Behaviourism Methodological Behaviourism In the early 20th C psychology used ‘introspection’ to study the mind. In the early 20th C psychology used ‘introspection’

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Week 2, Lecture 3 Dualism: mental events, substance vs. property dualism, four arguments.
Advertisements

“Big” essays are due next Wednesday. (Don’t try to write them next Tuesday!)
Summer 2011 Tuesday, 8/ No supposition seems to me more natural than that there is no process in the brain correlated with associating or with.
Summer 2011 Wednesday, 07/06. Mental vs. Physical Items Write down 3 examples of mental items (anything that you consider to be a part of the mind) and.
Metaphysics Part II. Thought Experiment: Physical & Mental Properties A1. 2 more objects: quarters, books, grass… A2. 2 more physical descriptors: green,
Philosophy of Mind Matthew Soteriou. Functionalism and Qualia Critics of functionalist accounts of the mental often appeal to thought experiments in which.
EPM: Chs XIII & XIV Pete Mandik Chairman, Department of Philosophy Coordinator, Cognitive Science Laboratory William Paterson University, New Jersey USA.
 Humans are metaphysically free  Our choices define us and as a result our intuitions about the human condition are satisfied.  Dualism  Kant  Existentialism.
Verificationism and religious language Michael Lacewing
Section 2.2 You Are What You Eat Mind as Body 1 Empiricism Empiricism claims that the only source of knowledge about the external world is sense experience.
© Michael Lacewing Behaviourism and the problem of other minds Michael Lacewing
Summer 2011 Tuesday, 07/05. Dualism The view that the mind is separate from the physical/material world. Tells us what the mind is not, but is silent.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 8 Moore’s Non-naturalism
The Problem of Induction Reading: ‘The Problem of Induction’ by W. Salmon.
Substance dualism: do Descartes’ arguments work? Michael Lacewing
Definitions – John Dewey
1. FOUNDATIONS (Dualism, Behaviorism, Central-State Materialism) (G. Ryle, ‘Descartes’ Myth’)
Philosophy of Mind Matthew Soteriou. Physicalism The physicalist answer to the question of the relation between the mental and the physical: The mental.
© Michael Lacewing Dualism and the Mind-Body Identity Theory Michael Lacewing
The Mind-Body Problem. Some Theories of Mind Dualism –Substance Dualism: mind and body are differerent substances. Mind is unextended and not subject.
1 Dennett The intentional stance, the interface problem. Tuesday introduction Fredrik Stjernberg IKK Philosophy Linköping University
Logical behaviourism: objections
Consciousness and biological naturalism
Philosophy of Mind Matthew Soteriou.
Positivism -v- Pragmatism. MMUBS Mres Epistemology, session 4, slide-1 Positivism -v- Pragmatism Is knowledge composed of a correct.
Michael Lacewing Logical behaviourism Michael Lacewing
Philosophy of Mind Week 3: Objections to Dualism Logical Behaviorism
Philosophical Origins of Psychology Empiricism The pursuit of knowledge through the observation of nature and the attribution of all knowledge to experience.
Life and Death Philosophical Perspectives. Two problems To discuss whether life after death is possible we need to understand two related philosophical.
Chapter 13 Science and Hypothesis.  Modern science has had a profound impact on our lives— mostly for the better.  The laws and principles of science.
1 5 Frege’s Anti-Psychologism. 2 The Rejection of Psychologism See Dummett 1993: ch.4 See Dummett 1993: ch.4 Frege’s statements: “Always separate sharply.
David Armstrong The Nature of Mind Key elements of the text Reference: Ross Phillips, La Trobe University, Sept Additions, editing: T. Hill, 2012.
Dualism: epiphenomenalism
Mind-Body Dualism. The Mind-Body Problem The problem of explaining how a mind is connected to and interacts with a body whose mind it is, or the problem.
Philosophy 4610 Philosophy of Mind Week 4: Objections to Behaviorism The Identity Theory.
EPM: Ch XII Pete Mandik Chairman, Department of Philosophy Coordinator, Cognitive Science Laboratory William Paterson University, New Jersey USA.
© Michael Lacewing Substance and Property Dualism Michael Lacewing
© NOKIAmind.body.PPT / / PHa page: 1 Conscious Machines and the Mind-Body Problem Dr. Pentti O A Haikonen, Principal Scientist, Cognitive Technology.
PHL 203 Theories of Reality Lecture for January 11 & 13, 2011 Prof. Borrowdale.
Gilbert Ryle: Behaviorism and the “Ghost in the Machine”
In his classic The Principles of Psychology, published in 1890, William James, who had a major role in establishing psychology as an independent field.
LECTURE 19 THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT CONTINUED. THE QUANTUM MECHANICAL OBJECTION DEPENDS UPON A PARTICULAR INTERPRETATION WE MIGHT REASONABLY SUSPEND.
Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing co.uk.
L ECTURE 7: T HE M IND -B ODY P ROBLEM. L ECTURE O UTLINE In today’s lecture we will: 1.Briefly recap Descartes theory of reality 2.Examine an important.
Philosophy of Mind materialism.
Eliminative materialism
Randolph Clarke Florida State University. Free will – or freedom of the will – is often taken to be a power of some kind.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 13 Minds and Bodies #2 (Physicalism) By David Kelsey.
Learning objective: To understand what Ryle thinks is a ‘category mistake’ To understand how he defends logical behaviourism.
The Mind And Body Problem Mr. DeZilva.  Humans are characterised by the body (physical) and the mind (consciousness) These are the fundamental properties.
Mind & Body Different Views. Positions on Mind & Body Descartes isn’t the only contributor Sources: – Psychological studies – Medical & physical observations.
Origins of Psychology 4.2.1: Approaches in Psychology Origins of Psychology: Wundt, introspection and the emergence of Psychology as a science.
Substance and Property Dualism Quick task: Fill in the gaps activity Quick task: Fill in the gaps activity ?v=sT41wRA67PA.
This week’s aims: To set two SMART targets based on formal assessment feedback and progress so far To understand basic ideas concerning each key theory.
Origins of Psychology 4.2.1: Approaches in Psychology Origins of Psychology: Wundt, introspection and the emergence of Psychology as a science. Pages
Philosophy of Mind Lecture II: Mind&behavior. Behaviorism
Philosophical behaviourism: two objections
Ryle’s philosophical behaviourism
Substance and Property Dualism
Hempel’s philosophical behaviourism
Philosophical behaviourism and consciousness
The problem of other minds
Property dualism: objections
Verificationism on religious language
How is this scenario like substance dualists?
Functionalism Eliminativism Prop Dualism MBIT Sub Dualism Behaviourism
PHL 203 Theories of Reality
True or False: Materialism and physicalism mean the same thing.
Behaviourism.
Functionalism Eliminativism Prop Dualism MBIT Sub Dualism Behaviourism
Presentation transcript:

Behaviourism

Methodological Behaviourism In the early 20th C psychology used ‘introspection’ to study the mind. In the early 20th C psychology used ‘introspection’ to study the mind. Not reliable, not repeatable, not objective Not reliable, not repeatable, not objective Not scientific. Not scientific. REJECTED! REJECTED!

Methodological Behaviourism Restrict psychological data to just the relevant observable data of the organism Restrict psychological data to just the relevant observable data of the organism Mental phenomena do not count as psychological data, but their existence doesn’t have to be denied Mental phenomena do not count as psychological data, but their existence doesn’t have to be denied Problem: there are difficulties in formulating useful explanations of psychological phenomena. Problem: there are difficulties in formulating useful explanations of psychological phenomena.

Logical Positivism Early in the 20th C in Europe there was a reaction to the wilder flights of metaphysics. Much of what was written appeared to be meaningless. Early in the 20th C in Europe there was a reaction to the wilder flights of metaphysics. Much of what was written appeared to be meaningless. Propose Verificationism: Propose Verificationism: The meaning of a statement is just the conditions whose verification would make that statement true. The meaning of a statement is just the conditions whose verification would make that statement true. Statements that have no discoverable conditions of verification are meaningless – so goodbye Heidegger Statements that have no discoverable conditions of verification are meaningless – so goodbye Heidegger What’s the status of the verificationist principle itself? What’s the status of the verificationist principle itself? Heidegger says: As de-severant Being-in, Dasein has likewise the character of directionality. Every bringing-close [Näherung] has already taken in advance a direction towards a region out of which what is de-severed brings itself close [sich nähert], so that one can come across it with regard to its place. Circumspective concern is de-severing which gives directionality. … (und so weiter for pages and pages.)

Logical Behaviourism Meaningful statements about mental objects have to determine behavioural and physical conditions. Meaningful statements about mental objects have to determine behavioural and physical conditions. We see clearly that the meaning of a psychological statement consists solely in the function of abbreviating the description of certain modes of physical response characteristic of the bodies of men and animals. Carl Hempel (1935)

Logical Behaviourism Ryle reacted against the ‘Official Doctrine’ of Dualism. Ryle reacted against the ‘Official Doctrine’ of Dualism. a human exists in two realms; a public, outer, physical manifestation, and a private, inner, mental manifestation. The realms are different but they belong to the same ‘category.’ This is the dogma of the ‘Ghost in the Machine’ and it is a logical error that Ryle calls the Category Mistake This is the dogma of the ‘Ghost in the Machine’ and it is a logical error that Ryle calls the Category Mistake

Logical Behaviourism Batsman Wicket Keeper Fair play?

Logical Behaviourism We are in an analogous position wrt our mental operations. Where, we ask, is the faculty to which intelligence is due? We are in an analogous position wrt our mental operations. Where, we ask, is the faculty to which intelligence is due? According to Ryle the intelligence epithets apply not to distinct causal entities but are descriptive of the performance of functions. According to Ryle the intelligence epithets apply not to distinct causal entities but are descriptive of the performance of functions. Note that as a consequence, we are able to know about other people’s mental conditions. Note that as a consequence, we are able to know about other people’s mental conditions.

Logical Behaviourism T o say that Alice is in pain is to say that Alice is showing pain-behaviours. T o say that Alice is in pain is to say that Alice is showing pain-behaviours. Alice could be in pain and yet exhibit no pain behaviours Alice could be in pain and yet exhibit no pain behaviours Alice could be not in pain and yet exhibiting pain behaviours. Alice could be not in pain and yet exhibiting pain behaviours. To say that Alice is in pain is to say that Alice is disposed to show pain-behaviours. To say that Alice is in pain is to say that Alice is disposed to show pain-behaviours.

Logical Behaviourism Ryle compares this with the description of glass as brittle. It is brittle because it is disposed to break when struck sharply Ryle compares this with the description of glass as brittle. It is brittle because it is disposed to break when struck sharply But isn’t there an explanation for why glass is brittle? But isn’t there an explanation for why glass is brittle? Yes. Brittleness is due to the internal structure of the glass. Yes. Brittleness is due to the internal structure of the glass. By analogy we could suppose that pain-behaviour dispositions are due to some internal structure. By analogy we could suppose that pain-behaviour dispositions are due to some internal structure.

Ontological Behaviourism What should a behaviourist say about the existence of mental things? What should a behaviourist say about the existence of mental things? 1. Behaviourist ways of speaking reflect the fact that there are no such things as mental objects. The logical behaviourist view. (Ryle says he thinks this.) 2. Behaviourist ways of speaking are justified whether or not there are really mental objects. The methodological behaviourist view. (Seems like Ryle should think this.)

Ontological Behaviourism Mental objects just are categories of behaviours Mental objects just are categories of behaviours LB does not imply OB LB does not imply OB OB does not imply LB OB does not imply LB Problems: Problems: Pain hurts Pain hurts ‘Reversed spectrum’ is possible. ‘Reversed spectrum’ is possible.

Behaviourism If talk of thoughts, desires, beliefs, pains, joys, etc. is to be rephrasable in principle in terms of behaviours then these behaviours have to be definable without reference to thoughts, desires, beliefs, pains, joys, etc. This turns out not to be possible. 1. Circularity Circularity Indefiniteness 4. Chauvinism An action becomes a part of some particular behaviour only with reference to a particular psychological state. It is impossible to define a category of actions that is sufficient to substitute for any mental term without appealing to intentional terms If we declare that pain, for example, is equivalent to a disposition to squeak, then any creature that is incapable of squeaking can not have a disposition to squeak and can therefore not be in pain.