1 www.vita.virginia.gov/oversight/projects Commonwealth Project Management Division Bob Haugh Project Management Division November 15, 2010 Revision of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 IT Risk Management in Government Jonathan Smith Sr. Risk Manager Commonwealth Security and Risk Management October 1,
Advertisements

Portfolio Management Initiative
Progress on Risk Assessment......continued Ms. Albana Gjinopulli, MPA Mr. Stanislav Buchkov.
Status Update on Future Water Quality Strategies for the Refuge Kenneth G. Ammon, P.E., Deputy Executive Director, Everglades Restoration and Capital Projects.
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
PROPOSITION 218 IMPACTS ON UTILITY USER FEES Case Study City of Dixon Sewer Rate Repeal of 2007.
Samuel Steel Safety Group Meeting Four November 14, 2013 Samuel Safety Systems.
ANSI/EIA A EIA STANDARD Earned Value Management Systems Overview May 2, 2006 NDIA Program Management Systems Committee Walt Berkey, Lockheed.
Instructional Materials Process and Progress Update Chief Academic Officer Quarterly Meeting November 13, 2012.
Presented By: Thelma Ameyaw Security Management TEL2813 4/18/2008Thelma Ameyaw TEL2813.
1 LBNL Enterprise Computing (EC) January 2003 LBNL Enterprise Computing.
UNIVERSITY OF BALLARAT RISK MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES John Gavens Managing Principal.
Office of Inspector General (OIG) Internal Audit
1 ®  Overview Benefits of a Good Construction Schedule Baseline Schedule Development Schedule Updating and Maintenance Managing Project Changes USACE.
EPLC Deliverables Sherry Brown-Scoggins & Wanda Hall
Change Advisory Board COIN v1.ppt Change Advisory Board ITIL COIN June 20, 2007.
1 expect the best June 30, 2004 Commonwealth Project Management (CPM) A Briefing for the JCOTS Integrated Government Advisory Committee.
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
IS-700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
1 Commonwealth ITIM Standard Managing Technology Investments to Provide Value to Citizens in Virginia Presenter Presenter’s Title Group/Event Name Date.
VIRGINIA PUBLIC-PRIVATE EDUCATION FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCURE ACT OF 2002 (PPEA) Augusta County Board of Supervisors Wednesday, January 6, 2009.
1 expect the best Briefing to the IT Project Review Committee January 19, 2005 ITIB Recommended Technology Investment Projects (RTIP)
Module 2.1 Finance and Administration Cabinet Organizational Changes and Agency Impact March
1 Our Expertise and Commitment – Driving your Success An Introduction to Transformation Offering November 18, 2013 Offices in Boston, New York and Northern.
Commonwealth Project Management: CPGAT Pat Reynolds Project Management Division 1 D R A F T.
OSF/ISD Project Portfolio Management Framework January 17, 2011.
11 the best Customer satisfaction enhancement plan N. Jerry Simonoff Director, IT Investment & Enterprise Solutions CIO-CAO.
State of Maine NASACT Presentation “Using the Business Case to Guide a Transformation Procurement” 1 Using the Business Case to Guide a Transformation.
Portfolio Committee Presentation Government printing Works Audit and Compliance 07 May 2013 Presented by: Chief Executive Officer.
VIRGINIA’S IMPLEMENTATION of the FINAL RULE on WORK ZONE SAFETY and MOBILITY Virginia Department of Transportation’s Instructional and Informational Memorandum-LD-241.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Important acronyms AO = authorizing official ISO = information system owner CA = certification agent.
Delaware Health Benefit Exchange (HBE) Project Update Delaware Health Care Commission Meeting: March 28, 2013.
Public-Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act 2002 (PPEA) Joe Damico.
MD Digital Government Summit, June 26, Maryland Project Management Oversight & System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Robert Krauss MD Digital Government.
Legislative Policy Committee ISAC Board approved concept at their meeting in December.
1 Commonwealth ITIM Standard Managing Technology Investments to Provide Value to Citizens in Virginia Presenter Presenter’s Title Group/Event Name Date.
TBPC Brown Bag Presentation Texas State Government
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AND COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
New Developments in IT Project Management Policy at NASA Robert Benedict Lara Petze August 18, 2010.
Project Kick-off Meeting Presented By: > > > > Office of the Chief Information Officer.
Click to add a subtitle 1 expect the best Briefing to the ITIB April 7, 2004 The VITA Process for the Management and Governance.
OMB’s Management Watch List (MWL) & High Risk Projects List How to More Effectively Track, Analyze and Evaluate Your Agency IT Investments October 9, 2007.
Implementation Strategy July 2002 STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT LIFECYCLE PROCESS ORP Publishes & Maintains 8 Standing Committee Recommends Approval / Disapproval.
Projects spanning over two programming periods Department for Programme and Project Preparation Beatrix Horváth, Deputy Head of Department Budapest, 5.
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1 expect the best Briefing to the IT Investment Board August 11, 2004 Annual ITIB Recommended Technology Investment Projects (RTIP)
NOAA Aviation Safety Board Meeting May 16, 2006 Lieutenant Commander Debora Barr NOAA Aviation Safety Program.
Earned Value Management Update Nancy L. Spruill Director, Acquisition Resources and Analysis Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology.
Topic 5 Initiating a project
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Program Assessment Technical Assistance Meetings December 2009.
1 expect the best Briefing to the IT Project Review Committee December 8, 2004 ITIB Recommended Technology Investment Projects (RTIP)
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Too l PREPARING FOR A TADAT ASSESSMENT.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
1 Biotech/Chem/Pharm Customer Partnership Meeting June 15, 2005 USPTO Study on Restriction Reform and Update on TC1600 Restriction Practice Action Plan.
Presented by Eliot Christian, USGS Accessibility, usability, and preservation of government information (Section 207 of the E-Government Act) April 28,
Overview PRINCE Hogeschool Rotterdam. 2 Project definition  A project is a temporary organization that is created for the purpose of delivering.
Implementing Program Management Standards at Duke Energy.
2016 NSF Large Facilities Workshop New Initiatives Business Roundtable II-III May 25-26, 2016 Jeff Lupis, Division Director, Division of Acquisition and.
Internal Audit Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.), authorizes the Inspector General to review.
Determinations / verifications under JI – Experience to date UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation Bonn, February 13 th, 2007 For the benefit.
Important acronyms AO = authorizing official ISO = information system owner CA = certification agent.
IV&V Facility 7/28/20041 IV&V in NASA Pre-Solicitation Conference/ Industry Day NASA IV&V FACILITY July 28, 2004.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Compliance Assessment for Florida Agencies. Florida Information Technology Project Management and Oversight Standards 2 Section (3), F.S. By June.
Phase 1 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
Digital Government Initiative Initiation Department of Information Technology Estevan Lujan, Acting Cabinet Secretary Susan Pentecost, Managing Director,
Charter School Legislation HB 1390 and SB 737.
Presentation transcript:

1 Commonwealth Project Management Division Bob Haugh Project Management Division November 15, 2010 Revision of the Commonwealth Project Management Standard

2 Commonwealth Project Management Division Purpose The purpose of this briefing is to provide the ProSight User’s Group an overview of the revision of the Commonwealth Project Management Standard.

3 Commonwealth Project Management Division Agenda Background High Level Overview –Commonwealth Project Governance Assessment –Project Categories –Project Phases –Project Documentation –IV&V Status & Next Steps Questions

4 Commonwealth Project Management Division Background § (13) of the Code of Virginia requires the Secretary of Technology to, “Develop criteria and requirements defining "major information technology project" for purposes of § Such criteria and requirements shall include, but are not limited to, analysis of each project's risk and complexity Other changes in the Code of Virginia, specifically the disestablishment of the Information Technology Investment Board and assignment of the Secretary of Technology to supervise VITA required changes to our processes and procedures.

5 Commonwealth Project Management Division Applies to all proposed projects that have an estimated cost of $250,000 (Commonwealth-level Projects) Provides a path to transition Agency-level Projects (Less than $250,000) to Commonwealth-level Projects if their estimated cost increases Implements the Commonwealth Governance Assessment (CPGA) Establishes Project Categories based on the CPGA Defines the process for approval, governance, and oversight of Commonwealth-level projects Defines the requirements for documentation of projects as they progress through their lifecycle Commonwealth Project Management Standard

6 Commonwealth Project Management Division What’s Changing Implementation of a Risk and Complexity-based methodology for the Oversight and Governance of Information Technology Projects Introduction of Four Project Categories or levels of Governance & Oversight Increased the estimated cost level that triggers Commonwealth Governance & Oversight Elimination of the terms “Major It Project” and Non-Major IT Project” with regard to Governance & Oversight Commonwealth Project Management Standard

7 Commonwealth Project Management Division What’s Changing Changes in some ITIM and project management terms Changes in Project Documentation Frequency of Status Reporting based on Project Category New Requirement for Operations and Maintenance Planning o Three months prior to the scheduled completion of project execution Reduction in the IV&V Program Commonwealth Project Management Standard

8 Commonwealth Project Management Division What’s Not Changing Requirement to thoroughly plan the project Requirement to thoroughly document the project Information Technology Investment Management Project Manager Qualification and Training Post Implementation Review Commonwealth Project Management Standard

9 Commonwealth Project Management Division Series of four Questionnaires Developed by PMD in cooperation with the ITIM Customer Council and Virginia Commonwealth University to assess the level of Risk and Complexity facing a particular project at key points in the project’s lifecycle. Commonwealth Project Governance Assessment

10 Commonwealth Project Management Division Series of four Questionnaires Developed by PMD in cooperation with the ITIM Customer Council and Virginia Commonwealth University to assess the level of Risk and Complexity facing a particular project at key points in the project’s lifecycle. Investment Business Case Approval (formerly known as Planning Approval) Commonwealth Project Governance Assessment

11 Commonwealth Project Management Division Series of four Questionnaires Developed by PMD in cooperation with the ITIM Customer Council and Virginia Commonwealth University to assess the level of Risk and Complexity facing a particular project at key points in the project’s lifecycle. Investment Business Case Approval (formerly known as Planning Approval) Project Initiation Approval (formerly known as Development Approval) Commonwealth Project Governance Assessment

12 Commonwealth Project Management Division Series of four Questionnaires Developed by PMD in cooperation with the ITIM Customer Council and Virginia Commonwealth University to assess the level of Risk and Complexity facing a particular project at key points in the project’s lifecycle. Investment Business Case Approval (formerly known as Planning Approval) Project Initiation Approval (formerly known as Development Approval) Completion of the Draft Detailed Plan Commonwealth Project Governance Assessment

13 Commonwealth Project Management Division Series of four Questionnaires Developed by PMD in cooperation with the ITIM Customer Council and Virginia Commonwealth University to assess the level of Risk and Complexity facing a particular project at key points in the project’s lifecycle. Investment Business Case Approval (formerly known as Planning Approval) Project Initiation Approval (formerly known as Development Approval) Completion of the Draft Detailed Plan At the request of the Secretariat Oversight Committee or CIO during review of a Change Control Request >10% Commonwealth Project Governance Assessment

14 Commonwealth Project Management Division Commonwealth Project Governance Assessment Risk is defined as an uncertain event or condition that, if it occurs, could have a positive or negative effect on a project’s objectives. Complexity is defined as the technological and management characteristics of the proposed project and the potential impacts, both positive and negative, that these characteristics could have on the project’s risks.

15 Commonwealth Project Management Division Methodology Project Sponsor/Manager Completes Draft Documentation Project Sponsor/Manger and Project Management Specialist review draft documents using the appropriate CPGA Questionnaire Establish Risk and Complexity levels based on CPGA scoring Establish Project Category based on Risk and Complexity levels Commonwealth Project Governance Assessment

16 Commonwealth Project Management Division Category One – High Risk/High Complexity Category Two – High Risk/Medium Complexity; High Risk/Low Complexity; Medium Risk/High Complexity Category Three – Medium Risk/Medium Complexity; Medium Risk/Low Complexity; Low Risk/High Complexity Category Four – Low Risk/Medium Complexity; Low Risk/Low Complexity Project Categories

17 Commonwealth Project Management Division CategoryRiskComplexity 1High 2 Medium 2HighLow 2MediumHigh 3Medium 3 Low 3 High 4LowMedium 4Low Project Categories

18 Commonwealth Project Management Division Level of Approval for Project Initiation Oversight by Internal Agency Oversight Committee, Secretariat Oversight Committee and PMD Number of Documents that must be prepared Frequency of Status Reporting Frequency of IV&V Review Project Categories

19 Commonwealth Project Management Division Project Initiation o Formerly known as “Development Approval” Detailed Planning Execution and Control Closeout Project Phases

20 Commonwealth Project Management Division Eliminate Preliminary Risk Assessment (ITIM Pre-Select Phase) Eliminate the Project Proposal o Some sections incorporated into the Project Charter Business Case Analysis and Approval o Formerly known as Project Analysis Worksheet (Optional) o New mandatory form Updated Cost Benefit Analysis in ProSight Move the Procurement Plan to the Project Initiation Phase Eliminate Project Complexity Form Organizational Change Management Plan o Form coming in Phase II or III Project Documentation

21 Commonwealth Project Management Division Eliminate the IV&V of the Detailed Plan o PMD Specialist performs a Detailed Review prior to CIO approval Eliminate the IV&V at Project Closeout Focus on IV&V at completion of key project phases in Execution Establishes a minimum calendar-based cycle Gives the SOC and the CIO the option of requesting an IV&V during review of a Change Control Request IV&V schedule established by completion of the “Quality Management and IV&V Plan” Independent Verification & Validation

22 Commonwealth Project Management Division Projects that have been granted “Development Approval” on/before January 1, 2011 will continue under the current Project Management Standard. o Any current project that submits a Significant Change Control Request (10% or greater change to the cost, schedule and/or scope baseline) after January 1, 2011 will be transitioned to the new standard. Agencies may petition the CIO for assimilation to the new standard through their cabinet secretaries. Projects seeking “Initiation Approval” on/after January 1, 2011 must undergo a “Pre-select Risk and Complexity Analysis” to establish their initial Project Category and will be subject to the provisions of the new standard. Implementation

23 Commonwealth Project Management Division Status Initial Draft of the Project Management Standard Revision completed and reviewed internally Draft posted to the Online Review and Comment Application (ORCA) from August 24 to September 24 Re-posted for additional review from September 30 - October 14 Comments are now being reviewed Ongoing meetings with the Joint Legislative Review and Audit Commission Periodic briefings to the ITIM Customer Council

24 Commonwealth Project Management Division Next Steps Finalize the Standard Decision Briefing for the CIO o Content of the Standard o Presentation to the SoTech Presentation to the SoTech Development of Communications and Training for Project Managers, AITRs and IT Directors Implementation

25 Commonwealth Project Management Division Questions

26 Commonwealth Project Management Division PMD Points of Contact Bob Haugh Senior Project Management Specialist Mike Sandridge Project Management Office Supervisor

27 Commonwealth Project Management Division Back-up Slides