BEST SURVEY 2007 Extra report 2007 Based on 400 interviews in areas surrounding Vienna city.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BEST 2014 BEST special topic 2013 Use of PT information channels Kjetil Vrenne, BEST Project Manager 2014.
Advertisements

BEST Survey 2010 City report: Copenhagen Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
Prepared by Margo Eyeson-Annan New South Wales Health Survey Program, Centre for Epidemiology and Research New South Wales Department of Health March 2006.
4 Conducting Marketing Research 1. What is Marketing Research? Marketing research is the systematic design, collection, analysis, and reporting of data.
BEST 2014 BEST 2011 BEST 2014 BEST Survey results 2013.
Going Grey in Mississauga Evaluating the Older Adult Plan using Quality of Life as a Measure of Success.
Survey Design Steps in Conducting a survey.  There are two basic steps for conducting a survey  Design and Planning  Data Collection.
The UCT approach approach to sensitive issues in surveys S-005 examples.
Result from Parents survey May Responses 131 families gave their opinions - 74% Scale Answers on a scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly.
PROJECTED RIDERSHIP OF THE HOUSATONIC RAILROAD STUDY Presented by Julie Pokela, Ph.D. August, 2010.
By: Chisom Alozie. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES:  To develop a budget for Shreve Island summer day camp.  To hire a responsible, educated, and trained staff.
Kenia Garcia Monica Molina UC MERCED CAT TRACKS. SURVEY QUESTION 1.
BEST 2014 BEST 2011 BEST 2014 BEST Survey results 2014.
BEST results 2007 VIENNA City + surrounding areas Berlin, Nov BEST-Seminar 2007 Berlin.
BEST Survey 2009 City report: Helsinki Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
1 London 10. October 2014 EMTA General Meeting A Danish experience: electronics for transport communication Per Gellert Director Planning.
1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.
1 Assessments of the Environment in the European Quality of Life Perception Surveys Klaus Trutzel German KOSIS Association Urban Audit c/o Bureau for Statistics.
In what ways are our superstitions and beliefs in the supernatural different to Chinese people?  The following is an example to help with your Tangjia.
THE 2011 VCC STUDENT CENSUS SURVEY Selected Findings for Overall Census Responses April 2012.
European TV Survey - Results Czech Republic January 2010.
1 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Customer Satisfaction Measurement FY 2006 Q3 Comparison April 28, 2006.
BEST Survey 2010 City report: Helsinki Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
Big Listening 2010 A summary of surveys 13, 14 and 15.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Data Collection With Surveys Unit 2: Describing Transit Systems with Data.
The Cost Savings and Enhancements of a District’s Wellness Program A Case Study from Broward Presented by: Kay Blake, Training Supervisor Tina Severance-Fonte,
BEST Survey 2011 City report: Stockholm Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
European TV Survey Overview of Results in 10 Countries January 2010.
Prepared by: DECEMBER 2008 Metro Transit Light- Rail and Bus Rider Survey FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PERISCOPE.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST) Main results of the BEST 2010 Survey.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST) Main results of the BEST 2009 Survey.
Responsible Electricity Transmission for Albertans (RETA) November 2, 2009 Responsible Electricity Transmission for Albertans (RETA)
Guilford County Schools Parent and Community Surveys Presentation January 24, 2015 Prepared By Nancy Burnap, Ph.D Research Strategies, Inc. Presented By.
Current trends and problems in Tbilisi public transport system.
FEST Finans Energi Samferdsel Telekom BEST Survey 2008 City report: Helsinki Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
Per Gellert /Barcelona Quality for Passengers.
Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics Richard Curtin University of Michigan.
Evaluating the Impacts of Real Time Passenger Information and Bus Signal Priority in Trondheim Morten Welde, Norwegian Public Roads Administration Trond.
Pilot National Travel Survey 2009 Summary Findings Prepared by Mairead Griffin.
2011 WHITE MOUNTAINS COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=339.
Key Findings from the 2008/9 Place Survey. Purpose of the Place Survey  Captures local people’s views, experiences and perceptions about the local area.
TRANSED of September 2012 in New Delhi, India How accessible was the Swedish public transport system in 2010? Helena Svensson, Ph D in public transport.
Designing Survey Instruments. Creating a Survey Instrument  Survey instruments should help researchers collect the most accurate data and reach the most.
1 BEST results 2007 for Oslo Svein L. Alfheim Manager for Planning and Development SL (Greater Oslo Public Transport)
BEST Survey 2010 City report: Oslo Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
BEST on Strategic Planning September 2008 Benchmarking Public Transport Strategic Planning Participants Ruter AS, Oslo HKL, Helsinki Movia, Copenhagen.
BEST 2014 BEST 2011 BEST 2014 Special survey & key figure topic 2014 Tickets and ticket inspections Kjetil Vrenne, BEST Project manager.
Misunderstanding of right-of-way rules at various pedestrian crossing types: Observational study and survey 學生:董瑩蟬.
BEST SURVEY 2007 Extra report 2007 Based on 600 interviews in Vienna city.
BEST SURVEY 2007 Report Copenhagen BEST 2007 BEST Survey Contents About the survey Participants Sample Method How to read the graphs Overall.
The monitoring of Customer Satisfaction Customer satisfaction survey of HCT BEST-survey Customer complaints.
BEST 2010 BEST 2010 Results of the survey Kjetil Vrenne BEST Project Manager May 27 th, 2010 BEST Survey 2010 Results & Analyses Page 1.
The effects of Peer Pressure, Living Standards and Gender on Underage Drinking Psychologist- Kanari zukoshi.
EMTA General Meeting – London October 9° 2014 SURVEY ON THE INTERCHANGE RATE Results of the questionnaire circulated among EMTA Members.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST) Main results of the BEST 2008 Survey.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport Results of the 2007 survey.
Quality indicators impact on overall citizen satisfaction BEST Survey 2014.
Impacts of Free Public Transport – An Evaluation Framework Oded Cats Yusak Susilo Jonas Eliasson.
© 2015© 2016 Results and Analysis 2016 School Climate Survey: Jenkins Elementary School.
Taxicab regulation and urban residents' perception of taxi services: a survey in eight cities Richard Darbéra CNRS, Latts Scientific director of IVM's.
Faculty Well-Being Survey: Assessment Activities Presentation for the NC State Assessment Work Group May 2, 2007 Nancy Whelchel, PhD Assistant Director.
Introduction to BEST Survey results 2015 Oslo, 8 th of February 2016.
EUROPEAN FORUM FOR GEOGRAPHY AND STATISTICS KRAKOW CONFERENCE October, Krakow, Poland Travel Behaviour in Pristina City Author 1: Naim Kelmendi.
Parves Khan Andrew Gostelow 7 October 2009 Tourist Information provision A national economic impact review Tourism Management Institute National Conference.
/ København Dok.nr. Nordic Cooperation in Public Transport Per Gellert.
Die Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) - Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts
Based on 400 interviews in areas surrounding Vienna city
BEST Special topic 2015 What could make PT more interesting for car users? Stockholm, 15th of March 2016.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST)
STEPS Site Report.
Presentation transcript:

BEST SURVEY 2007 Extra report 2007 Based on 400 interviews in areas surrounding Vienna city

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Contents About the survey Participants Sample Method How to read the graphs Overall results Quality dimension indexes, individual questions Satisfaction and impact Appendix Quality dimensions and indexes for subgroups Background information

BEST 2007 BEST Survey About the survey The following cities participated in the BEST 2007 survey: Stockholm (Extended questionnaire) Oslo (Extended questionnaire) Helsinki (Extended questionnaire, with additional questions) Copenhagen (Extended questionnaire, with additional questions) Vienna (Extended questionnaire) Berlin (Extended questionnaire) Prague (Extended questionnaire) For all cities 1000 residents in defined areas have been interviewed. The exception is Helsinki where 150 additional interviews where performed in the Espoo area. All interviews have been done by telephone. The response rate for each city is given in the table to the right. Results from the survey have been weighted with respect to sex and age to match the profile in each area. The Helsinki results are weighted with respect to geography as well, to correct for the uneven distribution of interviews resulting from the extra interviews in Espoo. All 1150 interviews in Helsinki are included in the analysis. The questionnaire used in the survey is an updated version of the 2006 questionnaire. Since 2006 one new statement (‘The information is good in stops and terminals’) and two new background questions (‘region/geography’ and ‘usage of different modes of public transport’) have been added. In Copenhagen the question on ‘usage of PT modes’ have been formulated differently. In Copenhagen respondents were asked how often they used each transport mode. For reporting and comparison purposes these questions have been recoded as follows: If a respondent states that he/she travels with PT on a daily basis, all transport modes which this respondent use on a daily basis is coded as ‘generally uses’. Transport modes who are not used on a daily basis have for this respondent been coded as ‘not used generally’. Response rate Stockholm64 % Oslo28 % Helsinki32 % Copenhagen40 % Vienna54 % Berlin33 % Prague31 %

BEST 2007 BEST Survey How to read the graphs The graphs show the proportion of respondents who agrees (partially agrees or fully agrees) to the different statements in blue columns. The red columns shows the proportion who disagrees (hardly agrees or not agree at all) to the statements. Respondents with a neutral position are not displayed in the graphs. The topmost column show the distribution for the compound index, while the columns underneath show the distributions for the individual questions that make up the index. The graph show proportion of respondents that agree/disagree to the statement (as described in more detail above). The topmost column show the distribution for the total city sample, while the columns underneath show the distribution for certain relevant subgroups of the total population – the subgroups included are sex, age, travel frequency, place of residence (city region) and mode(s) of public transport used most often by the respondent.

Results 2007

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Indices

Vienna – surrounding areas 2007 Quality dimensions

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Traffic supply

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Information

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Staff behaviour

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Security and safety

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Comfort

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Social Image

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Value for money

Vienna – surrounding areas 2007 Appendix

Vienna – surrounding areas 2007 Citizen satisfaction in subgroups

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas CITIZEN SATISFACTION - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

Vienna – surrounding areas 2007 Traffic supply in subgroups

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Traffic supply - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Good for work/school trips - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas PT is good for leisure trips - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas PT is good for trips in the city centre - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas PT is good for trips outside the city centre - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Nearest stop is close to where I live - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Travel time on PT is reasonable - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas I am satisfied with the number of departures - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Waiting time is short at transfers - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

Vienna – surrounding areas 2007 Reliability in subgroups

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Reliability - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

Vienna – surrounding areas 2007 Information in subgroups

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Information - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas It is easy to get the information needed when planning a trip - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Information is good when traffic problems occure - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Information is good in stops and terminals - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

Vienna – surrounding areas 2007 Staff behavior in subgroups

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Staff behaviour - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Staff answers my questions correctly - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Staff behaves nicely and correctly - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

Vienna – surrounding areas 2007 Security and safety in subgroups

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Security and safety - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas I feel secure at stations and bus stops - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas I feel secure on board busses and trains - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas I am not afraid of traffic accidents when using PT - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

Vienna – surrounding areas 2007 Comfort in subgroups

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Comfort - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas PT travel is comfortable - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Transfers are easy - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Busses and trains are modern - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Busses and trains are clean - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas I normally get a seat when travel with PT - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

Vienna – surrounding areas 2007 Social image in subgroups

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Social image - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas More people will travel with PT in the future - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas PT is good for the environment - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas PT is beneficial to society - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

Vienna – surrounding areas 2007 Value for money in subgroups

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Value for money - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas PT gives good value for money - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas PT fares are reasonable - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

Vienna – surrounding areas 2007 Loyalty in subgroups

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Vienna – surrounding areas Loyalty - subgroups Gender Age PT travel frequency

Vienna – surrounding areas 2007 Background information

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Public transport travel frequency – Vienna – surrounding areas 2007

BEST 2007 BEST Survey Life situation – Vienna – surrounding areas 2007

Results 2007 – other available reports at best2005.net