fwk-01 CCAMP WG, IETF 85 Oscar González de Dios, Telefónica.
EDMG Capability and Operation Element Channel Indications
OSPF Link Information Model for WSON
GMPLS OSPF-TE Extensions in support of Flexible-Grid in DWDM Networks
Guard Bands requirements for GMPLS controlled optical networks
Iftekhar Hussain (Presenter),
draft-ggalimbe-ccamp-flexigrid-carrier-label-02
YANG data model for Flexi-Grid Optical Networks
TGah Coexistence Assurance
YANG data model for Flexi-Grid Optical Networks
TAPI Photonic Media Model
Presentation transcript:

Generalized Label for Super-Channel Assignment on Flexible Grid Iftekhar Hussain Abinder Dhillon Zhong Pan Marco Sosa Bert Basch Steve Liu Andrew G. Malis draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-label-02 IETF 82 - Taipei, Taiwan November , 2011

New Co-Authors o Bert Basch o Steve Liu o Andrew G. Malis draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-label-02 2

Motivation Fixed Grid Limitations 1.Future transport systems are expected to support data rates of 400 Gbps - 1 Tbps and beyond, using wider bandwidth optical channels 2.ITU-T G (fixed-grid ) permits allocation of channel spectrum bandwidth in "single" fixed- sized slots (e.g., 50GHz, 100GHz ) independent of the channel bit rate. 3.This leads to inefficient use of optical spectrum due to excess frequency spacing for lower bit rate channels Flexible Grid Benefits  FlexGrid allows allocation of “arbitrary” size channel spectral bandwidth as an integer multiple of 12.5 GHz fine granularity contiguous or non-contiguous slices depending on required channel bit rate  This enables supporting multiple data rate super-channels in a spectrally efficient manner draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-label-02 3

Super-Channel Label Purpose – A super-channel represents an ultra high aggregate capacity channel containing multiple carriers which are co-routed through the network as a single entity from the source transceiver to the sink transceiver – This document defines a super-channel label format to setup an optical path manually or dynamically on a Flex-Grid network Why? – The existing label formats (e.g., RFC3471, RFC6205) either lack necessary fields to carry required flex-grid related information (e.g., channel spacing) or do not allow signaling of arbitrary flexible-size optical spectral bandwidth in an efficient manner (e.g., in terms of integer multiple of fine granularity slices) draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-label-02 4

Super-Channel Label Format Label Definition – This document defines a super-channel label as consisting of a Super- Channel Identifier and an associated list of slices representing the optical spectrum of the super-channel – Optical spectrum of a super-channel is flexibly enabled to be any subset of the slices (allows for split-spectrum super-channels) – The slice spacing used is identified within the label and can take on multiple standard options, with default flex-grid slice spacing of 12.5GHz used here Label Encoding Options – Option A: Encode super-channel label as a list of start and end slice numbers corresponding to N slots (where a slot is a contiguous set of optical spectrum slices) with each slot denoted by its starting and ending slice number (N defaults to 1 for use of a single slot super-channel) – Option B: Encode super-channel label as a first slice number of the grid (denoted as "n_start of Grid") plus the entire list of slices in the grid as a Bitmap where ‘1’ indicates inclusion of the slide in the super-channel draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-label-02 5

Super-Channel Label Encoding Option A draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-label-02 6 Slice Spacing (e.g., 12.5 GHz) Grid Type to be assigned by IANA (e.g., ITU-T Flex-Grid) A logical identifier for a super-channel (similar to waveband Id defined in RFC3471) The lowest or starting slice number of the slot # 1 The highest or ending slice number of the slot #1 Number of 32-bit entries in the super-channel label, where each entry is a contiguous slot of optical spectrum

Super-Channel Label Encoding Option B draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-label-02 7 First slice number in optical Grid being referenced (i.e., the start of the left most edge of the Grid For example n_start of Grid = -142 if the C-band left edge starts at THz using following formula: Total number of slices in the grid Each bit in the 32-bitmap word represents a particular slice with a value of 1 or 0 to indicate whether for that slice reservation is required (1) or not (0). Bit position zero in the first word represents the first slice in the Grid and corresponds to the value indicated in the “n_start of Grid” field

Flexible Allowance of Split-Spectrum Super-Channel Use Cases – Avoid wasted bandwidth on fiber with fragmented BW due to super- channels with different spectral widths Enable faster restoration of optical bandwidth in these scenarios – Enable super-channel to efficiently use both sides around a non-viable part of spectrum (e.g., lambda zero) – Enable assignment of a single super-channel label for a set of (e.g., alien) disjoint wavelengths that may be defined for use between a pair of ports draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-label-02 8

Super-Channel Label Example – Assume the super-channel requires a spectral bandwidth of 200 GHz with left-edge frequency of THz for the left-most 12.5 GHz slice and left-edge frequency of THz for the right- most slice – n_start = ( – 193.1)/ = -130 – n_end = ( – 193.1)/ = -115 draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-label-02 9

Comparison of Flex-Grid Drafts draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-label draft-hussain-ccamp-super- channel-label-02 draft-farrkingel-ccamp- flexigrid-lambda-label-01 draft-zhang-ccamp-flexible- grid-rsvp-te-ext-00 Defines a new GMPLS labelYes No. Instead proposes to use RSVP Tspec to signal similar information Encoding formatsTwo options : Nx(start, end) and bitmap Frequency (n) and spectrum width (m) Supports super-channels with contiguous spectrum Yes Supports split-spectrum super-channels YesNo Flexibility to support networks with wavelength conversion Yes No (Since Tspec is end-to-end)