March 13 th, 2007 by Indraneel Kumar, AICP; Spatial and GIS Analyst Christine Nolan, Senior Associate Purdue Center for Regional Development Purdue University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 ACS Data Products for Use in Transportation Planning: 2004 and Beyond By Phillip Salopek Chief, Journey to Work and Migration Statistics Branch Population.
Advertisements

The National Household Travel Survey Heather Contrino US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Office of Highway Policy Information.
What is SBCAG? Voluntary council of governments Established in 1966 under a JPA executed by local governments 13 member Board of Directors: – 5 County.
The SoCoMMS Model Paul Read Dan Jones. The Presentation Outline of the Study The Modelling Framework Accessibility Model.
Disaggregate State Level Freight Data to County Level October 2013 Shih-Miao Chin, Ph.D. Ho-Ling Hwang, Ph.D. Francisco Moraes Oliveira Neto, Ph.D. Center.
HED 460 Geographic Information Systems Cartographers Geographers Business managers Marketing strategists Financial analysts Professional planners.
GEOCODING AND CENSUS MAPPING WITH GIS IN NAMIBIA BY Ms Ottilie Mwazi Central Bureau of Statistics Tel: +264.
The use of GIS in the Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), Namibia By Mrs Ottilie M Mwazi Chief Statistician, Survey, Cartography/GIS
Presented to: Presented by: Transportation leadership you can trust. LEHD OnTheMap Data 2011 GIS in Public Transportation Tampa, FL Bruce Spear September.
1 Commuting and Migration Data Products from the American Community Survey Journey-to-Work and Migration Statistics Branch U.S. Census Bureau State Data.
Commuting in America Using the ACS to Develop a National Report on Commuting Patterns and Trends Penelope Weinberger, CTPP Program Manager, AASHTO ACS.
SourceHess, D.B Reconciling Incompatible Zone Systems in Metropolitan Planning. Ann Arbor, Mich.: ProQuest Dissertation Publishing. ContactDaniel.
Socio-Economic & Demographic Data Tools for Proactive Planning Robin Blakely-Armitage STATE OF NEW YORK CITIES: Creative Responses to Fiscal Stress March.
State Data Center Annual Affiliate Meeting New York State Department of Labor Earlene Dowell LEHD Program Center for Economic Studies U.S. Census Bureau.
Access 2007 ® Use Databases How can Access help you to find and use information?
County-to-County Worker Flow Map Journeys To and From Hampden MA.
Census Transportation Planning Products (CTPP) Data Products June 18, 2010.
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Special Tabulation by Jennifer Cheeseman Day Presentation for the State Data Centers Annual Meeting October 15, 2010.
1 Using the American Community Survey with American Factfinder CTPP Webinar Dec 2, 2008 Melissa Chiu, CTPP Coordinator Journey to Work and Migration Statistics.
U.S. Census Bureau census.gov Census Data Immersion From A Novice to A Skilled Data Miner Infopeople Webinar August 7,
Evaluating the Concept of a Jobs- Housing Balance through LA County Diana Gonzalez Gonzalez 3/19/2012.
But what about the ACS? What is the American Community Survey? Replacement of the Long Form Continuous Survey Methodology Conducted Monthly.
Census Transportation Planning Products Program Penelope Weinberger CTPP Program Manager - AASHTO GIS in Public Transportation Conference (September 14,
James Palma Maryland State Data Center Maryland Department of Planning 301 West Preston Street, Suite 702 Baltimore, Maryland September 20, 2010.
Your Table Is Waiting! Census 2010 Accessing and Using the Data Linda Clark Information Services Specialist U.S. Census Bureau Seattle Region April 19,
Attribute Data in GIS Data in GIS are stored as features AND tabular info Tabular information can be associated with features OR Tabular data may NOT be.
National Household Travel Survey Data User Tools Adella Santos FHWA-OFFICE OF HIGHWAY POLICY INFORMATION APDU 2008 ANNUAL CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 25, 2008.
U.S. Decennial Census Finding and Accessing Data Summer Durrant October 20, 2014 Data & Geographical Information Librarian Research Data Services
1 Commuting and Migration Data Products from the American Community Survey Journey-to-Work and Migration Statistics Branch U.S. Census Bureau 2010 State.
The World of Census DATA according to Ed Christopher FHWA Resource Center Planning Team an update of relevant activities.
1 Journey-to-Work Data in the American Community Survey (ACS) May 17, 2009 TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Federal Data for Modelers.
ARC ABM Visualization & Reporting ARC – Nov 12, 2010 Activity-Based Model (Java, Cube) Activity-Based Model (Java, Cube) Database (SQL Server) Visualization.
January Utah Statewide Household Travel Study Study overview and results.
1 Public Transportation Data in the American Community Survey (ACS) and Census Transportation Planning Products (CTPP) Dec 3, 2009 AASHTO Standing Committee.
National Household Travel Survey Statewide Applications Heather Contrino Travel Surveys Team Lead Federal Highway Administration Office of Highway Policy.
Chicago Traffic Analysis Zones 9-Counties 1990 Population: 7,429,181 Area (sq. miles): 137 Number of zones: 14,127 People per zone: 526 Resident workers:
1 The Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model: Overview Dave Schmitt, AICP Southeast Florida Users Group November 14 th 2008.
The Relation between Jobs-Housing Ratio and Commuting in LA County Diana Gonzalez Gonzalez 2/13/2012.
May 20, 2015 Estimation of Destination Choice Models using Small Sample Sizes and Cellular Phone Data Roberto O. Miquel Chaitanya Paleti Tae-Gyu Kim, Ph.D.
1 U.S. Census Bureau H urricane Preparedness Data Products (In addition to TIGER) People –General Demographic Characteristics (American Community Survey.
Montgomery County Travel Forecasting Model Validation — Status Report — Status Report Presented To: TPB Travel Forecasting Subcommittee By: Montgomery.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group presented by Krishnan Viswanathan and Capton Siluvairajan Cambridge.
American Community Survey (ACS) 1 Oregon State Data Center Meeting Portland State University April 14,
Mobility MATTERS! Connecting People to Life Who Rides the Bus? How Understanding Transit Demographic Can Improve Service May 7, 2015.
Transportation leadership you can trust. TRB Planning Applications Conference May 18, 2009 Houston, TX A Recommended Approach to Delineating Traffic Analysis.
Morgan County Transit Discussion UTA Corporate Staff Presentation November 19, 2013.
Journey to Work from 1990 Census and ACS National test (C2SS) Elaine Murakami, USDOT, FHWA Nanda Srinivasan, Cambridge Systematics Inc.
Summary of Tract-to-Tract Commuter Flows by Type of Geographic Area. A useful way of comparing the general pattern of tract-to-tract commuter flows across.
Exploring Patents & Citations Using GIS 2008Indiana GIS Conference Indiana Geographic Information Council Exploring Patents & Citations Using GIS 2008.
CEGR697: Geographic Information Systems Application in Transportation Chapter 3: Data Acquisition and processing Instructor: Min-Wook Kang
New Data & New Services Xiaosen Wang China Data Center University of Michigan
Tennessee State Data Center Murfreesboro, Tennessee November 2015 ERRAN PERSLEY.
Introduction The Texas Hill Country’s regional population is expected to double in the next 20 years. Proper planning is required to ensure that this area.
CTPP in TranStats The One-Stop Shop of Transportation Data
Geographic Units, Data Sources Geography Defined Absolute / Relative locations Cartogram (fig 4.2) Geographic Research –Areal or Spatial Association:
CTPP and Geography Census Geography Nesting Tracts and Blocks TAZs and TADs Resources.
American Community Survey (ACS) County-to-County Migration Flows Products.
On the Map & Statistical Abstract South Dakota State University Demography Conference May 2013.
Grand Traverse County, MI County SNAPSHOT. Overview 01 Demography 02 Human capital 03 Labor force 04 Industry and occupation 05 Table of contents.
Laborstats.az.gov Yavapai County November 10, 2015 Paul Shannon, LMI Director Office of Employment and Population Statistics Arizona Department.
Introducing the new SWITRS GIS Map application in TIMS Safe Transportation Research and Education Center University of California, Berkeley
1 Parish by Parish journey to work, 2013 Labor market section 04 ​ Source: U.S. Census Bureau, OTM, LEHD Work/Home Morehouse Parish, LA West Carroll Parish,
Modeling of Flows in GIS. Michael F. Goodchild Alan Glennon Department of Geography University of California, Santa Barbara 8 December 2004 Hot Creek,
Finding and Mapping Census Data Kathleen Fear, Data Librarian Blair Tinker, GIS Research Specialist.
INFORMATION SERVICESPopulation Technical Advisory Committee Copyright © 2010 Population Technical Advisory Committee Roles and Responsibilities January.
Introduction to GIS Programming Final Project Submitted by Todd Lenkin Geography 375 Spring of 2011 American River College.
John M. Abowd and Lars Vilhuber February 16, 2011
FHWA Planning Data Resources: Census Data Planning Products (CTPP) HEPGIS Interactive Mapping Portal Jeremy Raw, P.E. FHWA, Office of Planning, Systems.
AMPO Annual Conference October 22, 2014
Identifying Worker Characteristics Using LEHD and GIS
Presentation transcript:

March 13 th, 2007 by Indraneel Kumar, AICP; Spatial and GIS Analyst Christine Nolan, Senior Associate Purdue Center for Regional Development Purdue University Commuting Patterns in Indiana: A GIS Approach Acknowledgements: Eda Unal, Graduate Research Assistant, Purdue Center for Regional Development, Purdue University

What is Commuting? Movement / travel for a “trip” purpose Movement / travel for a “trip” purpose Work purpose- “Place of Work” and “Place of Residence” Work purpose- “Place of Work” and “Place of Residence” Trip purpose could be shopping, school, recreational, social, etc. Trip purpose could be shopping, school, recreational, social, etc. Each trip has an “origin” and “destination” Each trip has an “origin” and “destination” A trip could be “unlinked” or “linked” A trip could be “unlinked” or “linked”

Parameters Purpose Purpose Travel time- peak/non-peak Travel time- peak/non-peak Travel mode Travel mode Drove alone vs. Drove alone vs. car/van pooling Source: FHWA, FTA, DOT

Nationally, average travel time for commuting to job (workers 16 years and over) was 26 minutes in 2000 Nationally, average travel time for commuting to job (workers 16 years and over) was 26 minutes in 2000 In 1990, 22 minutes In 1990, 22 minutes About 76 % workers (who did not work at home) drove alone in 2000 About 76 % workers (who did not work at home) drove alone in 2000 In 1990, 73% In 1990, 73% At a Glance Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Decennial Census

At a Glance Based on American Community Survey In 2005, average travel time for commuting to job is 25.1 minutes In 2005, average travel time for commuting to job is 25.1 minutes About 77% workers (who did not work at home) drove alone to work About 77% workers (who did not work at home) drove alone to work Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey (NPTS), 1995 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey (NPTS), 1995 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Transportation Statistics

Data Characteristics Census Transportation Planning Package, 2000 Available from Federal Highway Administration, U.S. DOT Available from Federal Highway Administration, U.S. DOT Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Transtats Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Transtats Based on Census 2000 Long Form Questionnaire Based on Census 2000 Long Form Questionnaire 1 in 6 households in the U.S. covered by the survey 1 in 6 households in the U.S. covered by the survey Various data products- Place of Residence, Place of Work, Journey to Work Flow Tables Various data products- Place of Residence, Place of Work, Journey to Work Flow Tables County-County Worker Flows County-County Worker Flows

County-County Worker Flows Place of Residence and Place of Work Counties Commuter Flow methodology by FHWA Commuter Flow methodology by FHWA Available at Available at Data available at 0/commuting.html Data available at 0/commuting.html 0/commuting.html 0/commuting.html Select the whole State (Indiana) Select the whole State (Indiana) ---- Residence County ---- Work County

Simple Mapping of Net- Commuting

County-County Worker Flows Converting the Excel file into “line feature class” - Convert County Boundary into Center-Point feature class - Excel into DBF IV - Join center-point table to DBF to populate coordinates - Join Indiana counties as residence and then as workplace - Each pair of Indiana counties has two entries - Convert the DBF IV into “flow line” - Query and refine Tools Used: ET Geo Wizards, ArcGIS Toolbox

Process

Process

Process

Join by using Res_StCo (Residence State and counties) to populate the Indiana counties Join by using Res_StCo (Residence State and counties) to populate the Indiana counties If Indiana counties are residence- they are populated (2,555 out of 5,239 records in total) If Indiana counties are residence- they are populated (2,555 out of 5,239 records in total) Fill in X and Y Coordinates Fill in X and Y Coordinates Export as Indiana Residence Counties (DBF) file Export as Indiana Residence Counties (DBF) file Join by using Wrk_StCo (Work State and counties) to populate the Indiana counties Join by using Wrk_StCo (Work State and counties) to populate the Indiana counties All work counties are Indiana counties- each record is populated (5,239 records in total) All work counties are Indiana counties- each record is populated (5,239 records in total) Fill in X and Y Coordinates Fill in X and Y Coordinates Export as Indiana Work Counties (DBF) file Export as Indiana Work Counties (DBF) file Process

Add Indiana Residence Counties (DBF) and Indiana Work Counties (DBF) as Event Themes Add Indiana Residence Counties (DBF) and Indiana Work Counties (DBF) as Event Themes County center points outside of Indiana will come the origin (0,0) County center points outside of Indiana will come the origin (0,0) Put Spatial Reference- projection system Put Spatial Reference- projection system Origin (0,0) Process

Merge the Two Event Themes by using “Merge Function” in ArcGIS Toolbox Merge the Two Event Themes by using “Merge Function” in ArcGIS Toolbox Since “fields names” for both the themes are constant, this results into 10,478 records or two tables are merged into one “feature class” Since “fields names” for both the themes are constant, this results into 10,478 records or two tables are merged into one “feature class” Each unique id. (Residence State-Residence County-Work State- Work County) will be repeated twice, only X and Y coordinates will change Each unique id. (Residence State-Residence County-Work State- Work County) will be repeated twice, only X and Y coordinates will change If Residence and Work Counties are same- X and Y coordinates remain the same If Residence and Work Counties are same- X and Y coordinates remain the same ET Geo Wizards “Point to Polyline” ET Geo Wizards “Point to Polyline” A flow-line is created between each Residence-Work County pairs (5,239 lines) A flow-line is created between each Residence-Work County pairs (5,239 lines) Commuters coming from Residence County outside of state receives origin (0,0) coordinate as one end Commuters coming from Residence County outside of state receives origin (0,0) coordinate as one end Populate commuter count data by joining the tables Populate commuter count data by joining the tables Process

Process Within County and County to County Journey to Work (JTW)

Commuting Patterns

Interstates

State Highways

Inferences Generally, small dots represent bedroom communities and large dots are major employment centers (Marion County) Flow direction is from small dots to large dots Flow direction is from small dots to large dots Reverse flow is small and hidden beneath the larger flow Reverse flow is small and hidden beneath the larger flow small dots connected to other small dots represent rural regions small dots connected to other small dots represent rural regions Forms of major metropolitan areas emerge by using the Flow Maps Forms of major metropolitan areas emerge by using the Flow Maps

Counties Queries at a county level is possible Queries at a county level is possible

Commuting to-from neighboring states Commuting to-from neighboring states

Metropolitan Areas

Lake County as Residence-origin Lake County as Residence-origin Lake County as Work-destination Lake County as Work-destination

Further Explorations? Integrate other transportation variables Means of Transportation Means of Transportation Travel Time Travel Time Lower Geographies- Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) Lower Geographies- Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) Interactive GIS Database Interactive GIS Database Other Methods of Flow Mapping Other Methods of Flow Mapping Movement of Goods Movement of Goods Exploring Tobler’s Flow Mapper Exploring Tobler’s Flow Mapper

Further Explorations? Tobler’s Flow Mapper Center for Spatially Integrated Social Science (CSISS), University of California, Santa Barbara Center for Spatially Integrated Social Science (CSISS), University of California, Santa Barbara Movement Mapping- Migration, Flow of $, Journal Citations Movement Mapping- Migration, Flow of $, Journal Citations Source: Prof. Waldo Tobler

Thank you! Indraneel Kumar Purdue Center for Regional Development Purdue University 1201 W. State Street West Lafayette, IN Office: PCRD (7273) Toll Free: PCRD (7273) Fax: Tel: