Cohort 4 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring 2009 www.cenmi.org/miblsi.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida Y3D1 SBLT Tier 3 Problem Identification & Problem.
1 Module 2 Using DIBELS Next Data: Identifying and Validating Need for Support.
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
*This is a small school district of fewer than 1000 students located in northern Illinois. *The district consists of: an Elementary School (Pre-K--4 th.
Eugene, OR Brown Bag Presentation: November 19, 2007
1 Achieving a Healthy Grade- Level System in Beginning Reading Content developed by Carrie Thomas Beck.
1 Data-Based Leadership Cohort B March 2, 2006 (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
Instruction GoalsAssessment For Each Student For All Students Institute on Beginning Reading Day 4: Instruction: Time, Scheduling & Grouping / Reading.
Action Planning Spring 2008 Statewide Coaches’ Meeting Oregon Reading First.
1 Cohort B Q2: How are we doing?. 2 Reviewing Outcomes  What percent of students are reaching benchmark goals in each grade level?  What percent of.
1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading: Evaluating and Planning Spring, 2006 Cohort B.
Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Webinar Data-based Action Planning Winter 2009.
What Can We Do to Improve Outcomes? Identifying Targets of Opportunity Roland H. Good III University of Oregon WRRFTAC State.
1. 2 Dimensions of A Healthy System Districts Schools Grades Classrooms Groups.
Oregon Reading First (2010)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting May 13, 2010.
Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting May 2009.
Oregon Reading First (2008)1 Oregon Reading First Conference Call Data-based Action Planning Winter 2008.
1 Q3: How do we get there? Cohort B 2 GOALS AND ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS INSTRUCTIONAL TIME DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION/ ORGANIZATION.
1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading VII: Evaluating and Planning Institute on Beginning Reading VII: Evaluating and Planning.
Oregon Reading First (2010)1 Winter 2010 Data Based Planning for Instructional Focus Groups.
1 Project-wide Reading Results: Interpreting Student Performance Data and Designing Instructional Interventions Oregon Reading First February, 2004 Institute.
1 Q2: How are we doing? Cohort A (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
Oregon Reading First (2007)1 Oregon Reading First Coaches’ Meeting Spring 2007 IBR Preparation April 25 and 26th, 2007.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
From Data to Dialogue: Facilitating meaningful change with reading data Ginny Axon misd.net) Terri Metcalf
Cohort 5 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
Spring, Cohort 4 Middle/Jr. High School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading.
Grade-level Benchmark Data Meetings
Using a Comprehensive Assessment Plan to Meet All Students’ Instructional Needs Leadership Conference 2005 Orlando, Florida Pat Howard and Randee Winterbottom.
Interpreting DIBELS reports LaVerne Snowden Terri Metcalf
Pearson Copyright Tier Reading Model 3/26/08.
School Improvement Improving what’s happening in the classroom for students with disabilities: instruction & its impact on student learning Systems that.
Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive.
Progress Monitoring and Response to Intervention Solution.
Cohort 4 Middle/Jr. High School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Behavior Spring 2009.
1 RtII: Response to Instruction and Intervention Wissahickon School District.
Systems Review: Schoolwide Reading Support Cohort 5: Middle Schools Winter, 2009.
Systems Review: Schoolwide Reading Support Cohort 5: Elementary Schools Winter, 2009.
Cohort 4 - Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Behavior Spring
Effective Grade Level Teams Minnesota RtI Center Conference March 26, 2009 Kerry Bollman St Croix River Education District.
School-wide Data Team Meeting Winter NSIF Extended Cohort February 10, 2012.
Cohort 5 Middle/Jr. High School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring,
DIBELS Data: From Dabbling to Digging Interpreting data for instructional decision-making.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
CSI Maps Randee Winterbottom & Tricia Curran Assessment Programs Florida Center for Reading Research.
Data Analysis MiBLSi Project September 2005 Based on material by Ed Kameenui Deb Simmons Roland Good Ruth Kaminski Rob Horner George Sugai.
NASDSE November 14, 2006 Margaret McGlinchey Kim St. Martin.
Benchmark Data Meetings Presented to Coaches September 6, 2013 Adapted from MiBLSi materials.
Detroit Public Schools Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
DIBELS: Doing it Right –. Big Ideas of Today’s Presentation Reading success is built upon a foundation of skills DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early.
Systems Review: Schoolwide Behavior Support Cohort 5: Elementary Schools Winter, 2009.
Detroit Public Schools Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Behavior Spring
1 Linking DIBELS Data to Differentiated Instructional Support Plans 32 nd Annual COSA Seaside Conference June 23, 2006 Hank Fien, Ph.D. Center for Teaching.
1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading: Evaluating and Planning Spring, 2006 Cohort A (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
Schoolwide Reading: Day 3 Module 4.0 Evaluating the Schoolwide Reading Program Cohort 7 Winter
White Pages Team Grey Pages Facilitator Team & Facilitator Guide for School-wide Reading Leadership Team Meetings Elementary.
Extending an RTI Approach to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.
Data Review Team Time Spring Purpose 0 This day is meant to provide school leadership teams with time to review the current status of their.
Data Review Team Time Fall 2013.
Data Review Team Time Winter 2014.
Data-Based Leadership
Data Review Team Time Spring 2014.
Q3: How do we get there? Cohort A
Systems Problem Solving
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support
Presentation transcript:

Cohort 4 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring

Evaluation of Core/Strategic/Intensive Reading Programs Assuming we share a common goal of teaching all students to read… 1.Are we developing reading support systems for all students? 2.Are we improving reading outcomes at each grade level and across time?

As the building leadership team, we have three tasks: 1.Answer the question about how we are doing across the whole school and across time-at all tiers, for all students. 2.Identify improvements to celebrate with the staff 3.Identify what systems and procedures need to be in place to support each grade level in the development of a collaborative plan to address the needs of each and all students.

Using the PET-R to Evaluate and Plan a Schoolwide Beginning Reading Program

Overview of the PET-R Evaluation Sections reflect critical components of a Schoolwide Model: I.Goals, Objectives, Priorities II.Assessment III.Instructional Program and Materials IV.Instructional Time V.Differentiated Instruction/Grouping/Scheduling VI.Administration/Organization/Communicati on VII.Professional Development

Completing the PET-R PET-R can be completed individually or in school teams: Evaluation criteria: Each item has a value of 0, 1, or 2 to indicate the level of implementation –Some items are designated with a factor, (e.g., x2). Items with this designation are considered more important in the overall reading program. Multiply your rating by the number in parentheses and record that number in the blank to the left of the item. Documentation of Evidence: In the right-hand column of the table for each section, document the evidence to support your rating for each item. –Ex. What does it look like? How would an outsider know?

Using the PET-R to Evaluate a Schoolwide Reading Program: Administration/Organization and Professional Development Activity: Complete Sections VI and VII of the PET-R Review and complete each item As a school team, report a common score for each item and document the information sources available to substantiate the score reported.

Activity: School Summary Score 1.After your team evaluates current practices on all 7 sections, proceed to page 11 in the PET 2.Summarize the total score for each element and write that score plus the percent attained of the possible total in the spaces provided 3.Sum your total school score and percentage 4.Retain a copy of this document for planning 5.Turn in one copy of page 11

As a leadership team, complete the Planning and Evaluation Tool-Revised (PET-R).As a leadership team, complete the Planning and Evaluation Tool-Revised (PET-R). You may not have time to complete it all this morning. It is due by the end of the year June 15.You may not have time to complete it all this morning. It is due by the end of the year June 15. Team Time Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done PET document is Yellow

First: The celebration! Review each cross year box plot at every grade level. –Is there an upward trend from winter to spring? Is more of the box above the grey bars? –Across years, is there an upward trend? Do we have more successful students this year than we did last year? (“goesupness”- Roland Good) A good goal for the Leadership team would be to identify something positive to celebrate at each grade level.]

Using your PET-R and Cross Year Box Plots : –What results will be shared at each grade level in celebration? –What will the celebration consist of? Who?, What?, When?, Where?Who?, What?, When?, Where? –How will this information be integrated with your School Improvement Plan and evaluation of your School Improvement Plan ? Team Time Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done PET document is Yellow

Setting Our Sights on Bigger Goals Through the Problem Solving Process  Problem Identification  Problem analysis  Plan Implementation  Plan Evaluation ✔

Problem Identification –What are the standards? (goals, benchmarks, etc.) –What is the actual performance? –Is the performance acceptable? –What information will the team use today to answer these questions? Histograms

MiBLSi Cohort 4: Middle-of-Year Kdg Phoneme Segmentation Fluency* 62% (n=908) Low Risk 23% (n=342) Some Risk 14% (n=207) At Risk *Missing Data Questions: 1.What is the instructional priority? 2.How are we doing? Phonemic awareness skills of 35 correct sounds per minute by Spring

MiBLSi Cohort 4: Middle-of-Year 1 st Grade Nonsense Word Fluency* 56% (n=785) Established 35% (n=487) Emerging 9% (n=126) Deficit *Missing Data Questions: 1.What is the instructional priority? 2.How are we doing? Alphabetic principle skills of 50 correct letter sounds per minute by winter

MiBLSi Cohort 4: Middle-of-Year 5 th Grade Oral Reading Fluency* 61% (n=587) Low Risk 17% (n=167) Some Risk 22% (n=211) At Risk *Missing Data Questions: 1.What is the instructional priority? 2.How are we doing? Reading fluency skills of 124 correct words per minute by Spring

Setting Our Sights on Bigger Goals Through the Problem Solving Process  Problem Identification  Problem analysis  Plan Implementation  Plan Evaluation ✔ ✔

Problem Analysis Are we confident that the results are accurate? Why is the problem occurring? What else do we need to know about the discrepancy between the goal and the outcome? What information will the team use today? Summary of Effectiveness PET-R curriculum maps, goals, delivery of instruction, management etc.

Brief review of Summary of Effectiveness Report

Summary of Effectiveness Report : How effective is our system of support? StrategicBenchmarkIntensive School Names District Name All

Effectiveness Report: How are We Doing as a District? How effective is our core (benchmark) support? How effective is our supplemental (strategic) support? How effective is our intervention (intensive) support?

How Effective is our Core (Benchmark) Program? A Core Program is effective if it: Meets the needs of 80% of all students in the school. Supports % of benchmark students to make adequate progress and achieve the benchmark goal.

How Effective is our Core (Benchmark) Program?

How Effective is our Supplemental (Strategic) Support? A Supplemental Program is effective if it: Meets the needs of students in the school who will need more support than the core curriculum and instruction can provide Supports 80% - 100% of strategic students to achieve the benchmark goal.

How Effective is our Intervention (Intensive) Support? An Intervention Program is effective if it: Meets the needs of the 5% of students in the school who will need very intensive intervention to achieve literacy goals. Supports 80% - 100% of intensive students to reduce their risk of reading difficulty to strategic or achieve the benchmark goal.

DIBELS Summary of Effectiveness Reports 4 Ways to Achieve Adequate Progress

What is Adequate Progress? Benchmark Students –Effective core curriculum & instruction should: support 95% of benchmark students to achieve each literacy goal. Strategic Students –Effective supplemental support should: support 80% of strategic students to achieve each literacy goal. Intensive Students –Effective interventions should: support 80% of intensive students to achieve the goal or achieve emerging or some risk status.

Kindergarten First Semester Example: Evaluating Effectiveness of Schoolwide System Worksheet

Summary Table Example Evaluating the Effectiveness of School-wide System Worksheet

Summary of Effectiveness Examples

School A

School B

School C

School D

School E

Review your completed Summary Table –Is it accurate? –What are the implications of the results? If you do not have it completed… –Use your own data to complete the Evaluating Effectiveness of Schoolwide System Worksheets for the second semester –Complete the Summary Table to display your school’s relative strengths and weaknesses –As a leadership team what are your next steps? Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done Team Time Summary Table is Pink Effectiveness worksheet (k-3) is Blue Effectiveness worksheet (4-6) is Pink

Setting Our Sights on Bigger Goals Through the Problem Solving Process  Problem Identification  Problem Analysis  Plan Implementation  Plan Evaluation ✔ ✔ ✔

Plan Implementation What needs to happen differently so that more students are reaching our reading goals at each grade level? What are the implications for resources, professional development needs, instructional priorities, intervention, communication? What information will the team use today? –PET-R –Current hypotheses –Summary of Effectiveness Student Data –Your current action plan

Based on your student data at each grade level, your PET-R, and a review of your action plan revised in winter… –What actions will the school leadership team take to increase student achievement? (PD, intervention) –What support is needed at grade level meetings to maximize their effectiveness and efficiency ( How often? Action plans?) –How will this information be used to support, and integrate with your School Improvement Plan? Team Time Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done

Grade Level Meetings Share data with staff at least a week before meeting so that grade level teachers have an opportunity to think about and process the data. Develop and distribute an Agenda Make sure all individuals related to supporting grade level instruction are invited. Review group norms, and assign roles

Grade Level Meetings  Problem Identification-What reports?  Problem analysis-For core instruction and Tier II and III  Plan Implementation-Time, PD resources, intervention at all levels  Plan Evaluation-Who will need progress monitoring? How will it get done?

Grade Level Supports on Website

A Continuous Loop School Leadership Team Enables Planning at Grade Level Grade Level Teams Inform School Leadership Policy School/MiBLSi Leadership Grade Level Team

Communication How will the Building Leadership Team communicate and support the planning work that needs to happen at each grade level?How will the Building Leadership Team communicate and support the planning work that needs to happen at each grade level? How will the results of each grade level meeting be communicated to and monitored by the Leadership team?How will the results of each grade level meeting be communicated to and monitored by the Leadership team? Team Time

Setting Our Sights on Bigger Goals Through the Problem Solving Process  Problem Identification  Problem analysis  Plan Implementation  Plan Evaluation ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Plan Evaluation How and when will implementation of the plan and effect of the plan be evaluated?How and when will implementation of the plan and effect of the plan be evaluated? What information will the team use?What information will the team use? –Results and plans from grade level team meetings –Progress monitoring assignments and results Team Time Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done

Progress Monitoring Assignments and Progress Review Not making progress Revise Instruction Not making progress Revise Instruction Making progress Continue Instruction Making progress Continue Instruction

Preparing for the Next School Year

Starting the year… Take a few minutes to review the checklist for starting the year right…Take a few minutes to review the checklist for starting the year right… When will your school use this form to assist in setting up the school year for success.When will your school use this form to assist in setting up the school year for success. Team Time Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done Please take a moment to complete the appropriate section of the Follow-Up Activity Worksheet to document the work yet to be done Starting School Year Checklist is White

Team Pair Share Describe: 1.The results that you will celebrate with all staff 2.Two critical next steps for your school considering reading next steps Team Time