1.1 Where Are We and How Exactly Did We Get Here? An Overview of Responsiveness to Instruction, its History & Philosophy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention in Illinois November 22, 2008 Presented by: Beth Hanselman and Marica Cullen Illinois State Board of Education.
Advertisements

Response to Intervention in Illinois
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Responsiveness to Instruction North Carolina Problem Solving Model Problem Solving Model Session 1/4.
Response to Instruction ________________________________ Response To Intervention New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Instructional Decision Making
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention This ppt is an adaptation of a specific PISD Training on RTI, The Educational Testing and.
Multi-tiered Systems of Support Improving Outcomes for All Office of Special Programs.
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
Response to Intervention Edward Daly & Todd Glover University of Nebraska- Lincoln.
Policy Considerations and Implementation. Overview Defining RtI Where did it come from and why do we need it? Support for RtI in federal law Core principles.
Response to Intervention (RtI) A Basic Overview. Illinois IDEA 2004 Part Rules Requires: use of a process that determines how the child responds.
Response to Intervention…What does it mean for preschool? Sarah Jackson, State Support Team Region 8 Merrie Darrah, State.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Alvena Kauffman
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
Response to Intervention: The All Kinds of Minds Connection.
Response to Intervention: The new Road to Ensuring Student Success January, 2011 PISD.
July 2007 IDEA Partnership 1 RTI Process What is it?
RtI Response to Intervention April 2, 2008 Board Presentation.
Getting Started with RTI School-wide Assessment Tool for an RTI Model.
Today’s Objectives What is RtI and why it is here – Consensus-building Preparation for 2010 Implementation: – Three Tiers of Services – Data Analysis.
C4K – Building an efficient and effective delivery system to impact critical outcomes for kids Our initial focus as we build this system is early literacy.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
January 2010IDEA Partnership1 Response to Intervention: Basics for families and community members.
Thank you for joining us for Implementing an RTI Model The presentation will begin momentarily. RIGHT REASON TECHNOLOGIES YOUR SOLUTION FOR STUDENT SUCCESS.
Administrators’ Back to School INSTITUTE August 2013 RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION (RTI ) Brownsville Independent School District Curriculum & Instruction Department.
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Response to Intervention. Background Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 Changes to align with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Allows districts.
Response to Intervention USING RTI FOR NONACADEMIC INTERVENTIONS: PART II.
University of Rhode Island EDC 452. A process of:  Providing high-quality instruction and intervention matched to student needs and  Using learning.
RtI in Georgia: Student Achievement Pyramid of Intervention
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Improving Academics and Social Outcomes through a Systems Integrated Approach to RTI Carol Massanari Susan Barrett Steve Goodman.
FloridaRtI.usf.edu A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida Intervention Mapping.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention.
The ABCs of RTI: Background and the Basics. Questions we will cover about RTI 1.What is RTI anyway? 2.Why do it? 3.What’s so wrong with the way we’re.
Parent Leadership Team Meeting Intro to RtI.  RtI Overview  Problem Solving Process  What papers do I fill out?  A3 documenting the story.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
RtI 2 /ExCEL Update RtI 2 /ExCEL Update Cambrian School District February 9,
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Dr. Sarah McPherson New York Institute of Technology Adapted from Lora Parks-Recore CEWW Special Education Training and Resource Center SETRC 1 Response.
RtI.  Learn: ◦ What is RtI ◦ Why schools need RtI ◦ What are the components that comprise an RtI system - must haves ◦ Underlying assumptions for the.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI) Welcome! 1.Gather at your table with your team. 2.Before we begin, use sticky dots to answer the 6 statements posted.
Brief Overview of Response to Intervention within Glenbrook South Andy Piper & Lindsay Schrand NSSED Problem-Solving Coaches.
 Response to Intervention ◦ Most often associated with a new and effective special education model for identifying and servicing students ◦ In PA, and.
Overview, Considerations, and Implementation Sharon Hance Erie 1 BOCES SETRC Information for this presentation.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Teaching Students Who are Exceptional, Diverse,
1 Response to Intervention Background and Laws Gaynard Brown Paul Bunyan Special Education Co-op Director.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
What IS RtI?. National RtI Model “Response to Intervention” –Born out of Reauthorization of Special Ed Law (IDEA 2004) Two Models of RtI: –Problem-Solving.
Addressing Learning Problems in Elementary School Ellen Hampshire.
RtI: A Framework for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati
 RtII is a comprehensive multi-tiered prevention model that provides services and interventions as early as possible to meet the instructional needs.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Responsiveness to Instruction Vermont Principals Association Strand August, 2011 Julie Benay, M.Ed.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Responsiveness to Instruction: Using a Problem Solving Model to Guide Student Support Team Decision Making Pender County Schools Summer 2009.
Response to Intervention (RTI)
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Leaving No Child Behind: Response to Intervention
Presentation transcript:

1.1 Where Are We and How Exactly Did We Get Here? An Overview of Responsiveness to Instruction, its History & Philosophy

What’s in a Name? National Model: Response to Intervention North Carolina Model: Responsiveness to Instruction Why the difference? –Intervention sounds like Special Ed –Instruction ties the initiative to student achievement and away from Special Ed

Where did we start? Creation of pilot sites… Creation of pilot sites… –In 2005, the State Board of Ed created 10 pilot sites (2 schools in five districts) to examine the use of RtI –Lillington-Shawtown & Gentry were among those pilot sites

Piloting RtI As pilots… As pilots… –Waiver of some policies regarding requisite evaluations for making students eligible for special designed instruction through Programs for Exceptional Children In 4 areas: OHI, SED, ID(mild), & SLD In 4 areas: OHI, SED, ID(mild), & SLD –Very few answers/guidance beyond training in the use of the Problem- Solving Model & RtI Assessment

Piloting Phase II In 2008, the State Board’s waiver was extended to all of the schools within the five pilot districts (Bertie, Burke, Guildford, New Hanover, & HARNETT) In 2008, the State Board’s waiver was extended to all of the schools within the five pilot districts (Bertie, Burke, Guildford, New Hanover, & HARNETT) By this time, more districts were also implementing but ONLY could use RtI to determine eligibility for SLD By this time, more districts were also implementing but ONLY could use RtI to determine eligibility for SLD Now, all schools in pilot districts could entitle students for EC services in the 4 high incidence disability categories Now, all schools in pilot districts could entitle students for EC services in the 4 high incidence disability categories

Angier Benhaven Boone Trail Buies Creek Erwin North Harnett Overhills Anderson Creek Harnett Primary Highland Johnsonville Lafayette South Harnett Wayne Avenue Coats Gentry Lillington-Shawtown What does the timeline look like? (In corn years…1 day in the life of corn = 1 month of RtI implementation)

Well, what do you know? Take 2 minutes and answer all of the questions independently. At your tables, discuss your confidence in your knowledge of RtI. Also, discuss the sources of your information (implementation experience, research, conferences, magazine/web articles, etc.)

The Link Between IDEA and RtI IDEA – focus is on providing services in the least restrictive environment (LRE) IDEA – focus is on providing services in the least restrictive environment (LRE) Late ’90s shift to a focus on outcomes Late ’90s shift to a focus on outcomes IDEA ’04 says: IDEA ’04 says: “…to improve the academic achievement and functional performance of children with disabilities including the use of scientifically based instructional practices, to the maximum extent possible” (20 U.S.C. 1400(c)(5)(E))

The Link Between IDEA and RtI IDEA also says: IDEA also says: –In determining whether a child has a specific learning disability, a local education agency may use a process that determines if the child responses to scientific, research-based intervention…(20 U.S.C. 1414(b)(6)(B) Early intervening Early intervening

The Link Between ESEA (NCLB) and RtI NCLB focuses on proficiency for all students NCLB focuses on proficiency for all students Requires access to general education curriculum Requires access to general education curriculum Requires exposure to grade-level content (no out-of-level testing) Requires exposure to grade-level content (no out-of-level testing) Likelihood with reauthorization to insert RtI language Likelihood with reauthorization to insert RtI language

What Is RtI? “An ongoing process of using student performance and other data to guide instructional and intervention decisions” “An ongoing process of using student performance and other data to guide instructional and intervention decisions”

What Is RtI? “the practice of providing high-quality instruction and intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and level of performance to make important educational decisions” “the practice of providing high-quality instruction and intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and level of performance to make important educational decisions”

RtI Core Principles We can effectively teach all children We can effectively teach all children Effective instruction (academic AND behavior) in general education is foundation for all decision-making Effective instruction (academic AND behavior) in general education is foundation for all decision-making Intervene early Intervene early Use a multi-tier model of service delivery Use a multi-tier model of service delivery

Philosophy of RtI Changes in philosophy are necessary for all of those involved: Changes in philosophy are necessary for all of those involved: All children can learn All children can learn Focus on meeting the needs of all children Focus on meeting the needs of all children Wealth of knowledge and partnership from parents Wealth of knowledge and partnership from parents Work collaboratively to develop solutions and strategies Work collaboratively to develop solutions and strategies

Philosophy of RtI Proactive instruction within general education Proactive instruction within general education Prevention more cost effective than remediation Prevention more cost effective than remediation Utilize resources necessary to meet the educational needs of all children Utilize resources necessary to meet the educational needs of all children

Where do you see the connections? RtI shares a philosophical foundation with many of the current, important educational reform efforts. Where do you see philosophical connections between RtI and the other improvement efforts in your building, our district, and our state/nation? RtI shares a philosophical foundation with many of the current, important educational reform efforts. Where do you see philosophical connections between RtI and the other improvement efforts in your building, our district, and our state/nation?

What about Assessments? What about Assessments? RtI advocates two principles: Assessments should have a relationship to positive child outcomes, not just predictions of failure Assessments should have a relationship to positive child outcomes, not just predictions of failure Assessments without this relationship do little to benefit children and waste precious time and resources Assessments without this relationship do little to benefit children and waste precious time and resources

What About Traditional Evaluations? Brief screening measures of IQ can rule out intellectual disability Brief screening measures of IQ can rule out intellectual disability If intellectual disability is not suspected, measures of IQ have no role in LD diagnosis with RtI If intellectual disability is not suspected, measures of IQ have no role in LD diagnosis with RtI

Assessment In RtI Focus on achievement, behavior, and the instructional environment Focus on achievement, behavior, and the instructional environment Measurable and changeable Measurable and changeable Related to child outcomes Related to child outcomes In-depth analysis of performance relative to peers In-depth analysis of performance relative to peers Intervention aimed at improving rate and level of skill development Intervention aimed at improving rate and level of skill development

Cautions in Assessment Focusing only on the child can miss important factors Focusing only on the child can miss important factors “Instructional casualties” “Instructional casualties” Not exposed to early literacy skills Not exposed to early literacy skills Marginally effective general education Marginally effective general education Instruction not scientifically validated Instruction not scientifically validated Instruction implemented with poor integrity Instruction implemented with poor integrity

Core of RtI Assessment Measures all domains that may affect achievement Measures all domains that may affect achievement Comprehensive assessment includes: Comprehensive assessment includes: Screening of hearing & vision Screening of hearing & vision In-depth assessments in: In-depth assessments in: Current academic skills Current academic skills Instructional environment Instructional environment Behaviors Behaviors Interventions Interventions

Core of RtI Assessment Focuses on assessment of instructional principles Focuses on assessment of instructional principles Variables assessed and considered for intervention: Variables assessed and considered for intervention: Time allocated for instruction Time allocated for instruction Academic learning time Academic learning time Pacing of instruction Pacing of instruction Number of opportunities to respond Number of opportunities to respond Sequencing of examples and non-examples of skills Sequencing of examples and non-examples of skills

Core of RtI Assessment Uses assessment to make good teaching decisions Uses assessment to make good teaching decisions Includes a measure of integrity in interventions Includes a measure of integrity in interventions

Core of RtI Assessment Measurement of intervention effectiveness Measurement of intervention effectiveness Early identification and early intervention Early identification and early intervention Intervention increase in intensity, guided by data based decision making Intervention increase in intensity, guided by data based decision making

Where have all the evals gone? As a table, answer the following questions… As a table, answer the following questions… 1. Have you been a part of an eval (using A- Team) that ended with a determination the student was not eligible due to the lack of discrepancy? If so, what was the feeling after the meeting? 2. How have you changed your teaching practices because of the information in a psych report?

Why the Problem Solving Model (PSM)? The number of students with disabilities grew from 3.7 million to 5.3 million The number of students with disabilities grew from 3.7 million to 5.3 million Eliminate inappropriate referrals and increase the legitimacy of the referrals initiated Eliminate inappropriate referrals and increase the legitimacy of the referrals initiated

Why the Problem Solving Model (PSM)? Laut et al. (2001) implemented a PSM/CBM model in three elementary schools Laut et al. (2001) implemented a PSM/CBM model in three elementary schools 77% of the students that went through the previous (TAT) pre-referral process were referred for testing and only 35% qualified for special education services 77% of the students that went through the previous (TAT) pre-referral process were referred for testing and only 35% qualified for special education services With the PSM/CBM model 50% of the students that went through the process were sent for testing and 75% were found eligible for special education services With the PSM/CBM model 50% of the students that went through the process were sent for testing and 75% were found eligible for special education services

Why the Problem Solving Model (PSM)? 70% of K-5 initial placements first year are from K-2 nd grade. 70% of K-5 initial placements first year are from K-2 nd grade. –76% –80% After first year there has been an 8:1 reduction in Special Ed placements across 25 K-5 schools. After first year there has been an 8:1 reduction in Special Ed placements across 25 K-5 schools. –An additional 6% reduction After first year there was a 45% reduction is special education placements for black males. After first year there was a 45% reduction is special education placements for black males. –An additional 22% reduction Parents satisfaction surveys indicate higher level of approval for the new process. Parents satisfaction surveys indicate higher level of approval for the new process.

In sum… PREVENTION: RtI uses assessments to shape both the core instruction and the targeted interventions within general education INTERVENTION: RtI improves both the efficiency and effectiveness of investing resources to evaluate and intervene with special needs DETERMINATION: RtI provides data that is useful in making eligibility determinations for EC programs

How well is it going? Based on your experience, how well is RtI helping your school site with… Based on your experience, how well is RtI helping your school site with… –PREVENTION –INTERVENTION –ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATIONS [Use the old plus/delta approach to evaluating our efforts.]