Preoperative fluorouracil (FU)-based chemoradiation +/- weekly oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer. Pathologic response analysis of the STAR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neoadjuvant therapy for Rectal cancer
Advertisements

FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
I I. B.- T R E A T M E N T P L A N: DOCETAXEL 75 mg/m2 40 mg/m2 THORACIC RT (66 Gys: 180 cGy/d) CISPLATIN 40 mg/m2 Days E V A L U A.
Rectal Cancer: A Complete Clinical Response…Now what?
CM A pooled safety & efficacy analysis examining the effect of performance status on outcomes in 9 first line treatment trials of 6,286 patients.
MOSAIC Stage ll+lll FOLFOX4 LV5FU2 Randomize. DFS DFS (months) Hazard ratio: 0.77 [0.65 – 0.92] p < 0.01 FOLFOX (n=1123) 77.9% LV5FU2 (n=1123) 72.8% FOLFOX.
1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.
NSABP PROTOCOL C-10: RESULTS A Phase II Trial of 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin and Oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) Plus Bevacizumab for Patients with Unresectable.
Anal Cancer Rob Glynne-Jones Mount Vernon Cancer Centre on behalf of NCRI anal cancer subgroup.
Abstract Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy First, Followed by Chemoradiation and Then Surgery, in the Management of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer A. Cercek, K.
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer Key issues in trial design.
Mary McCormack & Jonathan Ledermann NCRI Gynae Clinical Studies Group.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Prospective Phase II Study of Preoperative Radiotherapy and Oral Capecitabine followed by Total Mesorectal Exicision (TME) in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.
Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil-based (neo-)adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Long term results.
C. ENG 1, G. J. CHANG 2, P. DAS 3, M. RODRIGUEZ-BIGAS 2, J. M. SKIBBER 2, W. QIAO 4, G. L. ROSNER 4, L. T. UKEGBU 1, R. A. WOLFF 1, C.H. CRANE 3 DEPARTMENT.
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by XELOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV as maintenance therapy in.
A phase I study on the combination of neoadjuvant radiotherapy plus pazopanib in patients with locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities.
Intergroup trial CALGB 80101
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
Sphincter preserving surgery after preoperative treatment for ultra-low rectal carcinoma. A French multicenter prospective trial: GRECCAR 1 P Rouanet,
ESMO/ECCO Presidential Session III
Definitive chemo-radiotherapy for esophageal cancer; failure pattern and salvage treatments Ryuta Koike, Y. Nishimura, K. Nakamatsu, S. Kanamori, M. Okubo,
Is surgical resection of an asymptomatic primary colorectal tumor beneficial for patients with incurable Stage IV disease? A Phase II Trial of 5-Fluorouracil,
The Impact of Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin in the Preoperative Multimodality Treatment of Patients with Carcinoma of the Rectum: NSABP R-04 1 Capecitabine.
What is the Preferable Treatment Option for T1/T2 Low Rectal Cancer? Christopher H. Crane, M.D. Program Director, GI Section Department of Radiation Oncology.
No Effect on Tumor Response with Weekly Oxaliplatin Added to Standard Preoperative 5-FU/RT in locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Ali Shamsedddine, MD Professor.
Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU/Leucovorin as Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer: X-ACT Trial Results James Cassidy, MD Colorectal Cancer Update Think Tank.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
CR07 results and informed patient consent David Sebag-Montefiore Leeds Cancer Centre.
TME trial TME radiotherapy 5 x 5 Gy TME alone randomisation n = 1861 resectable rectal carcinoma if CRM+: 50 GY.
This house believes that FOLFIRINOX is the best treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma Pro Marc YCHOU Montpellier.
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with 5-FU and oxaliplatin versus 5-FU alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: First results.
Phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without irinotecan in the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. FFCD
Rectal Cancer: French Prodige Study: Best of ASCO, Beirut, July 2009 Prof Eric Van Cutsem, MD, PhD Digestive Oncology Leuven, Belgium.
CE-1 IRESSA ® Clinical Efficacy Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive.
Effect of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy on survival of patients with resectable esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancer: Results from.
Oxaliplatin (OXP) plus protracted infusion 5- fluorouracil (PIFU) and external beam radiation (EBRT) for potentially curable esophageal adenocarcinoma.
CJ Allegra, G Yothers, MJ O’Connell, MS Roh, RW Beart, NJ Petrelli, S Lopa, S Sharif, and N Wolmark Neoadjuvant Therapy For Rectal Cancer: Mature Results.
THE OUTBACK TRIAL A Phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy following chemoradiation as primary treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer compared.
0 Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer NCCTG Intergroup Phase III Trial N0147 Jocelin Huang, Daniel J Sargent,
Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil-based (neo-)adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Long term results of a randomized phase.
Adjuvant chemotherapy in Rectal Cancer?. What is the evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy? Do patients achieving a pathological complete response need chemotherapy?
CapOx given concurrently to neoadjuvant RT improved pathologic response and tumor regression 2 in phase II trials. Synergy of cetuximab and RT has been.
Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: updated data from the CRYSTAL.
EORTC Tumor response to pre-operative chemotherapy (CT) with FOLFOX-4 for resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (LM) Interim results of the EORTC.
Michael Stahl on behalf of the German Oesophageal Cancer Study Group PreOperative Chemotherapy or Radiochemotherapy in Esophago- gastric Adenocarcinoma.
Final results of a randomized trial comparing preoperative 5-fluorouracil (F)/cisplatin (P) to surgery alone in adenocarcinoma of the stomach and lower.
Preliminary Results of the MRC CR07 / NCIC CO16 Randomized Trial Short course pre-op vs selective post-op chemo-RT for rectal cancer Local Recurrence after.
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Journal Club Dr. Eyad Al-Saeed Radiation Oncology 12 January, 2008.
Identification of localized rectal cancer (RC) patients (pts) who may NOT require preoperative (preop) chemoradiation (CRT). D. Roda 1, M. Frasson 2, E.
Complete pathologic responses in the primary of rectal or colon cancer treated with FOLFOX without radiation A. Cercek, M. R. Weiser, K. A. Goodman, D.
Multidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer. Medical oncology Carlo Aschele E.O. Ospedali Galliera – Genova - Italy Carlo Aschele E.O. Ospedali Galliera.
Rectal Cancer MOTP Half Day September 9, 2008
Addition of Chemotherapy to Preoperative Radiotherapy Improves Outcomes in Rectal Cancer Slideset on: Bosset JF, Calais G, Mineur L, et al. Enhanced tumorocidal.
นายแพทย์ธราธร ตุงคะสมิต นายแพทย์ชำนาญการพิเศษ โรงพยาบาลมะเร็งอุดรธานี
Is there a role for adjuvant oxaliplatin in rectal cancer? - YES! -
Neoadjuvant therapy of rectal cancer – how can we make it better?
What is the most appropriate therapy for a 50 year old patient with T3N+ rectal cancer and isolated resectable liver metastases?
Systemic chemotherapy->chemoradiation->surgery.
Christopher Crane, MD Professor, Dept of Radiation Oncology
Effect of Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy on Locally Advanced Middle and Low Rectal Cancer— A Propensity Score Matching Study 官泰全,林春吉,楊純豪,姜正愷,林宏鑫,藍苑慈,
CK RS for non-resectable pancreatic tumors
Adjuvant Radiation is Required for Gastric Cancer
ACT II: The Second UK Phase III Anal Cancer Trial
Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil-based (neo-)adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: safety results of a randomized phase III.
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
and the NSABP Investigators
Presentation transcript:

Preoperative fluorouracil (FU)-based chemoradiation +/- weekly oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer. Pathologic response analysis of the STAR (Studio Terapia Adiuvante Retto)-01 randomized phase III trial. C. Aschele, C. Pinto, S. Cordio, G. Rosati, A. Tagliagambe, S. Artale, P. Rosetti, S. Lonardi, L. Boni, L. Cionini, on behalf of STAR Network Investigators.

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE Locally-advanced rectal cancer  high rates of distant metastases ( %)  +ve CRM in % of “resectable” tumors Oxaliplatin  improves the efficacy of FU-based CT (colon ca.)  radiosensitizing properties (exp. models)  promising activity with pre-op RT and FU (phase I-II studies)

STUDY OUTLINE R RT 50.4 Gy FU 225 mg/m 2 /day PVI OXA 60 mg/m 2 weekly x 6 RT 50.4 Gy FU 225 mg/m 2 /day PVI TMETME FU/LV (bolus or CI, center choice) 6-8 wks stage center

MAIN INCLUSION CRITERIA  adenocarcinoma  within 12 cm from anal verge  cT3-T4 and/or cN+  resectable (no infiltration of the pelvic wall, prostate, bladder base)  cM0

STUDY END-POINTS  primary: overall survival - 30% RR in mortality rates (3-y S: 75 --> 82%) - 80% power - alpha error: 0.05  secondaries: pathologic complete response (pCR): - all path reports available (cut-off data 01/03/09) - 12% --> 25%; 90% power disease-free survival safety

STUDY POPULATION 747: randomized response/survival analyses 379 FU/RT 368 FU/OXA/RT never started - consent withdrawal (2) - squamous histology (1) - immediate surgery (2) 10 never started (3) consent withdrawal (2) squamous /melanoma (1 ) immediate surgery (2) only RT (2) different chemo 5 received FU alone 732: treated safety/compliance analyses

PATIENTS CHARACTERISTICS FU/RT FU/OXA/RT (n=379)(n=368) Age, years median6362 Sex, % males 6867 females 3233 ECOG PS, %

FU/RT FU/OXA/RT (n=379) (n=368) T stage, % T T37878 T42017 N +, %6467 cm from anal verge median 6 6 TRUS: 33; pelvic CT scan: 261; both 453 TUMORS CHARACTERISTICS

TREATMENT COMPLIANCE: OXALIPLATIN weekly courses patients, n * % > % * missing data=1 mean actually delivered dose intensity: 58.3 mg/mq/wk

patients, % FU/RT FU/OXA/RT (n=379) (n=353) FU > 5 weekly courses95 88 RT full dose +/- 10 %97 90 TREATMENT COMPLIANCE: 5-FU and RT

TOXICITY % of patients FU/RT FU/OXA/RT (n=379)(n=353) p grade III-IV any type824<.0001 diarrhea415<.0001 radiation dermatitis grade II-III neurosensory 0.5/0 36/1<.0001 Tx related deaths 0.3 (1) 0.6 (2)

patients, % FU/RT FU/OXA/RT (n= 379) (n= 368) Operated9696 LAR7273 APR1918 other 4 5 Median interval 52 days 53 days Deaths < 60 d 0.8 (3) 0.8 (3) SURGERY

patients, % FU/RTFU/OXA/RT (n= 379) (n= 368) p ypT0N (95% cl)(13-20) (13-20) pathologic CR

patients, % FU/RT FU/OXA/RT (n= 379) (n= 368) pT pT pT diameter, mm median (range)26 (1-100) 24 (2-80) CRM+ 6 4* PATHOLOGY (T) * p=0.13

patients, % FU/RT FU/OXA/RT (n= 379) (n= 368) examined median range pN pN pN PATHOLOGY (N)

patients, n FU/RT FU/OXA/RT (n=379) (n=368) p pM111 (3%) 2 (0.5%) liver 61 peritoneal 41 nodes 1- cM1 5 - liver 4- liver+lung 1- Overall162 M+ at SURGERY (unplanned / exploratory)

SUMMARY The addition of OXA to FU-based preop CRT: -does not improve local tumor response -significantly increases toxicity (still manageable) and slightly reduces treatment compliance (but surgery OK) -is associated with a lower frequency of occult distant metastases at surgery

CONCLUSIONS  These data do not support the addition of OXA to pre-op FU/RT to maximize tumor shrinkage in LARC (radiosensitizing properties unconfirmed)  OXA-based regimens may not be the optimal back-bone for incorporation of new radiosentizing agents  The observation of a lower number of distant mts at surgery lends support to the study primary hypothesis (confirmation with more mature data is required)  Follow-up is ongoing to assess the impact on efficacy end-points. Stay tuned!

Studio Terapia Adiuvante Retto ALBA AREZZO AVIANO BERGAMO BOLOGNARAVENNA BOLZANORIMINI CAMPOSAMPIERORIONERO VULTURE CASTELLANZA LUGOROMA CATANIA MANTOVASANREMO CATANZARO MASSA CARRARASARONNO CATTOLICA MILANO HUMANITASSAVONA CUNEO MILANO NIGUARDASONDRIO FAENZA MILANO SAN PAOLOTARANTO FANOMODENA THIENE FELTREMONZA TORINO FORLI'NOVARA TRENTO GENOVAPADOVA UDINE LEGNAGOPISA VENEZIA LIVORNOPOTENZA VIGEVANO THANKS TO ALL THE PATIENTS, INVESTIGATORS and DATA-MANAGEMENT STAFF!

patients, n FU/RT FU/OXA/RT (n=379) (n=368) p pM111 (3%) 2 (0.5%) liver 61 peritoneal 41 nodes 1- cM1 5 - liver 4- liver+lung 1- Overall162 M+ at SURGERY (unplanned / exploratory) low numbers potential biases but plausible (high OXA DI/rapid response in ACRC) consistent with the study 1ry hypothesis