Spatial Pattern of PM2.5 over the US PM2.5 FRM Network Analysis for the First Year: July 1999-June 2000 Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
July 2012 Q2 JANUARY TO JUNE 2012 STATISTICS SRI LANKA FREIGHT FORWARDERS ASSOCIATION.
Advertisements

Summer 2009 Western Fire Season Outlook Overview Significant fire potential is expected to be above normal across much of California, Florida, central.
Mapping of Fires Over North America Using Satellite Data Sean Raffuse CAPITA, Washington University September,
NESCAUM-MA Mapping Project: Example Maps. Translation Operations Gridding – Point-to-grind extrapolation –Standard 1/r2; declustering; Krieging (independent.
FASTNET Report: 0409RegHazeEvents04 Eastern US Regional Haze Events: Automated Detection and Documentation for 2004 Contributed by the FASNET Community,
PM 2.5 in the Upper Midwest Michael Koerber Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium.
Andy Wood Univ. of Washington Dept. of Civil & Envir. Engr. Statistics related to the merging of short and long lead precipitation predictions in the continental.
5 th Grade Social Studies Topic 1: Introduction to United States History & Geography.
HOW TO MAKE A CLIMATE GRAPH CLIMATE GRAPHING ASSIGNMENT PT.2.
IMPROVE Corrects OC and EC for a Positive Artifact The positive artifact correction causes the organic and elemental carbon to approach zero as fine mass.
Correction of Particulate Matter Concentrations to Reference Temperature and Pressure Conditions Stefan R. Falke and Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution.
Changes in NAO and ENSO 3.4 and Their Effects on U.S. Climate by Elise Lancaster METEO 497A April 22, 2003.
Maps of PM2.5 over the U.S. Derived from Regional PM2.5 and Surrogate Visibility and PM10 Monitoring Data Stefan R. Falke and Rudolf B. Husar Center for.
Springtime Airmass Transport Pathways to the US Prepared by: Rudolf B. Husar and Bret Schichtel CAPITACAPITA,Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Regions By Katelyn Ebenkamp Picture background with textured caption
CAPITA CAPITA PM and Ozone Analysis A. PM2.5 National Maps B. Visibility (PM2.5) trends C. Natural (out of EPA jurisdiction) Events D. US-Canada Ozone.
Alternative Approaches for PM2.5 Mapping: Visibility as a Surrogate Stefan Falke AAAS Science and Engineering Fellow U.S. EPA - Office of Environmental.
MODELS3 – IMPROVE – PM/FRM: Comparison of Time-Averaged Concentrations R. B. Husar S. R. Falke 1 and B. S. Schichtel 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
Let’s See What You Know: Draw the outline of the United States Draw California Identify and label our three major bodies of water Star the location of.
Spatial Pattern of 1-hour and 8-hour Daily Maximum Ozone over the OTAG Region Rudolf B. Husar CAPITA, Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis.
The Pattern and Transport of Ozone in the Missouri Region Rudolf Husar and Bret Schichtel CAPITA Washington University April 9, 1997 Prepared for a briefing.
PM Network Assessment: Speciated Network Planning Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis,
FASTNET Report: 0409FebMystHaze Mystery Winter Haze: Natural? Nitrate/Sulfate? Stagnation? Contributed by the FASNET Community, Sep Correspondence.
Estimating local versus regional contributions to tropospheric ozone: An example case study for Las Vegas Mark Green and Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.
National PM2.5 Concentration Spatial Pattern Contact: Stefan Falke, Background and Rationale Annual Average.
Global Distribution and Transport of Air Pollution Presented at The Haagen-Smit Symposium: From Los Angeles to Global Air Pollution Lake Arrowhead, April.
Quantitative Network Assessment Methodology: Illustration for PM Data Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf B. Husar and Stefan R. Falke Center.
Comparison of Arithmetic Mean Stage vs. Weighted Mean Stage in Refuge Compliance Calculations Cheol Mo, PhD Lead Environmental Scientist South Florida.
PM Network Assessment: Speciated Network Planning Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis,
Air Quality Monitoring Network Assessment: Illustration of the Assessment and Planning Methodology Speciated PM2.5 Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe.
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
August 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Characterizing PM23 Spatial Patterns Urban spatial patterns: explore PM concentrations in urban settings. Urban/Rural.
Network Assessment by Station Rankings: Description of Methodology Network Assessment Technical Support Group June 2001.
What is a Region?  Broad geographic area distinguished by similar features ○ Climate ○ Geography ○ Location ○ Natural Resources.
Bret A. Schichtel Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis (CAPITA) Washington University St. Louis, MO, Presented at EPA’s National Exposure.
Network Assessment Based on Daily Max Ozone Concentration Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf B. Husar and Stefan R. Falke Center for Air.
Global and Local Dust over North America Initial Assessment by a Virtual Community on Dust Coordinated by R.
Network Assessment Based on Compliance Monitoring (Deviation from NAAQS) Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf B. Husar and Stefan R. Falke.
Weekday/Weekend O 3 and PM Differences in Three Cities Outside California Betty K. Pun and Christian Seigneur AER, San Ramon, CA Warren White Washington.
Technical Details of Network Assessment Methodology: Concentration Estimation Uncertainty Area of Station Sampling Zone Population in Station Sampling.
OAQPS Update WESTAR Fall Meeting October 2, 2008.
The Five Regions of the United States Rachel Payne.
Springtime Airmass Transport Pathways to the US Prepared by: Rudolf B. Husar and Bret Schichtel CAPITACAPITA,Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Alternative Approaches for PM2.5 Mapping: Visibility as a Surrogate Stefan Falke AAAS Science and Engineering Fellow U.S. EPA - Office of Environmental.
Proposal to NARSTO: Incorporation of Canadian and Mexican PM data into NAM Spatio-Temporal Analysis Submitted to NARSTO Rudolf Husar May 2001.
A&WMA International Specialty Conference, May 10-14, 2010, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China Leapfrogging Opportunities for Air Quality Improvement Air Pollution.
August 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Characterizing PM23 Spatial Patterns Urban spatial patterns: explore PM concentrations in urban settings. Urban/Rural.
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
Aerosol Pattern over Southern North America Tropospheric Aerosols: Science and Decisions in an International Community A NARSTO Technical Symposium on.
Technical Details of Network Assessment Methodology: Concentration Estimation Uncertainty Area of Station Sampling Zone Population in Station Sampling.
The student will use maps locating the 50 states and the cities most significant to the historical development of the United States Cities serve as centers.
2c: States grouped by region
Jan 2016 Solar Lunar Data.
Nescaum MAC Meeting April 24-25, 2007 Alison Simcox, EPA New England
Average Monthly Temperature and Rainfall
Constructing Climate Graphs
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
What is this part of the map called? What is it used for?
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Presentation transcript:

Spatial Pattern of PM2.5 over the US PM2.5 FRM Network Analysis for the First Year: July 1999-June 2000 Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis, CAPITA Washington University, St. Louis Draft, March, 2001

The PM2.5 FRM Network The evolving PM2.5 network provides that data for evaluation compliance with the NAAQS for PM2.5 The network begun operation in late 1998 using the Federal Reference Method (FRM) Further information on the FRM PM network is on the EPA AMPTIC website.EPA AMPTIC The analysis of the early data (July 2000) is reported by EPA in Initial Summary of Preliminary 1999 Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5 ) Monitoring Data.Initial Summary of Preliminary 1999 Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5 ) Monitoring Data This progress report examines the evolution of the network and presents the seasonal and annual PM2.5 maps based on the data in AIRS as of January 2001.

PM2.5 FRM Network Evolution The FRM PM2.5 network grow mostly in early The three colors represent the data content in AIRS as of July 00, Oct 00 and Jan 01. By January 2000 there were ~720 stations monitoring every 6 th day, ~620 stations every 3 rd day and ~100 sites reported daily data

PM2.5 FRM Network: Evolution of Spatial Coverage The spatial coverage of the PM2.5 network has increased somewhat: July 99 (672 stations), Oct. 99 (717), Jan. 00 (753), April 00 (751). There are station clusters in the Washington DC-Boston megalopolis, around the Great Lakes, Florida and parts of California and Washington. The station density is low over Alabama, the Texas-N. Dakota the range and the Rocky Mountain states and July 99 Jan 00 Oct 99 Apr 00

Annual PM2.5 Concentration Estimates The map is based on AIRS PM2.5 data (as of January 01). The length and spatial coverage of the data are uneven. The annual PM2.5 map spatial show –A remarkably uniform regional distribution over the East (12-18  g/m 3 ). –Urban-metropolitan areas over the East are slightly above (1-2  g/m 3 ) their surrounding region –There are PM2.5 ‘hot spots’ in the valleys of the West (San Joaquin and South Coast Air Basins)

PM2.5 Annual Exceedance Regions CRUDE ESTIMATES – inadequate data Potential PM2.5 exceedance regions (>12  g/m 3 ) Entire non-coastal Eastern US (East of Mississippi) San Joaquin and South Coast Air Basins ‘Specks’ of Montana, Texas Possible PM2.5 exceedance regions (>12  g/m 3 ) Entire E. US except New England, Florida, Upper Midwest Parts of the Texas, Arizona, Oregon, Montana Potentially significant exceedance (>12  g/m 3 ) Georgia-E. Tennessee corridor San Joaquin and South Coast Air Basins Parts of the Ohio River Valley

PM2.5, PM10 and Estimated PM Coarse Maps Measured Annual PM2.5 Concentration based on the FRM network data Estimated Annual PMCoarse Concentration PMCoarse = PM10 – PM2.5 Difference of the aggregated PM10 and PM2.5 Note: Sampling methods differ; estimate uncertain. Measured Annual PM10 Concentration based on FRM PM10 data in AIRS.

PM2.5 Seasonal Concentration Pattern The entire country shows pronounced seasonality: summer peak in the East, fall/winter peak in the West The highest regional PM2.5 concentration is over the Southeast in the summer season (>21  g/m 3 ). The regional Quarter 1 concentrations are highest around the Great Lakes, Georgia and California Jan, Feb, Mar Jul, Aug, Sep Apr, May, Jun Oct, Nov, Dec Note: The spatial pattern are based on July 1999-June 2000 data. Preliminary analysis shows that the second year of PM2.5 FRM data has a different pattern over the East.

PM2.5 Urban/Rural Pattern In the winter months the PM2.5 is highest (16-20  g/m 3 ) is the urban areas of the industrial corridor, Illinois-New York. The remote sites of the East show 8-12  g/m 3 seasonal average concentration. In the summer months, the Eastern PM2.5 is highest (22-26  g/m 3 ) over a broad region of the the Southeast, adjacent to the S. Appalachian Mts. In the summer, urban sites show seasonal average PM2.5 only 1-2  g/m 3 above the surrounding regional values. Hence, urban excess PM2.5 in the East is a winter phenomenon. In the summer, the PM2.5 is regional.

Summary of PM2.5 FRM Network Evolution and Pattern By January 2000 there were ~ FRM stations, ~100 sites with daily data The PM2.5 network is significantly clustered near urban-metro areas The annual PM2.5 map shows a remarkably uniform regional distribution over the East and ‘hot spots’ over the West Virtually the entire Eastern US is in the vicinity of the annual NAAQS, (15 +/- 3  g/m 3) PM10 is dominated by PM2.5 in the East and PMCoarse over the Midwest and West. Over the East, the seasonal concentration is highest in the summer, while the ‘dirty’ Western valleys peak in the fall/winter.