THE CONCEPTS of PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, CUMULATIVE STEPS AND VALIDATION STUDIES Dr. John Kvenberg, Acting Director, Office of Field Programs July 15, 1999.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FSIS Notice Measures to Address E. coli O157:H7 at Establishments that Receive, Grind, or Otherwise Process Raw Beef Products FSIS Notice Measures.
Advertisements

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
PROCESS FOR EVALUATING THE EQUIVALENCE OF FOREIGN MEAT AND POULTRY FOOD REGULATORY SYSTEMS Sally White, JD Director International Equivalence Staff Office.
HACCP Validation The FSIS Perspective Charles Gioglio FSIS/OPPD Director, Meat and Poultry Advisory Committee Staff.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 03G Fully Cooked Not Shelf Stable Tool Industry FSA Methodology Walk-through.
Food Safety and Inspection Service Pathogen Reduction/HACCP.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Role of Economics in Pathogen Control Regulations Daniel Engeljohn, Ph.D. Office.
Objectives Objectives: Food safety management systems
GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES Training about our Food Safety Plan
Proposed Rules to Help Ensure the Safety of Imported Food 1.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA HACCP Principle.
Food Safety Management Systems

Listeria Summit - Washington, DC November RISK MANAGEMENT Current FSIS Activities Daniel Engeljohn, Ph.D. Office of Policy and Program Development.
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
Seafood HACCP Alliance for Training and Education Chapter 10 Principle 6: Establish Verification Procedures.
Future Editions This manual, future additions and the latest updates are available at the following website:
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACCORDING TO ISO
Perspectives on Pathogen Performance Standards Richard C. Whiting FDA, CFSAN College Park, MD December 10, SRA Annual Meeting.
Ashland Specialty Ingredients IFAC’s cGMP Audit Guide How the Food Ingredient Industry has Responded to FSMA and Food Safety Audits Priscilla Zawislak.
Food Safety and Inspection Service U. S. Department of Agriculture
8-2 Food Safety Management Systems Food safety management system: Group of practices and procedures intended to prevent foodborne illness Actively controls.
Food Safety Management Systems
Apple Cider Food Safety Workshop FDA’s Good Agricultural Practices Dr. Michelle A. Smith July 15, 1999.
Alternatives 1 & 2 for Control for Listeria monocytogenes
Interventions to improve microbial safety –Compounds, Ingredients, Processes 1. Carcass washing - remove, reduce beginning numbers –remove bacteria before.
Risk Assessment: Food Safety and Public Health Hazards Karen Carson Deputy Director Office of Plant and Dairy Foods and Beverages.
Preparing for the Food Safety Modernization Act
Current Strategies used to Eliminate or Reduce Pathogenic Microorganisms from Fruits and Vegetables Lesson 3 of 4 Supported in part by a USDA-CSREES grant.
Review of the Compliance Guide HACCP Systems Validation Public Meeting June 25, 2013 Washington, DC Dr. William Shaw Risk, Innovations & Management Staff.
Best Practices: Where Industry Should Lead on Ensuring Proper Testing & Auditing Stephen F. Sundlof, DVM, PhD Senior Advisor for Animal and Food Safety.
ERASTUS K. KANG’ETHE UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI 1 FOOD SAFETY.
Proposed Regulations for Foreign Supplier Verification Programs (FSVPs)
9 - 2 Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point 9 - The HACCP Philosophy 3 Prevented Eliminated Reduced to safe levels If significant biological, chemical,
Donald A. Kautter, Jr. Consumer Safety Officer Division of HACCP Programs Washington, D.C. United States of America Juice HACCP Final Rule.
CRICOS Provider Code: 01505M RTO Number: 3045 DHS V Implement Food Safety Procedures SITXFSA001A.
Lessons Learned from the Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein Incident Jenny Scott FDA CFSAN Office of Food Safety.
Preventive Controls for Human Food S upplemental Proposal 1
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food September 16, THE FUTURE IS NOW 1.
Foreign Supplier Verification Programs Supplemental Proposal 1.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA HACCP Principle.
Pathogen Reduction Dialogue Panel 3 Microbial Testing for Control Verification Robert L. Buchanan U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety.
Molecule-to-Market-Place Quality
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLUPDATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE Manufacturing Subcommittee July 20-21, 2004 Stephen Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 HACCP Systems Validation NACMPI September 22-23, 2011 Washington, DC William.
Data Acquisition to Anticipate Foodborne Hazards National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection Sean Altekruse DVM, PhD November 16, 2004.
Food and Drug Administration Juice Warning Statement.
8-2 Service Objectives: Food safety management systems Active managerial control Hazard Analysis Critical Control point (HACCP)
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
What is HACCP?  HACCP is a food safety management system to prevent food borne illness.  Manager can find out where a Biological, physical or chemical.
Doane Pet Care Company Pet Food Safety System (PFSS) M.W. Merkel September 23, 2003 Animal Feed Safety System Public Meeting.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Validation – In Plant Findings Kenneth Petersen, DVM, MPH Assistant Administrator.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Overview of Trim Sampling Compliance Guidelines and Discussion Daniel Engeljohn,
USDA Public Meeting; Control of E. coli O157:H7
Awareness Training: ‘HARPC’ for Food Safety Complimentary Presentation by Quality Systems Enhancement 1790 Wood Stock Road Roswell GA E. mail:
RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July 2015 Registration Management Committee Company Confidential RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 03B Raw Ground Meat Industry FSA Methodology Walk-through December 18, 2008.
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 9 CH 8 ISO MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT INTERNAL AUDITS.
PREREQUISITE PROGRAMS. Prerequisite Programs Support the HACCP Plan.
Food Safety Challenges and Benefits of New Technology Randall Huffman, Ph.D. Vice President, Scientific Affairs American Meat Institute Foundation USDA-
1 ©2016, G.R. Acuff Process Validation Pathogens, Indicators or Surrogates Gary R. Acuff Director, Texas A&M Center for Food Safety Professor, Food Microbiology.
Warm-Up In your journal, write a minimum, 5 sentence paragraph that describes what you just watched in the video.
External Provider Control
Author: Nurul Azyyati Sabri
Thermal and Non-Thermal Preservation
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food
Food Production Systems
H A C C P HAZARD ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINTS 1 December 2018
PREREQUISITE PROGRAMS
Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs
Presentation transcript:

THE CONCEPTS of PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, CUMULATIVE STEPS AND VALIDATION STUDIES Dr. John Kvenberg, Acting Director, Office of Field Programs July 15, 1999

Performance Standards — Background A control measure must prevent, eliminate or reduce a hazard to acceptable levels A performance standard sets the criteria for “acceptable reduction” Applied to individual control measures or to a series of control measures

Performance Standards Performance standards define level of acceptable hazard reduction Have created need for scientific studies Issues in designing validation studies: –Laboratory studies vs In-plant validation –Pathogens vs surrogates –Other study design considerations (e.g. individual control vs entire process evaluation)

Performance Standard for Juice — Warning Statement Rule Fresh juice industry: –No control measures to prevent a pathogen hazard from occurring – raw agricultural product –No control measures to eliminate a pathogen – no kill step Have to reduce hazards to an acceptable level

What is a 5 Log Reduction Performance Standard? Reduction in number of microorganisms by a factor of 100,000 fold (from 100,000 to 1 organism) Reduction of risk to less than 1 in 100,000

Advantages of a Performance Standard Gives industry flexibility -- use different control measures Shift away from a “command and control” approach Disadvantage -- validation more complicated: –individual controls only partially effective –can use different combinations of controls

How Does a Manufacturer Achieve 5 Log Reduction? Use of control measures shown to be effective Use of a single control measures alone or in combination with other measures Combination results in a cumulative reduction

Which Control Measures are Effective? Sources of Information: –Scientific literature –Federal and state agencies –Industry associations –Data generated at the facility or by a consultant FDA Technical Workshop proceedings for citrus processing

Which Control Measures Can Be Counted as Cumulative? A measure that has been shown to be effective A measure that the processor can verify has been effectively applied to every lot

How Effective are Control Measures? Effectiveness of Citrus Fruit Industry Control Measures (APPROXIMATE REDUCTIONS): –Culling to 1.0 log reduction –Cleaning, washing, brushing, and sanitizing log reduction –Hot waxing log reduction –Hot dip or steam tunnel log reduction –Pinpoint juice extraction to 1.9 log reduction

Validation Study Design Study design not specified by FDA Options include: –In-plant studies using surrogate microorganisms –Pilot plant studies –Laboratory studies using pathogens Laboratory studies need in-plant confirmation that controls are applied

Validating 5 Log Reduction Processors may contract with a private laboratory: –use laboratory to test a simulated process using a know pathogen or pertinent microorganism –conduct tests on a simulated process using surrogates Processors may conduct their own studies: –conduct studies in-plant using a surrogate microorganism

What are Pertinent Microorganisms? Most resistant illness-causing microbe Ability to survive the specific treatment being tested Examples include: –E. coli O157:H7 –Salmonella sp. –Listeria monocytogenes

What are Surrogate Microorganisms? Any non-pathogenic microbe that is acid- resistant and heat-resistant Has other relevant characteristics Should have GRAS status Examples include: –food grade lactic acid bacteria –Klebsiella pneumoniae which is naturally occurring

Validation Studies Assess whether the hazard analysis and controls are working: –all hazards have been identified, and –the control measures being used are effective.

Microbial Testing and the Initial Validation Purpose of Validation: –Demonstrate that control measures selected as critical are effective –Demonstrate that proper control limits are applied –Confirm that CCP’s are sufficient to control identified hazards and reduce the microbial levels appropriately

Verification Audits Purpose is to assess whether preventive measures have been applied as designed Audits based upon control records

FDA’s Role in Validation Studies Provides for self-validation by processor FDA’s role is auditing validation studies FDA needs baseline data on effectiveness of various control measures and critical limits Requires shift from regulatory samples to research

Validation Studies Types of Validation Activities: –Review documents and scientific literature –Challenge studies –Product testing

Using Validating Data Processors may rely upon scientific studies and validations conducted by others including: –ingredient suppliers –equipment and chemical providers –academia and government agencies Processors may rely upon ‘standard’ controls that utilize equivalent procedures and limits

Microbial Testing and Verification Microbial testing not currently required but encouraged by FDA Microbial testing can help: –keep management informed on safety issues –evaluate sanitation & cleaning –evaluate incoming ingredients –provide data for annual validations –provide data for customer reviews Microbial testing not required but