FORENSIC DNA ASSESSMENT Presented by: Smith Alling Lane, P.S. Tacoma, WA (253) Washington, DC (202) London 011 (44) Tim Schellberg, J.D. Lisa Hurst Attorney General's Initiative on DNA Laboratory Backlog Working Group Meeting October 21 & 22 – Washington, DC

The Next Five Years: Goals for DNA Advocates 1. All felons databases in all but a few states 2. Casework backlogs cleared 3. Routine casework at all relevant crime scene State legislators State agencies responsible for crime labs Congress US Department of Justice Law enforcement City and County government

Policy Makers Want DATA, FACTS, NUMBERS... Four questions policy makers want answered 1. What does passing DNA database expansion legislation do to the odds of solving a particular crime? 3. How many crimes, particularly rapes and homicides, could be prevented if database legislation is passed and all casework (past, current, future) is completed? 4. Will expanded databases and casework funding create financial efficiencies for the criminal justice system? What are the anticipated savings? 2. With funding to complete all DNA casework (past, current, future) how many crimes will be solved? This would include an assessment of how many untested rape kits exist.

Forensic DNA Assessment Project NIJ has awarded a grant to Smith Alling Lane, working in partnership with Washington State University, to answer these questions. Assessment questionnaire will be sent to –state labs –local labs –local law enforcement agencies All agencies with 100 or more officers (approximately 1000). A statistically valid sampling of remaining agencies (approximately 2000). Indian tribes

TIMELINE Assessment tool will be mailed on November 1, Preliminary report to NIJ by the end of January 2003 (in time for congressional budgets). Report updates every two months until report is finalized (targeted at June 2003).

STATUS Assessment is in final review. Reviewers include: –National Institute of Justice –Washington State University –State Laboratory representatives –Local Laboratory representatives –Local Agency representatives

ENSURING RESULTS Assessment mailing will include two follow-up mailings to all non-respondents Personal calls will be made to all forensic labs –identification of respondent designee Personal calls will be made to all local agencies with more than 100 officers –identification of respondent designee –coordination between units, as necessary Personal calls will be made to remaining local agencies, as time permits.

THE PROJECT GOAL IS NOT … to obtain a statistical survey of laboratory backlogs …to complete a census of the untested DNA evidence at every local law enforcement agency in the country

THE PROJECT GOAL IS …to provide a general assessment of the use of forensic DNA by law enforcement …to give a base from which extrapolations may be made projecting the national DNA backlog …to educate on the importance of expanded, operational forensic DNA programs and databases

QUESTION 1: What does passing DNA database expansion legislation do to the odds of solving a particular crime? –Extensive review of CODIS successes Types of crimes solved and types of offenders linked to crimes Criminal history of offenders Investigations aided –Case studies, as needed Successes of Virginia and Florida New York data – 75% of first 500 hits a result of 1999 expansion.

QUESTION 2: With funding to complete all DNA casework (past, current, future) how many crimes will be solved? –Assessment of backlog Rape kits, cold cases, property crimes Numbers from state labs, local labs and local agencies Analysis turn-around time –Report on state of DNA casework Types and numbers of cases being analyzed –Comparisons of success in all-felons states

QUESTION 3: How many crimes, particularly rapes and homicides, could be prevented if database legislation is passed and all casework (past, current, future) is completed? –Crime rates and crime scene DNA collection rates –Case studies Serial offenders with criminal histories Backlogs that delayed the identification of offenders –Comparisons of success in all-felons states

QUESTION 4: Will expanded databases and casework funding create financial efficiencies for the criminal justice system? What are the anticipated savings? –Forensic DNA needs of labs –Historic funding levels from local, state, federal –Case studies: Identifying (or excluding) suspects quickly Prosecuting DNA cases

YOUR QUESTIONS