Information provision for winter 09/10 Jenny Phillips – GNCC Strategy & Support Manager.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Commercial Arrangements For Gas Quality Service – Process UNC Transmission Workstream 23 rd April 2007.
Advertisements

Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
NEC & EMERGENCY ARRANGEMENTS Paul Green 2 nd June 2005 NGT Emergency Planning.
Linepack ‘Park and Loan’ Quantity - Influencing Factors Review Group 291 – July 2010.
MIPI / RG140 Update Chris Shanley. Agenda  Review Group Background  MIPI Project - Background  RG140 Principles to be delivered via MIPI  Functionality.
Market Integration & SoS Initial proposals for SJWS #5 ENTSOG offices – Brussels Stakeholder Joint Working Session – 20 March 2012.
Energy Risk Management – 3 October 2006 Increasing interactions with global energy markets - the impact on the GB gas market Jo Witters Wholesale Markets,
Exercise Opus Findings Gas Customer Forum 10 th March 2008.
NTS Update Gas Customer Forum 25 th September 2006.
Network Analysis - Introduction Transmission Planning Code Workshop 2 1 st May 2008.
Capacity trade and transfer mechanism and the next AMSEC auction Nienke Hendriks Head of Gas Transmission Policy, Enforcement and Compliance 9 May 2007.
20 September 2015 GAZ DE FRANCE ESS Introduction of Gas Reserve Arrangements Mark Bailey Gaz de France ESS.
Gas Customer Forum Transmission Update Chris Logue 9 th July 2007.
Highlights of AESC 2011 Report Vermont Presentation August 22, | ©2011 Synapse Energy Economics Inc. All rights reserved.
“Introduction of a New Shipper Obligation in Relation to the Procurement of Gas Below the Gas Safety Monitors” Transmission Workstream 4 th Jan 2007 Chris.
SMART METERING GAS Director Strategic Market Development, André Wankelmuth, Itron Istanbul, May 9th, 2014 Revenue Potential or Waste of Money?
Further consultation on NTS entry baselines Nienke Hendriks Head of Gas Transmission Policy, Compliance and Enforcement 14 August 2007.
The Entry Capacity Transfer & Trade Methodology Statement Transmission Workstream
Benoît ESNAULT Commission de Régulation de l’Energie 17th Madrid Forum Madrid, 15 January year network development plan ERGEG recommendations.
Review Group 291 – Balancing Arrangements Default Cashout Workshop 3 – 21 st June 2010.
Updated Cost/Benefit Analysis for PRR Part A/S Bidding Proposed Methodology.
Changes to the Network Emergency Co-ordinator (NEC) Safety Case resulting from Exit Reform UNC Workgroup 0412 Meeting – 1 st March 2012.
Flow Margin Assumptions for NTS Planning and Development Transmission Planning Code Workshop 3 5 th June 2008.
Revision of the UNC Post-Emergency Arrangements draft proposal July 2009.
Mod 0333: Update of default System Marginal Prices Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 07/10/2010.
Gas Balancing Alert Transmission Workstream – Oct 2005 Ritchard Hewitt.
UNC Proposal 329 – Review of Industry Charging & Contractual Arrangements - DM SHQs and DM SOQs Joel Martin – 21/09/10.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Sustainable Energy Management Options for Totara Bank Project for Master of Technology: MUCER Mandy Armstrong.
Transmission Planning Code – Design Margin Update Transmission Workstream, 4 th February 2010.
Governance and Charging Methodology for User Pays Services 10 th January 2007.
Update on Entry Capacity Substitution Transmission Workstream 6 th March 2008 Summary of consultation responses.
Entry Capacity Substitution Workshop 2 7 th May 2008 Substitution Example.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Entry Capacity Substitution Workshop 3 11 th June 2008 Substitution Example.
The credit exposure impact of higher system-wide offer caps was estimated using an internal ERCOT model under four scenarios: 1.(Base Case) “Normal” summer.
Emergency Cashout Prices and Emergency Curtailment Quantity (ECQ) Adjustment Ritchard Hewitt Gas Code Development Manager.
Draft for discussion1 Daily Outlook Gas Day : Wednesday, 15/01/06 Todays Opening Linepack296mcm Predicted Closing Linepack (PCLP1)293mcm Change in Linepack-3mcm.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
1 Review Group 264 Rules & Options Analysis for BSSOQ Methodology Changes Post MOD th September 2009.
2005/06 Safety Monitors Presentation to Gas Transmission Workstream, 5 January 2006.
Gas Storage – the DTI perspective John Havard Energy Markets Unit, DTI Presentation to the Geological Society 19 th October 2004.
Supply Assumptions for Investment Planning Transmission Planning Code Workshop 1 3rd April 2008.
Facilitating Release of Non-obligated Entry Capacity Draft – for discussion purposes only 22 November 2007.
Demand Side Investment Planning Transmission Planning Code Workshop 2 1 st May 2008.
UNC Modification 0050 – Storage Monitor Adjustment.
European Ten Year Network Development Statement Volker Schippers GTE+ Senior Adviser GTE+ Workshop on GTE+ Work Programme 24 June 2008.
Energy Market Issues for Biomethane Projects Workshop - 31 October 2011 RIIO-GD1 Environmental Incentives.
Safety Monitor modifications: Ofgem’s recent decisions Simon Bradbury.
Winter 2006/07 so far Gas Forum 29 January Actual Weather  December was the 5th warmest on record on a Composite Weather Variable Basis.
Modification Proposal 0435: Arrangements to better secure firm gas supplies for GB customers Initial Workgroup discussion 1 November 2012.
Gas storage: GB experience and future trends Sonia Brown Director, European Strategy and Environment GSE Conference - May 2007.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
UNC Modification Proposal 0097: Modification to release aggregated ex-post information for pipeline interconnector offtake flows Christiane Sykes E.ON.
Transmission Workstream 7th Dec 2006 Chris Logue
Review of System Alerts
Transmission Workgroup 7th July 2011
UNC Modifications 061 & 062 – An Overview
Review of System Alerts
Background to National Grid’s Baseline analysis
Development of Firm Monitor & GBA
Enhanced information provision and revision of the Gas Balancing Alert for Winter 2009 July 2009.
Mod_38_18 Limitation of Capacity Market Difference Payments to Loss Adjusted Metered Quantity. 12th December 2018.
Modification Proposal 0101 – “Amendment to demand forecasting timings in relation to the Gas Balancing Alert”
Action NTS0504: - Provide comparative demand data over a sample number of years NTS Charging Methodology Forum (NTSCMF) 23rd June 2014.
Review Group 0175: DM Supply Point Emergency Arrangements
AUG Query Responses 21st November 2013.
Optimisation of Entry Capacity Modification Proposal
Proposed Changes to UNC Section Q Emergencies - Mod 035
Presentation transcript:

Information provision for winter 09/10 Jenny Phillips – GNCC Strategy & Support Manager

2 Agenda Safety & introductions Review of last winter New Safety Monitor methodology Walk through some data to establish actions Model Interactive session

3 Winter 08/09

4 Gas Balancing Alert GBA intended to signal that additional supplies/demand reduction may be required to avoid the risk of a Gas Supply Emergency. At day ahead, compare 13:00 demand forecast with GBA trigger level GBA trigger level based on combination of available supply forecast demand impact of a potential breach of Safety Monitor.

5 When is the GBA Trigger level revised? When stock in any individual storage site reaches a level where there is less than 2 days remaining at max deliverability, it is removed from GBA trigger level Revise trigger if there are significant and sustained changes to supplies

6 Demand and GBA Position January 1 st 2009

7 Demand and GBA Position January 5th to 472 as 2nd Isle Of Grain entry point commissions.

8 Demand and GBA Position January 10th to 429 as SRS volumes are removed from GBA Trigger calculation High IUK Export and SRS withdrawals

9 Demand and GBA Position January 20th to 414 to reflect established IUK export behaviour IUK continues to export high volumes

10 Demand and GBA Position February 3 rd to 434 to reflect IUK supply behaviour IUK re-established as a supply into the UK

11 Demand and GBA Post February 3 rd 2009

12 What information was being published?

13 Demand

14 Storage

15 Storage Deliverability

16 Assumptions of Non Storage Supply

17 GBA Trigger

18 GBA Trigger

19 Information is there, but disparate…

20 So how have we built on the experience? Revised safety monitor methodology Raised a corresponding UNC mod for GBA Seeking to put all information together in useful format on web pages

21 The new safety monitor methodology

22 How would this work?

23 Some data… NSSStorage Deliverability (for safety monitor) Total Supplies GBA storageGBA Trigger Happy Storage Stock Happy Storage Deliverability

24 NSSStorage Deliverability (for safety monitor) Total Supplies GBA storageGBA Trigger Happy Storage Stock Happy Storage Deliverability

25 NSSStorage Deliverability (for safety monitor) Total Supplies GBA storageGBA Trigger Happy Storage Stock Happy Storage Deliverability Happy stock level reduces to less than 2 days at max deliverability Therefore 20 mcm removed from GBA Trigger level

26 NSSStorage Deliverability (for safety monitor) Total Supplies GBA storageGBA Trigger Happy Storage Stock Happy Storage Deliverability But overall storage deliverability doesn’t change…

27 NSSStorage Deliverability (for safety monitor) Total Supplies GBA storageGBA Trigger Happy Storage Stock Happy Storage Deliverability But overall storage deliverability doesn’t change …until stock level reduces below max daily deliverability

28 Safety Monitor Deliverability DemandNSSStorage Deliverability Total Supplies GBA storage GBA Trigger Happy Storage Stock Happy Storage Deliverability SM Deliverability requirement

29 DemandNSSStorage Deliverability Total Supplies GBA storage GBA Trigger Happy Storage Stock Happy Storage Deliverability SM Deliverability requirement GBA Trigger level reduced

30 DemandNSSStorage Deliverability Total Supplies GBA storage GBA Trigger Happy Storage Stock Happy Storage Deliverability SM Deliverability requirement Storage deliverability reduced

31 DemandNSSStorage Deliverability Total Supplies GBA storage GBA Trigger Happy Storage Stock Happy Storage Deliverability SM Deliverability requirement Demand > GBA Trigger Storage Deliverability = SM Deliverability requirement

32 Safety Monitor To allow safe operation of network on a peak day when supplies exceed demand, during a 1 in 50 winter Two components:  1 st day would required high deliverability to allow “protected by isolation” demand to be disconnected  2 nd day onwards requires lower volume, with 60 days duration, to meet demand which is “protected by monitor”

33 Coldest day of 1 in 50 winter…..490 mcm/d demand? Market response to price makes ~ 450 mcm/d a more realistic demand level

34 Demands during isolation ~450 mcm, a realistic maximum for demand at start of isolation process First 24 hours of isolation

35 Supplies 340 mcm/d non storage supply level Load above 340 mcm/d must be met by storage

36 Isolation Approx. 15 mcm/d of storage deliverability required to isolate load (within day use of linepack minimises requirement) Approx. 40 mcm/d of storage deliverability required to support “protected by monitor load” for first 24 hours Hence safety monitor deliverability requirement is 55 mcm/d. 55 mcm/d storage mcm/d non-storage supports isolation on a ~450 mcm day

37 What if storage deliverability monitor is breached? Approx. 15 mcm/d of storage deliverability is still required to isolate load This leaves only 25 mcm/d of storage deliverability to support “protected by monitor load” ie a 15 mcm/d shortfall Hence 40 mcm/d storage mcm/d non-storage can only support isolation on a = 435 mcm day Assuming only 40 mcm/d of storage deliverability is left….

38 The Safety Monitor applies to the whole winter…

39 Rest of workshop… Given the information already available, how can we present it in a way which adds value? 5 Day Demand Forecast Safety Monitor Volume Requirement Storage Stock levels Safety Monitor Deliverability Requirement Storage Deliverability level Non Storage Supply assumption

40 Supply/Demand Balance

41 Supply/Demand Balance

42 Use of storage based on max deliverability or “smart” use?