Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Mary Chepiga, 609-771-3955, Susan Colarullo, 609-771-3922, Jeff Fischer, 609-771-3953,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Mary Chepiga Susan Colarullo Jeff Fischer
Advertisements

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Welcome to the USGS Webinar: New Science and Online Management Tools to Help Guide Action on Nutrients.
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Streamgaging Task Force Final Report Advisory Committee on Water Information Herndon, Virginia April 3, 2002.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
The Wisconsin River TMDL: Linking Monitoring and Modeling Ann Hirekatur, Pat Oldenburg, & Adam Freihoefer March 7, 2013 Wisconsin River TMDL Project Team.
Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.
Developing a Nutrient Management Plan for the Napa River Watershed Group Members Vinod Kella  Rebecca Kwaan  Luke Montague Linsey Shariq  Peng Wang.
Hydrologic Theory One of the principal objectives in hydrology is to transform rainfall that has fallen over a watershed area into flows to be expected.
Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.
SPARROW Modeling in the Mississippi River Basin Iowa Science Assessment Davenport, IA Nov. 14, 2012 (608) By Dale M. Robertson*
0 The National Hydrography Dataset Plus a tool for SPARROW Watershed Modeling Richard Moore (presented by Alan Rea)
Spatial and temporal trends in dissolved oxygen concentrations and dissolved oxygen depletion (hypoxia) in the Delaware River Basin Demonstration Area.
Modeling Water Quality. Special reference of this work to….
Apalachicola/Chattahoochee/Flint Focus Area - USGS WaterSMART NIDIS SE Climate Forum Lake Lanier Islands, GA December 2, 2011.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
SPARROW Water- Quality Modeling: Application of the National Hydrography Dataset What is SPARROW? Use of NHD SPARROW results By Craig Johnston and Richard.
Hydrologic Issues in Mountaintop Mining Areas Ronald Evaldi, USGS-WSC, Charleston, WV Daniel Evans, USGS-WSC, Louisville, KY Hugh Bevans, USGS-WSC, Charleston,
Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits of Agricultural Conservation Policies: In-stream vs. Edge-of-Field Assessments of Water Quality. Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits.
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
GIS Tools for Watershed Delineation Public Policy Perspectives Teaching Public Policy in the Earth Sciences April 21, 2006 Gary Coutu Department of Geography.
Predicting Sediment and Phosphorus Delivery with a Geographic Information System and a Computer Model M.S. Richardson and A. Roa-Espinosa; Dane County.
Spatial Water Data Subcommittee Update to Coordination Group Wendy Blake-Coleman, EPA (Representing Tod Dabolt, EPA & Bob Pierce, USGS)
Co-Benefits from Conservation Policies that Promote Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture: The Corn Belt CARD, Iowa State University Presented at the Forestry.
Integrating FIA with Other Research Activities The Delaware River Basin Project & The North American Carbon Program Richard Birdsey Program Manager Global.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Regional scale point source nutrient load estimation in support of SPARROW* modeling Gerard McMahon,
The Collaborative Environmental Monitoring and Research Initiative (CEMRI) A Pilot in the Delaware River Basin Peter S. Murdoch, USGS Richard Birdsey,
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
Changes in Phosphorus Concentrations and Loads in the Assabet River Following Mandated Reductions in Wastewater Treatment Plant Discharges U.S. Geological.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
Iowa Nutrient Load Estimations for Point and Non-point Sources Iowa DNR November 14, 2012.
San Francisco Estuary Institute Annual Meeting October 7, 2008 Water Quality Science and Management in the Delaware Estuary Thomas J. Fikslin, Ph.D.
SPARROW Surface Water Quality Workshop October 29-31, 2002 Reston, Virginia Section 5. Comparison of GIS Approaches, Data Sources and Management.
Modeling experience of non- point pollution: CREAMS (R. Tumas) EPIC (A. Povilaitis and R.Tumas SWRRBWQ (A. Dumbrauskas and R. Tumas) AGNPS (Sileika and.
1 Evaluating and Estimating the Effect of Land use Changed on Water Quality at Selorejo Reservoir, Indonesia Mohammad Sholichin Faridah Othman Shatira.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Mississippi River Basin Nutrient Losses Herb Buxton, USGSRob Magnien, NOAA Co-Chairs, Monitoring, Modeling, and Research Workgroup,
Twinning water quality modelling in Latvia Helene Ejhed
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Using Monitoring Data from Multiple Networks/Agencies to Calibrate Nutrient SPARROW* Models, Southeastern.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Watersheds Chapter 9. Watershed All land enclosed by a continuous hydrologic drainage divide and lying upslope from a specified point on a stream All.
Vision for the National Geospatial Framework for Surface Water Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological.
Response of benthic algae communities to nutrient enrichment in agricultural streams: Implications for establishing nutrient criteria R.W. Black 1, P.W.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Nutrient Management in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, U.S. Geological Survey.
Freshwater and Society Module 1, part C. Developed by: Updated: U?-m1c-s2 Water quality degradation
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Rivers Component of the National Monitoring Network Jerad Bales National Monitoring Conference.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
Description of WMS Watershed Modeling System. What Model Does Integrates GIS and hydrologic models Uses digital terrain data to define watershed and sub.
1. The Study of Excess Nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin “A Landscape Level Analysis of Potential Excess Nitrogen in East-Central North Carolina, USA”
Relating Surface Water Nutrients in the Pacific Northwest to Watershed Attributes Using the USGS SPARROW Model Daniel Wise, Hydrologist US Geological Survey.
Opportunities for Collaboration on Water- Quality Issues in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, Office of Water Quality.
1 Contractor for the USGS at the EROS Data Center NHD Plus as a geospatial framework for drought indicators Jim Verdin.
Estimating future scenarios for farm-watershed nutrient fluxes using dynamic simulation modelling – Can on-farm BMPs really do the job at the watershed.
Integrating the NAWQA approach to assessments in rivers and streams By Donna Myers, Bill Wilber, Anne Hoos, and Charlie Crawford U.S. Geological Survey,
Surface Water Surface runoff - Precipitation or snowmelt which moves across the land surface ultimately channelizing into streams or rivers or discharging.
Ch. 1: “Watersheds and Wetlands” Lesson 1.5: “Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds” Part 2.
SPARROW: A Model Designed for Use With Monitoring Networks Richard A. Smith, Gregory E. Schwarz, and Richard B. Alexander US Geological Survey, Reston,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Reston, Virginia (703) NHD Flow and Velocity Project Greg Schwarz, Reston,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Overview and Evaluation of the Current Hydrologic Data Network Scott Morlock USGS Indiana Water.
Water Census Progress: DRB Focus Area Perspective Bob Tudor Deputy Director Delaware River Basin Commission.
K. N. Schneider What is a Watershed?  It is also known as a Drainage Basin  A couple of definitions:  EPA: “A watershed is the area of land where.
Modeling with WEAP University of Utah Hydroinformatics - Fall 2015.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
State Standards Hydrology
Bayesian SPARROW Model Song Qian Ibrahim Alameddine The University of Toledo American University of Beirut.
Approach in developing PnET-BGC model inputs for Smoky Mountains
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Nitrogen Transport Estimates in the San Antonio River Basin
Environmental modeling application domains
Presentation transcript:

Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Mary Chepiga, , Susan Colarullo, , Jeff Fischer, , US Geological Survey Delaware NAWQA Oct. 29, 2002

Delaware River Basin Collaborative Environmental Monitoring & Research Initiative CEMRI The US Geological Survey, US Forest Service, National Park Service and other agencies are implementing a prototype environmental monitoring strategy to link hydrologic, forest, and water quality information across the landscapes of the Delaware River Basin.

CEMRI Framework CEMRI promotes environmental monitoring across agencies, scales, and environmental resources to track complex environmental issues at a range of spatial and temporal scales. Delaware Issues: Ecosystem Health & Change Calcium Depletion Carbon Cycling Nutrient Cycling SPARROW

Delaware River Basin SPARROW SPARROW will integrate monitoring research at various scales in the Delaware River Basin to assess effects of nitrogen deposition and land use on water quality, forest productivity, forest health, and to assess the causes of water quality and environmental impacts.

Delaware SPARROW Project Objective To evaluate the distribution of Total Nitrogen (TN) and Total Phosphorous (TP) loads within the Delaware River Basin for time period To evaluate the statistical significance of factors affecting the predicted TN and TP distributions

Delaware River Basin Area > 12,000 square miles Population over 7 million. An additional 7 million people outside the basin rely on the Delaware for drinking water. Delaware River is tidal up to Trenton

GEOLOGY 5 Physiographic Provinces. Most of Basin is consolidated sedimentary and metamorphic rocks. Northern third of basin was glaciated and has unconsolidated valley fill. Coastal plain is unconsolidated sediments.

Basin-wide Land use 60% forest, 24% Agriculture, 9% urban. 80% of population lives in Piedmont and Coastal Plain which are >20% Urban land and >30% agriculture. Appalachians are primarily Forest.

SPARROW Model Components 1.Stream Network and Associated Basins 2.Stream Loadings from monitoring data (dependent variable) 3.Nutrient Sources - Point Source, Nonpoint Source, Atmospheric Deposition, Others 4.Delivery Factors - Soils, Slope, Geology, Meteorology, Stream size, Others

SPARROW uses a digital network of streams and associated contributing basin areas for flow routing and as a spatial reference for all model parameters For Delaware Model 1:24,000 NHD digital stream network Use GIS to generate basin areas, flow, and travel times for stream reaches Model Framework

Developing Areas, Streamflow, and Travel Times, for 1:24K NHD Stream Reaches Generate contributing areas for each river segment similar to NECB Apply runoff to those areas Use gage data to correct flow at sites that export water and have reservoirs Estimate travel time using Jobson method Excluding Estuary and tidal rivers

NHD Stream Network and Basins Schuylkill River GIS Generated Basins

Data Checks Catchment Areas –GIS areas vs gaged site areas –Rivers crossing HUC divides Flow –Estimated flow vs measured flow at gage sites Travel times –Calculated vs published travel times

FLOW CORRECTIONS Reservoirs control mainstem flow and are used to export water from the basin. Drinking water withdrawls at major metropolitan areas. Many large STPs discharge to Estuary. Mandated flow of 1750 cfs 800 mgd export to NYC 100 mgd export to north NJ 3000 cfs minimum flow target Power Releases 0 – 1800 cfs Major drinking water intakes Flood control & flow augmentation Water Supply Reservoirs 50 mgd transfer to Schuylkill

A word on 1:24K NHD Streams 1:100K 1:24K New reaches are added at 1:24K scale, but reach numbering is maintained from 1:100K scale. Difficult to distinguish between a reach above and below a new confluence. = start of new reach

Calculated Nutrient Loads at monitoring stations Data from Federal and State Agencies 1975 to 2000 time period for predictors Usually 10 or more years of data at each site Loads calculated using ESTIMATOR for 1990 to 2001 time period

Total Phosphorous Load Sites State Area Number of Sites. NJ 2969 sq mi NY 2363 sq mi PA 6465 sq mi DE 968 sq mi TOTALS Sites with measured flows and concentrations Sites with some or all estimated flows Total Sites

QW and Discharge (Q) QW with Q estimated ~ 3 years of QW & Q Appalachian Coastal Plain New England Piedmont Valley and Ridge Total Phosphorus Monitoring Station Locations DATA TYPE PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCE

Total Nitrate Load Sites State Area Number of Sites. NJ 2969 sq mi NY 2363 sq mi PA 6465 sq mi 51633? 54 DE 968 sq mi TOTALS ?>169 Sites with measured flows and concentrations Sites with some or all estimated flows Sites with some estimated concentrations Total Sites

Total Nitrate Monitoring Station Locations QW and Discharge (Q) QW with Q estimated ~ 3 years of QW & Q Appalachian Coastal Plain New England Piedmont Valley and Ridge DATA TYPE PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCE

Estimator Load Calculations Plans: Use post 1974 data to generate predictors. Calculate average load for each year Use 12 year average for SPARROW loads Comments: Several versions of ESTIMATOR Use of long-term quarterly monitoring data vs short-term intensive sites Small research basins (<5 mi 2 ) Sites with abrupt change in QW

Sites with short period of record and small basins (including NAWQA sites) QW sample

Sites with abrupt changes in QW parameters Regional Sewer System Installed Concentration (mg/l)

Nutrient Data Sources DATASOURCE Fertilizer usage, NAWQA/USDA 1992 & 1997 Livestock waste production, NAWQA/USDA 1992 & 1997 Non- agricultural land use, MRLC data from EROS 1992 or 2000 Atmospheric deposition, National Atmospheric Deposition Program Point sources, EPA, NOAA DRBC, state DEP’s

Point Sources Model will use EPA data from 1992 to 2002, updated with state flow and location data. Regional sewer systems collect waste from non- tidal basins and discharge into tidal estuary.

SPARROW Model Input Data Watershed Characteristics  Land-to-water delivery factors  Temperature  Soil permeability  Land Use  In-stream removal  Stream-size  Reservoirs  Slope  Others …..

Delaware SPARROW Model Unique Aspects  Land-to-water delivery factors  Forest type and fragmentation.  In-stream removal  Stream-size (first 1:24K model).  Model Comparisons  Comparison with PnET Forest productivity model.

Delaware SPARROW Model Project Plans ESTIMATOR load calculations - 6 mo. NHD area, flow, and travel time generation - 12 mo. Apply Overland and In-stream factors - 6 mo. Model Simulations - 12 mo. Reports –Estimated Nutrient Loads –Data –Delaware SPARROW Goal: Completed model by end of 2003.

Modeling Support NAWQA –National NAWQA Program –Delaware NAWQA Project –NAWQA/State Coop for 1:24K NHD streams US Forest Service –Forest Type and Fragmentation Indexes –Climate and Atmospheric loading data US EPA –Point Source Loading data