Improvement on vertex reconstruction Motivations Many peaks in vertex distributions Further study for the <0.1MeV events S. Moriyama 6 th March 2004 XMASS.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Creating and Measuring Very Uniform Magnetic Fields for a Polarized 3 He Target Mark Fassler, Tatsuya Katabuchi, and Thomas B. Clegg, University of North.

Advertisements

The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.

13/02/20071 Event selection methods & First look at new PCB test Manqi Ruan Support & Discussing: Roman Advisor: Z. ZHANG (LAL) & Y. GAO (Tsinghua))

PS wirescanner calibration Student Meeting 10/03/2014 Carolina Bianchini BE-BI-BL.

Some answers to the questions/comments at the Heavy/Light presentation of March 17, Outline : 1) Addition of the id quadrant cut (slides 2-3); 2)

Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?

QM Interference in τ ± →π ± π + π - π 0 ν τ decays at BaBar Tim West The University of Manchester.

Review of PID simulation & reconstruction in G4MICE Yordan Karadzhov Sofia university “St. Kliment Ohridski” Content : 1 TOF 2 Cerenkov.

Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.

GLAST LAT Project Software vrvs meeting X. Chen 1 GLAST LAT Project Software vrvs meeting X. Chen 1 Analyses of Muon Calibration Data Xin Chen.

Alex Moiseev NASA/GSFC 12/16/2005 Some ACD Calibration issues I.ACD mip peak monitoring 1. ACD mip peak monitoring requires the measurements to be done.

1 Ghost Trackers If there’s something strange (or charm or bottom) in your neighbourhood… Dave Jackson Oxford University / RAL LCFI Collaboration 28 th.

1 Chris Rogers MICE Collaboration Meeting 11th Feb 2005 Tracking and Cooling performance of G4MICE.

Outline: (1) The data sample (2) Some news on the analysis method (3) Efficiency revised (4) Background revised (5) Data: spectrum + “phi-curve”

 Informally: In an art gallery with n paintings what is the optimal position for a camera?  Formally: Given a set of n points in the Euclidean space,

Automated Electron Step Size Optimization in EGS5 Scott Wilderman Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences, University of Michigan.

W  eν The W->eν analysis is a phi uniformity calibration, and only yields relative calibration constants. This means that all of the α’s in a given eta.

Monte Carlo Comparison of RPCs and Liquid Scintillator R. Ray 5/14/04  RPCs with 1-dimensional readout (generated by RR) and liquid scintillator with.

Turtle ray interactions with the EMC Tim West University of Manchester.

HBD Performance Estimates Zvi Citron 3 April 2008 HL Meeting.

Exclusive π 0 electroproduction in the resonance region. Nikolay Markov, Maurizio Ungaro, Kyungseon Joo University of Connecticut Hadron spectroscopy meeting.

N. Saoulidou Fermilab 1 Status & Update of track reconstruction in the Near Detector N. Saoulidou, Fermilab

Kalanand Mishra April 27, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,

COBRA Magnet Status W. Ootani June 27th, 2006 MEG Review W. Ootani June 27th, 2006 MEG Review.

Status of MAPS Geometry Simulation Yoshinari Mikami University of Birmingham 21 th April 2006 MAPS Meeting at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.

Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1.

Optimization of  exclusion cut for the  + and  (1520) analysis Takashi Nakano Based on Draft version of Technical Note 42.

G4Beamline Simulated Electron Distribution within the HPRF Cavity 2/15/20121.

N. Saoulidou, Fermilab, MINOS Collaboration Meeting N. Saoulidou, Fermilab, ND/CC Parallel Session, MINOS Collaboration Meeting R1.18.

PCAL Strips light transmission properties April 25, 2011April 26, 20111April 27,

Lukens - 1 Fermilab Seminar – July, 2011 Observation of the  b 0 Patrick T. Lukens Fermilab for the CDF Collaboration July 2011.

D. Jason Koskinen FNAL Collaboration mtg. 10/ Near Detector Efficiency.

N eutrino O scillation W orkshop Conca Specchiulla, September 11 th 2006 Michael Smy UC Irvine Low Energy Challenges in SK-III.

PMT Calibration R.Sawada 7/Jan/2007. Time calibration Method was talked at the previous meeting. The problems which was shown before were because I used.

BESIII Cell-type EMC Photon Position Measurement Zhe Wang Mar

Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.

XMASS experiment Ultra-low BG, multi-purpose detector 3kg fiducial volume (FV) prototype detector 1ton (100kg FV) detector for DM Search S. Moriyama for.

UM PPS Lab Activities Mid-size Panel Tests PPS meeting January 15, 2012 Claudio, Curtis, Dan, Ethan, Riley.

Progress Report on GEANT Study of Containerized Detectors R. Ray 7/11/03 What’s New Since Last Time?  More detailed container description in GEANT o Slightly.

1 EMCAL Reconstruction in Pass pp 900 GeV 29/03/2010 Gustavo Conesa Balbastre.

A different cc/nc oscillation analysis Peter Litchfield  The Idea:  Translate near detector events to the far detector event-by-event, incorporating.

Update on my oscillation analysis Reconstructed Near detector data event Reconstructed Near detector MC event Truth Near detector MC event Truth Far detector.

Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,

1 Warsaw Group: Marek Szczekowski and Artur Ukleja 2015 Search for CPV in four-bodies charm decays using the kNN method Outline The goal of analysis The.

Kalanand Mishra February 23, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 decay Giampiero.

MEG 実験 2009 液体キセノン検出器の性能 II 西村康宏, 他 MEG コラボレーション東京大学素粒子物理国際研究センター第 65 回年次大会岡山大学.

LNF 12/12/06 1 F.Ambrosino-T. Capussela-F.Perfetto Update on        Dalitz plot slope Where we started from A big surprise Systematic checks.

Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.

Status of the measurement of K L lifetime - Data sample (old): ~ 440 pb -1 ( ) - MC sample: ~125 pb -1 ( mk0 stream ) Selection: standard tag (|

 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.

Monitoring Energy Gains Using the Double and Single Arm Compton Processes Yelena Prok PrimEx Collaboration Meeting March 18, 2006.

ICARUS T600: low energy electrons

Fabio, Francesco, Francesco and Nicola INFN and University Bari

Observation of a “cusp” in the decay K±  p±pp

Converted photons efficiency

Astronomy session: a summary

Tracking System at CERN 06 and 07 test beams

Update of the Fiducial calibration study in 2km WC detector

Summary of fiducial volume test at KEK

A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004

Data Analysis in Particle Physics

Beam Tilt & TFC: Can we see a (MC) beam tilt?

° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.

Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC

Beam Tilt & TFC: Can we see a (MC) beam tilt?

KEK, 阪大RCNPA, 阪大理B, 京大理C, 原研先端研D,

G. Battistoni, R. Brunetti, K. Cieślik, A. Dąbrowska, R. Dolfini,

西村美紀（東大）他 MEGIIコラボレーション日本物理学会第73回年次大会（2018年）東京理科大学（野田キャンパス）

Occlusion and smoothness probabilities in 3D cluttered scenes

° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.

Presentation transcript:

Improvement on vertex reconstruction Motivations Many peaks in vertex distributions Further study for the <0.1MeV events S. Moriyama 6 th March 2004 XMASS meeting Namba’s plots

Problem in the vertex reconstruction We are using maps which have value on a 2.5cm spacing grid.  F(ix,iy,iz,ith PMT) Between grid points, F(probability to observe photoelectron by ith PMT) is obtained by a linear interpolation.  F(x,y,z, ith PMT) Namba pointed out that there must be discontinuity of dF/dx, etc, on the grid edge. When I saw likelihood distribution, there is a valley on the grid edge due to the dF/dx discontinuity.

How to solve? 1.Adopt higher order interpolation for the maps.  Technically complex for me. 2.Slightly modify likelihood distribution near the current best fit point.  looks good. Best fit here One example: Z(cm) Likelihood Z(cm) Likelihood Zoom up * Actual likelihood 2 nd order polynomial fit Concentration to the grid is now understood.

Principle of the improvement For the events wall>2cm, vertex improvement code is called. In the code, likelihood along x, y, and z axis is calculated by 1mm spacing for +/- 1cm region. For each likelihood, 2 nd order ploynomial fit is performed based on the 1mm spacing data, and adopt minimum value of the 2 nd order polynomial as a new fitted result. No modification for energy information (/home/xmass/src/reconst_v6.0)

Effect on the source run analysis (Namba) Improvement succeeded. MC Data Further improvement needs maps with more fine spacing.

Performance check revisited… Minamino?

Background data and MC Note: There was a bug in MC treatment after applying reconst_v4.4 (improvement on <0.1MeV analysis), but there is almost no change by the bug fix. Almost no change observed

How about <0.1MeV events? Detail check of wall distribution Horizontal axis (15.5-wall)**3  uniform volume plots can be seen. ~0.6kg/bin

Background distributions Horizontal: cm3 (125cm3==10cmFV, 1000cm3==20cmFV) Vertical: DRU Data MC 0-0.1MeV MeV MeV MeV MeV0.5-1MeV 1-2MeV 2-3MeV

0-0.1MeV MeV MeV MeV

Summary Improvement on the vertex reconstruction done. Still there is small grid effect. It will be improved by making fine maps. <0.1MeV problem and Kr like signals seems to be related. Further study is needed why event concentration at the detector center occurs.