International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve 18.10-22.10.10 1 Muon reconstruction and identification in the ILD detector N. D’Ascenzo, V.Saveliev.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.
1 Study of the Tail Catcher Muon Tracker (TCMT) Scintillator Strips and Leakage with Simulated Coil Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE.
Track Timing at e + e - Linear Collider with the Silicon Drift Detector Main Tracker R. Bellwied, D. Cinabro, V. L. Rykov Wayne State University Detroit,
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation Report Venkatesh Kaushik 1 Simulation Study of Digital Hadron Calorimeter Using GEM Venkatesh Kaushik* University of Texas.
Application of Neural Networks for Energy Reconstruction J. Damgov and L. Litov University of Sofia.
David Attié Club ‘ILC Physics Case’ CEA Saclay June 23, 2013 ILD & SiD concepts and R&D.
ALCPG09 Albuquerque, The new geometry of the ILD muon system in MOKKA N. D’Ascenzo, V. Saveliev, Obninsk State University / DESY U. Schneekloth.
Development of Particle Flow Calorimetry José Repond Argonne National Laboratory DPF meeting, Providence, RI August 8 – 13, 2011.
J-C BRIENT Prague Performances studies of the calorimeter/muon det. e + e –  W + W – at  s=800 GeV Simulation SLAC-Gismo Simulation MOKKA-GEANT4.
Large Magnetic Calorimeters Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) in a Nufact Nufact04 (Osaka, 1/8/2004)
Precise Measurements of SM Higgs at the ILC Simulation and Analysis V.Saveliev, Obninsk State University, Russia /DESY, Hamburg ECFA Study Workshop, Valencia.
Non-prompt Track Reconstruction with Calorimeter Assisted Tracking Dmitry Onoprienko, Eckhard von Toerne Kansas State University, Bonn University Linear.
Silicon Tracking Systems in Mokka Framework Valeri Saveliev, Obninsk State University.
Summary of Simulation and Reconstruction Shaomin CHEN (Tsinghua University)  Framework and toolkit  Application in ILC detector design Jupiter/Satellites,
Single Particle Performance Akiya Miyamoto, KEK 2 nd ILD Cambridge 12-Sep-2008.
PID for super Belle (design consideration) K. Inami (Nagoya-u) - Barrel (TOP counter) - Possible configuration - Geometry - Endcap (Aerogel RICH) - Photo.
CALICE Digital Hadron Calorimeter: Calibration and Response to Pions and Positrons International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders LCWS 2013 November.
V.Dzhordzhadze1 Nosecone Calorimeter Simulation Vasily Dzhordzhadze University of Tennessee Muon Physics and Forward Upgrades Workshop Santa Fe, June 22,
Development of a Particle Flow Algorithms (PFA) at Argonne Presented by Lei Xia ANL - HEP.
Optimizing the SiD Detector - mainly a calorimeter perspective Andy White SiD Advisory May 5, 2008.
UTA GEM DHCAL Simulation Jae Yu * UTA DoE Site Visit Nov. 13, 2003 (*On behalf of the UTA team; A. Brandt, K. De, S. Habib, V. Kaushik, J. Li, M. Sosebee,
Coil and HCAL Parameters for CLIC Solenoid and Hadron-calorimetry for a high energy LC Detector 15. December LAPP Christian Grefe CERN.
ECAL PID1 Particle identification in ECAL Yuri Kharlov, Alexander Artamonov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
Update on CLIC_ILD detector studies necessarily incomplete, but attempting to give you a “glimpse” presented by K. Elsener (CERN), for the CLIC detector.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
13 July 2005 ACFA8 Gamma Finding procedure for Realistic PFA T.Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.), M-C. Chang(Tohoku Univ.), K.Fujii(KEK), A.Miyamoto(KEK), S.Yamashita(ICEPP),
C. Milsténe1 Muon Purity and Detection Efficiency Variation With Depth in an SiD Type Detector C. Milstene- Fermilab SiD Workshop- SLAC- October-2006 In.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
2° ILD Workshop Cambridge 11-14/09/08 The sensitivity of the International Linear Collider to the     in the di-muon final state Nicola D’Ascenzo University.
1 Hadronic calorimeter simulation S.Itoh, T.Takeshita ( Shinshu Univ.) GLC calorimeter group Contents - Comparison between Scintillator and Gas - Digital.
1 1 - To test the performance 2 - To optimise the detector 3 – To use the relevant variable Software and jet energy measurement On the importance to understand.
Individual Particle Reconstruction The PFA Approach to Detector Development for the ILC Steve Magill (ANL) Norman Graf, Ron Cassell (SLAC)
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
Detectors for VEPP-2000 B.Khazin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics 2 March 2006.
7/13/2005The 8th ACFA Daegu, Korea 1 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP), M-C.Chang(Tohoku), K.Fujii (KEK), T.Fujikawa (Tohoku), A.Miyamoto (KEK), S.Yamashita.
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
12/20/2006ILC-Sousei Annual KEK1 Particle Flow Algorithm for Full Simulation Study ILC-Sousei Annual KEK Dec. 20 th -22 nd, 2006 Tamaki.
Status of SiD/Iowa PFA by Usha Mallik The University of Iowa for Ron Cassell, Mat Charles, TJ Kim, Christoph Pahl 1 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas,
2005/07/12 (Tue)8th ACFA Full simulator study of muon detector and calorimeter 8th ACFA Workshop at Daegu, Korea 2005/07/12 (Tue) Hiroaki.
Study of Calorimeter performance using the LC full simulator The 8th ACFA Workshop Yoshihiro Yamaguchi (Tsukuba U.) M. -C. Chang (RCNS, Tohoku U.) K. Fujii.
W Prototype Simulations Linear Collider Physics & Detector Meeting December 15, 2009 Christian Grefe CERN, Bonn University.
Geant4-based detector simulation activities at NICADD Guilherme Lima for the NICADD simulations group December 2003.
Simulation and reconstruction of CLAS12 Electromagnetic Calorimeter in GSIM12 S. Stepanyan (JLAB), N. Dashyan (YerPhI) CLAS12 Detector workshop, February.
HCAL Leakage Studies CLIC Physics & Detector Meeting 10. November 2008 Christian Grefe CERN.
21/09/2010CALICE Manqi RUAN Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet (LLR) Ecole Polytechnique 91128, Palaiseau Status of DHCAL PFA Study.
16/10/2010ECFA CERN1 Manqi RUAN Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet (LLR) Ecole Polytechnique 91128, Palaiseau SDHCAL PFA Study: Single Particle Event.
Muon Fast Simulation & Z’ Study
Summary of Muon Studies Yoke Discussion
on behalf of ATLAS LAr Endcap Group
Starting up the CLIC detector design study CLIC Workshop, 15. Okt 2008
Studies with PandoraPFA
State-of-the-art in Hadronic Calorimetry for the Lepton Collider
Charged PID in Arbor 23/02/2016 Dan YU.
ILD Optimisation: towards 2012 University of Cambridge
Reconstruction of TauTau events
Simulation study for Forward Calorimeter in LHC-ALICE experiment
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration
longitudinal shower profile
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
Forward-Backward Asymmetry Study in
ZHH: Linear collider Benchmark
Michele Faucci Giannelli
Status of CEPC HCAL Optimization Study in Simulation LIU Bing On behalf the CEPC Calorimeter working group.
Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation
Sheraton Waikiki Hotel
Presentation transcript:

International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Muon reconstruction and identification in the ILD detector N. D’Ascenzo, V.Saveliev National Research Nuclear University U.Schneekloth DESY

International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve The magnet and muon system for ILD Yoke: - Barrel: 10x(100+40) +3x( ) mm - EndCup: 10x(100+40) +2x(560+40) mm Cryostat: - Cylinder with 40 mm thick inner wall and 30 mm thick outer wall mm distance between walls - Instrumentation 2 double scintillator layers Coil: mm thick, segmented in 3x1650 mm + 2x1200 mm long modules Muon Detector System: - Scintillator Double Sensitive Layers in the Yoke Gaps (1cm + 1cm scintillator) View of the muon detector, magnet and Yoke of the ILD detector as described in MOKKA

International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Analysis and tools Tasks of the muon system: –Identification of muons and tracking (PFA segment) –Tail catcher for HCAL Topics of analysis: –Study of the muon reconstruction (muon momentum, impact parameter) –Study of the muon identification efficiency and  separation Analysis data and tools: –Simulation with GEANT4, geometry described in MOKKA –Reconstruction algorithm: PANDORA (MARLIN) –Muons and pions are simulated in the ILD detector with initial momentum between 1 GeV and 500 GeV. The initial direction ranges between 93° (barrel) and 157° (endcap) events per point are simulated.

International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Muon momentum resolution study Gluckstern parameterization: Multiple scattering: Detector resolution: PFA

International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Angular dependence of the momentum resolution pt constant, 5 GeV PFA

International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Impact parameter resolution (Data quality check 50 GeV) A 0 : finite detector resolution term, B ms : multiple scattering term. PFA

International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Impact parameter resolution study In the very forward region, for  the impact parameter resolution deteriorates up to 70  m pt constant, 5 GeV. PFA

International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve  id and  separation E=10 GeV Selection based on visible energy in the calorimeters and in the muon detector Mainly in-flight decay pions  →  are misidentified as muons No PFA,  separation with calorimeters No PFA,  separation with muon detector  10 GeV barrel  10 GeV barrel

International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve  id and  separation E=10 GeV Selection based on visible energy in the calorimeters and in the muon detector Mainly in-flight decay pions  →  are misidentified as muons  10 GeV End-cap  10 GeV End-cap No PFA,  separation with calorimeters No PFA,  separation with muon detector

International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve  separation in calorimeters (E=10 GeV) 95 % muon efficiency acceptance cut. (98.98 ± 0.18)% pion purity No PFA

International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve  separation in muon detector (E=10 GeV) 95 % efficiency acceptance (99.62 ± 0.12)% pion purity No PFA Muons with initial momentum higher than 10 GeV are identified with efficiency of about 95% and the corresponding pion contamination is always less than 1%

International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve  id and  separation E=10 GeV (PFA) PFA Low efficiency of single  identification in PFA algorithm (about 20%). For 95% muon-id, pion purity very low PFA

International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve  id and  separation E=3 GeV No PFA, Muon-id with muon detector Impact of the coil material on the muon identification  3 GeV barrel  3 GeV barrel No PFA, No Muon-id with muon detector

International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Problem in  id and  separation at low energy Low energy pions deposit energy mainly in ECAL For muons which not identified by the muon system, estimation for 95 % muon efficiency, pion purity (73.75±0.69)% Necessary special analysis method No PFA

International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve  id and  separation with muon system at low energy For muons which are identified by the muon system, estimation for 95 % muon efficiency, pion purity (96 ± 5)% No PFA

International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve  id and  separation in PFA (E=3 GeV) PFA algorithm unefficient in the connection between mip-like stubs in calorimeters and in the muon detector at low energy due to the curvature of the tracks (20% PFA muon reconstruction efficiency) Good reconstruction and identification of low energy pions PFA

International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve  id and  separation with muon detector No PFA Effect of the coil in the end-cap region for soft muons: the  -id based only on the muon system is weak for energy lower than 4 GeV.

International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve  id and  separation with muon detector (PFA) PFA Effect of the coil in the end-cap region for soft muons: the  -id based only on the muon system is weak for energy lower than 4 GeV.

International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve  id and  separation (muon det. + calorimeters) No PFA PFA 95% muon identification efficiency Pion purity about 100% at energy more than 4 GeV. Low energy region needs dedicated analysis

International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Conclusions and Outlook New geometry of the coil and the muon system for ILD introduced in MOKKA and tested. Muon reconstruction in the ILD detector: –  /pt) = GeV -1 –  (D 0 ) = 2.5  m Muon identification and  separation: –~95%  -identification efficiency and correspondingly about 99%  purity at energy >4 GeV –Lower purity for muon energy < 4GeV. Needs dedicated analysis