CCRPI AND BEATING THE ODDS Charter School Performance Goals 11/9/20151 GCSA Leadership Conference at Lake Oconee Academy January 31, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Contextual effects In the previous sections we found that when regressing pupil attainment on pupil prior ability schools vary in both intercept and slope.
Advertisements

South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
Class 18 – Thursday, Nov. 11 Omitted Variables Bias
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
Irwin/McGraw-Hill © Andrew F. Siegel, 1997 and l Chapter 12 l Multiple Regression: Predicting One Factor from Several Others.
Kentucky’s School Report Card and Spreadsheets
Comparing Growth in Student Performance David Stern, UC Berkeley Career Academy Support Network Presentation to Educating for Careers/ California Partnership.
IE 2 and CHARTER SYSTEMS Accountability Comparison Sources of Information Governor’s Office of Student Achievement website Georgia Department of Education.
A-F School Grading Presentation October 2, History of A to F School Grading System Preliminary grades based on data from SY08-09 through SY10-11.
Oxford Preparatory Academy Chino Valley Unified School District Chino Valley, South Orange County & Oceanside A Kindergarten Through Eighth Grade Program.
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900 Lecture 7: Interactions in Regression.
Measures of Variability. Why are measures of variability important? Why not just stick with the mean?  Ratings of attractiveness (out of 10) – Mean =
1 Leanna Stiefel and Amy Ellen Schwartz Faculty, Wagner Graduate School and Colin Chellman Research Associate, Institute for Education and Social Policy.
An Introduction to Logistic Regression
Today Concepts underlying inferential statistics
Stat 112: Lecture 9 Notes Homework 3: Due next Thursday
Probability Population:
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
Understanding Wisconsin’s New School Report Card.
Multiple Linear Regression A method for analyzing the effects of several predictor variables concurrently. - Simultaneously - Stepwise Minimizing the squared.
Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals in Multiple Regressors
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
Marketing Research Aaker, Kumar, Day and Leone Tenth Edition
Chapter 13: Inference in Regression
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
Chronic Absence in Oregon Attendance Works The Children’s Institute The Chalkboard Project ECONorthwest.
LEARNING PROGRAMME Hypothesis testing Intermediate Training in Quantitative Analysis Bangkok November 2007.
Statistics Used In Special Education
One-Factor Experiments Andy Wang CIS 5930 Computer Systems Performance Analysis.
How Does Secondary Education in Louisiana Stack up? Presented by Dr. Bobby Franklin January 31, 2005.
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Understanding and Using SGPs to Improve Student Performance 1.
The Impact of Including Predictors and Using Various Hierarchical Linear Models on Evaluating School Effectiveness in Mathematics Nicole Traxel & Cindy.
Slide 1 Estimating Performance Below the National Level Applying Simulation Methods to TIMSS Fourth Annual IES Research Conference Dan Sherman, Ph.D. American.
State Charter Schools Commission of Georgia SCSC Academic Accountability Update State Charter School Performance
Guilford County Schools Parent and Community Surveys Presentation January 24, 2015 Prepared By Nancy Burnap, Ph.D Research Strategies, Inc. Presented By.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
Measures of Variability. Why are measures of variability important? Why not just stick with the mean?  Ratings of attractiveness (out of 10) – Mean =
Stat 112 Notes 9 Today: –Multicollinearity (Chapter 4.6) –Multiple regression and causal inference.
Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. How Do They Do That? EVAAS and the New Tests October 2013 SAS ® EVAAS ® for K-12.
Stats Lunch: Day 3 The Basis of Hypothesis Testing w/ Parametric Statistics.
Public School Accountability System. Background One year ago One year ago –100 percent proficiency required in –AMOs set to increase 7-12 points.
Sonoraville Elementary Parent Meeting February 3, 2015.
Chapter 8: Simple Linear Regression Yang Zhenlin.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Release of Preliminary Value-Added Data Webinar August 13, 2012 Florida Department of Education.
Miller County School System STRATEGIC WAIVERS SCHOOL SYSTEM (IE2) FY17-23.
Value Added Model and Evaluations: Keeping It Simple Polk County Schools – November 2015.
PED School Grade Reports (with thanks to Valley High School) ACE August 3, 2012 Dr. Russ Romans District Accountability Manager.
Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. How Do They Do That? EVAAS and the New Tests October 2013 SAS ® EVAAS ® for K-12.
District 11 CSAP Results School Year D11 Board Presentation August 9,2006.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 Supplemental Packet.
1 Grade 3-8 English Language Arts Results Student Growth Tracked Over Time: 2006 – 2009 Grade-by-grade testing began in The tests and data.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
Biostatistics Regression and Correlation Methods Class #10 April 4, 2000.
Chronic Absence in Oregon Attendance Works The Children’s Institute The Chalkboard Project ECONorthwest.
Accountability Overview Presented by Jennifer Stafford Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:pp: 12/11/2015.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007.
Examining Achievement Gaps
CINS Data Presentation
School Quality and the Black-White Achievement Gap
CMSD Fall Data Check In November 3, 2017.
Accountability Measures A perspective on how to “Beat the Odds”
Portability of Teacher Effectiveness across School Settings
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System
Bloomington Public Schools Districtwide Achievement Report
Analyzing Stability in Colorado K-12 Public Schools
Central City Elementary School
Chronic Absence in Oregon
Presentation transcript:

CCRPI AND BEATING THE ODDS Charter School Performance Goals 11/9/20151 GCSA Leadership Conference at Lake Oconee Academy January 31, 2014

Charter schools will be measured by their performance on two factors: 1.Beating the Odds 2.CCRPI (College and Career Readiness Performance Index) 11/9/20152 For New Charter Schools (opening in 2014 or later)

CCRPI Overall Scores - Actual 11/9/20153 Note: Charters schools may have more than one score within the distribution. The CCRPI calculates a school level score for grades K-5; 6-8; and 9;12 and schools with grade configurations that span multiple will receive a score for each level.

CCRPI Charter Goals For new start-up charter schools first opening in 2014 or later, using Year 1 of the charter term to establish a CCRPI baseline: The Charter School’s CCRPI score shall be equal to or better than both the State and local district in Year 2, and Better than both the State and local district in Years 3-5 of the charter contract 11/9/20154

CCRPI Charter Goals (continued) If the school’s first-year CCRPI score is lower than either or both the local district and the State The school shall have until the end of Year 2 of the charter term to close the gap between the Charter School and whichever score is higher, the local district or the State In Years 3-5 of the charter term, the Charter School’s CCRPI score shall be better than both the State and the local district 11/9/20155

CCRPI and New Charter Renewal Renewal decisions for new start-up charter schools first opening in 2014 or later will be based in part on whether the school’s CCRPI score was equal to or better than both the State and local district in Year 2, and better than both the State and local district in Years 3-4 of the charter contract. 11/9/20156

Beating the Odds (BTO) Charter Goals For new start-up charter schools first opening in 2014 or later, d uring each year of its first five-year charter term, all charter schools shall “beat the odds” as determined by a formula measuring expected student growth –A school “beats the odds” when it does as good as or better than all the schools in Georgia that are similar to that school 11/9/20157

BTO Analysis The Beating the Odds analysis is a cross-sectional, fixed-effects regression model that uses the following factors from the CCRPI school-level dataset, GaDOE student record file, and GaDOE CPI data –Analytical Aim: Use non-malleable factors to predict performance on each of the CCRPI components –Data: CCRPI school-level dataset, GaDOE student record file, and GaDOE CPI data 11/9/20158

Factors Included in BTO Student-based Factors % African American% Hispanic % Students with Disabilities % Talented and Gifted % White% English Learners % Other% Male % Free/Reduced Lunch (or County’s TANF using USED measure) School-based Factors School Size (FTE)Locale Type (i.e. City, Town, Rural) Student/Teacher RatioDistrict Performance (fixed effect) School Configuration/CCRPI Score Type (i.e. Elem, Middle, High) 11/9/20159

REFERENCE BTO Predicting Model BTO Model Specification: Cross-sectional fixed-effects regression model Y i = β 0 + β 1 SD i + β 2 SI i + β 3 CL i +  i + α d β 0 = constant term β 1 SD i = vector of student demographic variables for each individual school β 2 SI i = vector of school type information including school size, student- teacher ratio, and location type β 3 CL i = dummy (binary) variables for each of the CCRPI reporting clusters (i.e. Elementary, Middle, High)  i = individual schools’ random error term α d = district level fixed-effects to control for district-level policies and procedures 11/9/201510

REFERENCE BTO Model Postestimation Prediction Post-Estimation: To calculate the predicted score the following approach used: Linear prediction from the fitted regression model where: – estimating a set of parameters b 1, b 2, : : :, b k, and the linear prediction is: – For the linear regression model selected the values are called the predicted values. x 1j, x 2j, : : :, x kj are obtained from the actual reported school level data on the student-based and school level predictors 11/9/201511

BTO and Charter Renewal Renewal decisions for new charter schools first opening in 2014 or later will be based in part on whether the school “beat the odds” in each of the first four years of its first charter term (Years 1-4) Renewal decisions for existing charter schools will be based in part on whether the school “beat the odds” in each of the remaining years of its charter term (beginning ) 11/9/201512

How much time do NEW charter schools need to succeed? Some say charter schools need time (4 years?) before it is determined that the school is performing so poorly that it should be closed. But the research shows that how a charter school starts in year one sets the pattern for subsequent years. Charter schools don't have permission to waste any years of a child's academic life. 11/9/201513

The comparison to local and state CCRPI averages is only significant for those schools not "beating the odds" (BTO). The key question for future charter renewals is whether a school is "beating the odds" -- i.e., doing better than schools across the state serving similar students in similar situations. 11/9/ CCRPI, BTO and Charter Renewal

An existing charter school can win renewal if it is beating the odds -- regardless of where its CCRPI stands compared to its local district and the state average. Existing charter schools will never suffer negative consequences merely for attracting students most in need of help! 11/9/ CCRPI, BTO and Charter Renewal

They will only risk their charters if they fail to add sufficient measurable value while educating the children that do show up. – That's what the BTO measure tells us about a school. Thus, even though it will take them years to catch up with their local district and the state on CCRPI, they will win charter renewal if they continue to beat the odds each year. 11/9/ CCRPI, BTO and Charter Renewal

For example, several schools in the lower percentiles on CCRPI are in the highest percentiles in the preliminary BTO analysis -- because they're adding so much educational value for their students. Alternately, schools that have high CCRPI scores but are not beating the odds will need to show aggressive plans for improving their results if they want to win charter renewal. 11/9/ CCRPI, BTO and Charter Renewal

Once the CCRPI data for is released in February 2014 (using the revised definition of CCRPI approved by the State Board in December 2013), we will run the BTO analysis and send it out to all existing schools to let them know where they stand. 11/9/ BTO and Charter Renewal

CCRPI Overall Scores - Actual 11/9/ Note: Charters schools may have more than one score within the distribution. The CCRPI calculates a school level score for grades K-5; 6-8; and 9;12 and schools with grade configurations that span multiple will receive a score for each level.

CCRPI Overall Score - Actual & Prediction 11/9/ Note: Charters schools may have more than one score within the distribution. The CCRPI calculates a school level score for grades K-5; 6-8; and 9;12 and schools with grade configurations that span multiple will receive a score for each level.

Preliminary BTO results 8 schools are in the bottom half of the CCRPI distribution but ARE Beating the Odds 54 schools are in the bottom half of the CCRPI distribution and are NOT Beating the Odds 33 schools are in the TOP half of the CCRPI distribution and are ALSO Beating the Odds 23 schools are in the TOP half of the CCRPI distribution and are NOT Beating the Odds 11/9/201521

CCRPI - Actual vs. Predicted 11/9/ Note: Charters schools may have more than one score within the distribution. The CCRPI calculates a school level score for grades K-5; 6-8; and 9;12 and schools with grade configurations that span multiple will receive a score for each level.