For All Priority and Focus schools Developing the School Comprehensive Educational Plan Fall 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Parents as Partners in Education
MEMORIAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Priority and Focus Schools Allocation FY 2013 Hosted by: Office of School Support Children First ESEA Waiver Set-Aside Requirement FY
Campus Improvement Plans
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
Local Assistance Plan Schools: The Diagnostic Self-Review Document and Report Template August 2013 Presented by Alexandra Pressley, Associate in Education.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
What is the Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? Why do we have a Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? (PIP) PARENT INVOLVEMENT PLAN 1.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.
Parent/Community Involvement Where are we? Where do we want to be? Date: October 7, 2013 Dublin ISD 1.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
CESA 10 February,  Overview of the the legal requirements  Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) formerly known as No Child Left Behind.
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
OFFICE OF FIELD SERVICES SPRING PLANNING WORKSHOP 2012.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Module IV: Implementing and Monitoring the LEA Plan Systemic Local Educational Agency (LEA) Plan Development.
STOCKBRIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL ANNUAL TITLE I PARENT MEETING BUILDING A BRIDGE TO A BETTER TOMORROW…ONE STUDENT AT A TIME!!! SEPTEMBER 18, 2014.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
Single Plan for Student Achievement Session #2.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
AWMLP BOARD MEETING JANUARY 26, 2014 MIKE HUBERT.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
Edit the text with your own short phrases. To change the sample image, select the picture and delete it. Now click the Pictures icon in the placeholder.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Rapides Parish School District February 2, 2011.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
Why are we here? All Title I schools are required to hold an annual meeting for Title I parents* for the purpose of informing you of: our school’s participation.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Developing the Comprehensive Educational Plan Fall 2011.
Mount Vernon City School District Comprehensive Team Planning for Improved Student Achievement Presentation by Maureen Gonzalez Deputy Superintendent.
Interrelationships: Plans + Funding = Student Proficiency Ingham ISD Curriculum Director’s Meeting November 4, 2015.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Adapted from guidance presented on August 2013 by Alexandra Pressley, Associate in Education Improvement Services NYSED Local Assistance Plan Schools:
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
North Carolina ESEA Flexibility Focus Schools 1. How are Focus Schools identified?  Title I schools with in-school gaps between the highest- achieving.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Spring 2016 Title I Parent Meeting. AGENDA  School Wide Plan  School/Parent Compact  Parent involvement Policy  Teacher training on parental involvement.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
Title I Annual Public Meeting 2015/16. Welcome Parents! Agenda Title I Program Overview Read to Achieve Updates Our Title I Plan for Our Intervention.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Essential Questions What are the ramifications of continued identification under the ESEA Accountability Act? What do we need to do to get our school.
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT
Presentation transcript:

For All Priority and Focus schools Developing the School Comprehensive Educational Plan Fall 2012

Agenda Overview of the ESEA waiver Origins of the SCEP Developing Action Plans and Goals Resource and Programmatic Alignment 2

Overview of the ESEA Waiver The existing accountability system, prescribed by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), had design challenges that caused large increases in the numbers of schools in negative accountability status NYSED has discontinued the previous identification system of PLA, Restructuring, Corrective Action, In Need of Improvement, In Good Standing, Rapidly Improving, and High Performing Schools The new accountability designations include Priority Schools, Focus Districts, Focus Schools, In Good Standing, Local Assistance Plan Schools, Recognition Schools, and Reward Schools To assist improvement efforts for schools to yield improved student outcomes funding and programmatic requirements have changed This is a transitional year for SED interventions, accountability, and corresponding documentation 3

The Origins of the SCEP The former accountability system of mandated supports and interventions is being replaced with a more flexible system The waiver provides latitude to direct federal funds to provides targeted and effective services for districts, schools and students based on their unique needs The new accountability system will be evaluated using a newly developed diagnostic tool to assess school and district performance (DTSDE) The tool will assist districts to create District Comprehensive Improvement Plans (DCIP) and schools to create School Comprehensive Education Plans (SCEPs). 4

How the SCEP differs from the CEP The SCEP is comprised of all components of the CEP The SCEP differs in the following ways: >Aligned to the Tenets of the Diagnostic Tool for School and District Effectiveness (DTSDE) >The needs assessment is derived from the recommendations from previous SED interventions >Priority and Focused allocations are used to support activities and programs based on the SED recommendations All Priority and Focus Schools will complete the SCEP Five Annual Goals & Action Plans are required to address the Tenets of the DTSDE 5

The Purpose of the SCEP Develop comprehensive improvement plans that detail how the school plans to improve instruction Delineate their plans for annually increasing student performance through comprehensive instructional programs and services Enhance their plans for teacher and leader effectiveness Align allocations to program activities effect proven to be effective 6

2.Developing Annual Goals & Action Plans 7

Five Annual Goals and Action Plans Priority and Focus schools must have five annual goals with corresponding action plans for five of the tenets of the DTSDE Each goal and action plan should be developed to address the recommendations from the school’s most recent SED led intervention Each goal and action plan is comprised of six sections The responses provided for within each section of the action plan should align with the specific annual goal 8

Major Recommendations Goals must be informed by the findings and recommendations from the most recent State review: School Quality Review (SQR) External School Curriculum Audit (ESCA) School Curriculum Readiness Audit (SCRA) Joint Intervention Team (JIT) **Include the page number of the report For schools that did not undergo an SED intervention, use data that is available to conduct your needs assessment such as: NYCDOE Quality Review Progress Report data Learning Environment Survey NYS assessment data **This data can not be used in lieu of an SED recommendation 9

Example of a Major Recommendation 10 “School leaders should ensure through PD activities that teachers acquire the necessary skills for consistent, ongoing conferring note ‐ taking and recordkeeping of student progress as part of a systematic and uniform plan to use data to inform instruction. Standardized portfolios of student work and classroom data books should be used to individualize learning and create student goals. The impact of PD activities should be closely monitored by school leaders through formal and informal classroom observations and the review of classroom data books and student portfolios.” –SQR 11-12, page 2

Tenets of the Diagnostic Tool for School and District Effectiveness (DTSDE) Priority and Focus schools will have to address five the tenets of the DTSDE: Tenet 2: School Leadership Practices and Decisions Tenet 3: Curriculum Development and Support Tenet 4: Teacher Practices and Decisions Tenet 5: Student Social and Emotional Developmental Health Tenet 6: Family and Community Engagement Tenet 1-District Leadership and Capacity (This tenet will be addressed in the DCIP) 11

The Tenets Continued 12 Schools respond to tenets 2-6 Statements of Practice (SOP)

Selection of the Tenet This is a cross-walk of the categories of the various SED interventions and the tenets Tenets of the DTSDESQRSCRA ESCAJIT 2. School Leadership Practices and DecisionsIII. School Leadership May appear throughout the report Critical Analysis, Part E Management/Administrative Staff III. School Leadership 3. Curriculum Development and Support May appear throughout the report I. Alignment to the Rigors of the CCSS Critical Analysis, Part A CurriculumI. Curriculum 4: Teacher Practices and DecisionsII. Teaching & Learning III. Instructional Supports Critical Analysis, Part B Instruction II. Teaching & Learning 5. Student Social and Emotional Developmental Health IV. Infrastructure for Student Success May appear throughout the report IV. Infrastructure for Student Success 6. Family and Community Engagement May appear throughout the report 13

Statements of Practice (SOP) Each tenet includes 5 statements of practice (SOP) The SOP selected by the school for each of the tenets should align to the Major Recommendation Schools will not address SOP 2.1, 3.1, 4.1, 5.1 or 6.1 and these indicators do not appear in the SCEP template as they pertain to district support The SOPs indicated above will be addressed district leadership and will be included in the DCIP along with Tenet 1 14

Selection of the SOP(s) A minimum of one SOP for each tenet must be identified All though the recommendation may address several SOPS, schools should select the SOPs that are addressed by the goal and action plan To see the complete SOP refer to the link in the directions of the SCEP template The SOP may be used as the objective of the goal 15

Setting Annual Goals Schools should continue to follow all of the criteria used in the CEP for setting goals: Goals should be S.M.A.R.T Guide schoolwide planning May be adapted from the PPR goals Annual goals should be based on the recommendation, SOP and corresponding tenet. 16

Instructional strategies/activities Like the CEP 17

Instructional Strategies/Activities Priority and Focus schools must ensure that the following areas are addressed in the instructional strategies/activities section of the SCEP Key Personnel who will implement these strategies Identify targets to evaluate progress and effectiveness Timeline for implementation Activities that encompass the needs of the identified subgroups

Activities Activities selected should align to the annual goal Activities captured in the SCEP must be aligned to the set-asides identified in Galaxy

The Goal and Action Planning Process Recommendations from the most recent SED intervention form the basis of the goals and action plans Schools need to address at least one recommendation for each of the tenets There is an goal and action plan for each tenet Schools align their budgets to their programmatic need. School select activities to meet each goal Recommendations Recommendations from the most recent SED intervention form the basis of the goals and action plans Tenet/SOP Schools need to address at least one recommendation for each of the tenets Goals & Action Plans There is an goal and action plan for each tenet Budget Alignment Schools align their budgets to their programmat ic need. Activities School select activities to meet each goal 20

The Goal and Action Planning Process Recommendations Recommendations from the most recent SED intervention form the basis of the goals and action plans Tenet/SOP Schools need to address at least one recommendation for each of the tenets Goals & Action Plans There is an goal and action plan for each tenet Activities Schools select activities to meet each goal Budget Alignment Budget aligned to programmatic need 21

Strategies to increase parental involvement To ensure alignment with federal requirements, the Parent Involvement Policy (PIP) should address: use of technology, literacy, curriculum, standards and assessments used to measure student progress, and how parents can work with educators. For Title I schools: The activities and strategies listed in this section should be reflected in the school’s PIP. The PIP should include references to those topics highlighted above that are intended to keep parents informed about the school’s Title I program and help build school and parent capacity in support of student learning. Such workshops and/or activities include: >training and professional development for parents and staff; >regularly scheduled parent and school meetings (e.g., SLT, Annual Title I Parent Meeting, Title I Parent Committee, PA or PTA); >school events (e.g., curriculum nights, parent-teacher conferences); and >access to materials and resources that will be made available to parents for in-school and/or at-home use to support their child’s learning and monitor student progress. For Non-Title I schools: Identify activities and strategies to : engage parents in support of their child’s education share information with parents about the school’s educational programs provide resources offered by the school to support student achievement and meaningful parent involvement. (See above for suggestions.) 22

Use of the Parent Engagement 1% Set-Aside Priority and Focus schools have been allotted an additional 1% set-aside for parent engagement These funds should be used to provide activities that will build and enhance meaningful partnerships between the school and families that support student achievement These activities should align closely with the “Partnership Standards for Schools and Families” recently adopted by the Department with a focus on: Fostering Communication Encouraging Parent Involvement Creating Welcoming Schools Partnering for Student Success Collaborating Effectively

Focus and Priority Schools must explicitly delineate their plans for annually increasing student performance through comprehensive instructional programs and services as well as their plans for enhancement of teacher and leader effectiveness. New program descriptions have been created in Galaxy to help schools identify the activities that align with their program plans. Schools may also identify allowable school improvement activities funded with other allocations using the new program descriptions. The Focus and Priority allocations issued in School Allocation Memorandum No. 70 must be scheduled on school TOs in Galaxy by November 16, Aligning Budget with School Improvement Activities

PF Common Core State Standards PF NYS Standards and Assessments PF Positive Behavior Management Programs PF Response to Intervention (RTI) PF Career and Technical Education (CTE) PF Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PF Advance Placement/International Baccalaureate (AP/IB) PF Advance International Certificate of Education (AICE) PF International General Certificate of Secondary Education (IGCSE) PF College and Career Readiness PF Expanded Learning Time PF Inquiry Teams PF Parent Engagement PF Supporting Great Teachers and Leaders Program Activities 25 Schools that receive Priority and Focus funds should select the appropriate activity for the respective item they are scheduling in the Program field in Galaxy.